Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Livingston has published two articles of nitrogen, the most frequently used stand-
(111, 112) with the title used above. These ard gas, is still not completely agreed upon.
papers are now 15 or more years old, and Most workers use 16.2 A 2, and we have
there is some value to re-examining the sub- chosen this as our working standard.
jeer. The most obvious fact is t h a t con- T h e use of N2 as the p r i m a r y standard
siderably more data are now available. Some has been questioned recently (3, 92, 136).
of the factors responsibIe are (1) the natural There are suggestions that the quadrupole
tendency to make more use of the gas m o m e n t of N2 can interact with hydroxyl,
adsorption technique as it continues to or other polar groups, leading to a change
yield fruitful information; (2) efforts to use in ~. Further testing is needed before the
the method of Brunauer, E m m e t t , and Teller use of N2 as the reference is abandoned
(40a) with adsorbates which do not require I t is also still quite common to use a cross-
liquid nitrogen; (3) the growing awareness of sectional area calculated from liquid density.
the gas adsorption method in scientific fields I t is probably no longer reasonable to expect
farther and farther removed from catalysis, to pick a single value of z for each molecule
where it first started; and (4) the usual scien- and then expect that value to be applicable
title curiosity to apply a proved technique on all absorbents. There are numerous papers
to new chemical systems. showing t h a t when applied to two or more
During the past 25 years, it has become gases, such a procedure does not give the
fairly well agreed that the B E T theory has same value of sample area for all samples
some features that are probably oversim- and all gases tested.
plifications of the true situation at the solid To help get an experimental answer to
interface. I n general, the alternate treat- the question " W h a t area does an adsorbed
ments are more complicated to apply or molecule occupy?" we have collected all
involve difficult experimental measurements. the data we could find in which the adsorp-
Thus, a dichotomy exists. The B E T equa- tion of two or more gases was measured on
tions and method are used quite extensively the same solid. These values for about 106
to determine surface area but with the compounds are collected in Table I, which
recognition t h a t errors of the order of 10 % - also contains ~ values calculated b y three
20 % m a y exist. On the other hand, most m e t h o d s - - f r o m molecular models, critical
theoretical work now involves other equa- constants, and liquid density.
tions, often applied to adsorption on rather The three types of calculations were done
special solids chosen to be amenable to in the following ways. Molecular models were
calculations. Some of these methods (17, built for each compound and a shadow-
73, 170) do not require assigning a molecular graph was t a k e n with a point light source
area. 6 feet away. The resulting shadowed areas
However, for the use of the B E T method were measured with a planimeter. Both
m a n y of the points of caution discussed b y m a x i m u m and minimum possible areas were
Livingston still apply. For example, the obtained. Such values are undoubtedly
cross-sectional area (usually symbolized a) smaller t h a n a molecule actually occupies,
577
578 McCLELLAN AND HARNSBERGER
even neglecting interaction with the surface. gadro's number, and p the density in grams
This underestimation occurs because neigh- per cubic centimeter. Livingston gives other
boring molecules cannot fill in all the spaces formulas for different assumed packings
around such an outline. A single molecule (112). Values for p were taken from the same
covers more space b y excluding other mole- sources as critical constants. In this case,
cules. Another way to estimate the area p for the liquid or solid was calculated at or
from models is to make the shadowgraphs, near the temperature of adsorption.
then draw a regular "area-filling" polygon Further, the table contains columns show-
around the molecular shadow. Such a pro- ing the standard used by the original au-
cedure tends to overestimate the area per thors and the corrected ~ value found for
molecule. the minority of cases that were not based
The two-dimensional van der Waals' con- on zN~ = 16.2 A 2. The corrected values
stant b was derived from critical constants were used in all averages, figures, and tables.
of the bulk substance b y using Hill's for- See the Notes on Use of the Table for details
mula (82), b (in square Angstroms) = 6.354 INTERCOMPARISON OF METHODS
(To/Pc) 2/3. Values for Tc and Pc were
taken from International Critical Tables Since we have four methods for obtaining
and Lange's Handbook of Chemistry, 10th ~, there are six ways to pair them for com-
edition. However, critical constants are not parison. A plot of the data in Table I
available for all adsorbates. showed that the two-dimensional van der
An estimate of area can be had from the WaMs contant derived from critical data is
density of the adsorbed material if a shape closely related to ~ values calculated from
and packing of molecules are assumed (56). liquid density values. For most cases, t h e y
If we make the usual approximation of agree within 10%. Since liquid density is
more usually available or more easily meas-
spherical shape and hexagonal close pack-
urable, it will probably continue to be widely
ing, the formula is:
used to estimate ~. However, critical con-
o-= 1.091(M/Np) 2/3, stants can be used too if they are readily
found.
