Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The report “Capital Structure and Dividend Policy of M I Cement Industry Ltd. and Confidence Cement Industry
Ltd.” is mainly prepared for the course that is “Corporate Finance”. This report is mainly prepared for the partial
requirement of the course. This report is basically assigned to get an exposure of the practical world. This report is
authorized by my course teacher, Dr. Mahmud Osman Imam, Professor, Department of Finance, University of
Dhaka.
4. To know the how to analyze capital structure of the company and its cost and dividend policy and behavior.
5. To know the how to calculate the profitability and growth rate.
Methodology
The data were derived from Dhaka Stock Exchange, Company Website.
Limitations
1. Insufficient information
2. Subjective Judgments
3. Lack of experience
Reporting Company
I have analyze two companiess. These are:
01. M I Cement Industry Ltd. Target Company
02. Aramit Cement Peer Company
3
Capital Structure
Aramit Cement
% of Debt & Equity in Capital Structure
Debt 74.82% 73.20% 65.70% 73.06% 78.03%
Long Term Debt 0.51% 0.20% 12.83% 29.87% 22.18%
Short Term Debt 74.31% 73.00% 52.87% 43.19% 55.85%
Equity 25.18% 26.80% 34.30% 26.94% 21.97%
70.00%
Interpretation:
Capital Structure of M I Cement Ltd. In 2012 was 39%Debt & 61% Equity of total capital. The long term debt was paid in the
next years but company take short term loan. That’s why their debt equity ratio goes to 46% to 54% in 2016, but short term
loan was taken to meet up the working capital requirmrnts. Once short term loan was paid then % of equity will be increase.
On the other hand, Aramit Cement takes 80% debts and 20% equity in 2012. It is most leavered firm. There is no change of
this structure untill 2016. There short term and long term debt increase very high to meet up both working capital and fixed
investment.
In this capital structure we can easily interpret that Aramit cement is more levered firm than M I Cement and use optimal
capital Structure.
Stock Concept:
70.00%
66.37%
63.68%
60.00%
53.77%
50.00%
47.29%
44.54%
40.83% 42.51%
40.00% 40.09% M I Cement
34.76% 35.14% Aramit Cement
30.00% 28.28% 26.53% 27.17% 26.50% Industry Debt Ratio
22.89%
20.00%
10.00%
0.00%
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Fig: Debt Ratio
Analysis:
The debt to asset ratio is a leverage ratio that measures the amount of total assets that are financed by creditors instead of
investors. In other words, it shows what percentage of assets is funded by borrowing compared with the percentage of resources
that are funded by the investors.
Basically it illustrates how a company has grown and acquired its assets over time. Companies can generate investor interest to
obtain capital, produce profits to acquire its own assets, or take on debt. Obviously, the first two are preferable in most cases.
This is an important measurement because it shows how leveraged the company by looking at how much of company’s
resources are owned by the shareholders in the form of equity and creditors in the form of debt. Both investors and creditors
use this figure to make decisions about the company.
Analysts, investors, and creditors use this measurement to evaluate the overall risk of a company. Companies with a higher
figure are considered more risky to invest in and loan to because they are more leveraged. This means that a company with a
higher measurement will have to pay out a greater percentage of its profits in principle and interest payments than a company of
the same size with a lower ratio. Thus, lower is always better.
Debt ratio of both M I Cement & Aramit Cement is higher than the industy ratio.
Annexure-3
02.00 Debt to Equity Ratio Total Debt/Total Equity
400.00%
350.00% 355.14%
300.00% 297.11%
273.16% 271.22%
250.00%
M I Cement
200.00% 191.55% Aramit Cement
150.00% Industry Debt Ratio
100.00%
81.64% 87.22% 84.42%
63.85%
53.04% 61.45%
50.00% 40.30% 48.45% 51.05% 50.57%
0.00%
1 2 3 4 5
Fig: Debt Equity Ratio
Analysis:
The debt to equity ratio shows the percentage of company financing that comes from creditors and investors. A higher debt to
equity ratio indicates that more creditor financing (bank loans) is used than investor financing (shareholders)
A lower debt to equity ratio usually implies a more financially stable business. Companies with a higher debt to equity ratio are
considered more risky to creditors and investors than companies with a lower ratio. Unlike equity financing, debt must be repaid
to the lender. Since debt financing also requires debt servicing or regular interest payments, debt can be a far more expensive
form of financing than equity financing. Companies leveraging large amounts of debt might not be able to make the payments.
Here, Aramit cement is more risky comparing with industry. Other other side M I Cement contain low risk because they have no
long term debt by paying frquently their loan. Their ratio increase because they use short term financing to meet up working
capital rewuirements.
Annexure-4
03.00 Financial Leverage Ratio (Net Financial Obligation/Total Equity)
0.5000
- 0.0110 0.0358
(0.0648) (0.0902) (0.1196)
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
(0.5000)
(1.0000)
Aramit Cement
(1.5000) (1.3531)
(1.7036) M I Cement
(2.0000) (1.9754)
(2.1029)
(2.5000)
(3.0000) (2.9787)
(3.5000)
Fig: Financial Leverage Ratio
Analysis:
Financial leverage ratios, sometimes called equity or debt ratios, measure the value of equity in a company by analyzing its
overall debt picture. These ratios either compare debt or equity to assets as well as shares outstanding to measure the true value
of the equity in a business.
In other words, the financial leverage ratios measure the overall debt load of a company and compare it with the assets or
equity. This shows how much of the company assets belong to the shareholders rather than creditors. When shareholders own a
majority of the assets, the company is said to be less leveraged. When creditors own a majority of the assets, the company is
considered highly leveraged. All of these measurements are important for investors to understand how risky the capital structure
of a company and if it is worth investing in.
Here, Aramit cement is in worse situation. There financial obligation is more than 2 times higher than it's equity. Aramit Cement
is more risky than the M I Cement. M I Cement have sufficient equity to repat it's debts. It seems good position for M I Cement.
