You are on page 1of 10

Article

Effect of thyme and oregano essential oils on the shelf


life of salmon and seaweed burgers

D Dolea1 , A Rizo2, A Fuentes1, JM Barat1 and


I Fernández-Segovia1

Abstract
The effect of different essential oils on the quality and shelf life of fish and seaweed burgers during storage
was evaluated. For this purpose, thyme and oregano essential oils were selected at a concentration of 0.05%
(v/w). Three types of salmon and seaweed burgers were prepared: without essential oil, burgers with red
thyme essential oil (0.05% (v/w)) and burgers with oregano essential oil (0.05% (v/w)), which were vacuum
packaged and stored at 4  C for 17 days. Physicochemical and microbiological analyses were carried out
periodically throughout storage. The addition of both essential oils did not have any effect on the evolution of
the pH, the moisture content or texture parameters. Only the thyme essential oil managed to slightly slow
down the increase of total volatile basic nitrogen and trimethylamine nitrogen. The samples with oregano
essential oil and especially those with thyme essential oil showed minor oxidation. The salmon and seaweed
burgers without essential oils and those which contained oregano essential oil showed a faster increase of
mesophilic counts than those which had thyme essential oil, but no noticeable improvement was observed in
the shelf life of the burgers with thyme essential oil. To improve the shelf life of the fish and seaweed burgers,
it would be necessary to increase the concentration of both essential oils.

Keywords
Algae, antimicrobial agents, antioxidants, essential oils, fish and fish products
Date received: 1 September 2017; accepted: 22 January 2018

for their antioxidant capacity (Farvin and Jacobsen,


INTRODUCTION
2013). This property is important for human health,
In the last decades, an increase in the use of seaweeds as because the oxidative processes are involved in a wide
food ingredients in western countries has been variety of diseases. In addition, the lipid oxidation
observed. This fact is closely linked to the excellent plays an important role in the fatty food spoilage,
nutritional composition and functional properties that where the use of synthetic additives is very often neces-
seaweeds exhibit. They are rich in proteins, essential sary. Seaweeds could be an alternative to the use of this
amino acids and minerals (Peinado et al., 2014; type of additives, constituting a natural source of
Rupérez, 2002). These marine plants have low fat con- antioxidants.
tent which implies the low caloric value that they add. The bioactive compounds present in seaweeds have
It is important to highlight the significant amount of also been proven to exhibit antimicrobial action against
fibre which seaweeds provide (Cofrades et al., 2008;
Gómez-Ordóñez et al., 2010). The phenolic compounds 1
Departamento de Tecnologı́a de Alimentos, Universitat
present in the seaweeds are also noticeable, responsible Politècnica de València, Valencia, Spain
2
Instituto de Agroquı́mica y Tecnologı́a de Alimentos (IATA-CSIC),
Food Science and Technology International 0(0) 1–10
Valencia, Spain
! The Author(s) 2018 Reprints and permissions: Corresponding author:
sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav I Fernández-Segovia, Departamento de Tecnologı́a de Alimentos,
DOI: 10.1177/1082013218759364 Universitat Politècnica de València, Camino de Vera s/n, Valencia
journals.sagepub.com/home/fst 46022, Spain.
Email: isferse1@tal.upv.es
Food Science and Technology International 0(0)

gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria (Gupta and to the manufacturer’s specifications, red thyme EO was
Abu-Ghannam, 2011). This property would allow sea- obtained from the entire flowering plant (without root),
weeds to replace chemical preservatives. the cinnamon bark EO was obtained from the dried
At present the incorporation of seaweeds as a func- bark and had a content of cinnamic aldehyde >60%
tional ingredient constitutes an interesting alternative in and safrole <0.1%, and the oregano EO was obtained
the development of new healthy food products, which from the flowering tops and the phenol contents ranged
are both natural and have high nutritional value. from 60 to 75%.
In the search for alternatives to the synthetic preser-
vatives or antioxidant, the essential oils (EOs) obtained
Selection of EO concentrations
from plants have also been widely studied. The anti-
microbial and antioxidant activity of EOs is due to A preliminary sensory study was conducted to select
their high levels of phenolic compounds. In this sense, the concentration of each EO which was sensorially
thyme is characterized by high concentrations of acceptable. The concentrations of red thyme, cinnamon
thymol and p-cymene, and to a lesser extent a-pinene bark and oregano EOs are shown in Table 1. To select
and linalool. Oregano has high contents of carvacrol the concentration of each EO to be added to the bur-
and p-cymene, with other compounds, such as gers for the final study, seven trained panellists were
thymol, in lower concentrations. Clove is characterized used (two men and five women), members of the
by its high content in eugenol, while cinnamon is rich in Food Technology Department at the Universitat
cinnamic aldehyde, among others. Rosemary shows Politècnica de València, which had participated in pre-
important contents of borneol, camphor, a-pinene vious studies of development of burgers, pâtes and
and 1,8-cineol (Ballester-Costa et al., 2013; Perricone sausages made of seaweeds and fish.
et al., 2015; Pesavento et al., 2015). The effectivity in Burger samples were presented to the panel in two
the inhibition of microbial growth and the antioxidant different sessions. In the first one, nine samples were
capacity of some EOs, such as rosemary, oregano, evaluated (the three EOs at 0.5, 0.25 or 0.10% v/w).
thyme or cinnamon, on fish and meat products have In the second one, six samples were tested (the three
been proven in several studies (Abdollahzadeh et al., EOs at 0.05 or 0.025% v/w) (Table 1). The panellists
2014; Kostaki et al., 2009; Kykkidou et al., 2009; had to decide by consensus if each of the samples eval-
Mexis et al., 2009; Pesavento et al., 2015). uated was sensorially acceptable or not. Based on the
The aim of this work was to evaluate the effect of results obtained in this preliminary study, as will be
different EOs on the quality and shelf life of salmon and explained in the ‘Results and Discussion’ section, two
seaweed burgers during storage. EOs were selected (red thyme and oregano) at the con-
centration of 0.050 ml/100 g sample. Sample prepara-
MATERIALS AND METHODS tion was conducted following the procedure described
below.
Materials
Fish. Aquacultured salmon (Salmo salar) of commercial
Sample preparation
size (weighing 2–3 kg) from a Norwegian farm
(Hallvard Leroy, Bergen, Norway) was used as raw Salmon fillets were thawed during 24 h at 4  C. Salmon
material. The fish were purchased in a local supermar- skin and remaining bones were removed and it was cut
ket in Valencia (Spain). The specimens were headed, into pieces of 3 cm  3 cm approximately. The portions
gutted and filleted, and two fillets were obtained from were randomly divided into three batches. Batch 1 was
each fish. On arrival at the laboratory, the fillets were used to prepare control samples (Ct samples), which
frozen at 20  C until processing and analysis, for a consisted of burgers made of salmon and seaweeds
total period of 72 h.
Seaweed. Dehydrated and powdered seaweeds were
used as raw material. Four types of seaweeds (kombu
(Laminaria ochroleuca), wakame (Undaria pinnatı´fida), Table 1. Essential oil (EO) concentrations used in the
espagueti de mar (Himanthalia elongata) and agar-agar preliminary study
(Gelidium sesquipedale)) were provided by the company
EO Concentration (ml EO/100 g sample)
Porto-Muiños (Cerceda, A Coruña, Spain).
EOs. Three EOs were studied: red thyme EO Red thyme 0.50 0.25 0.10 0.050 0.025
(Thymus zygis L.), cinnamon bark EO (Cinnamomum Cinnamon bark 0.50 0.25 0.10 0.050 0.025
zeylanicum) and oregano EO (Origanum vulgare L.). Oregano 0.50 0.25 0.10 0.050 0.025
They were provided by the company Ernesto Ventós, First session Second session
S.A. (Sant Just Desvern, Barcelona, Spain). According

2
Dolea et al.

Analytical determinations
without EOs. Portions in batches 2 and 3 were used to
prepare salmon–seaweeds burgers with red thyme EO Physicochemical and microbiological analyses of the
(0.050 ml/100 g sample) (T samples) and with oregano burgers were performed on days 0, 3, 7, 10, 14 and 17
EO (Og samples) (0.050 ml/100 g sample), respectively of refrigerated storage. Three bags of each batch were
(Figure 1). randomly taken on each sampling day (n ¼ 3). The ana-
Portions of each batch were weighed and minced in lyses were performed in duplicate on each sample.
the ThermomixÕ (Vorwerk & Co., Wuppertal,
Germany) for 45 s. Then, a mixture of the four sea-
Physicochemical analyses
weeds in powder were added in the necessary amount
up to a final content of 1% kombu, 1% wakame, 3% Moisture contents were determined according to the
sea spaghetti and 1% agar-agar (w/w), and the fish with AOAC method 950.46 (1997).
the seaweeds were homogenized for 45 s in the A pH meter (Crison Instruments, S.A., Barcelona,
ThermomixÕ , until obtaining an homogeneous paste Spain) was used to measure pH values, previously
(sample Ct). This methodology was based on previous homogenizing the samples in distilled water
studies carried out by the authors (data not published). (weight:volume ratio 1:10).
Burgers with EOs were prepared in the same way as The total volatile basic nitrogen (TVB-N) and tri-
control samples, incorporating the EO at the same time methylamine nitrogen (TMA-N) contents were deter-
as the seaweed mixture (Figure 1). mined by steam distillation according to the method
Finally, the paste obtained was divided into 30 g por- described by Malle and Tao (1987). Thirty grams of
tions, which were introduced into a mould to give the sample was weighed and homogenized with 60 ml of
typical shape of small burgers. All samples were trichloroacetic acid solution 7.5% (w/v), centrifuged
vacuum packaged (two burgers/bag) using high barrier at 3000 rpm/min for 5 min. The supernatant was filtered
bags and stored at 4  C for 17 days. through a Whatman No. 1 filter, obtaining the extract