in which M is molecular weight, N Avo- Figure 1 shows z from adsorption data
60
I I I I I l I I I
085
PERFECT CORRELATION
53
N 50 0 o 086
=.<: 082 S~ ~ 87
:
I--
0'3 70
Z ,40
LCJ 64 59 S =o61
72
O~
30
I
<E o o3e5
LLJ
)7
<E
~. DEN = 6 3 6 + 0 . 5 9 6 O'ADS. rDERIVED FROM]
~:: 2 0 • [SOLID POINTSJ
<E
.--I 89•
(,.9
LLI • MEASURED FIVE OR MORE T I M E S
J ~c o MEASURED LESS T H A N FIVE T I M E S
I I I I I 1 I I
20 30 4o 7050 60 80 90 I00
MOLECULAR AREA-ADSORPTION, R2
FIG, 1. C o r r e l a t i o n of m o l e c u l a r a r e a f r o m t w o m e t h o d s .
CROSS-SECTIONAL AREAS OF MOLECULES 579
TABLE 1--Continued
s Devolatized.
ss Not volatized.
t Original author used 17.0 Ae.
tt Outgassed at 20°C.
u B y "preferred position" calculation,
uu Outgassed a t 360°C.
TABLE 1--Continued ¢~
to
Area per molecule (A2)
Formula Compound name ~o. Adsorbent T, (°C.) Refer-
Adsorption Adsorption corrected Status Reference ~ for ence
for A v adsorbed area
H20 Water 94 5 I1Htes 6.2, 7.9, 8.0, 8.0, 9.2 vv H J method 131
VdW 13 Mod. 6-8 l.d. 10.5 (25 °) va]ue
~a = 12.5 Charcoal 25 (7.9) v N2 n.s. 144
(NHd)sPOd.12MoO3 25 (3.6) 69
13 Kalinites 20 12.6 vv 95
5Montmorillonites 25 9.8, 11.3, 11.5, 12.6, HJ method 130
14.8vv value
AgI --20 10 16 33
A t t a p u l g i t ew 50 (10.3) 10.8 N~ = 15.4 18
Graphitized C 19 10.5 np 10 ¢5
Graphitized C 30 10.6 np 102
Fe2Oax 25 10.8 78
7 SiO2 25 10.8, 1t.0, 11.9, 12.2, 10.5, 10.7, 11.6, 11.8, np K r = 20.8 59
12.5, 16.8, 20.4 y 12.1, 16.3, 19.8
SiO2 25 (11.1)v N2 = n.s. 144
Annealed SiO2 I5, 25 11.73 11.4 Kr = 20.8 70
Ge 25 11.8 np Ar n.s. 169
10 SiO~ 12 13.0, 13.4, 13.5, 13.7, N2 n.s. 120
14.9, 15.1, 15.5, 15.8,
>
18.1, 18.7
U n a n n e a l e d SiO2 15.25 13.73 13.3 X r = 20.8 70
CaCOa 15, 25 14.3 13.9 K r = 20.8 70
TiO2--rutile 25 15.1 16.27 84
Au 18 17 np n.s. 158
Glass 26.5 19.5 np 57
2 SiO2 20 24, 31 x 55
SiO2 26 P~
24.6 x 176
H2S tIydrogen sulfide 95 GIass spheres --79 (21 ) 74
VdW 16.5 Mod. 8-10
Iodine 96 BaCI~ n~s. 22.1 np n.s. 53
M o d . 10-17 Graphitized C 20 23.7 np Ns n.s. 98
MgO 25 35.3 Crystal struc- 179
ture of MgO
Carbon 25? 40 N~ n.s. 124
Kr Krypton 97 Graphitized C --183 14.5 x 102
VdW 15.6 Mod. 11.2 NiO ( + 0.16 H20) --195 (15.3) 16.1 15.4 172
o- = 20.2 NaBr --207 to --190 17.1 np 63
SiO2 --196 (18.5) 163
N i (O t t ) --195 (19.1) 20.1 15.4 172
G e (oxidized) --195 19.4 ± 0.2 20.4 np 15.4 147
Poly (ethylene) --196 19.5 81
Poly (ethylene), n y l o n --196 19.5 187
Quartz --196 19.5 163
Tridymite --196 19.5 17.0 (at --183 °) 181
19.5 :t: i z 65
TiC2 --anatase --195 19.5 :t: 0.4 22
SiO~ --195 19.5 89
a
--195 20.8 52
Carbon, charcoal --78 21.0 Ar = 13.8 97
UO2, UO2 partly fluori- --195 (21)b 173
ded
Zr --183, --196 21.5 72
Q
Glass --195 21.5 22
Glass --205 21.6 N2 n , s . 163 O
Ti02--anatase --183, --195 21.78 H.J m e t h o d 22
CaCO~ --184 22.4 21.4 17 76, 75 b~
SiC2 --195 22.5 101
SiO~ --196 23.6 75 ©
SIO~ --184 24.2 21.3 17.0 75
NH3 Ammonia 98 Graphitized C --78 11.4 102
VdW 15.0 Mod. 7-10 1.d. 12.9 5 SiC2cc --34 9.5, 13.6, 14.1, 15, 16.5 21
~a ~ 14.0 Attapulgite 100 12.6 13.2 15.4 18
Charcoal --78 14.8 v 145
Charcoal --38 14.9 c 145 ~v
Glass --32.5 15.4 57
Gruphitized C --78 16.0 25
N~ Nitrogen TIC.2, SiC2 --196 12.9 Ar = 13.8 107
VdW 15.3 Mod. 7-10 I.d. 16.2 (--196 °) 3 A1203 --195 ©
15~1 12.5 Ar = 16.6 121
See note ~ 4 AhO~ --195 15-17.2 12.5-13.3 Ar = 16.6 121
~N: = 16.2 taken as s t a n d a r d in this NaC1 --195 15.9 19.2 CsHs = 35 180
work TiO2--anatase --195 16.27 HJ method 135 0
TiC2 anatase --195 17.72 HJ method 135
NeO Nitrous oxide 100 SiC2 n.s. (19.3) 163 C~
YdW I6.9 Mod. 7-13 I.d. 16.8 SiC2 --78.5 20.4 162
N20~ Nitric oxide dimcr 101 Carbon --154 31.4 N2 n.s. 165
N204 Nitrogen tetroxide 102 TiC2 --15 to 50 23.7 N2 n.s. 146
e Outgassed at 20°C.
