Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The output is at its equilibrium level when the quantity of output produced is
equal to the quantity demanded.
That is, Y = AD = C + I + G + NX
Consumption increases with increase in income. The relation between consumption and
income is described by the consumption function.
Thus,
C = f (Y )
The complete function is C = C + c Y
This shows that consumption is an increasing function of income. There is a part of
consumption which is independent of income.
That is,
1
2/22/2022
AD = A + c Y
Where, A = C + I + G + NX
1
Y0 = A
1− c
2
2/22/2022
So, given increase in government spending, increase the final output by 2 time, i.e., the
output gets doubled. Thus, the equilibrium level of output is higher, larger the marginal
propensity to consume, c, and higher the level of autonomous spending.
To the process of increase in autonomous spending and increase in final income or output is
called multiplier. The multiplier is the amount by which equilibrium output changes when
autonomous aggregate demand increases by 1 unit.
Keynes asserted that investment in a particular industry not only raises output
in that industry but also expands production in other industries, whose
product is demanded by the people employed in the former industry.
3
2/22/2022
Example:
Assume that i) MPC = 0.5, and ii) initial investment is Rs 20 cr.
Thus for an initial investment of Rs 20 Crores, the final increase in income with MPC of 0.5 is
Rs 40 Crores.
However, please note that the process of income expansion of Rs 40 crores is not all at once. The income
expansion is spread over a period of time involving several rounds of investment and consumption.
The following mathematical derivation explains how the Multiplier (k) depends upon the value of MPC.
Symbolically,
Y
k = Where, k is multiplier, Y is income, I is investment
I
Or
Y = k ( I ) .........................................(1)
Since, Y = C + I
ΔY = ΔC + ΔI
Or ΔI = ΔY – ΔC …………………………………(2)
4
2/22/2022
ΔY = k (ΔY- ΔC)
ΔY/k = ΔY – ΔC
1 C
Or, =1− (by dividing ΔY on both sides)
k Y
1
Or, k =
C
1−
Y
1 C
Or, k = ...............................................................(3) (Since, = MPC)
1 − MPC Y
1
Alternatively, k = (Since, MPC + MPS = 1)
MPS
5
2/22/2022
For example, if the marginal propensity to consume, c is 0.8 and the tax
rate is 0.25, the mpc out of disposable income, c (1-t), is 0.8 (1 – 0.25) =
0.6.
Y = A + c (1 − t ) Y
The equilibrium condition will be:
1
Y0 = A
1 − c (1 − t )
For the equilibrium level of output:
Accelerator
The acceleration principle explains the process by which an increase in the demand for
consumption goods leads to an increase in investment.
It is based on the idea that the demand for capital goods is derived from the demand for
consumer goods.
Symbolically, β = 𝛥𝐼/𝛥𝐶
Or, ΔI = β ΔC ………………………………………………(1)
6
2/22/2022
Hicks version believed that demand for capital goods is not derived from consumer goods but
any direct demand for national output. Therefore, his equation is given as:
Super-Multiplier
For a satisfactory explanation of income generation, economists have
combined the two concepts: multiplier and accelerator, which is called super-
multiplier.
7
2/22/2022
Hicks divided investment component into autonomous investment and induced investment, so that:
or , Y = C + I
or , Y = c Y + I a + i Y sin ce, c = C / Y , and I = I a + i Y
I a = Y − c Y − i Y
I a = (1 − c − i ) Y
I a
= (1 − c − i )
Y
Y 1
=
I a 1− c − i
1
Ks = ...................................................................(2)
1− c − i
Here, K s is the sup er multiplier
c is MPC
i is MPI
1
Y = (I a ) .........................................................(3)
1− c − i
Which means that final increase in income is dependent on the Super-multiplier (Ks) times
the initial autonomous investment.
8
2/22/2022
Numerical example:
Assume, MPC is 0.5, MPI is 0.4 and initial investment of Rs 100 crores.
The final increase in income will be
1 1
Y = ( Rs.100 cr .) = (100 cr .) = 1000 cr
1 − 0.5 − 0.4 0 .1
Thus, a rise in initial autonomous investment of Rs. 100 crores generates the final
income of Rs 1000 crores through super-multiplier effect, whereas the simple multiplier
would have raised the final income to Rs 200 crores only, given K = 2 and initial
investment of Rs. 100 crores.