Thawed salmon fillets (Salmo salar)

Cut into portinons


Batch 2

Mincing 45 s Mincing 45 s Mincing 45 s

Seaweed mixture Seaweed mixture Seaweed mixture


+ thyme EO + oregano EO

Homogenisation 45 s Homogenisation 45 s Homogenisation 45 s

Burger shaping Burger shaping Burger shaping

Vacuum packaging and Vacuum packaging and Vacuum packaging and


storage at 4ºC for 17 days storage at 4ºC for 17 days storage at 4ºC for 17 days

Samples Ct Samples T Samples Og

Figure 1. Flow diagram of sample preparation.

3
Food Science and Technology International 0(0)

of the sample. For TVB-N determination, 5 ml of data was performed using the Statgraphics Centurion
NaOH 10% (w/v) was added to 25 ml of the extract software (Statpoint Technologies, Inc., Warrenton,
and it was submitted to steam distillation in a Unit VA, USA).
Pro Nitro M, SELECTA (Barcelona, Spain). The
ammonia was collected in 15 ml of boric acid at 4% RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
(w/v) and titrated with sulphuric acid 0.01 N. Results
Selection of EO concentrations
were expressed as mg N/100 g sample. The same pro-
cedure was followed for TMA-N analysis, except for The EOs have strong odours and flavours, which is why it
the addition of 20 ml of formaldehyde solution 35% is necessary to check that the amount incorporated to a
(v/v) to the extract before distillation, in order to food product is acceptable from a sensorial point of view.
block primary and secondary amines. In the first session of the sensorial analysis, panellists
The thiobarbituric acid (TBA) index was measured evaluated the three EOs (red thyme, cinnamon bark
using a spectrophotometric method with some minor and oregano) at the highest concentrations (0.5, 0.25
modifications (Tarladgis et al., 1960) to evaluate oxida- and 0.1 ml EO/100 g sample) in the burgers, as mentioned
tion stability during chilled storage. The method is above. They concluded that for those concentrations, the
based on the measurement of absorbance at 530 nm burgers were not acceptable for any of the EOs.
of a chromogen formed by reaction between thiobarbi- In the second session, the concentrations tested were
turic acid and malondialdehyde (MDA) (one of the 0.05 and 0.025 ml EO/100 g sample, for the three EOs.
main compounds formed as a result of lipid oxidation). Panellists established that the cinnamon EO conferred a
strong, odd flavour to the burgers, not being acceptable
at any of the concentrations used. For the red thyme
Texture measurements
and oregano EOs for both concentrations, they con-
Texture profile analysis (TPA) was performed by use of a cluded that, although the burgers had typical flavours
Texture Analyser TA.XT2Õ (Stable Micro Systems, of these EOs, they could be acceptable for consumers.
Surrey, UK), equipped with a load cell of 250 N. Based on these results, the use of cinnamon EO was
Samples were obtained by cutting out pieces of 2 cm  2 cm rejected for the final study. For the red thyme and ore-
from the central part of each burger. For TPA analysis a gano EOs, the concentration of 0.05 ml/100 g was chosen,
flat-ended cylindrical plunger (7.5 cm diameter) was used. since it was the highest amount at which the burgers
The plunger was pressed into the sample at a constant obtained may be sensorially acceptable. Nevertheless,
speed of 1 mm/s until it reached 50% of the sample this study should be completed with a further sensory
height, in order to simulate jaw movement during masti- analysis to check the consumer’s acceptation with hedo-
cation (Bourne, 1978). Force–distance curves were pro- nic trials using a high number of non-trained panellists.
cessed in order to obtain the texture parameters: It is important to note that in other studies carried
hardness, cohesiveness, elasticity, chewiness and resilience. out on swordfish with thyme EO, contents of 0.1%
(v/w) in fresh fish were sensorially acceptable.
However, in other works on squid rings, concentrations
Microbiological analyses
equal to or over 0.075% of thyme and oregano EOs in
Mesophilic bacteria and Enterobacteriaceae were the coating mixture, gave a strong odour in the final
determined according to the methods given by the product, using concentrations equal to or below 0.05%
ISO standards 4833:2003 and 21528-2:2004, respect- (Sanjuás-Rei et al., 2012), which agrees with this work.
ively. All the analyses were performed in duplicate
and the results were expressed as log cfu/g. All the cul-
Quality and shelf life study
ture media were provided by Scharlau Chemie, S.A.
(Barcelona, Spain). Changes in the physicochemical parameters during
storage. Values of pH and moisture content in the
three types of burgers (Ct, T and Og) during cold storage
Statistical analysis
are shown in Table 2. Initially, pH was approximately 6.2,
During the storage study, the data relating to each par- with no significant differences between the three types of
ameter were analysed with a multifactor ANOVA to samples. This parameter slightly decreased from day 0 to
evaluate the effect of the EO and of the storage time day 14, showing a slight increase from this sampling day
and their interactions. All the physicochemical and onwards, as has been observed in other fish studies (Cai
microbiological parameters were considered as depend- et al., 2015; Mexis et al., 2009).
ent variables and type of EO and the storage time were The initial decrease could be due to the growth of
the factors in these analyses. Data are reported as lactic acid bacteria with the subsequent lactic acid for-
mean  standard deviation. Statistical treatment of the mation. The final increase could be due to basic

