Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CONTENTS
Page Page
Introduction 1 Developmental period, etc.—Continued.
Systematic position 2 Number of generations per year .. 10
Distribution 2 Longevity __ 11
Descri ption 3 Hibernation 12
Size of adults 3 Hosts.. 13
Proportion of the sexes,_ ._ 4 List of host species H
Reproduction -- 4 Host case records -. 14
Matins__ __- 4 Preference for host 15
O viposit ion 5 The screw-worm fly as a host 17
Number of parasites developing from a Brachymeria fonscofombei breeding in car-
sinple host larva 0 casses 18
Number of epgs produced by a single female- 6 Arachnid and insect enemies of lirachymeria. 19
Parthenogenesis 7 The abundance of Brachymeria fonscolombei and
Developmental period of immature stages 7 its importance as a factor in blowfly controL- 19
Methods 7 Summary - 20
Length of developmental period __ 9 Literature cited — 21
Relation oí temperature to development-_. 10
INTRODUCTION
Lower Austria (1^), Tyrol (/f), Küstenland {1^}; Herzegovina- Stolac (le);
Germany: Brandenburg (IS); Sweden; southern part (H); Russia: Transcaucasia
(12), Waluiki (Í2).
Asia.—Nord-Mongolei (le); Java: Batavia.
North America.—Mexico: Tampico, Tamaulipas; West Indies: Port au Prince,
Haiti; United States: Arizona, Arl^ansas, California, Florida, Illinois, Kansas,
Louisiana, Oklahoma, Maryland, Mississippi, New Mexico, Texas.
DESCRIPTION
SIZE OF ADULTS
OVIPOSITION
The number of eggs which a female B. fonscolombei can lay has not
been definitely ascertained. From a single female 80 ofl'spring, 20
males and 54 females, were obtained. This represents the largest
number of individuals produced by a single parasite under observation.
On April 29, 1930, two females were dissected. The first, a medium-
sized gravid female, 3 days old, contained 87 perfectly formed eggs
BIOLOGY OF BRACHYMERIA FONSCOLOMBEI /
and many more so small that they could not be counted. The second
was smaller and contained 85 large eggs. On June 24, 1930, two large,
3-day-old gravid females were examined. In one, 164 clearly formed
eggs were found, and 177 in the other. There were numerous smaller
immature eggs.
PARTHENOGENESIS
FIGURE 2.—Jars used as containers of meat baits in breedinc ¡niinature stapes of Bmchymerm fonscolombei
Jar on left shows larjie-mesh cover u,sed durinn exposure: jar on right has cover of brass strainer cloth
used to close jars after exposure.
In all the tests pint Mason jars were used. Each jar contained
1}{ inches of slightly moist sand on which was placed a 4-ounce piece
of fresh rabbit meat. Each jar was marked with a gummed label
showing all data concerning the exposure. Figure 2 shows the breed-
ing jars, and Figure 3 shows the method of exposing the jars in the
field.
8 TECHNICAL BULLETIN 365, U.S. DEPT. OF AGRICULTUKE
FIGURE 3.—Jar eüiitaining ineat bait exposed for infestation b\ h\m\ flies and tlieir \> u i -i-ileii
shelter is i)rotection aííainst rnn and animals
Emergence records for each test are listed in table 1. These tests
were carried out during 1928, 1929, and 1930, and include records of
parasites bred from exposures during the months from March to
November, inclusive. Each record presents the number of parasites
that emerged, the range in the developmental period, and the average
developmental period for the group.
TABLE 1.—Summary of tests showing developmental period of Brachymeria fonsco-
lombei in blowfly larvae, Uvalde, Tex., 1928, 1929, and 1930
Num- Num-
Days Days ber °F. "F. Days Days ber °F. "F. 'F.
