Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Lecture 5-International Monetary Econ
Lecture 5-International Monetary Econ
1
Roadmap
1. Interest rate parity
– Demand for currency deposits (material from the last time)
– Equilibrium (material from the last time)
– Diagram
– UIP vs. CIP
– Empirical evidence
2
The Demand for Currency Deposits
3
Demand for Foreign Currency Assets
• The demand for a foreign currency bank deposit depends on
the same factors that affect any other asset demand
– Rate of return
– Risk
– Liquidity
• Rates of return on a foreign currency deposit depend
– interest rates that the assets will earn
– exchange rate growth expectations
Demand for Foreign Currency Assets
Interest rates in US and Japan
$102.82 – $100
2% = 2.82%
$100
Demand for Foreign Currency Assets
• Note that the expected rate of appreciation of the euro or, equivalently,
the rate of depreciation of the dollar is dollar appreciates
𝐸 𝑒 − 𝐸 0.97 − 1
= = −3%
𝐸 1
however, since I converted my $ to € at a higher exchange rate, my return will be lower in $ because of $ appreciation
• The dollar rate of return on Euro deposits approximately equals:
– the interest rate on euro deposits
– plus the expected rate of appreciation of € or depreciation of $
6% + −3% = 3%
𝐸 𝑒 −𝐸
Expected rate of return on a foreign deposit ≈ 𝑅€ + 𝐸
Equilibrium
10
Equilibrium on the Forex Market
• Equilibrium
– deposits of all currencies offer the same expected return
14
A Convenient Way to Represent the Parity
$ = domestic currency
€ = foreign currency
Intersection occurs where the equation
𝐸𝑒 − 𝐸
of interest parity holds true
𝑅$ = 𝑅€ +
𝐸
R€ + (Eexpected/E) -1
Return on Foreign Investment depends negatively on the exchange rate ($/€, US home)
depends positively on
the domestic interest
rate
does not depend on the exchange rate
Note: 𝑅€ and 𝐸 𝑒 are fixed on this diagram
Exercise 1
A Decrease in Domestic Interest Rate
Return on
𝐸 domestic
assets
At 𝐸1 , the expected rate of
return on foreign assets is
higher than 𝑅2
𝐸2 2 ⇓
1
higher demand for foreign
𝐸1
currency
Expected return on
foreign assets
⇓
the domestic currency
depreciates
𝑅2 𝑅1 𝑅
Exercise 2
A decrease in the foreign interest rate
Return on
𝐸 domestic At 𝐸1 , the expected rate of
assets
return on foreign assets is
lower than 𝑅1
⇓
higher demand for domestic
1
𝐸1 currency
𝐸2 2 Expected return on ⇓
foreign assets
the domestic currency
appreciates.
𝑅1 𝑅
Exercise 3
An increase in 𝐸 𝑒
Return on
𝐸 domestic 𝐸𝑒 ↑
assets
⇓
higher demand for foreign
currency
⇓
2
𝐸2 the foreign currency
𝐸1 1 Expected return on appreciates/the domestic
foreign assets
currency depreciates
𝑅1 𝑅
The exchange rate behaves like any other asset price: its value today
depends on expectations of its value in the future
Interest Parities
1. Covered interest parity (CIP)
𝐹−𝐸
∗
𝑅=𝑅 +
𝐸
– 𝐹 is the forward exchange rate
– Forward exchange contract covers the FX risk
22
Evidence on CIP
23
capital control —> less arbitrage opportunities
TAXES!!!!!
24
CIP during and after the Global Financial Crisis
25
riskless arbitrage??
Evidence on CIP
• CIP holds remarkably well most of the time
• But sometimes it does not hold because of
– capital controls taxes
– counterparty/liquidity risk default risk
– Financial regulations
• Examples of the recent deviations
– Following the collapse of Lehman Brothers, counterparty risk
increases enormously
– Persistent deviations after that due to new regulations that limit
financial positions of banks
26
(E(expected) - E )/ E = R - R(star)
Evidence on UIP
• A realized (actual)
rate of depreciation
on Y axis
• The plot shows that
– UIP does not seem
to hold
– This observed
failure of the UIP is
usually called the
forward premium
puzzle
Interpreting the slope of the best fit line: for every 1% of interest differential in favor of the foreign currency, we would
expect only a 0.2% increase in the rate of appreciation of the home currency, on average, leaving a profit of 0.8%. 27
Evidence on UIP
• An expected rate of
depreciation on Y axis
(surveys of currency
traders)
• The plot shows that
– UIP does not seem to
hold precisely
– However, there is a
good positive relation
• Based on this
evidence, we will treat
the UIP as a useful
approximation
Data are monthly for the German mark, Swiss franc,
Japanese yen, British pound, and Canadian dollar against
the U.S. dollar from February 1988 to October 1993
Source: Menzie Chinn and Jeffrey A. Frankel, 2002,
“Survey Data on Exchange Rate Expectations: More 28
Currencies, More Horizons, More Tests.”
UIP and the Carry Trade
29
Carry Trade
• Motivation
31
Carry Trade: Borrow in Yen, invest in AUD
• AUD appreciates most of the time, but can abruptly depreciate
– With prob. 90% AUD appreciates by 1% against the Yen
– With prob. 10% AUD depreciates by 40% again the Yen
– Expected rate of depreciation of Yen = 0.9 × 0.01 + 0.1 × −0.4 = −0.031
– This is potentially consistent with the UIP
• Next lecture:
– KOM, Chapter 15
34