4
Dolea et al.

Table 2. Evolution of pH, moisture and texture parameters in salmon and seaweed burgers: without
essential oils (Ct), with thyme essential oil (T) and with oregano essential oil (Og), during 17 days of
storage at 4  C. (means and standard deviations)

Days of
Parameters storage Ct T Og

pH 0 6.19  0.01 6.21  0.01 6.20  0.01


3 6.14  0.03 6.24  0.03 6.22  0.04
7 6.10  0.00 6.14  0.04 6.11  0.01
10 6.08  0.01 6.03  0.01 6.01  0.01
14 6.02  0.01 6.03  0.05 5.99  0.03
17 6.05  0.03 6.06  0.00 6.05  0.02
Moisture 0 63.2  0.4 63.2  0.9 62.9  0.3
3 62.6  0.4 63.5  0.8 62.5  0.2
7 63.1  0.8 63.4  0.3 62.9  0.2
10 64.1  0.5 65.4  0.7 64.2  0.1
14 65.1  0.6 65.3  0.1 64.5  0.1
17 64.1  0.4 63.9  0.2 63.4  0.1
Texture
Hardness (N) 0 3.27  0.01 3.91  0.01 3.68  0.01
3 7.08  0.07 4.79  0.08 4.8  0.8
7 5.1  0.8 4.2  0.1 52
10 3.76  0.06 5.6  0.4 5.2  0.3
14 52 4.7  0.7 62
17 4.5  0.7 5.1  0.4 62
Adhesiveness (g s) 0 0.09  0.00 0.12  0.01 0.07  0.01
3 0.29  0.02 0.19  0.03 0.16  0.06
7 0.13  0.03 0.13  0.03 0.16  0.09
10 0.11  0.01 0.26  0.04 0.18  0.05
14 0.2  0.1 0.15  0.01 0.19  0.06
17 0.19  0.09 0.29  0.09 0.17  0.08
Elasticity 0 0.54  0.00 0.60  0.01 0.55  0.01
3 0.70  0.03 0.64  0.04 0.63  0.02
7 0.65  0.03 0.65  0.03 0.5  0.2
10 0.66  0.03 0.78  0.08 0.65  0.09
14 0.76  0.07 0.70  0.01 0.6  0.2
17 1.4  0.1 1.40  0.09 1.4  0.6
Chewiness (N) 0 0.89  0.00 1.23  0.01 0.99  0.05
3 2.6  0.1 1.6  0.1 1.6  0.4
7 1.9  0.2 1.6  0.1 1.6  0.9
10 1.5  0.3 2.58  0.02 1.96  0.01
14 2.8  0.7 1.9  0.3 2.3  0.9
17 3.44  0.04 4.1  0.7 54
Cohesiveness 0 0.50  0.00 0.52  0.00 0.49  0.01
3 0.53  0.01 0.54  0.01 0.54  0.01
7 0.54  0.04 0.56  0.02 0.62  0.09
10 0.54  0.01 0.59  0.01 0.57  0.04
14 0.57  0.03 0.59  0.01 0.6  0.1
17 0.6  0.2 0.60  0.02 0.59  0.02
(continued)

5
Food Science and Technology International 0(0)

Table 2. Continued

Days of
Parameters storage Ct T Og

Resilience 0 0.15  0.00 0.15  0.00 0.15  0.00


3 0.15  0.00 0.15  0.00 0.15  0.00
7 0.15  0.01 0.17  0.01 0.24  0.08
10 0.16  0.00 0.15  0.00 0.18  0.01
14 0.16  0.00 0.18  0.00 0.21  0.07
17 11 0.18  0.02 0.18  0.02

compounds formation as a consequence of fish spoil-


(a)
age. The EOs incorporation did not affect the pH 70
Control
values throughout the storage, with no significant dif- 60 Thyme

mg N / 100 g sample
Oregano
ferences between samples. These results agree with 50
those observed by Kykkidou et al. (2009), where the 40
thyme EO incorporated to fresh fish did not have any 30
effect on the pH evolution. 20
Moisture values varied during storage with no clear 10
trend. T samples exhibited values slightly higher than 0
the other two types of burgers, although the statistical 0 5 10 15 20
Storage time (days)
analysis showed no statistical differences between sam-
(b)
ples (p > 0.05). 35
Control
mg N/100 g sample