] Bangham's surface energy method.
c Original author used 14.1 Ae.
g Bangham's surface energy method.
h From lattice dimensions of metal.
i Original author used 24.9 A2 and said low area was due to sieving.
CROSS-SECTIONAL AREAS OF MOLECULES 595
TABLE II
RECOMMENDED MOLECULAR AREAS
[4- Values are 95% confidence interval (twice standard deviation)]
Area per molecule (A2)
Adsorbent Temp. (°C.) Comment
All exptl, values a Nonporous only Liquid density Recom-b
mended
Ar -195, -183 14.7 4- 4.1 14.1 ± 4.4 13.8 13.8 14.1 :t= 3.0 for
-183°C. values
Kr -196 20.3 4- 3.3 20.2 4. 2.6 -- 20.2
Xe -184 23.2 -4- 6.7 23.2 -4- 6.7 18.6 --
( - 109oc.)
I:I20 25 12.5 i 6.5 - - 10.5 12.5
Methanol 20-25 21.9 4- 9.0 -- 18 --
Ethanol 25 28.3 4- 11.2 -- 23.1 --
n-Butane 0 44.8 4. 9.8 44.4 4. 8.1 32.3 44.4
Benzene 20 43.6 4- 9.8 43.0 4. 6.0 32 43.0
~ Except those marked "x" in column 8.
b Used in compilation.
= / REFERENCES
0
i
I0
t
20
i
30
i
40
i
50
1
60
i
70 A~"
8~o ok IOO 1. ANDERSON, J. R., AND BAKER, B. G., J. Phys.
k4OLECULAR AREA- ADSORPTION, Chem. 66, 482-489 (1962).
Flo. 3. Correlation lines of P a r a ~ n i c and 2. ANDERSON, R. B., AND EMMETT, r . I-I., dr.
spherical molecules. Phys. Chem. 56, 756-761 (1952).
596 McCLELLAN AND HARNSBERGER
3. A~ISTOV, B. G., AND KISELEV, A. V., Russ. 24. BEEBE, R. A., KINGTON, G. L., POLLEY, M.
J. Phys. Chem. English Transl. 37, 1359- H., AND SMITH, W. R., J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1363 (1963). 72, 40-42 (1950).
4. A~NOnD, J. R., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 71,104-110 25. BEEBE, R. A., KISELEV, A. V., KOVALEVA,
(1949). N. V., TYSON, 1~. F. S., AND HOLMES, J. M.,
5. ARONSON, S., CLAYTON, J. C., RULLI, J. E., Russ. J. Phys. Chem. English Transl. 38,
AND PADDEN, T. R., U.S. Atomic Energy 372-378 (1964).
Comm. WAPD-BT-19, 83-92 (1960). 26. BEEBE, R. A., POLLEY, M. H., SMITH, W. R.,
6. AvouL, N. N., BEREZlN, G. I., KISELEV, AND WENDELL, C. B., J. Am. Chem. Soc.
A. V., AND LYGINA, I. A., Bull. Aead. Sci. 69, 2294-2298 (1947).
USSR, Div. Chem. Sci. English Transl. 27. BELYAKOVA,L. D., GROMOV,V. V., ~4~ISELEV,
1956, 1339. A. V., AND SPITZIN, V. I., RadiokMmiya 4,
7. AVGUL, N. N., BEREZIN, G. I., KISELEV, 410-421 (1962).
A. V., AND LYGINA, I. A., Bull Aead. Sci. 28. BEzus, A. G., DREVING, V. P., AND KA-
USSR Div. Chem. Sci. English Transl. YACHKO-GURBICH,A. L., Kolloidn. Zh. 23,
1957, 1052-1061. 241-247 (1961).
