Father Saturnino Urios University

Engineering and Technology Program

Butuan City

ORAL DEFENSE ASSESSMENT

Unsatisfactory/Does Not Meet

Attribute A B C D Satisfactory/Meets Expectations
Expectations
Overall ☐ Poorly organized paper/ ☐ Clearly organized
presentation presentation paper/presentation
quality ☐ Poor presentation ☐ Clear presentation
☐ Poor communication skills ☐ Good communication skills
☐ Slides and handouts are difficult to ☐ Slides and handouts clear
read
☐ Presentation reveals critical ☐ Presentation demonstrates
weaknesses in depth of knowledge in the depth of knowledge in subject
subject matter matter
Quality of ☐ Responses were incomplete ☐ Responses were complete
response to ☐ Respondent exhibited lack of ☐ Respondent exhibited
questions/critical knowledge in subject area adequate knowledge in subject
thinking skills area
☐ Responses did not meet level expected ☐ Responses met level expected
☐ Presentation does not reflect well ☐ Presentation demonstrates
developed critical thinking skills critical thinking skills
Total scores
To deduct scores: 1 – less one, 2 – less two, 3 – less three, 4 – less four, 5 – less five
Names
A. Talal Sultan
B. Nikhalypsys Nemeno
C. Loraine Cacanindin
D. Marjon Timtim
E. Hannah Bianca Trillo
Area of Improvement/s and general comments: (see separate paper)
OVERALL ASSESSMENT
(95-100) 9 out 9 (Excellent) – Passed with few revisions
(90 – 94) 8 out 9 (Very satisfactory) – Passed with some general revisions
(85 – 89) 7 out 9 (Very satisfactory) – Passed with some detailed revisions
(80 – 84) 6 out 9 (satisfactory) – Passed with many detailed revisions
(75 – 79) 5 out 9 (satisfactory) – Passed with major revisions
(74) 4 and below out 9 (unsatisfactory) – Failed, subject for re-oral defense

________________________
Panel member