The TVB-N, TMA-N and TBA index evolution are 30 Thyme


Oregano
shown in Figure 2(a) to (c), respectively. The TVB-N is 25
widely used as a fish spoilage index, since an increase in 20
this parameter has been associated with the spoilage 15
specific bacterial growth and with endogenous enzyme 10
activity, which entail the loss of quality in fish (Özyurt 5
et al., 2009). The acceptability limit of TVB-N varies 0
depending on the fish species, season, region, age or 0 5 10 15 20
Storage time (days)
sex. This parameter also depends on whether the fish (c)
is fresh or processed. 1
mg malonaldehyde/kg sample

Control
Thyme
According to Regulation 2074/2005, the European 0.8 Oregano
Commission (2005) considers an acceptable value of
0.6
35 mg N/100 g for S. salar. In control sample (Ct), the
value of this parameter increased from 18.9 up to 32 mg 0.4
N/100 g at day 10 of storage. The acceptability limit
0.2
was exceeded on day 14, showing an important increase
through to day 17 of study, where values were signifi- 0
0 5 10 15 20
cantly higher than those with EOs. Burgers with ore-
Storage time (days)
gano EO showed a similar pattern to the Ct samples. In
samples with thyme EO, the TVB-N levels kept under
the acceptability limit until day 17, although at day 14, Figure 2. Evolution of TVB-N (a), TMA-N (b) and TBA
T samples exhibited values very close to Ct and Og index (c), in salmon and seaweed burgers: without EOs
(control), with thyme EO (thyme) and with oregano EO
samples. From these results, it can be concluded that
(oregano), during 17 days of storage at 4  C. (means and
the EOs only showed a slight effect at the end of the standard deviations). Dashed line shows the acceptability
studied period, but they would not be able to inhibit or limit.
delay spoilage, from the point of view of this param-
eter, since values close to the acceptability limits were
obtained practically at the same time for the three types during the storage time can be observed for all the sam-
of samples. ples. Samples with EOs showed lower values of this
Initial values of TMA-N range from 3 to 4 mg parameter than Ct samples, as occurred with TVB-N.
N/100 g of sample. In Figure 2(b) a progressive increase Og samples exhibited a similar pattern to the control

6
Dolea et al.

samples, except for the last day of analysis, where the observed on the evolution of fish hardness (Cai et al.,
values were lower in burgers with oregano EO. T bur- 2015). In this work, since the fish was previously
gers had a slower evolution during the first days of minced, the texture evolution has not reflected the
storage. However, from day 10 these samples reached spoilage of the product and, therefore, although the
similar values to Ct and Og burgers. EOs would have had a preservative action, this could
Regarding the TBA index, the initial values were low not be reflected on the texture study.
for the three types of burgers, remaining stable until
day 7 of analysis. From this day onwards, a gradual Changes in the microbial parameters during
increase was observed in all samples. The Ct samples storage. Evolution of mesophilic and
exhibited a significantly higher increase than those with Enterobacteriaceae counts in the three types of burgers
thyme and oregano EOs. This fact shows the antioxi- (Ct, T and Og) during cold storage is shown in
dant effect of the EOs, which agrees with other studies Figure 3(a) and (b), respectively. Levels of mesophilic
on thyme and oregano (Kostaki et al., 2009; Kykkidou counts of 7 log cfu/g have been established as the
et al., 2009; Mexis et al., 2009). Marino et al. (1999) acceptability limit, based on the criteria established by
reported the important antioxidant potential of thyme the International Commission on Microbiological
extract due to the high concentrations of phenolic com- Specifications for Foods (1986) and numerous studies
pounds, including carvacrol, thymol, p-cymene, among of fish shelf life (Cai et al., 2015; Kykkidou et al., 2009;
others. Different acceptability limits have been given Özyurt et al., 2012). At the beginning of the study,
for this parameter in different fish species. No absolute the mesophilic counts in the three types of samples
limit for TBA index has been established for fish or fish were around 5 log cfu/g. A progressive increase of the
products in general. According to Conell (1995), the growth of this microorganism was observed until day
limit would be 1–2 mg MDA/kg; whereas other authors 10 for all samples, with no significant differences
have given higher values. Although Ct samples showed between them. However, from day 10, Ct and Og bur-
TBA values significantly higher than those of burgers gers exhibited a faster increase compared with T
with EOs, it is important to note that the value reached
by control samples at the end of storage was 0.599 mg
MDA/kg. Taking into account the lowest acceptability
limits for this parameter (around 1 mg MDA/kg), that (a)
value is considered to be low. It can be concluded that 10
Control
any of the burgers evaluated exhibited an important 8
Thyme
Oregano
oxidation degree. This demonstrates that, in addition
log cfu/g sample

to the antioxidant effect of the EOs, the vacuum packa- 6

ging would play a decisive role in burger preservation 4


against oxidation. It is also important to mention that
in numerous studies, the antioxidant capacity of sea- 2

weeds has been proven (Farvin and Jacobsen 2013; 0


López-López et al., 2009). 0 5 10 15 20
Storage time (days)
The textural parameters are shown in Table 2.
The initial values of hardness were similar in the three (b)
6
Control
burgers. For the three types of samples, a fluctuation of Thyme
this parameter could be observed throughout the stor- Oregano
log cfu/g sample