Flow Concept:
Annexure-5
01.00 Interest Cover Ratio EBIT (Earning before Interest & Taxes)/Interest Expenses
5.0000
4.7009
4.5000
4.0000
3.5000 3.5136
3.2919
3.1445 3.0990
3.0000
2.5000 M I Cement
Interest Cover Ratio
2.0000
1.6896 1.5538
1.5000
1.1487 1.1465 1.1504
1.0000
0.5000
0.0000
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Fig: Interest Coverage Ratio
Analysis:
The interest coverage ratio is a financial ratio that measures a company’s ability to make interest payments on its debt in a timely
manner. Creditors and investors use this computation to understand the profitability and risk of a company. A creditor, on the
other hand, uses the interest coverage ratio to identify whether a company is able to support additional debt. If a company can’t
afford to pay the interest on its debt, it certainly won’t be able to afford to pay the principle payments. Thus, creditors use this
formula to calculate the risk involved in lending.
Analyzing a coverage ratio can be tricky because it depends largely on how much risky the creditor or investor is willing to take.
Depending on the desired risk limits, a bank might be more comfortable with a number than another. The basics of this
measurement don’t change, however.
If the computation is less than 1, it means the company isn’t making enough money to pay its interest payments. This type of
company is beyond risky and probably would never get bank financing.
If the coverage equation equals 1, it means the company makes just enough money to pay its interest. It can only cover the
interest on the current debt when it comes due.
If the coverage measurement is above 1, it means that the company is making more than enough money to pay its interest
obligations with some extra earnings left over to make the principle payments.
Here, M I Cement is in better sitution to cover it's debt than Aramit Cement. They have much more earnings to cover the
interest. On the other hand if Aramit Cement falls in danger or unavoidable cercumstances then company will fall in problem to
cover it's interest.
Annexure-6
02.00 Debt Service Ratio: EBIT/Interest + Principal
0.3500
0.3251
0.3000
0.2609 0.2543
0.2500
0.2272 0.2355
0.2185
0.2000
0.1789 M I Cement
0.1500 Aramit Cement
0.0500
-
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Analysis:
The debt service coverage ratio is a financial ratio that measures a company's ability to service its current debts by comparing its
net operating income with its total debt service obligations. In other words, this ratio compares a company's available cash with
its current interest, principle, and sinking fund obligations.
The debt service coverage ratio is important to both creditors and investors, but creditors most often analyze it. Since this ratio
measures a firm's ability to make its current debt obligations, current and future creditors are particularly interest in it.
The debt service coverage ratio measures a firm's ability to maintain its current debt levels. This is why a higher ratio is always
more favorable than a lower ratio. A higher ratio indicates that there is more income available to pay for debt servicing.
Here, Aramit Cement is in better situation than Aramit Cement. If this ratio more than 1 then it has less risk to cover it's financial
obligation.
Annexure-7
03.00 Cash Flow Coverage Ratio Operating Cash Flow/Interest + {Principal/(1-Tc)}
0.2500
0.2000 0.1933
0.1662 0.1724
0.1500
0.1346 0.1369
0.1000
(0.1500) (0.1504)
(0.2000)
Analysis:
The cash flow coverage ratio is an indicator of the ability of a company to pay interest and principal amounts when they become
due. This ratio tells the number of times the financial obligations of a company are covered by its earnings. A ratio equal to one
or more than one means that the company is in good financial health and it can meet its financial obligations through the cash
generated by operating activities. A ratio of less than one is an indicator of bankruptcy of the company within two years if it fails
to improve its financial position.
Here, Aramit cement is in bad situation, there cash flow coverage ratio is conjecutively negative for last three years. They are in
financial distress or bankruptcy threat. On the other hand, M I Cement is in good position and also need to improve their ratio to
avoid the financial ditress and smooth operation.
Cost of Capital
Annexure-1
Cost of Debt Cost of debt/Total debt
Cost of Capital
M I Cement 11.44%
Aramit Cement 11.44%
(Calculation Shown in Annexure 8 & 9)
WACC 9.97%
Aramit Cement
Weight
Debt 78.03%
quity 21.97%
WACC 10.19%
Annexure-10
01. Tangibility Ratio Tangible Asset (PPE)/Total Asset
A tangible asset is an asset that has a physical form. Tangible assets include both fixed assets, such as machinery, buildings
and land. This ratio represents the portion of tangible asset includes in total assets. How much tangible asset holds the
company to sustain.
Debt Ratio
M I Cement 34.76% 35.14% 40.83% 42.51% 40.09%
Aramit Cement 44.54% 47.29% 53.77% 63.68% 66.37%
45.00% 45.00%
M I Cement Aramit Cement
50.00% 70.00%
40.00% 40.00%
45.00%
35.00% 35.00% 60.00%
40.00%
30.00% 30.00% 35.00% 50.00%
The ratio of M I Cement is decreasing and also debt ratio is also decreasing. They paid their long term debt but taking short
term debt for covering net working capital and also this ratio decreasing for time ly repay the debt. They are not going in
major investment in PPE by using debt.
On the other hand ratio of both Aramit Cement is also decreasing. They also not going to invest in PPE but also increasing
debt because of covering networking capital due to shotage of internal fund.
Annexure-11
02. Company Growth ROE*(1-Dividend Payout Ratio)
A growth company is any company whose business generates significant positive cash flows or earnings, which increase at
significantly faster rates than the overall economy. A growth company tends to have very profitable reinvestment
opportunities for its own retained earnings. Thus, it typically pays little to no dividends to stockholders, opting instead to put
most or all of its profits back into its expanding business.
M I Cement 25.00%
Aramit Cement
70.00%
10.00% 45.00%
9.00% 60.00%
40.00% 20.00%
8.00% 35.00% 50.00%
7.00% 30.00% 15.00% 40.00%
6.00%
25.00%
5.00%
20.00% 10.00% 30.00%
4.00%
3.00% 15.00%
20.00%
2.00% 10.00% 5.00%
5.00% 10.00%
1.00%
0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Fig: Company Growth
Analysis: Growth of M I Cement has increasing but growth of Aramit cement in not stable due to not retaining dividend and
increasing operating profit.Debt is stable for M I Cement which contain short term debt, on the other hand debt of Aramit
Cement increasing.
Annexure-12
03. Profitability
03.01 ROOA Net Income/Operating Asset
Return on operating assets (ROOA) is an efficiency financial ratio that calculates the percentage return a company earns from
investing money in assets used in its operating activities. In other words, this is the percentage profit that a company can
expect from the purchase of a new piece of equipment.
Debt Ratio
M I Cement 34.76% 35.14% 40.83% 42.51% 40.09%
Aramit Cement 44.54% 47.29% 53.77% 63.68% 66.37%
Annexure-13
03.01 RNOA Net Income/ (Fixed Asset + Net Working Capital)
Return on Net Operating Assets (RNOA) can be used like Return on Assets. The difference is that Return on Net Operating
Assets captures the return on the company's Assets that are generating Revenue. It is a good indicator of how well a
company uses operating assets to create profit. Investors are generally more interested in companies with higher RNOA.
