You are on page 1of 11

ORIGINAL

ARTICLES

Retention of permanent
incisors by mesiodens
A Case Report
AUTHORS:

ORA. TERE SA M. r l N I IO

DR.. lostr M. USTRELL T O RREN T

DR. JOAO G. R CORllElRA PlNTO

Ar;STRiKT

T he term mesiodens refers to a supernumerary tooth that is present in the


median area of the maxilla between the two central incisors. Its presence
can lead to localized disturbances near the medial maxillary line, as well
as to a displacement of central incisors with diastema or rotations or even to its
impaction, to the development of dentigerous cysts and adjacent root
resorption
This is the clinical case of a lO-year-old male patient who, at the beginning of
treatment presented retention of a permanent central maxillary incisor on the
buccal side, without enough space between the adjacent tooth roots due the
presence of mesiodens on the palatine side.
In order to resolve this dental problem , procedures , such as an orthodontic
treatment with the traction of the central incisors after the extraction of the
mesiodens were adopted. This procedure made possible the termination of
the case with improved dental and facial aesthetics.

I N T RO DUCT IO N

Th e term su pe rn u me rary refers to the presen ce of Although the ae tiology of hyperdo ntia rem ains
an access ory tooth o r toothbud on the midline of un clear, several pot entiall y causative mechanism s
the maxilla betw een the two ce ntral incisor s with a have been sugges ted , nam ely tissue h yperactivity
co nical sha pe, or a tuber cular shape (rud ime ntary located on th e epithelial dental lamina \ 6.7. For so me
tooth) 1.2J authors, the explanatio n is based on gene tic and
Most research ers are agreed on supe r nume rary as a enviro nme ntal factors but for others it is entire ly th e

co nge nital ph en om en on , but there is no clear-cut result of a development abno rmality \ .6.7.

answe r to its hereditar y natu re ,j .

WWW GNA THO S NET / PAGE 22


The reported freq uen cy of supe rnumerary teeth There are several clinical co mp lications and dental
varies amo ng d iffere nt studies and dep ending on the cha nges ass ociated with th e presen ce of
populatio n stud ie d U .H.Y lO.11 Percentage s var y su pern umera ry teeth . Co nce rn ing th e most
betwee n 0.1 and 3.5% for the pe rmanen t dentition frequent, th e mesiod en s, its presen ce can lead to
and bet ween 0.05% and 1.9 % for the tempo rar y localized disturbances near the maxillary midline , as
dentition 1.3.12 .1 ". In general, su pe rn umerary teeth are well as the disp laceme nt of cent ral incisor s with
report ed mor e freq uently in males than in femal es, diastem a o r rotation s o r even to its im pac tion, to the
in a 2:1 ratio, although significant differen ces can be developm ent of dentige rous cysts and ad jacent root
observed acco rd ing to th e pop ulation studied i.s io u resorption ' '<. 9 10.
Asupe rnu merary tooth in the median line is called
mesiod en s. Supern umerary teeth may have vertical,
transverse o r inverted position s (2 "1)

rrc . 1: I' H O T O G IZ A PH S RFFORF TREATMf:NT ( 10 YEARS OLD ).


W VI W G N A T H 0) ~'E T I I' A G f 23
T H E CLI N ICAl CASE

A.F.S , a lO-year-old male, sought consultation for the


absen ce of permanent upper cent ral incisors du e to
the presen ce of a mesioden s (Fig . 1, 2 and 3). The
so ma tic and dental development was normal for his
age , and his medical history revealed no relevant
data.

F1Ci.2: PA N O RA MI C X-RAY AN D H EA D FI LM IN Ll\ rER AI. I N C I D EN CE !)F f O RE TREAHvlEN I""

FIG . 3: CAST HEFOR[ TIUATM E.NT.


WW W G NAT J-I O , N CT I P AGE 2~
FIG. 4: D ETA IL O F T HF H EA D FI LM IN LATE RA L I N C I D EN C E
5EFOR I TREATI\HN T A D V ISUA LI ZAT ION O F TH F TH FRA PEU T I C
O LI! ECT I \IF.S (\ITO) .