Mar. 25, 1929 26-33 27 456 97 S3 75
Mar. 27, 1930 32-37 35 12 95 30 70
Apr. 10, 1930 27-36 32 12 94 47 75
May 6, 1930 25-27 26 6 94 47 76
May 21, 1930 23-36 26 137 97 60 78
June 5, 1930 20-27 22 181 lOO 64 81
June 27, 1928 17-26 21 870 104 73 88
July 11, 1928 20-29 24 266 102 70 86
Aug. 1, 19.30 18-24 21 22 104 70 86
Aug. 2, 1930 19-20 21 81 1Ü4 65 86
Aug. 3, 1930 16-22 19 43 104 70 86
Sept. 4, 1930 20-26 23 30 102 59 82
Oct. 6, 1928 42-69 51 9 94 28 63 171-191 178 37 100 2Ô 60
Oct. 15, 1928 42-83 49 44 89 20 67 163-181 173 376 100 20 69
Oct. 20, 1928 78-93 82 8 87 20 66 156-176 167 318 100 20 59
Oct 22 1928 143-174 166 302 100 20 69
Oct 27 1928 156-169 164 182 100 20 58
Oct 30 1928 153-165 161 62 100 20 58
149-155 150 20 lOO 20 57
153-166 155 U 100 20 58
Many host larvae and pupae from these tests were dissected in the
laboratory, and it was found that in warm weather the period from the
hatcliing of the parasite larva until it reached maturity was from 8 to
12 days. The host larva pupates during this period, and the parasite
larva continues its feeding until the host pupa is destroyed, after wliich
it in turn pupates and remains in this stage for a period of about 10 to
12 days.
Temperatures (Fahrenheit) during these tests were recorded from
the date the larvae were parasitized until the end of the emergence
period of the parasites. For each test the extreme maximum and
minimum and the average of the daily means are given.
In the course of these tests 3,483 B. Jonscolombei were reared. A
satisfactory test was started as early as March 25. The average
developmental period in this case was 27 days. Thereafter, generally
10 TECHNICAL BULLETIN 365, U.S. DEPT. OF AGRICULTURE
VTTT
FIGURE 4.—A calendar year for Brachymeria fonscotombeî at Uvalde, Tex., showing maximum number of
generations per year and average lengtii of developmental period of parasite. Summer broods are repre-
sented by solid lines, overwintering broods by broken lines.
tion by Sarcophaga or other flies. After the fly eggs had hatched,
parasites were placed within the jar. Later both the parent fly and
parasites were pinned and saved for further study. The parasitized
larvae, after feeding had been completed, pupated in the sand; and,
upon emergence, the second generation of flies and parasities were
recorded and saved.
LIST OF HOST SPECIES
Sarcophaga impar Aid. —Dallas, Tex. August 24, 1928, larvae taken from dead
bird, placed on beef, and exposed to parasites. September 13-14, II S■ impar
(identified by Laake) emerged. September 13-16, 34 B. fonscolombei emerged;
average developmental period 22 days.
Sarcophaga haemorrhoidalis Fall.—Reference: Dalla Torre (Í, p. 388).
Sarcophaga carnaria L.—Reference: Stefani {IS, p. 11-12).
Sarcophaga sj). Reference: Parker {9, p. 239). Parker said: "We liave
reared C. fonscolombei from various species of the genus Sarcophaga living in a
larval state in decomposing meat * * *."
Synthesiomyia nudiseta V.d.W.—Uvalde, Tex. August 4, 1930, progeny of
single fly (eggs deposited August 2) exposed to parasites. August 16^17, 52
S. nudiseta (identified by Aldrich) emerged; average developmental period 15
days. August 22-25, 32 B. fonscolombei emerged; average developmental period
19 days.
Although efforts were made to breed B. fonscolombei from Calli-
phora erythrocephala Meig. and Cynornyia cadaverina Desv., they were
unsuccessfid. There is little doubt, however, that the parasite will
breed in these two species. Attempts to rear the parasite from Musca
domestica L. and Ophyra aenescens Wied. also failed. It is not im-
possible that B. fonscolombei will breed in these two flies.
PREFERENCE FOR HOST
B
FIGURE 5.—A, Tub containing rabbit carcasses exposed to blowflies and their parasites. The shelter
furnished protection ac^ainst sun, rain, and animals. B, Sifters of 14-mesh screen wire and 6- and lO-mesh
hardware cloth used in separating blowfly larvae and pupae from sand.