Debt Ratio
M I Cement 34.76% 35.14% 40.83% 42.51% 40.09%
Aramit Cement 44.54% 47.29% 53.77% 63.68% 66.37%
25.00% 70.00%
12.00% 45.00%
40.00% 60.00%
10.00% 20.00%
35.00% 50.00%
8.00% 30.00% 15.00% 40.00%
25.00%
6.00% 30.00%
20.00% 10.00%
4.00% 15.00% 20.00%
5.00%
10.00% 10.00%
2.00%
5.00%
0.00% 0.00%
0.00% 0.00% RNOA 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 RNOA
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Annexure-14
04. Free Cash Flow Per share Free Cash Flow/No of Share Outstanding
Free cash flow (FCF) is a measure of a company's financial performance, calculated as operating cash flow minus capital
expenditures. FCF represents the cash that a company is able to generate after spending the money required to maintain or
expand its asset base. FCF is important because it allows a company to pursue opportunities that enhance shareholder value.
Debt Ratio
M I Cement 34.76% 35.14% 40.83% 42.51% 40.09%
Aramit Cement 44.54% 47.29% 53.77% 63.68% 66.37%
8.00 45.00%
- 20.00% (5.00)
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 30.00%
15.00%
(2.00) (10.00)
20.00%
10.00%
(4.00) (15.00) 10.00%
FCF
5.00%
FCF
(6.00) 0.00% (20.00) 0.00%
Analysis:
FCF of M I cement is growing for last two years and also positive. On the other hand, FCF is going to negative and also going in
worse situation. For Aramit cement it can not add valut to the shareholder.
Annexure-15
05. Financial Slack Financial Asset/Total Asset
Extra money that a company has available in case of a downturn in sales, revenue, or profit. Financial slack may help a
company make it through a difficult period. It is the equivalent of a company's savings.
Debt Ratio
M I Cement 34.76% 35.14% 40.83% 42.51% 40.09%
Aramit Cement 44.54% 47.29% 53.77% 63.68% 66.37%
39.00% 45.00%
20.00% 70.00%
40.00% 18.00%
38.00%
60.00%
35.00% 16.00%
37.00%
30.00% 14.00% 50.00%
Analysis:
Finacial Slack of M I Cement is positive & almost same for last few years. It may help to company to meet up emergency
crisis. On the other hand Financial Slack of Aramit cement is increasing, that’s means they are capable to earn by using it's
financial assets. It may help in financial crisis but company should take care its operating assets and productivity to generate
operating profit.
07. Book Value of Equity Per Share (Total Shareholder' Equity/Total Outstanding Share)
The book value per share may be used by some investors to determine the equity in a company relative to the market value
of the company, which is the price of its stock. In which book value per share is used in the denominator. In contrast to book
value, the market price reflects the future growth potential of the company.
M I Cement
Total Shareholde's Equity 231,286,234 274,728,165 524,796,660 507,403,678 485,381,968
Total Outstanding Shares 16,940,000 16,940,000 33,880,000 33,880,000 33,880,000
50.00
45.00 45.29
40.00 40.01 39.59
37.67 38.22
35.00
30.00
25.00
20.00
15.00 16.22 15.49 14.98
13.65 14.33
10.00
5.00
-
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
08. Book Value of Firm Per Share (Total Shareholder' Equity+Debt)/Total Outstanding Share
90.00
83.51
80.00
74.12
70.00 69.42
65.55 65.21
60.00 60.82
60.52
54.22 55.60
50.00
45.16
40.00
30.00
20.00
10.00
-
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
09. Market Value Pershare (Total Out standing Share*Market Price per share)
M I Cement
Total Out standing Share 135,000,000 148,500,000 148,500,000 148,500,000 148,500,000
Market Price per share 98.73 90.5 86 76 74.9
(30 June 2012) (30 June 2013) (30 June 2014) (30 June 2015) (18 June 2016)
Aramit Cement
Total Out standing Share 16,940,000 16,940,000 33,880,000 33,880,000 33,880,000
Market Price per share 48.25 44.17 45 25.4 31.4
(30 June 2012) (30 June 2013) (30 June 2014) (30 June 2015) (18 June 2016)
120
100 98.73
90.5
86
80
76 74.9
60
48.25
44.17 45
40
31.4
25.4
20
0
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
06. Uncertainty of Operating Income (using 3 years Moving Average)
M I Cement
Moving Average 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
EBIT 517,105,297 684,277,135 952,363,513 1,231,617,783 1,277,004,930 1,255,514,648 1,446,900,259
Moving Average of EBIT 717,915,315 956,086,144 1,153,662,075 1,254,712,454 1,326,473,279
Mean of EBIT 230,732,415 250,942,491 265,294,656
SD of EBIT 218,188,310 236,850,313 246,548,130
CV of EBIT 0.95 0.94 0.93
Aramit Cement
Moving Average 74,586,768 169,436,047 172,434,036 151,730,281 121,372,189 171,101,836 195,083,324
Moving Average of EBIT 138,818,950 164,533,455 148,512,169 148,068,102 162,519,116
Mean of EBIT 29,702,434 29,613,620 32,503,823
SD of EBIT 12,986,376 10,679,918 10,815,520
CV of EBIT 0.44 0.36 0.33
Debt Ratio
M I Cement 34.76% 35.14% 40.83% 42.51% 40.09%
Aramit Cement 44.54% 47.29% 53.77% 63.68% 66.37%
Analysis:
CV of Aramit Cement is higher than the Aramit Cement. It means M I Cement is comparatively risky than the Aramit Cement.
TK IN '000
PADMA OIL 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
DPS 923175000992239000/
Divedend Payment Schedule
2019 2018 2017 2016 2015
Dividend Behavior:
Dividend relevance therory is followed by MJLBDL. That means that there is a direct relationship between a firm's
dividend policy and market value and Company follows stable dividend policy.
There also dividend relevance therory is followed by POCL. There have direct relationship between a firm's
dividend policy and market value and Company follows stable dividend policy.
