Professional Documents
Culture Documents
INTRODUCTION
ACTIVITY #1: Reading lists (video)
ACTIVITY #2: Selecting what to read (Mentimeter)
ACTIVITY #3: Keyword exercise (Mentimeter)
ACTIVITY #4: Evaluation of sources using CRAAP (Mentimeter)
REFLECTION& FEEDBACK
Learning outcomes
By the end of this session you should be able to:
2
Introduction
Open up the slides below and watch the introductory video on the first slide.
Then work your way through the rest of the slides.
Look out for the speaker icon in the bottom-right corner of many slides. If you
click on this you will hear us explain more about the content of
the slide.
Activities
Activity 1: Reading lists
3
Reading lists should be provided online via your module on Blackboard.
They provide access to the materials that your tutors want you to read.
They allow you to manage your reading by noting what you have read,
and will read in future.
Watch the reading lists video below then go into the Academic
Professional Development Module on Blackboard and find the reading list
for this course.
https://vimeo.com/240154631
4
You cannot read everything on a topic so you need to plan your reading
carefully. How do you decide what to read?
Wei is studying business and management at University. His tutor has set the
class a 1500-word essay on change management. He has carried out a search
and identified some items that might be helpful.
After the lecture, Wei’s friend Alison also told him about a source she had
found useful in her own work. Wei now needs to select which sources he will
read.
Below are the titles of the items on Wei’s shortlist, with Alison’s suggestion
noted. Consider each of the sources in turn. Which do you feel Wei should
read? Which do you think he can ignore? Applying the 4 Rs will help!
Essay: In the UK context, introduce the main approaches to and challenges for
change management
5
[ITEM 1] Cameron, E. (2020) Making Sense of Change Management [online].
4th edition. London: Kogan Page. [NB recommended in the reading list for the
module Wei is studying]
[ITEM 2] Adams, M. and Straw, P. (2017) The Little Black Book of Change: The 7
Fundamental Shifts for Change Management that Delivers [online]. London and
New York: SAGE.
[ITEM 5] Ullah, V. (2016). Change management theory and practice. Three case
studies on implementing change in small and medium-sized enterprises’,
Managing Organisations Today 23 (4), pp. 23-37.
6
Imagine that this is the essay question you have been given:
After you have submitted your answers, ctrl + click here to see your
answers and those of your fellow coursemates.
7
Double click on the image to open the slide and press play to listen
Read through the three extracts below from different publications. Try
to rank them in order of the most to the least academic piece of
writing. Also, think about what it is that make some extracts more
academic than others.
Extract 1
Grimm, M. (2004) ‘Is marketing to kids ethical?’, Brandweek 45 (14), p.44-48.
8
expenditures went to hawking stuff with health consequences attached. One
Department of Agriculture study calculated that 95% of the 10,000 food
commercials children see each, pitch high-fat, high-sugar products.
Extract 2
Daems, K. et al. (2019) ‘Personalized and cued advertising aimed at children’,
Young Consumers 20 (2), pp. 13-23.
Extract 3
9
Snowdon, M. (2019) Sweets health warnings are pointless… and seriously
harm your freedom; NANNY STATE STRIKES AGAIN. The Sun [online] 05 June.
[Accessed 14 October 2010].
Those of us who opposed the sugar levy warned that the nanny state zealots
would soon demand similar taxes on a range of everyday food products.
Similarly, we opposed plain packaging for tobacco because it would create a
slippery slope, with food, soft drinks and alcohol next in the firing line.
A report published by the Institute for Public Policy Research (IPPR) yesterday
proved the naysayers correct.
Not only are they calling for plain packaging for sweets, crisps and fizzy drinks,
the IPPR is calling for tobacco style sin taxes on cakes and confectionery, plus
an extensive advertising ban for anything that the Government considers to be
high in fat, sugar or salt.
Some of the IPPR's justifications for these Stalinist diktats border on the
surreal. They claim that plain packaging for so-called "junk food" will "level the
playing field between confectionary [sic] products and fruit and vegetables", as
if children would be eating turnips rather than chocolate bars if it weren't for
colourful wrappers.
Their report stresses the need for health policy to move "from the punitive to
the empathetic" and yet they propose a raft of stealth taxes on ordinary food
products which will raise the cost of living for everybody and clobber the poor
particularly hard.
Where is the empathy there? There seems to be remarkably little
consideration for the adverse consequences of these draconian policies, or the
costs they will impose on consumers.
Workshop feedback
Please fill out this short form to let us know what you thought about this
online workshop: https://tinyurl.com/eyypx9pc
10
Useful links
Ask a Librarian: https://www1.uwe.ac.uk/library/contactus.aspx
Assignment Planner:
https://academicskills.uwe.ac.uk/general/workbooks/assignment-planner/
11