Skeleton Class
convexity of point A 6.0
distance A-B 8.7
Inferior maxillar
facial axis 84.4"
facial depth 86.0"
mandibular plane angle 30 .~
inferior facial height 48.1 c
mandibular arch 28.4"
Superior maxillar
maxillar depth 91.9'"
Teeth
distance inferior incisor /A­ 1.8
Po
distance inferior incisor
/occ1usal plane
inferior incisor
angle/mandibularplane
overjet 3.4
overbite 5.6
Esthetic
exposition of superior incisor 8.3
inferior lip/plane E .3.1
nasolabial angle 109.4°

ric; 5: I N I r i A L ANA LYS1S AND Cf I' H A LO M ETR IC I\\EAS U I~F.MEN TS flY fU C K ETT S.

FIC;. 6 : SURG IC/\ L I' H A SF Of- T H l' M ESJ U DENS EXT RACT ION FOR I'A LAT I N F SI D E AND C O LLAG E OF

T i l E [\ U TT O N I'OR BU CC A L A SPECT.

WWW .G NATHOS NeT I PA G l 25


D IAGNOSIS Th e hygiene was fault y with so me ves tiges of
bacte rial plate , but with good periodontal co nd itio n.
From th e aes the tic po int o f view , th e pati ent Th e telerradiograph shows the ce n tral incisor
pr esented a st raight facial p rofile (Fig .I) with meetin g in a highl y buccalized positio n and the
sym me trical and proportional facial thi rd s, lip mesiodens in a palatin e position (Fig.2 and 4).
regularity and a normal smile line . In relation to th e The ce phalome tric analysis (Fig. 4) re vealed a mild
mid -line of the face , the mid-line of th e dental class II skele tal (co nvexity of po int A = 6 mm ) with
maxilla was shown to have deviated to the right Class IT alveolar (distance A-B = 8 .7 mm ) , smoo th
about 2mm du e to the abse nce in the arcad e o f the doli cofacial pattern with - 0.8 grade of severity, light
right upper ce ntral incisor (Fig.1). No apparent prom a:.xillia (91.9°) and orthornandibulia (86°). The
skeletal asym me try was detected. u ppe r and lower incisors showed normal inclination
From the dental point of view, th e pati ent presented and position relative to A-Po line (Fig. 5) .
impacted upper right ce ntral maxillary incisor due
the impaction of mesiod ens without enoug h bon y Th e obj ectives of treatment co nsisted of rne siod en s
space and in the arcade for its erup tion (Fig.2) . extrac tion to crea te space betw een the root s and the
From the dental point of view, the pati ent pre sented: crow ns of the right u pp er lateral incisor (too th 12)
right ce nt ral upp er inciso r includ ed in a high an d left upper ce n tral incisor (too th 21) for
b uccalize d po siti on du e to th e presence of a po sterior traction right upper cent ral incisor (too th
me siodens in the palatin e po sition : d ecreased inter­ 11) that met in a very high bu ccalizcd position to
radi cu lar and inter-coronal space am ong th e maint ain the relation ship o f molar and ca nine Class
adj acent te eth; th e Class T mol ar a nd ca nine 1. The co rrec tion of th e ove rbite was done and was
relation ship o f right and left side with a slight vertical also part o f the objectives (Fig. 4) .
ove rbite of 5.6 mm (Fig.l and 3) .

FIG . 7: P H AS eS OF O RT HODON llC CO rUUCT ION .


WWW GN i\T l-lOS NeT / PA GE 2 6
j [G8 . r ,\ Nl 1t 1\ ,M l l_ A j-tA'c ' l 1l I Il.I N t::i f RE A I .... l t.f'.J I \0\1 1111 fI r I c nH. ~ l l ' 1 1 1~ l r l >N Cr> I N T i l E
II C/\D E

11<; " ru. TO Cd ,,.,, 1' Sl 'l) \ 1HR TI l EJ\.',[1 '/\ L (H I H L r rx D A I 1' ll AN e l l lJ .\ { ~ I