EPS Schedule:
2019 2018 2017 2016 2015
MJLBDL (Target Co.) 5.87 7 6.91 7.72 3.48
PADMAOIL (Peer Co.) 29.07 34.18 20.68 19.07 19.63
Company Maintain Regular Dividend Policy. But they retain their earnings. Net profit & EPS also increases
year to year.
Company not provide stock dividend since 2013 but Provide cash dividend. They Provide signal in 2012 by
issuing both stock dividend (10%) and cash dividend (35 %).
In 2013 Company provide 40% cash dividednd and gradually decrease the dividend and retain dividend for
payment long term Loan which is taken in 2012 amounting BDT. 1,557,704,892.
Now (2016) this amount is BDT. 129,371,414, so it is assume that in near future company may provide
handsome dividend if all finasncial indicator remain growing.
Public
This indicate that company's most ownership were contained by sponsors/directors, so there may have
chance to influence on future dividends due to ownership.
Pecking Order Theory:
In corporate finance, pecking order theory (or pecking order model) postulates that the cost of financing increases with
asymmetric information.
Financing comes from three sources, internal funds, debt and new equity. Companies prioritize their sources of
financing, first preferring internal financing, and then debt, lastly raising equity as a "last resort". Hence: internal
financing is used first; when that is depleted, then debt is issued; and when it is no longer sensible to issue any more
debt, equity is issued. This theory maintains that businesses adhere to a hierarchy of financing sources and prefer
internal financing when available, and debt is preferred over equity if external financing is required (equity would mean
issuing shares which meant 'bringing external ownership' into the company). Thus, the form of debt a firm chooses can
act as a signal of its need for external finance.
Analysis:
In above analysis we can interprete that M I cement can manage fund internaly first for liquidity, then they have no
long term debt so company can manage easily. Finally they can go external finance (Issuing equity) for severe liquidity
crisis.
Analysis:
In above analysis we can interprete that M I cement can manage fund internaly first for liquidity, then they have no
long term debt so company can manage easily. Finally they can go external finance (Issuing equity) for severe liquidity
Annexure-1:
Capital Structure
M I Cement 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Total Debt 3,448,242,178 3,437,936,724 4,633,191,382 5,127,781,531 5,676,815,876
Long Term Debt 1,811,139,113 1,451,551,878 946,349,388 426,932,519 129,371,414
Short Term Debt 1,637,103,065 1,986,384,846 3,686,841,994 4,700,849,012 5,547,444,462
Short Term Loan 1,351,027,065 1,486,345,228 3,143,054,994 4,142,616,763 5,064,048,878
Current portion of long term
286,076,000 500,039,618 543,787,000 558,232,249 483,395,584
debt
Annexure-2
Debt Ratio: 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
M I Cement 34.76% 35.14% 40.83% 42.51% 40.09%
Total Debt 3,448,242,178 3,437,936,724 4,633,191,382 5,127,781,531 5,676,815,876
Total Asset 9,921,478,513 9,783,395,912 11,347,005,462 12,061,702,982 14,159,618,877
Annexure-4
Annexure-6
Debt Service Ratio: EBIT/Interest + Principal
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
M I Cement 0.2609 0.3251 0.2543 0.2272 0.2355
Debt Principal 3,448,242,178 3,437,936,724 4,633,191,382 5,127,781,531 5,676,815,876
Long Term Loan 1,811,139,113 1,451,551,878 946,349,388 426,932,519 129,371,414
Short Term Loan 1,637,103,065 1,986,384,846 3,686,841,994 4,700,849,012 5,547,444,462
Financial Expenses 202,592,548 350,531,177 387,929,150 399,279,044 466,891,015
EBIT 952,363,513 1,231,617,782 1,277,004,930 1,255,514,648 1,446,900,259
Annexure-7
Cash Flow Coverage Ratio Operating Cash Flow/Interest + {Principal/(1-Tc)}
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
M I Cement 0.0424 0.1662 0.0160 0.1369 0.1724
Annexure-11
Company Growth ROE*(1-Dividend Payout Ratio)
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Annexure-12
Profitability
01. ROOA Net Income/Operating Asset
M I Cement 8.82% 10.83% 9.52% 8.69% 8.01%
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Net Income 565,760,597 665,368,660 674,389,464 648,850,994 744,247,825
Operating Asset 6,413,807,122 6,144,936,393 7,081,504,630 7,464,307,708 9,286,969,794
Property Plant & Equipment 2,770,455,941 4,082,860,704 3,926,836,388 4,203,551,837 4,951,214,875
Capital Work in Progress 1,365,071,599 92,183,867 91,468,281 6,600,233 465,481,202
Inventories 442,126,977 432,775,981 626,525,720 722,240,942 797,868,489
Trade receivables 753,851,554 667,643,514 1,169,445,807 1,169,678,553 1,065,262,109
Other receivables 61,234,099 109,357,300 57,331,527 53,961,432 75,030,322
Advance, Seposits & Prepayments 275,326,903 231,078,396 345,964,790 367,850,046 730,491,856
Advance Income Tax 717,452,042 494,888,145 823,978,904 899,103,460 1,156,538,198
Operating Asset 28,288,007 34,148,486 39,953,213 41,321,205 45,082,743
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Aramit Cement 3.9045% 3.3306% 0.9673% 0.8903% 1.2222%
Annexure-13
02. RNOA Net Income/ (Fixed Asset + Net Working Capital)
M I Cement 7.70% 9.17% 9.78% 9.80% 10.19%
Annexure-14
Free Cash Flow Per share Free Cash Flow/No of Share Outstanding
Market
Year Month Index Data MI Cement Cash Dividend Bonus share Dividend Capital MI Cement Return
Ltd Info Adjustment Yield Gain Return
(RM)