8. AVGUL, N. N., BEREZIN, G. I., KISELEV, 29. BEZUS, A. G., DREVING, V. P., AND KISELEV,
A. V., AND LYGINA, I. A., Bull. Aead. Sci. A. V., Russ J. Phys. Chem. English Transl.
USSR, Div. Chem. Sci. English Transl. 38, 30-35 (1964).
1959, 764-773. 30. BEZUS,A. C., DREVING, V. P., AND KISELEV,
9. AvGuL, N. N., BEREZIN, G. I., KISELEV, A. V., Russ. J. Phys. Chem. English Transl.
A. V., AND LYGINA, I. A., Bull. Acad. Sci. 38, 511-515 (1964).
USSR, Div. Chem. Sci. English Transl. 31. BEZUS, A. G., DREVING, V. P., AND I~ISELEV,
1961, 186-193. A. V., Russ. J. Phys. Chem. English Transl.
10. AVGUL, N. N., DZHIGIT, O. M., KISELEV, 38, 1589-1593 (1964).
A. V., AND SHCHERBAKOVA, K. D., Dokl. 32. BEZUS, A. G., DREVlNG, V. P., AND KISELEV,
Akad. Nauk SSSR 92, 105-108 (1953). A. V., Kolloidn. Zh. 23, 389-397 (1961).
11. AVGUL, N. N., KISELEV, A. V., AND LYGINA, 33. BIRSTEIN, S. J., J. Meteorol. 12, 324-331
I. A., Bull. Acad. Sci. USSR, Div. Chem. (1955).
Sci. English Transl. 1962, 26-30. 34. BLAINE, R. L., AND VALIS, H. J., J. Res.
12. AVGUL, N. N., KISELEV,A. V., AND LYGINA, Natl. Bur. Std. 59, 257-267 (1949).
I. A., Bull. Aead. Sci. USSR, Div. Chem. 35. BORESKOV, G. K., AND VASILEVICH, A. A.,
Sci. English Transl. 1962, 717-723. Kinetica i Kataliz 1, 69-82 (1960).
13. AVGUL N. N., KISELEV, A. V., AND LYGINA, 36. BOWERS, R., Phil. Mag. 44, 467-484 (1953).
I. A., Bull. Acad. Sci. USSR, Div. Chem. 37. BREWER,D. F., SYMONDS,A. J., AND THOM-
Sci. English Transl. 1961, 1977-1984. SON, A. L., Phys. Letters 13, 298-299 (1964).
14. AVGUL,N. N., KISELEV, A. V., AND LYGINA, 38. BROAD, D. N., AND FOSTER, A. G., J. Chem.
I. A., Trans. Faraday Soc. 59, 2113-2128 Soc. 1945, 366-371.
(1963). 39. BROWN, C., AND UHLIG, H. H., 0r. Am. Chem.
15. BAGG, J., AND BRUCE, L., J. Catalysis 2, 93- Soc. 69, 462-464 (1947).
103 (1963). 40. BRUNAVER, S., AND EMMETT, P. H., J. Am.
16. BALLOV, E. V., AND ROSS, S., J. Phys. Chem. Chem. Soc. 57, 1754-1755 (1935).
57, 653-657 (1953). 4Oa. BRUNAUER, S., EMMETT, P. H., AND TELLER,
17. B~-RKER, J. A., AND EVERETT, D. H., Trans. E. J. Am. Chem. Soe. 60, 309 (1938).
Faraday Soe. 58, 1608 (1962). 41. BYKOV, V. T., AND BURMAKINA, V. V.,
18. BARREn, R. M., ANDMACKENZIE,N., J. Phys. Soobsheh. Dal'nevost. Filiala Sibirsk. Otd.
Chem. 58, 560-568 (1954). Akad. Nauk SSSR 19, 51-60 (1963).
19. BARREn, R. M., AND REUCROFT, P. J., Proc. 42. CAMPBELL,I(. C., AND DUTHIIE,D. T., Trans.
Roy. Soc. (London) 258A, 431-488 (1960). Faraday Soe. 61, 558-570 (1965).
20. BARTELL, F. E., AND DOBAY, D. G., J. Am. 43. CANNON,W. A., Nature 197, 1000-1001 (1963).
Chem. Soc. 72, 4388-4393 (1950). 44. CIBOROWSKI, S., PLACZEK, Z., AND CELLER,
21. BASTICK, J., Congr. Intern. Chim. Ind. 1, W., Przemysl Chem. 8, 78-81 (1952).
859-863 (1958). 45. CINES, M. R., AND RUEHLEN, F. N., Or. Phys.
22. BEEBE, R. A., BECKWITH, J. B., AND HONIG, Chem. 57, 710-714 (1953).
J. M., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 67, 1554-1558 46. CORRIN, M. L., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 73, 4061-
(1945). 4065 (1951).