4
age, without a clear trend. Therefore, the EOs incorp-
oration had no effect on this textural parameter. This
behaviour could be due to the fact that the preparation 2
of the burgers included mincing the fish; consequently,
the muscle structure was destroyed from day 0.
Adhesiveness values also varied throughout the time 0
0 5 10 15 20
period with no trend. Elasticity and chewiness values Storage time (days)
remained constant until day 14 of storage, slightly
increasing at the end of the study. Cohesiveness Figure 3. Evolution of mesophilic bacteria (a) and
and resilience remained stable during all the time. Enterobacteriaceae (b) in salmon and seaweed burgers:
These results indicate that the EOs did not affect the without EOs (control), with thyme EO (thyme) and with
evaluated texture parameters or their evolution through oregano EO (oregano), during 17 days of storage at 4  C
the storage time. In work carried out on red drum fillets (means and standard deviations). Dashed line shows the
with different types of EOs, a positive effect was acceptability limit.

7
Food Science and Technology International 0(0)

samples. At the end of the study, all samples reached Table 3. F-ratio values and significance levels obtained in
levels near the acceptability limit (107 cfu/g). the multifactor ANOVA for the physicochemical and
The oregano EO, therefore, at the concentration microbiological parameters according to factors: type of
used in this study, did not exert any inhibitory effect sample (S), storage time (t) and their interaction (S  t)
on mesophilic growth. Although the thyme EO slows S T St
down the microbial growth, there was no noticeable
ns
improvement of the T burger’s shelf life. In order to pH 1.87 62.57*** 2.42ns
delay microbial spoilage, a higher concentration of Moisture 6.63** 19.73*** 0.79ns
both EOs would be necessary. However, the increase TVB-N 0.32ns 15.78*** 1.64ns
of the EOs concentration would affect the sensory TMA-N 4.50* 50.03*** 1.67ns
quality. TBA index 1535.78*** 5871.80*** 283.60***
Based on the results of mesophilic growth, the shelf Texture
life of the burgers (Ct, Og or T) would be lower than or Hardness 0.23ns 2.98* 1.47ns
equal to 17 days. Adhesiveness 0.89ns 3.79* 1.68ns
Regarding the Enterobacteriaceae, fluctuations of
Elasticity 0.46ns 24.09*** 0.23ns
counts were observed during storage with no clear
Cohesiveness 0.27ns 3.45* 0.58ns
trend. Although C samples showed slightly higher
counts on some sampling days, at the end of the Chewiness 0.02ns 7.21*** 0.65ns
study, Enterobacteriaceae levels were similar in the Resilience 0.81ns 1.05ns 1.00ns
three types of burgers, which demonstrated that Mesophilic bacteria 14.95*** 470.79*** 16.78***
thyme and oregano EOs did not have antimicrobial Enterobacteriaceae 3.34* 16.48*** 2.13*
effect under the conditions used in this study. ns: non-significant; TBA: thiobarbituric acid; TMA-N: trimethyla-
In work carried out on trout fillets using oregano EO mine nitrogen; TVB-N: total volatile basic nitrogen.
at 0.4% (v/w), an important reduction in the mesophilic *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001.
and Enterobacteriaceae counts was observed, extending
the shelf life by 3–4 days (Mexis et al., 2009). Similar F-ratio and the significance level of factors and their
results were obtained in a study conducted on swordfish interactions. The F-ratio represents the quotient
with thyme (0.1%), with a shelf life extension of about between variability due to the effect considered and
three days. the residual variance. A higher value of F-ratio means
The results of the present study demonstrated that a more marked effect of that factor (type of sample or
the oregano or thyme EOs added to salmon and sea- storage time) on a variable (parameters analysed).
weed burgers at 0.05% (v/w) achieved a reduction in The statistical analysis showed that the use of thyme
the degree of sample oxidation, but they did not slow or oregano EOs significantly affected the TBA index
down microbial growth to the necessary levels to extend and mesophilic counts. Storage time had a significant
the burger’s shelf life. effect in practically all the analysed variables, although,
Given that product shelf life was limited by the TVB- as has been mentioned before, some parameters varied
N contents and mesophilic growth, both EOs should be throughout the storage time with no clear trend.
incorporated at higher concentrations to be effective in Regarding interaction between the factors, it is import-
the improvement of hygienic quality of burger made ant to highlight that it was significant for the TBA
from salmon and seaweed. Taking into account that, index and mesophilic counts, which demonstrated
from a sensorial point of view, this increase would not that the evolution of both parameters was different
be possible, combinations of the different EOs and/or depending on the type of sample.
combinations with other preservation methods would
be interesting, since several authors have demonstrated
CONCLUSIONS
that they can have a synergetic effect on food preserva-
tion (Calo et al., 2015; Cherrat et al., 2014; De Oliveira Cinnamon EO confers an intense odour and flavour,
et al., 2015). In this way, low concentrations of EOs even at low concentrations (0.025 v/w), which make it
could be used to achieve microbial inhibition without unsuitable for use as a natural preservative in salmon
compromising burger sensory quality. and seaweed burgers. Red thyme and oregano EOs
could be incorporated to these burgers at concentra-
tions of 0.05% (v/w) conferring a typical odour and
Multifactor ANOVA
flavour, but which may be sensorially acceptable.
An ANOVA multifactor was conducted to study the Oregano EO at 0.05% (v/w) in the burgers does not
influence of the EOs and the storage time, on the par- affect the changes of TVB-N or TMA-N during cold
ameters analysed in the burgers. Table 3 shows the storage. The red thyme EO at the same concentration