January 4,136.31 81.8 0 0
February 3,973.28 83.7 0 0 0.00% 2.32% 2.32% -3.94%
March 3,590.05 71.3 0 0 0.00% -14.81% -14.81% -9.65%
April 3,438.90 63.4 0 0 0.00% -11.08% -11.08% -4.21%
May 3,878.07 77.5 0 0 0.00% 22.24% 22.24% 12.77%
June 4,104.65 90.5 0 0 0.00% 16.77% 16.77% 5.84%
2013
July 3,940.81 89 0 0 0.00% -1.66% -1.66% -3.99%
August 4,127.48 97.1 0 0 0.00% 9.10% 9.10% 4.74%
September 3,937.68 90.6 0 0 0.00% -6.69% -6.69% -4.60%
October 3,967.73 89.7 0 0 0.00% -0.99% -0.99% 0.76%
November 4,230.73 82.6 4 0 4.46% -7.92% -3.46% 6.63%
December 4,266.55 78.2 0 0 0.00% -5.33% -5.33% 0.85%
January 4,753.17 88 0 0 0.00% 12.53% 12.53% 11.41%
February 4,749.87 87.2 0 0 0.00% -0.91% -0.91% -0.07%
March 4,491.98 84.1 0 0 0.00% -3.56% -3.56% -5.43%
April 4,566.86 89.7 0 0 0.00% 6.66% 6.66% 1.67%
May 4,430.48 85.7 0 0 0.00% -4.46% -4.46% -2.99%
June 4,480.52 86 0 0 0.00% 0.35% 0.35% 1.13%
2014
July 4,427.16 83.3 0 0 0.00% -3.14% -3.14% -1.19%
August 4,549.52 83.9 0 0 0.00% 0.72% 0.72% 2.76%
September 5,074.31 84.3 0 0 0.00% 0.48% 0.48% 11.54%
October 5,173.23 84.9 0 0 0.00% 0.71% 0.71% 1.95%
November 4,769.43 75.6 3 0 3.53% -10.95% -7.42% -7.81%
December 4,864.96 72.2 0 0 0.00% -4.50% -4.50% 2.00%
January 4,724.05 68.6 0 0 0.00% -4.99% -4.99% -2.90%
February 4,624.95 66.7 0 0 0.00% -2.77% -2.77% -2.10%
March 4,530.48 66.3 0 0 0.00% -0.60% -0.60% -2.04%
April 4,047.29 68 0 0 0.00% 2.56% 2.56% -10.67%
May 4,586.95 78.3 0 0 0.00% 15.15% 15.15% 13.33%
June 4,583.11 76 0 0 0.00% -2.94% -2.94% -0.08%
2015
July 4,792.31 77.3 0 0 0.00% 1.71% 1.71% 4.56%
August 4,768.67 77.5 0 0 0.00% 0.26% 0.26% -0.49%
September 4,852.08 79.8 0 0 0.00% 2.97% 2.97% 1.75%
October 4,564.49 74.7 0 0 0.00% -6.39% -6.39% -5.93%
November 4,581.00 82.9 2.5 0 3.35% 10.98% 14.32% 0.36%
December 4,629.64 85.4 0 0 0.00% 3.02% 3.02% 1.06%
January 4,540.89 76.3 0 0 0.00% -10.66% -10.66% -1.92%
February 4,511.97 77.9 0 0 0.00% 2.10% 2.10% -0.64%
March 4,357.54 76.8 0 0 0.00% -1.41% -1.41% -3.42%
April 4,195.70 76.4 0 0 0.00% -0.52% -0.52% -3.71%
May 4,419.39 76.1 0 0 0.00% -0.39% -0.39% 5.33%
June 4,507.58 74.9 0 0 0.00% -1.58% -1.58% 2.00%
2016
July 4,525.35 75.8 0 0 0.00% 1.20% 1.20% 0.39%
August 4,526.58 76.7 0 0 0.00% 1.19% 1.19% 0.03%
September 4,695.19 76.2 0 0 0.00% -0.65% -0.65% 3.72%
October 4,592.18 78.9 0 0 0.00% 3.54% 3.54% -2.19%
November 4,801.24 75.2 2 0 2.53% -4.69% -2.15% 4.55%
December 5,036.05 82.5 0 0 0.00% 9.71% 9.71% 4.89%
January 5,468.34 83.9 0 0 0.00% 1.70% 1.70% 8.58%
February 5,612.70 84.3 0 0 0.00% 0.48% 0.48% 2.64%
March 5,719.61 102.3 0 0 0.00% 21.35% 21.35% 1.90%
2017
April 5,475.55 99.1 0 0 0.00% -3.13% -3.13% -4.27%
May 5,656.05 91.2 0 0 0.00% -7.97% -7.97% 3.30%
June 5,403.12 93.3 0 0 0.00% 2.30% 2.30% -4.47%
Cost of Capital calculation using market data:
This Cost of Capital is not acceptable because the rate is low than the market. The rwason is that any information is not adjusted in the
market, so its givel lower cost of capital.
Aramit Market
Year Month Aramit
Index Data Cement Cash Dividend Bonus share Dividend Capital Cement Return
Ltd Info Adjustment Yield Gain
Return (RM)
January 4,136.31 46.91 0 0
February 3,973.28 46.91 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% -3.94%
March 3,590.05 37.77 0 0 0.00% -19.48% -19.48% -9.65%
April 3,438.90 37.36 0 0 0.00% -1.09% -1.09% -4.21%
May 3,878.07 40.5 0 0 0.00% 8.40% 8.40% 12.77%
June 4,104.65 44.17 0 0 0.00% 9.06% 9.06% 5.84%
2013
July 3,940.81 38.82 0 0 0.00% -12.11% -12.11% -3.99%
August 4,127.48 47.43 0 0 0.00% 22.18% 22.18% 4.74%
September 3,937.68 44.4 0 0 0.00% -6.39% -6.39% -4.60%
October 3,967.73 38.58 0 0 0.00% -13.11% -13.11% 0.76%
November 4,230.73 40.62 4 0 10.37% 5.29% 15.66% 6.63%
December 4,266.55 49.06 0 0 0.00% 20.78% 20.78% 0.85%
January 4,753.17 63.2 0 0 0.00% 28.82% 28.82% 11.41%
February 4,749.87 66.3 0 0 0.00% 4.91% 4.91% -0.07%
March 4,491.98 54.5 0 0 0.00% -17.80% -17.80% -5.43%
April 4,566.86 46.6 0 0 0.00% -14.50% -14.50% 1.67%
May 4,430.48 43.4 0 0 0.00% -6.87% -6.87% -2.99%
June 4,480.52 45 0 0 0.00% 3.69% 3.69% 1.13%
2014
July 4,427.16 42.8 0 0 0.00% -4.89% -4.89% -1.19%
August 4,549.52 42.6 0 0 0.00% -0.47% -0.47% 2.76%
September 5,074.31 45.2 0 0 0.00% 6.10% 6.10% 11.54%
October 5,173.23 41.9 0 0 0.00% -7.30% -7.30% 1.95%
November 4,769.43 37.8 3 0 7.16% -9.79% -2.63% -7.81%
December 4,864.96 39 0 0 0.00% 3.17% 3.17% 2.00%
January 4,724.05 34.9 0 0 0.00% -10.51% -10.51% -2.90%
February 4,624.95 33.3 0 0 0.00% -4.58% -4.58% -2.10%
March 4,530.48 27.8 0 0 0.00% -16.52% -16.52% -2.04%
April 4,047.29 20.1 0 0 0.00% -27.70% -27.70% -10.67%
May 4,586.95 26.7 0 0 0.00% 32.84% 32.84% 13.33%
June 4,583.11 25.4 0 0 0.00% -4.87% -4.87% -0.08%
2015
July 4,792.31 36.6 0 0 0.00% 44.09% 44.09% 4.56%
August 4,768.67 35.8 0 0 0.00% -2.19% -2.19% -0.49%
September 4,852.08 43.3 0 0 0.00% 20.95% 20.95% 1.75%
October 4,564.49 37.2 0 0 0.00% -14.09% -14.09% -5.93%
November 4,581.00 36 2.5 0 6.72% -3.23% 3.49% 0.36%
December 4,629.64 41.1 0 0 0.00% 14.17% 14.17% 1.06%
January 4,540.89 37.9 0 0 0.00% -7.79% -7.79% -1.92%
February 4,511.97 35.8 0 0 0.00% -5.54% -5.54% -0.64%
March 4,357.54 32.2 0 0 0.00% -10.06% -10.06% -3.42%
April 4,195.70 27.2 0 0 0.00% -15.53% -15.53% -3.71%
May 4,419.39 33.1 0 0 0.00% 21.69% 21.69% 5.33%
June 4,507.58 31.4 0 0 0.00% -5.14% -5.14% 2.00%
2016
July 4,525.35 33 0 0 0.00% 5.10% 5.10% 0.39%
August 4,526.58 35.3 0 0 0.00% 6.97% 6.97% 0.03%