WWW GNAI H O S NET I PAGC 27

TREATME NT Afte r the eru ption of the su ppo rt zone per manent
teeth the bands of the first maxillary molars were
Trea tment began by cementing the band s of the first ceme nted and were glued on the brackets of the
maxillary molar s and straigh t wire bracket s, Roth rem aining teeth. The alignme nt and the coronary
versio n with a slot of 0.018 x 0.022" were glued on levelling of the maxillary was achieved with 0.014"
maxillary incisor s. Placem ent of a ut ility arch 0.016 x arches and po ste riorly by 0.016" o ne s o f nickel­
0.022" of steel with a spring in T for alignme nt titanium , later substituted by arc he s in 0.016" steel.
between 21 and 22, and a spring in nickel titanium After exfoliation of the lower sup po rt zo ne , the
between 12 and 21, for th e opening space . It was band s of the first mandibular molars were cemente d
allowed to rem ain this way for th ree mor e months and were glue d o n th e brackets of the rem ainin g
be fore th e surgical access for th e extract ion of th e teeth.
mesioden s and collage of the butto n with a th read of
0.0 10" stee l, in the bu ccal asp ect of th e 11 for
pos te rior traction (Fig 6) .
Before beginning 11 traction , it was necessary to
achieve th e righ t posi tion of the bracke t of th e 12
and th e su bstitution of th e utilitarian arch for o ne
with a spring in T near the 12 mesial as pec t (Fig. 7) .
It was in th is way that the possible d istalization of 12
root was clone to recove r th e bony space between
the adjacent tooth roo ts, facilitating the 11 trac tion
inside th e alveolar bon e . This traction was applied
with elastics tha t we re change d eve ry thr ee wee ks.
Thirteen mon ths after th e treatment began , whe n
the right ce ntral upp er incisor appeared in the
arcade , th e button was replaced by a bracke t.
Super position of an arch of 0.014 nickel-titanium
indi re ctly link ecl to the brac ke t was lat er o n
s ubs titu ted fo r a 0.016 arch." The connectio n of th e
11 to th e arch was macl e in a progressively way to a
utilit y'0.016'· x 0.022" arc h (Fig. 7) .

FIG . 10: !'ANORAM IC X- RAY AN D TE l EX N RAY. LATER A L VI EW. AFTER T HE T IU J\T MF N T.


WW W .G N AT HO~. NE T / PA G E 28
fi G . II : (''\5T AFTE R T H E T R EAT M EN T.

Skeleton Class
convexity of point A 3.3
distance A-B 6.6
Inferior maxillar
facial axis 83 .80
facial depth 86.6°
mandibular plane angle 30.0°
inferior facialheight 49.4°
mandibular arch 28.8°
Supeliot' maxillar
maxillar depth 89.4°
Teeth
distance inferiorincisor 3.6
lA-Po
distance inferiorincisor 2.3
locclusal plane
inferior incisor 88.3°
angle/mandibular plane
overjet 4.1
ove~~e 3.4

FI G . 12: ANMYS IS AND ( [\l H A LO M ET RI C M EASUIU M EN TS. ACCO I~ I) ING T O R. ICKErT:' , I N T Il [


fI N A L T RI:AT J'v\ EN T.

Taki ng int o acco unt that the Bolton analysis showed ma nd ibular teeth were achieve d with 0.014" arches
a seco nd lower pre m olar disc repancy, th e and pos terio rly by means o f 0.016" nickel-titaniu m
inte rp roximal surfaces in thei r mesial and distal arches, late r subs titu ted fo r 0.016" steel arches .
aspec ts were filed after using a rubber se pa rato r fo r The alignment an d levelling ph ase of th e ro ots o f
two d ays. both arcades was achieved with a braided 0.016" X
The align ment and the coro nary levelling of the 0.022·'a rch, s ubs titu ted pos te rio rly for nickel-

wWW G N ,\ T 1-] 0 S . NIl / I' A G [ 2 »


FIG . 13: CE PH ALOME TR IC SU PErUOS lT lON (RI C K H T S M ET H O D ).