23. BEEBE, R. A., AND DELL, R. M., J. Phys. 47. CORRIN, M. L., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 75, 4623
Chem. 59, 746-754 (1955). (1953).
CROSS-SECTIONAL AREAS OF MOLECULES 597
48. CORRIN, M. L., J. Phys. Chem. 59, 313-317 74. HARRIS, B. L., AND EMMETT, P. H., or. Phys.
(1955). Chem. 53, 811-825 (19~I9).
49. DANES, V., Collection Czech. Chem. Cornmun. 75. HAUL, R. A. W., Angew. Chem. 68, 238-243
21, 1122-1139 (1956). (1956).
50. DANES, V., AND NOVAKOVA, J., Collection 76. HAVL, R. A. W., AND STEIN, L. H., Trans.
Czech. Chem. Cornmun. 27, 874 (1959). Faraday Soc. 51, 1280-1290 (1955).
51. DAvis, 1:{. T., AND DEWITT, T. W., J. Am. 77. HAYNES, J. M., or: Phys. Chem. 66, 182-185
Chem. Soe. 70, 1135-1141 (1948). (1962).
52. DAvIs, R. T., DEWITT, T. W., AND EMMETT, 78. HEALEY~F. H., CHESSICK,J. J., AND FRAIOLI,
P. H., J. Phys. Chem. 51, 1232-1248 (1947). A. V., J. Phys. Chem. 60, 1001-1004 (1956).
53. DEBoEn, J. H., Rec. Tray. Chim. 65, 576-579 79. HEALEY, F. H., CHESSICK,J. J., AND ZETTLE-
(1946). MOVER, A. C., J. Phys. Chem. 57, 178-182
54. DEBoER, J. H., AND KRUYER, S., Koninkl. (1953).
Ned. Al~ad. Wetenschap. Proc. Net. B 56, 80. HEALEY, F. H., FETSK0, J. M., AND ZETTLE-
415-426 (1953). MOYER, A. C., or. Phys. Chem. 57, 186-188
55. DUBININ, M. M., ZHUKOVSKAYA, E. G., (1953).
ZAVERINA, E. D., NEIMARK, I. E., AND 81. HIGHTOWER, Z. W., AND EMMETT, P. H., or.
SHEINTAIN, l:~. YU., [zv. Akad. Nauk SSSR Polymer Sci. A2, ]647-1653 (1964).
1960, 588-590. 82. HILL, T. L., J. Chem. Phys. 16, 181-189
56. EMMETT, P. H., AND BRUNAUER, S., ,7. Am. (1948).
Chem. Soc. 59, 1553-1564 (1937). 83. HIRSCHFELDER, J. O., CURTISS, C. F., AND
57. EMMETT, P. H., AND CINES, M., or. Phys. BIRD, R. B., "Molecular Theory of Gases
Chem. 51, 1248-1262 (1947). and Liquids," pp. 839, 1028. Wiley, New
58. EMMETT, I ). H., AND CINES, M., ar. Phys. York, 1964.
Chem. 51, 1329-1341 (1947). 84. HOLLARAUGH,C. M., AND CHESSICK, J. J., or.
59. EVERY, I'~. L., WADE, W. H., AND ~ACKER- Phys. Chem. 65, 109-114 (1961).
MAN, N., J. Pht/s. CheTn. 6~, 25-29 (1961). 85. HONIG, J. M., AND REYERSON, L. H., or.
60. FARRAa, R. L., AND SMITH, H. A., J. Am. Phys. Chem. 56, 140 (1952).
Chem. Soc. 77, 4502-4505 (1955). 86. HORVAT, D. M., AND SING, K. S. W., or.
61. FEJES, P., KIRALY, J., AND SCHAY, G., Z. Appl. Chem. (London) 11,313-317 (]961).
Anorg. Allgem. Chem. 300, 72-80 (1959). 87. ISIRIKYAN, A. A., AND KISELEV, A. V., J.
62. FINGER, K. F., LEMBERGER, A. P., WURSTER, Phys. Chem. 65, 601-607 (1961).
D. E., AND HIGUCHI, W., J. ATr~. Pharm. 88. ISIRIKYAN,A. A., AND KISELEV, A. V., Russ.
Assoc. Sci. Ed. 49, 565-568 (1960). J. Phys. Chem. English Transl. 3~, 1324-
63. FISHER, B. B., AND McMILLAN, W. G., J. 1327 (1960).
Chem. Phys. 28, 549-554 (1958). 89. JOHANSEN, I{. T., LORENZ, P. B., DODD,
64. FOWLER, R. D., HAMILTON, J. M., KASPER, C. G., PIDGEON, F. D., AND DAVIS, J. W.,
J. S., WEBER, C. E., BUFORD, W. B., AND J. Phys. Chem. 57, 40-45 (1953).
ANDERSON, }~. C., Ind. Eng. Chem. 39, 375- 90. JOLLY, W. L., A~'DERSON, L. B., AND BEL-
378 (1947). T a ~ I , R. L., UCRL-4707, June 7 (1956).