September 4,695.19 34.7 0 0 0.00% -1.70% -1.70% 3.72%
October 4,592.18 31.6 0 0 0.00% -8.93% -8.93% -2.19%
November 4,801.24 33.3 2 0 6.33% 5.38% 11.71% 4.55%
December 5,036.05 37.2 0 0 0.00% 11.71% 11.71% 4.89%
Cost of Capital calculation using market data:
This Cost of Capital is not acceptable because the rate is low than the market. The rwason is that any information is not adjusted in the
market, so its givel lower cost of capital.
So Cost of Capital (Ke) is calculated in alternative way:
Total Owners Equity & Liabilities 9,921,478,513 9,783,395,911 11,347,005,461 12,061,702,984 14,159,618,877
In above analysis we can interprete that M I Cement Ltd. In in good position comparing to Aramit
Cement Ltd. Aramit cement is overlevered firm. They may go equity financing if fund is required.
There operating income should be increased.
References:
19
01. Annual report of M I Cement Ltd.
02. Annual Report of Aramit Cement Ltd.
03. dsebd.org
04. stockbd.org
05. Internet
20
Capital Structure
M I Cement
70.00%
60.00%
50.00%
40.00%
Debt
30.00% Equity
20.00%
10.00%
0.00%
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Here, debt is increased year by year. Long Term debt was decresing and short term debt was increasing year to year to cover the
operating capital. It is almost 50% debt & Equity. If debt will increase near future the total cost of debt will increase and company
will face financial risk.
% of Long Term Debt to total asset 18.25% 14.84% 8.34% 3.54% 0.91%
% of Short Term Debt to total asset 16.50% 20.30% 32.49% 38.97% 39.18%
12.00%
10.20% 10.44%
10.00%
8.35% 8.37% 8.22%
8.00% 7.79%
7.45%
0.00%
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Here, Cost of Debt is higher than the cost of equity. If debt increase the cost of debt will higher & will be burden to company for
repayment.
The debt to equity ratio is a financial, liquidity ratio that compares a company's total debt to total equity. The debt to equity ratio
shows the percentage of company financing that comes from creditors and investors. A higher debt to equity ratio indicates that
more creditor financing (bank loans) is used than investor financing (shareholders)
Analysis
A debt to equity ratio of 1 would mean that investors and creditors have an equal stake in the business assets.
A lower debt to equity ratio usually implies a more financially stable business. Companies with a higher debt to equity ratio are
considered more risky to creditors and investors than companies with a lower ratio. Unlike equity financing, debt must be repaid to
the lender. Since debt financing also requires debt servicing or regular interest payments, debt can be a far more expensive form of
financing than equity financing. Companies leveraging large amounts of debt might not be able to make the payments.
Here,Total liabilities increases over equity in 2015 to 2016 and gradually increasing.
This is an important measurement because it shows how leveraged the company by looking at how much of company’s resources
are owned by the shareholders in the form of equity and creditors in the form of debt. Both investors and creditors use this figure
to make decisions about the company.
Investors want to make sure the company is solvent, has enough cash to meet its current obligations, and successful enough to pay
a return on their investment. Creditors, on the other hand, want to see how much debt the company already has because they are
concerned with collateral and the ability to be repaid. If the company has already leveraged all of its assets and can barely meet its
monthly payments as it is, the lender probably won’t extend any additional credit.
Analysis
Analysts, investors, and creditors use this measurement to evaluate the overall risk of a company. Companies with a higher figure
are considered more risky to invest in and loan to because they are more leveraged. This means that a company with a higher
measurement will have to pay out a greater percentage of its profits in principle and interest payments than a company of the same
size with a lower ratio. Thus, lower is always better.
If debt to assets equals 1, it means the company has the same amount of liabilities as it has assets. This company is highly
leveraged. A company with a DTA of greater than 1 means the company has more liabilities than assets. This company is extremely
leveraged and highly risky to invest in or lend to. A company with a DTA of less than 1 shows that it has more assets than liabilities
and could pay off its obligations by selling its assets if it needed to. This is the least risky of the three companies.
Financial leverage ratios, sometimes called equity or debt ratios, measure the value of equity in a company by analyzing its overall
debt picture. These ratios either compare debt or equity to assets as well as shares outstanding to measure the true value of the
equity in a business.
In other words, the financial leverage ratios measure the overall debt load of a company and compare it with the assets or equity.
This shows how much of the company assets belong to the shareholders rather than creditors. When shareholders own a majority
of the assets, the company is said to be less leveraged. When creditors own a majority of the assets, the company is considered
highly leveraged. All of these measurements are important for investors to understand how risky the capital structure of a company
and if it is worth investing in.