titanium and later for s tee l of the sa me calipe r DiSCUSSION


(Fig.7) . Panoramic radi ographs we re take n to
co nfi rm the position of the roots (Fig.S) Supe rnume rary teeth are co nside red to be o ne of
Two months before the end of treatment, the upp er the mo st significan t dental an omalies affe ct ing
arch was changed for 0,015" coax ial and mixed dentition J,
<f Anterior maxillar y
int ermaxillary e lastics of Class I of 4.8mm diamet er supe rn umeraries in young patients are of great
to imp rove the interarcad e intercuspidation (Fig. 7) . co nce rn to both den tist and parents because of the
del ayed eruption, occlusal and aestheti c probl ems
CONTENT ION they can create.
Since mo st supe rn ume rary teeth are impacted . the
Thirty-seven months afte r the beginning of the radiograph s are an esse ntial diagn ostic tool, no t only
trea tment, the bands and bracket s we re rem oved to identify and characte rize these teeth , but also to
and th e es tablish me nt of the oc clusion was det ect the rep ercussion s o n ad jacent teeth and
acco m plished . nearby tissues, and the distan ce of the unerupted
Impressions for th e retainer were taken. Th e permanent tee th from the occlusal plane. Early
maxillary ret ainer was preformed in a vacuum . On diagnosis of supe rn ume raries is crucial, if these
the mandibl e. a lingual arch was attache d by gluing co m plications are to be avoid ed or minimized .
it to incisors and canines on their lingu al asp ects. Clinically, th e presen ce of supe rn ume raries sho uld
The stabilization of the occlusio n was in this way be suspe cted , if ther e is a sign ifican t delay in the
achi eved . Phot o graphs, pan oramic radiographs, er up tion of the permanent maxillary ce n tral incisors.
telerradiographs and dental casts we re taken (Fig. 9, as in this case 4.
10 and 11). A cephalome tric evaluation was mad e A supe rn ume ra ry tooth is ind icated for rem oval if
(Fig. 12 and 13) any co m plications are identified . The timing of the
Two yea rs afte r th e beginning of treatm ent, surgical rem oval of supe rn ume rary teeth has two
photographs were taken to evaluate the stability of schoo ls of thou ght, immediate vs. delayed . The
th e results (Fig. 14) . imm ediate ap p roac h calls for rem oval of th e
supe rn ume rary tooth or tee th soon after the initial
diagnosis o f the co nd itio n. The delayed approach
recommends rem oval at the time adjacent root
WV-1W G N A T J-lO S N ET / PA G E 3 0
FI G . 14 : PHO TOGRAP HS T W O YEARS AFTER THE ORT HO DON T IC T REAT M EN T.

form ation is co mplete, usu ally at ages eigh t to te n In this case , taking int o acco u nt that the un erupted
years 6. tooth is located too high and the ne ighbo uring teeth
Perma nent incisor re tentio n is an anoma ly that is close the space by bodily movem ent; it is impo rtan t
infreq uent in the po p ulation 2. Curre nt ly, however, to e nsure sufficient space to accommoda te the
increasing d e mands o f o ur patie nts rega rding the e rupting pe rma ne nt tooth bu t, in this case, using
aes thet ics o f the front sector have led clinicians to o rt hodontic forces . The opening of th e s pace
focus o n the probl em . As shown in this case , be twe e n the adjacent tee th, no t o nly intercoronal
treatme nt of impac ted teeth is the typical example of but inter rad ic ula r as we ll, sho uld p recede the
interd isciplina ry cooperatio n and the solution is surgical ph ase . This is followed by traction of the
usually th e shared aim of odon thoped iatrician , included eleme nt accordi ng to the right axis. In this
orthodontist and d ental surgeo n . case the distalization o f root of the too th 12 was
Generally, ea rly surgical int e rve ntion is pre ferre d . requi red. In this W<Jy the space is recove red for the
This app roac h takes advantage of the spontaneo us correct traction positioning of 11, to allow the
erup tive pot enti al of the per man ent incisors and alignmen t of the upper medi al line and to res tore
may pre vent d iastema for matio n a nd exte nsive the sym me try of the upper arcade .
surgical/o rtho don tic treatment 4,6. The cep halo me tric analysis at the en d of treatm ent
WWW G N AT H O S N ET I P AG E 31
(Fig. 12) cle arl y shows th e form su pe rim pose d o n th e facial axis was found.
th e alt erati ons ob tained with trea tm ent an d th ose Th e co rrec tion of th e overb ite was due to th e
a ttrib u te d to growth . The ini tial aug me n ted bony intrusive movement of th e upper incisors.
co nvexity must be to th e prornaxilia, probabl y owi ng Th e prognosis is q uite good as there is no ind icati on
to th e high buccalization of th e cen tra l right upper of radi cul ar re ab sorption a t the 11 and 12 levels .
in cisor justi fying in thi s way th e re duced co nvex ity In co nc lus io n, it is evident that th e propo sed
verified in th e final treatment afte r trac tio n (Fig 4 tre a tm ent o bjec tives were ac hieved : a s table dental
and 11) . a rtic ula tio n, a goo d aes thetic an d fu nc tio na l result.
Th e bone altera tio ns also have an impact a t th e Th e evalua tio n in th e post-retainer p erio d , two yea rs
alve ol ar tooth level by redu cin g Class II at th is level afte r th e e nd of th e o rt ho do ntic treatrnen t, co nfir ms
fro m 8 .7 mm to 6 .6 mm ; in turn , a sm all o pe n ing o f th e stability o f th e results.