BIOLOGY OF BRAGHYMERIA FONSCOLOMBEI 17
TABLE 2.—Parasites bred from larvae reared from 13 rabbit carcasses exposed unde/
natural conditions, showing host preference of Brachymeria fonscolombei. Uvalde,
Tex., June IS, 1.930, to Aug. 14, 1931
Parasites
Propor-
Propor- tion of
Fly lar- tion of fly lar-
Flies I'ropor- fly lar- vae and
Host vae einereed tion of
reared total vae para- pupae
Einerfied sitized 1 that
emer- died'
gence
LITERATURE CITED
(1) DALLA TORRE, K. W. VON
1898. CATAL0GU8 HYMENOPTENORUM Hü0U8QUE DE8CRIPT0RUM BT8TE-
MATicDS ET 8YNONYMICD8. V. 5, 598 p. Lipsiae.
(2) DALMAN, J. V.
1921. FöBSöK TILL DPPSTäLLING AF INSECT-FAMILJEN PTEROMALINI
(CYNIPSEAE LATR.) I 8YNNERHET MED AF8EENDE PÄ DE I 8VEBIGE
FDNNE ARTER. Svensk. Vet. Akad. Hand!. 41:143.
(3) DuFOUR, L.
1841. DES METAMORPHOSES DES CU ALOIS, ET DESCRIPTION D'UNE ESPÈCE
PEU CONNUE DE CE GENRE D'HYMêNOPTèRES. Ann. Soo. Ent.
France 10:11-19, illus.
(4) GAHAN, A. B., and FAGAN, M. M.
1923. THE TYPE SPECIES OF THE GENERA OF CHALCIDOIDEA OR CHALCID-
FLiES. U.S. Nati. Mus. Bul. 124, 173 p.
(5) HoLDAWAY, F. G., and EVANS, A. C.
1930. PARASITISM A STIMULUS TO PUPATION; ALYSIA MANDUCATOB IN
RELATION TO THE HOST LuciLiA SERicATA. Nature (London) 125:
598-599.
(6) MASI, L.
1909. CONTRIBUZIONI ALLA CONOSCENZA DEI CALCIDIDI ITALIANI. SPECIE
DEL GENERE cHALcis FABR. Bol. Lab. Zool. Goii. e Agr. Scuola
Super. Agr. Portici 3:106-110.
(7)
1916. MATERIALI PER UNA FAUNA DELL'ARCIPELAGO TO8CAN0. CALCIDIDI
DEL GiGLio. Ann. Mus. Cívico di Storia Nat., Genova 47 (ser.
3, V. 7) : [54]-122, illus.
(8) MERCET, R. G.
1923. LOS CALCIDID08 pAR.ÍsiTos DE ORUGAS. Rcv. Fitopatología 1:12-
19, illus.
(9) PARKER, H. L.
1923. CONTRIBUTION .\ LA CONNAISSANCE DE CHALCIS FONSCOLOMBEI
DUFOUR (HYM.) . Bul. Soc. Eilt. France 1923:238-240.
(10)
1924. RECHERCHES SUR LES FORMES POST-EMBRYONNAIRES DES CHALCID-
IEN8. Ann. Soc. Ent. France 93;[261]-379, illus.
(U) Rossi, P.
1807. FAUNA ETRUSCA, SISTEN8 INSECTA QUAE IN PROVINCIIS FLORENTINA
ET PISANA PRAESERTIM COLLEGIT PETRUS ROSSIUS. CXVI.
CHALCIS. V. 2, p. 86-89. Helmstadii.
(12) RuscHKA, F.
1922. CHALCIDIDENSTUDIEN. DIE EUROPÄISCHEN ARTEN DER GATTUNG
CHALCIS FABR. Konowia, Ztsclir. systematische Insektenkunde
1:221-233.
(13) STEPANI, T. DE
1889. UNA NOTA SULLA CHALCIS DALMANNi, THMS. Nat. SicUiano 9:11-12.
(14) WESTWOOD, J. 0.
1832. DESCRIPTIONS OF SEVERAL NEW BRITISH FORMS AMONGST THE PARA-
SITIC HYMENOPTEHOUS INSECTS. London and Edinburgh Phil.
Mag. and Jour. Sei. (3) 1:127-129.
ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
WHEN THIS PUBLICATION WAS LAST PRINTED