The interest coverage ratio is a financial ratio that measures a company’s ability to make interest payments on its debt in a timely
manner. Unlike the debt service coverage ratio, this liquidity ratio really has nothing to do with being able to make principle
payments on the debt itself. Instead, it calculates the firm’s ability to afford the interest on the debt.
Creditors and investors use this computation to understand the profitability and risk of a company. For instance, an investor is
mainly concerned about seeing his investment in the company increase in value. A large part of this appreciation is based on profits
and operational efficiencies. Thus, investors want to see that their company can pay its bills on time without having to sacrifice its
operations and profits.
A creditor, on the other hand, uses the interest coverage ratio to identify whether a company is able to support additional debt. If a
company can’t afford to pay the interest on its debt, it certainly won’t be able to afford to pay the principle payments. Thus,
creditors use this formula to calculate the risk involved in lending.
Analysis
Analyzing a coverage ratio can be tricky because it depends largely on how much risky the creditor or investor is willing to take.
Depending on the desired risk limits, a bank might be more comfortable with a number than another. The basics of this
measurement don’t change, however.
If the computation is less than 1, it means the company isn’t making enough money to pay its interest payments. Forget paying back
the principle payments on the debt. A company with a calculation less than 1 can’t even pay the interest on its debt. This type of
company is beyond risky and probably would never get bank financing.
If the coverage equation equals 1, it means the company makes just enough money to pay its interest. This situation isn’t much
better than the last one because the company still can’t afford to make the principle payments. It can only cover the interest on the
current debt when it comes due.
If the coverage measurement is above 1, it means that the company is making more than enough money to pay its interest
obligations with some extra earnings left over to make the principle payments. Most creditors look for coverage to be at least 1.5
before they will make any loans. In other words, banks want to be sure a company make at least 1.5 times the amount of their
current interest payments.
Here, Company may provide its interest frequently because operating income is in more than 1 but operating income decreasing.
The debt service coverage ratio is a financial ratio that measures a company's ability to service its current debts by comparing its net
operating income with its total debt service obligations. In other words, this ratio compares a company's available cash with its
current interest, principle, and sinking fund obligations.
The debt service coverage ratio is important to both creditors and investors, but creditors most often analyze it. Since this ratio
measures a firm's ability to make its current debt obligations, current and future creditors are particularly interest in it.
Analysis
The debt service coverage ratio measures a firm's ability to maintain its current debt levels. This is why a higher ratio is always more
favorable than a lower ratio. A higher ratio indicates that there is more income available to pay for debt servicing.
For example, if a company had a ratio of 1, that would mean that the company's net operating profits equals its debt service
obligations. In other words, the company generates just enough revenues to pay for its debt servicing. A ratio of less than one
means that the company doesn't generate enough operating profits to pay its debt service and must use some of its savings.
Generally, companies with higher service ratios tend to have more cash and are better able to pay their debt obligations on time.
Company is in better position to recover the debt.
9.0 Cash Flow Coverage Ratio 0.07 0.27 0.03 0.22 0.28
(Total Operating Cash flow/Total Debts
Here,
Total Operating Cash flows 233,558,290 937,062,975 119,987,162 1,134,272,933 1,586,197,717
Total Debt 3,448,242,178 3,437,936,724 4,633,191,382 5,127,781,531 5,676,815,876
The cash flow coverage ratio is an indicator of the ability of a company to pay interest and principal amounts when they become
due. This ratio tells the number of times the financial obligations of a company are covered by its earnings. A ratio equal to one or
more than one means that the company is in good financial health and it can meet its financial obligations through the cash
generated by operating activities. A ratio of less than one is an indicator of bankruptcy of the company within two years if it fails to
improve its financial position.
It is les than 1, but company repay its long term debt frequently. Company reduces their dividend year by year for covering the debt.
10.0 Net Tangible Asset Ratio 0.54 0.57 0.50 0.49 0.47
Tangible Common Equity Ratio = (Total Shareholder's Equity - Total Intangible Assets - Preferred Stock) / (Total Assets - Total
Intangible Assets)
Here,
Total Shareholder's Equity 5,400,876,238 5,594,400,354 5,675,411,006 5,879,329,648 6,724,823,855
Total Intangible Assets - - - - -
Preferred Stock - - - - -
Total Assets 9,921,478,513 9,783,395,911 11,347,005,461 12,061,702,984 14,159,618,877
Total Intangible Assets - - - - -
The net tangible assets ratio shows the actual amount of tangible assets for each ordinary share of the company, and indicates the
worth of each share in a company in the eventuality of liquidating all assets, and paying off all debts.
11.0 Book Value Per Share 40.01 37.67 38.22 39.59 45.29
(Total Shareholder' Equity/Total Outstanding Share)
The book value per share may be used by some investors to determine the equity in a company relative to the market value of the
company, which is the price of its stock. For example, a company that is currently trading for $20 but has a book value of $10 is
selling at twice its equity. This example is referred to as price to book value (P/B), in which book value per share is used in the
denominator. In contrast to book value, the market price reflects the future growth potential of the company.
Book value per share is also used in the return on equity formula, or ROE formula, when calculating on a per share basis. ROE is net
income divided by stockholder's equity. Net income on a per share basis is referred to as EPS, or earnings per share. As shown at the
top of this page, book value per share is expressing stockholder's equity on a per share basis.
Tangibility Ratio
45.00%
40.00%
35.00%
30.00%
25.00%
20.00%
15.00%
10.00%
5.00%
0.00%
2012 2013 2014 2015 20
Asset Growth 7% 7% 8%
Asset Growth
10%
9%
8%
7%
6%
5%
4%
3%
2%
1%
0%
2012 2013 2014 2015 201
5%
4%
3%
2%
1%
0%
2012 2013 2014 2015 201
03. Profitability
Operating return/Total Asset
2012 2013 2014
Operating return 574,892,238 822,467,018 937,104,713
Total Asset 9,921,478,513 9,783,395,911 11,347,005,461
Profitability 6% 8% 8%
Profitability
9%
8%
7%
6%
5%
4%
3%
2%
1%
0%
2012 2013 2014 2015 20
Profitability
31%
30%
29%
28%
27%
26%
2012 2013 2014 2015 20
05. Ownership of Company
Sponsor/Director 67.08%
Govt. 0.00% Sponsor/
0.67% 17.62% Director
Institution 14.63%
Foreign 0.67% Govt.