65. GAINES, G. L., AND CANNON, P., J. Phys. 91. JURINAK, J. J., AND VO~MAN, D. H., J. Phys.
Chem. 64, 997-t000 (1960). Chem. 63, 1373-1376 (1959).
66. GRAHAM, D., J. Phys. Chem. 68, 2788-2792 92. KAGANER, M. G., Akad. Nauk SSSR Proc.
(1964). Phys. Chem. See. 138, 419 (1961).
67. GRAHAM, D., J. Phys. Chem. 66, 1815-1818 93. KARNAUKHOV, A. P., KISELEV, A. V., AND
(1962). K~APOVA, E. V., Proc. Acad. Sci. USSR
68. GRANQUIST, W. T., MITCH, F. A., AND ED- English Transl. 92, 361 (1953).
WARDS, C. H., Ind. Eng. Chem. 46, 358- 94. KEENAN, A. G., AND HOLMES, J. M., or. Phys.
362 (1954). & Colloid Chem. 53, 1309-1320 (1949).
69. GREGG, S. J., AND STOCK, t~., Trans. Faraday 95. KEENAN, A. G., MOONEY, l~. W., AND WOOD,
Soc. 53, 1355-1362 (1957). L. A., J. Phys. & Colloid Chem. 55, 1462-
70. HACKERMAN,N., AND ~XlALL, A. C., J. Phys.
1474 (1951).
Chem. 62, 1212-1214 (1958).
71. HAMMAN, S. D., AND LAMBERT, J. A., Aus- 96. KIDNAY, A. J., AND HIZA, M. J., or. Phys.
tralian J. Sci. 7, 1-17 (1954). Chem. 67, 1725-1727 (1963).
72. HANSEN, N., Vacuum-Tech. 11, 70-77 (1962). 97. KINI, K. A., or. Phys. Chem. 68, 217-218
73. I-~ARKINS,W. D., AND JURA, G., or. Am. Chem. (1964).
Soc. 66, 1366-1373 (1944). 98. KIPLING, J. J., SHERWOOD, J. N., AND
598 McCLELLAN AND HARNSBERGER
SHOOTER, P. V., Trans. Faraday Soc. 60, 122. MALHERSE, P. LER., AND CARMAN,P. C.,
401-411 (1964). Fuel S1, 210-219 (1952).
99. KISELEV, A. V., AND FROLOV, B. A., Kinetics 123. MARSH, H., AND WYNNE-JONES, W. F. I4~.,
Catalysis (USSR) (Eng. Transl.) 3, 667- Carbon 1, 269-279 (1964).
672 (1962). 124. MIZUTORI, M., HAGIWARA,S., FUKUI)A, Y.,
100. I4]-ISELEV,A. V., AND ~ROLOV, B. A., Kinetics AND I(AWAGOE, K., Nippon Gomu Kyo-
Catalysis (USSR) (Eng. Transl.) 3, 672-681 kaishi 35, 578-588 (1962).
(1962). 125. MENNESSlEa, A., AND BOTCHER, R., Compt.
i01. KISELEV, A. V., KOROLEV, A., YA. PETROVA, Rend. 226, 1448-1449 (1948).
R. C., AND SHCHERBAKOVA, K. D., Kol- 126. Mooi, J., PIERCE, C., AND SMITH, R. N., J.
loidn. Zh. 22, 671-679 (1960). Phys. Chem. 57, 657-659 (1953).
102. KISELEV, A. V., KOVALEVA,N. V., SINITZEN, 127. NAY, M. A., AND MORRISON, J. L., Can. J.
V. A., AND KRAPOVA, E. V., Kolloidn. Zh. Res. 27B, 205-214 (1949).
20, 444-455 (1958). 128. NELSON, R. A., AND I-IENDRICKS,S. B., Soil
103. I4~ISELEV, A. V., AND KULICHENKO, V. V., Sci. 56, 285-296 (1943).
Dokl. At~ad. Nauk SSSR 93, 101-104 (1953). 129. OLIVlER, J. P., AND ROSS, S., Proc. Roy. Soe.
104. KISELEV, A. V., LEONT'EV, E. A., LUK'YANO- (London) A265, 447-454 (1961).
VICH, V. M., AND NIKITIN, YU. S., Zhur. 130. O~CHISTON, H. D., Soil Sci. 79, 71-78 (1955).
Fiz. Khim. 30, 2149-2159 (1956). 131. O~CHISTON, H. D., Soil Sei. 87, 276-282
105. I~OEE, K. A., AND LYNN, R. E., Chem. Rev. (1959).
52, 117-236 (1953). 132. OaR, C., AND BANKSTON, P. T., J. Am.
106. KODERA, K., AND ONISHI, Y., Bull. Chem. Ceram. Soc. 35, 58-60 (1952).
Soc. Japan 32, 356-361 (1959). • 133. PACE, E. L., AND SIEBERT, A. R., J. Phys.