8
Dolea et al.

slows down the increase of both parameters; neverthe- Bourne MC. (1978). Texture profile analysis. Food
less, this decrease in the TVB-N content is not enough Technology 32: 62–66, 72.
to significantly extend burger’s shelf life. Cai L, Cao A, Li Y, Song Z, Leng L and Li J. (2015). The
Moisture content, pH and texture of the product are effects of essential oil treatment on the biogenic amines
inhibition and quality preservation of red drum
not affected by the red thyme or oregano EOs. Both
(Sciaenops ocellatus) fillets. Food Control 56: 1–8.
EOs have a marked influence on the inhibition of Calo JR, Grandall PG, O’Bryan CA and Ricke SC. (2015).
burger oxidation. The antioxidant capacity of seaweed Essential oils as antimicrobials in food systems: A review.
together with the vacuum packaging, also protect bur- Food Control 54: 111–119.
gers against oxidation, meaning that oxidation is not a Cherrat L, Espina L, Bakkali M, Garcı́a-Gonzalo D, Pagan
spoilage process in this product. R and Laglaoui A. (2014). Chemical composition and
Enterobacteriaceae growth is not affected by the antioxidant properties of Laurus nobilis L. and Myrtus
presence of both EOs at the concentrations studied, communis L. essential oils from Morocco and evaluation
while the addition of red thyme EO causes a decrease of their antimicrobial activity acting alone or in combined
in mesophilic growth. However, this inhibition is not processes for food preservation. Journal of the Science of
enough to increase burger’s shelf life. Food and Agriculture 94: 1197–1204.
Cofrades S, López-López I, Solas MT, Bravo L and
In order to extend the product shelf life, both EOs
Jiménez-Colmenero F. (2008). Influence of different
had to be used at higher concentrations, but this is not
types and proportions of added edible seaweeds on char-
possible from a sensorial point of view. The combin- acteristics of low-salt gel/emulsion meat systems. Meat
ation of the different EOs and/or combinations with Science 79: 767–776.
other preservation techniques would be interesting, Conell JJ. (1995). Control of Fish Quality, 4th ed. London:
since they may have a synergetic effect on burger pres- Fishing News Books Limited.
ervation. In this way, low concentrations of EOs could De Oliveira TLC, De Castro-Leite Junior BR, Ramos ALS,
be used to achieve microbial inhibition without com- Mendes-Ramos E, Hilsdorf-Piccoli R and Cristianini M.
promising the burger sensory quality. (2015). Phenolic carvacrol as a natural additive to improve
the preservative effects of high pressure processing of low-
DECLARATION OF CONFLICTING INTERESTS sodium sliced vacuum-packed turkey breast ham. LWT –
Food Science and Technology 64: 1297–1308.
The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with European Commission. (2005). Commission regulation 2074/
respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this 2005 of 5 December 2005, implementing measures for cer-
article. tain products under regulation (. . .). Section II, Chapter I:
Total Volatile Basic Nitrogen (TVB-N) Limit Values for
FUNDING Certain Categories of Fishery Products and Analysis
The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial sup- Methods To Be Used. Official Journal of the European
port for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this Union, L338: 1.
article: The experiment reported here is a part of a project Farvin SKH and Jacobsen C. (2013). Phenolic compounds
financially supported by Universitat Politècnica de València and antioxidant activities of selected species of seaweeds
(‘SaPesAl’ (UPV-FE-2014-55)), which the authors gratefully from Danish coast. Food Chemistry 138: 1670–1681.
acknowledge. The translation of this paper was funded by the Gómez-Ordóñez E, Jiménez-Escrig A and Rupérez P. (2010).
Universitat Politècnica de València, Spain. Dietary fibre and physicochemical properties of several
edible seaweeds from the northwestern Spanish coast.
ORCID ID Food Research International 43: 2289–2294.
Gupta S and Abu-Ghannam N. (2011). Recent developments
D Dolea http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8278-7967
in the application of seaweeds or seaweed extracts as a
means for enhancing the safety and quality attributes of
REFERENCES foods. Innovative Food Science and Emerging Technologies
Abdollahzadeh E, Rezaei M and Hosseini H. (2014). 12: 600–609.
Antibacterial activity of plant essential oils and extracts: ICMSF. (1986). Sampling plans for fish and shellfish. In:
The role of thyme essential oil, nisin, and their combin- ICMSF (ed.) Microorganisms in Foods. Sampling for
ation to control Listeria monocytogenes inoculated in Microbiological Analysis: Principles and Scientific
minced fish meat. Food Control 35: 177–183. Applications. 2nd ed, Vol. 2. Toronto: University of
Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC). (1997). Toronto Press, pp.181–196.
Official Methods of Analysis, 16th ed. Washington, DC: ISO 4833 (ed.). (2003). Microbiology of Food and Animal
Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Feeding Stuffs. Horizontal Method for the Enumeration of
Ballester-Costa C, Sendra E, Fernández-López J, Pérez- Microorganisms. Colony-Count Technique at 30  C.
Álvarez JA and Viuda-Martos M. (2013). Chemical com- Geneva: International Organization for Standardization.
position and in vitro antibacterial properties of essential ISO 21528-2 (ed.). (2004) Microbiology of Food and Animal
oils of four Thymus species from organic growth. Feeding Stuffs – Horizontal Methods for the Detection and
Industrial Crops and Products 50: 304–311. Enumeration of Enterobacteriaceae – Part 2: Colony-Count