Public 17.62% 14.63% Institution
100% 67.08% Foreign
Public
This indicate that company's most ownership were contained by sponsors/directors, so there may have chance to
influence on future dividends due to ownership.
34.91% 38.25%
2015 2016
2015 2016
648,850,994 744,247,825
5,879,329,648 6,724,823,855
25% 20%
11% 11%
75% 80%
8% 9%
wth
2015 2016
2015 2016
2015 2016
984,673,291 1,196,135,443
12,061,702,984 14,159,618,877
8% 8%
ity
2015 2016
2015 2016
3,684,277,882 3,903,092,587
223,182,815 264,839,216
3,502,416,272 3,683,336,114
41,321,205 45,082,743
3,461,095,067 3,638,253,371
12,061,702,984 14,159,618,877
31% 28%
ity
2015 2016
Sponsor/
Director
Govt.
Institution
67.08% Foreign
Public
Total Owners Equity & Liabilities 9,921 9,783 11,347 12,062 14,160
In Million
RE 5.688383
1. Beta Adjust???
2. Mkt Return AM or GM ????
Bonus
Index MI Cash share Dividend Capital
Year Month Data Cement Dividend Adjustme Yield Gain
Ltd Info
nt
January 4,136.31 81.8 0
February 3,973.28 83.7 0 0.00% 2.32%
March 3,590.05 71.3 0 0.00% -14.81%
April 3,438.90 63.4 0 0.00% -11.08%
May 3,878.07 77.5 0 0.00% 22.24%
June 4,104.65 90.5 0 0.00% 16.77%
2013
July 3,940.81 89 0 0.00% -1.66%
August 4,127.48 97.1 0 0.00% 9.10%
September 3,937.68 90.6 0 0.00% -6.69%
October 3,967.73 89.7 0 0.00% -0.99%
November 4,230.73 82.6 4 0 4.46% -7.92%
December 4,266.55 78.2 0 0.00% -5.33%
January 4,753.17 88 0 0.00% 12.53%
February 4,749.87 87.2 0 0.00% -0.91%
March 4,491.98 84.1 0 0.00% -3.56%
April 4,566.86 89.7 0 0.00% 6.66%
May 4,430.48 85.7 0 0.00% -4.46%
June 4,480.52 86 0 0.00% 0.35%
2014
July 4,427.16 83.3 0 0.00% -3.14%
August 4,549.52 83.9 0 0.00% 0.72%
September 5,074.31 84.3 0 0.00% 0.48%
October 5,173.23 84.9 0 0.00% 0.71%
November 4,769.43 75.6 3 0 3.53% -10.95%
December 4,864.96 72.2 0 0.00% -4.50%
January 4,724.05 68.6 0 0.00% -4.99%
February 4,624.95 66.7 0 0.00% -2.77%
March 4,530.48 66.3 0 0.00% -0.60%
April 4,047.29 68 0 0.00% 2.56%
May 4,586.95 78.3 0 0.00% 15.15%
June 4,583.11 76 0 0.00% -2.94%
2015
July 4,792.31 77.3 0 0.00% 1.71%
August 4,768.67 77.5 0 0.00% 0.26%
September 4,852.08 79.8 0 0.00% 2.97%
October 4,564.49 74.7 0 0.00% -6.39%
November 4,581.00 82.9 2.5 0 3.35% 10.98%
December 4,629.64 85.4 0 0.00% 3.02%
January 4,540.89 76.3 0 0.00% -10.66%
February 4,511.97 77.9 0 0.00% 2.10%
March 4,357.54 76.8 0 0.00% -1.41%
April 4,195.70 76.4 0 0.00% -0.52%
May 4,419.39 76.1 0 0.00% -0.39%
June 4,507.58 74.9 0 0.00% -1.58%
2016
July 4,525.35 75.8 0 0.00% 1.20%
August 4,526.58 76.7 0 0.00% 1.19%
September 4,695.19 76.2 0 0.00% -0.65%
October 4,592.18 78.9 0 0.00% 3.54%
November 4,801.24 75.2 2 0 2.53% -4.69%
December 5,036.05 82.5 0 0.00% 9.71%
January 5,468.34 83.9 0 0.00% 1.70%
February 5,612.70 84.3 0 0.00% 0.48%
March 5,719.61 102.3 0 0.00% 21.35%
April 5,475.55 99.1 0 0.00% -3.13%
May 5,656.05 91.2 0 0.00% -7.97%
2017 June 5,403.12 93.3 0 0.00% 2.30%
B 0.82819905
MI Market
Cement Return
Return (RM)
2.32% -3.94%
-14.81% -9.65%
-11.08% -4.21%
22.24% 12.77%
16.77% 5.84%
-1.66% -3.99%
9.10% 4.74%
-6.69% -4.60%
-0.99% 0.76%
-3.46% 6.63%
-5.33% 0.85%
12.53% 11.41%
-0.91% -0.07%
-3.56% -5.43%
6.66% 1.67%
-4.46% -2.99%
0.35% 1.13%
-3.14% -1.19%
0.72% 2.76%
0.48% 11.54%
0.71% 1.95%
-7.42% -7.81%
-4.50% 2.00%
-4.99% -2.90%
-2.77% -2.10%
-0.60% -2.04%
2.56% -10.67%
15.15% 13.33%
-2.94% -0.08%
1.71% 4.56%
0.26% -0.49%
2.97% 1.75%
-6.39% -5.93%
14.32% 0.36%
3.02% 1.06%
-10.66% -1.92%
2.10% -0.64%
-1.41% -3.42%
-0.52% -3.71%
-0.39% 5.33%
-1.58% 2.00%
1.20% 0.39%
1.19% 0.03%
-0.65% 3.72%
3.54% -2.19%
-2.15% 4.55%
9.71% 4.89%
1.70% 8.58%
0.48% 2.64%
21.35% 1.90%
-3.13% -4.27%
-7.97% 3.30%
2.30% -4.47% 0.505%
MI
Required Return =
0.00807996934351
Market
Return =
Risk Free Rate = .05
Individual Beta =
0.83840061313
0.0419205
Re = Rf+(Rm-Rf)*B
0.00808 = .05+(RM-.05)*.8384
Aramit
Required
Return =
0.015389
2741026
Market
Return =
Risk Free
Rate
= .05
Individual
Beta =
0.692214
517947
uired Return =
807996934351