BIBLIOGRAPHY:

1. Laskaris G. Color Atla s of Oral Diseases in 9. j o h a n n sd o ttlr B, Wis th PJ, Magnus son TE .
Ch ildren a nd Ad olescents. Ed Thieme Stuttgart, Prevalence of ma locclusion in 6-year-o ld Icelandic
New' York; 2000. ch ild re n. Acta Odonto l Scand 1997; 55:398-402.
2 . Koprivova J. Etiology a n d treatment of 10 . Pr imo LG , \X1i1h el m RS, Bastes EPS. Frequ ency
un eru pted u p p e r central permanent in cisors. and c h a rac te r is tics of supernu merary teeth in
Ortodoncie 2001 ; 4 :28-35. Brazilian ch ild ren: consequences and proposed
3. Mataix CG. Etio logia: factores lo cais . Canut­ t reatments. Rev Odontol Univ Sao Pau lo
Brussola J Ortodoncia Clinica. Ed Masson, Salvat i 1997 ; 11 (4) :231-37
2(JOO. 11. Bacceui T. A con troll ed s tu d y of ass ociated
4. Gall as lvI/V!, Garda A. Retent ion o f permanent denta l anom alies . Angle Orthod 1998; 68(3): 267­
inci sors by mesi odcns: a fami ly affair. Br Dental J 274 .
1999 ;188 :63-64 . 12 . Ravn D. Aplasia , su p e rn u m e rar y teeth and
s. Hartab FN, Yassin OM , Rawashdeh MA . fused teeth in the primary dentition . An
Supranumerary teeth : Report of th re e cases and epidemiologic study. Scand ] Dent Res 1971; 79 :1­
review of the lite ratu re . Journal of Dentistry for 6.
Children 199 4; 6 1:382-94. 13 . Miyosh i 5, Tanaka S, Kunimatsu H, Murakami Y,
6. 7.hu J F, Mar c ushamer lvI, King DL, He nry RJ Fukam i M, Fu jisawa S. An epidemiological stu dy of
Supernumerary and co nge n itally absent teeth: a s uper numerary primary teeth in Ja panese ch ild re n :
lite ra tu re review.] Clin Ped iatr Den t 1996; 20(2) :87­ a re view of ra cial d iffer en ces in the prevalence . Oral
95 . Diseases 2000 ; 6:99-102 .
7. Nick-Hu ssein NN , Majid ZA. Dental anomalies in 14 . Atasu M, Orgunescr A. in ve rt e d impaction or a
t he primary d entit io n : Dist ribution and cor re lation mesiodens. a case report . J Clin Pediatric Dent
with the permanent dentition . J Clin Pediarr Dent 1999; 23 (2) :143-146 .
1996 ; 21( 1):15-19. 1;. Euiseong K, Yi-Tai j. A supernumerary tooth
8. Leitao P. Prevalen cia da rna oc lusao em criancas fused to the facia l su rface of a maxillary permanent
de 12 anos da cidade de Lisboa . Rev Port Estomatol central incisor: case report . Am Assoc End 2000;
Cir Maxilofa c 1993 ; 33 : 193-201. 26(1) :45-48 .

Dr. Patricio Soto PaY1Ja Dr. ]oao G. R. Correia Pinto


• Assistant Professor 0/ Orthodontics, Instituto • Prof essor of Orthodontics, In stitute Supe rior de
Supe rior de Ciencias da Saude-Norte, Porto, Ciencias da Saude -Norte, Port, Portugal.
Portugal.
• Gna tbos Foundation Graduate.

E-rnail. terpin bo@netcabo.pt

Dr. ]osep M. Ustrell Torrent


• Professor. Uniuersitat de Barcelona, Spain.

You might also like