107. I(ODERA, K., AND ONISHI, ~., Bull. Chem. Chem. 64, 961 (1960).
Soc. Japan 33, 338-343 (1960). 134. PAP~E, D., Bull. Soc. Chim. France 1955, 14-
108. KOMAROV, V. A.. I)ROZDOVA, V. M., AND 35.
CHERNIKOVA, E. A., Zhur. Fiz. Khim. 23, 135. PICKERING, I-I. L., AN]) ECKSTROM, H. C., J.
1141-1151 (1949). Am. Chem. Soe. 74, 4775-4777 (1952).
109. LAUTERBACH,K. E., LASKIN, S., AND LE.~Cg, 136. PIERCE, C., AND EWING, B., J. Phys. Chem.
L., J. Franlclin Inst. 250, 13-24 (1950). 68, 2562-2568 (1964).
110. LAW, J. Y., J. Phys. Chem. 59, 543-549 (1955). 137. PIERCE, C., AND SMITH, R. N., J. Phys.
111. LIVINGSTON, H. K., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 66, Chem. 54, 354-364 (1950).
569-573 (1944). 138. PIERCE, C., AN])SMITH, R. N., J. Phys. Chem.
112. LIVINGSTON,H. K., J. Colloid Sei. 4, 447-458 54, 784-794 (1950).
(1949). 139. PIERCE, C., WILEY, J. W., AND SMITH, R. N.,
113. LOESER, E. H., AND HARKINS, W. D., J. Am. J. Phys. Chem. 53, 669-683 (1949).
Chem. Soc. 72, 3427-3431 (1950). 140. PIEROTTI, R. A., J. Phys. Chem. 66, 1810-
114. LOES]~R, E. H., HAR~INS, W. D., AND TWINS, 1814 (1962).
S. B., J. Phys. Che~n. 57, 591-597 (1953). 141. POLYAXOVA, M. M., AND TESNER, P. A.,
115. LOPEZ-GONZALEZ,J. D., CA!~PENTER, ]2. G.~ Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 93, 855-858, 1061-
AND DIETZ, V. R., J. Phys. Chem. 65, 1112 1064 (1953).
(1961). 142. PONEC, V., AND KNOR, Z., Collection Czech.
116. LUBARSKI~, G. D., KUL'KOVA, N. V., BUR- Chem. Commun. 27, 1091-1098 (1962).
SHTEIN, R. KH., ISAEVA, G. G., IVANOV- 143. PalTCHAnD, J., Nature 194, 38-39 (1962).
SXAYA, L. N., AND SHVRMOVS~AVA,N. A., 144. PURl, B. R., AND SHARMA,L. R., J. Sci. Ind.
Dol~l. Akad. Nauk SSSR 140, 634-636 Res. (India) 15B, 178-182 (1956).
(1961). 145. RAZOUE, R. I., AND ELGOBEILY, M. A., J.
117. MACHIN,W. D., AND ROSS, S., Proc. Roy. Soe. Phys. Chem. 54, 1087-]098 (1950).
(London) 265A, 455-462. 146. REYERSON, L. I-I., ANDWERTZ, J. E., J. Phys.
118. MACIvER, D. S., ZABOR, R. C., AND EM~IETT, Chem. 53, 234-251 (1949).
P. It., J. Phys. Chem. 63, 484-489 (1959). 147. ROSENBERG, A. J., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 78,
119. MADELEV, J. D., AND SING, K. S. W., Chem. 2929-2934 (1956).
Ind. (London) 1959, 289-290. 148. Ross, J. R. H., AND ROBERTS, M. W., J.
120. MAKRIDES, A. C., J. Phys. Chem. 63, 1789- Catalysis 4, 620-624 (1965).
1791 (1959). 149. Ross, J. W., AND GOOD, 1~. ft., J. Phys. Chem.
121. M~SIMOVA, M. P., VASSERBERG, V. E., AND 60, 1167-1171 (1956).
BALANDIN, A. A., !fzv. Al~ad. Naut~ SSSR 150. Ross, S., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 70, 3830-3837
1963, 17-21. (1948).
CROSS-SECTIONAL AI~EAS OF MOLECULES 599
151. RUBINSHTEIN,A. M., EL'TEKOV, Yu. A., AND TLEMOYER, A. C., J. Phys. Chem. 66,
BRUEVA, T. R., Bull. Acad. Sci. USSR, 1819-1822 (1962).
Div. Chem. Sci. English Transl. 1960, 1954- 170. STEELE, W. A., AND HALSEY, G. D., J. Chem.
1963. Phys. 22, 971 (1954).
152. RUBINSHTEIN, A. M., SLOYETSKAYA,K. I., 171. STEEL~, W. A., AND ttALS~Y, G. D., JR., J.
AND BRU~VA, T. R., Kinetics Catalysis Chem. Phys. 22, 979-984 (1954).
(USSR) (Eng. Transl.) 2, 530-534 (1961). 172. TEICHNEn, S. J., ANDMORRISON, J. A., Trans.
153. RUBINSHTEIN, A. M., SLOVETSKAYA,K. I., Faraday Soc. 51, 961-966 (1955).
AND BRUEVA, T. R., Proc. Aead. Sci. USSR 173. TOMLINSON, L., United Kingdom Atomic
(English Transl.) 151, 574-576 (1963). Energy Authority IGR-TN/s 1032 (1959).
154. RUBINSHTEIN, A. M., SLOVETSKAYA,I~. I., 174. TOMPKINS, F. C., AND YOTSNG,D. M., Trans.
AND ]3RUEVA,T. 1~., Proc. Aead. Sci. USSR Faraday Soc. 47, 77 (1951).
(English Transl.) 134, 1093 (1960). 175. TSURUIZUMI, A., Bull. Chem. Soc. Japan 34
155. RUBINSHTEIN, A. M., SLOVETSKAYA,K. I., 1457-1465 (1961).
KLYACHKO-GuRvICH, A. L., AND BHUEVA, 176. VAN VOORHIS, J. J., CRAIG, R. G., AND BAR-
T. R., Proc. Aead. Sei. USSR (English TELL, F. E., J. Phys. Chem. 61, 1513-1519
Transl.) 151, 549-555 (1963). (1957).
156. RUBINSHTEIN, A. M., AND VASSERBERG, 177. VASSERBERG, V. E., BALANDIN, A. A., AND
V. E., Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 79, 263- MAKSlMOVA, M. P., Russ. J. Phys. Chem.
266 (1951). 35, 419-424 (1961).
157. RUSSELL, A. S., AND COCHRAN, C. N., Ind. 178. WALKER:P. L., FORESTI, R. J., XND WRIGHT,
Eng. Chem. 42, 1332-1335 (1950). C. C., Ind. Eng. Chem. 45, 1703-1710 (1953).
158. SARAKHOV, A. I., Dokl. Akad. Naulc SSSR 179. WALK~R, W. C., AND ZETTLEMOYER,A. C., J.
112, 464-466 (1957). Phys. Chem. 57, 182-186 (1953).
159. SCHAEFFER, W. D., POLLEY, M. H., AND 180. WEILER, ]~. R., BEECKMANS, J., AND MCIN-
SMIT~, W. R., J. Phys. Chem. 54, 227-239 TOSIL R., Can. J. Chem. 39, 1360-1371
(1950). (1961).
160. SCHREINER, G. D. L., AND KEMBALL, C., 181. WHEATLEY, I4., J. Appl. Chem. (London) 9,
Trans. Faraday Soc. 49, 190-194 (1953). 159-162 (1959).
161. SHERESttEFSKY, J. L., AND RUSSELL, E. R., 182. WHEELER, D. J,, DARBY, P. W., AND KEM-
J. Phys. Chem. 57, 660-665 (1953). BALL, C., ] . Chem. Soc. 1960, 332-340.
162. SING, K. S. W., AND MADELEY, J. I)., J. 183. WOLOCK, I., AND HARRIS, B. L., Ind. Eng.
Appl. Chem. (London) 3, 549-556 (1953). Chem. 42, 1347-1349 (1950).
163. SING, K. S. W., AN1) SWALLOW,D., J. Appl. 184. WOOTEN, L. A., AND BROWN, C. J. Am.
Chem. (London) 10, 171-175 (1960). Chem. Soc. 65, 113-118 (1943).
164. SINGLETON, J. H., AND HALSEY, G. D., JR., 185. WYNNE-JoNES, W. F. I4~., "Structure and
J. Phys. Chem. 58, 330-335 (1954). Properties of Porous Materials," Proc.
165. SMITH, R. N., LESNINI, D., AND MOOI, J., Symp. Colston Res. Soc. 10, 38-39 (1958).
J. Phys. Chem. 60, 1063-1066 (1956). 186. YOTJNT, R. A., J. Phys. Chem. 66, 326-328
166. SMITH, R. N., AND PIERCE, C., J. Phys. Chem. (1962).
52, 1115-1128 (1948). 187. ZETTLEMOYER, A. C., CHAND, A., AND GAM-
167. SMITH, R. N., PIERCE, C., AND CORDES, H., BLE, E., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 72, 2752-2757
J. Am. Chem. Soe. 72, 5595-5597 (1950). (1950).
168.[SPENCER, W. B., AMBERG, C. H., AND BEEBE, 188. ZETTLEMOYER, A. C., I-~ASSIS,C. I~., CHES-
R. A., J. Phys. Chem. 62, 719-723 (1958). SICK, J. J., _~NI) SRINIVASAN, G., Advan.
169. SRINIVASAN, G., CHESSlCK, J. J., AND ZET- Chem. Ser. 33, 229-238 (196I).