9
Food Science and Technology International 0(0)

Method. Geneva: International Organization for Özyurt G, Kuley E, Özkütük S and Özogul F. (2009).
Standardization. Sensory, microbiological and chemical assessment of the
Kostaki M, Giatrakou V, Savvaidis IN and Kontominas freshness of red mullet (Mullus barbatus) and goldband
MG. (2009). Combined effect of MAP and thyme essential goatfish (Upeneus moluccensis) during storage in ice.
oil on the microbiological, chemical and sensory attributes Food Chemistry 114: 505–510.
of organically aquaculture sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax) Peinado I, Girón J, Koutsidis G and Ames JM. (2014).
fillets. Food Microbiology 26: 475–482. Chemical composition, antioxidant activity and sensory
Kykkidou S, Giatrakou V, Papavergou A, Kontominas MG evaluation of five different species of brown edible sea-
and Savvaidis IN. (2009). Effect of thyme essential oil and weeds. Food Research International 66: 36–44.
packaging treatments on fresh Mediterranean swordfish Perricone M, Arace E, Corbo MR, Sinigaglia M and
fillets storage at 4  C. Food Chemistry 115: 169–175. Bevilacqua A. (2015). Bioactivity of essential oils: A
López-López I, Bastida S, Ruiz-Capillas C, Bravo L, Larrea review on their interaction with food components.
MT, Sánchez-Muniz F, et al. (2009). Composition and anti- Frontiers in Microbiology 6: 76.
oxidant capacity of low-salt meat emulsion model systems Pesavento G, Calonico C, Bilia AR, Barnabei M, Calesini F,
containing edible seaweeds. Meat Science 83(3): 492–498. Addona R, et al. (2015). Antibacterial activity of Oregano,
Malle P and Tao SH. (1987). Rapid quantitative determin- Rosmarinus and Thymus essential oils against
ation of trimethylamine using steam distillation. Journal of Staphylococcus aureus and Listeria monocytogenes in beef
Food Protection 50: 756–760. meatballs. Food Control 54: 188–199.
Marino M, Bersani C and Comi G. (1999). Antimicrobial Rupérez P. (2002). Mineral content of edible marine sea-
activity of the essential oils of Thymus vulgaris L measured weeds. Food Chemistry 79: 23–26.
using a bioimpedometric method. Journal of Food Sanjuás-Rei M, Pourashouri P, Barros-Velázquez J and
Protection 62: 1017–1023. Aubourg SP. (2012). Effect of oregano and thyme essential
Mexis SF, Chouliara E and Kontominas MG. (2009). oils on the microbiological and chemical quality of refri-
Combined effect of an oxygen absorber and oregano gerated (4  C) ready-to-eat squid rings. International
essential oil on shelf life extension of rainbow trout fillets
Journal of Food Science and Technology 47: 1439–1447.
stored at 4  C. Food Microbiology 26: 598–605.
Tarladgis BG, Watts BM, Younathan MT and Dugan LR Jr.
Özyurt G, Kuley E, Balikçi E, Kaçar Ç, Gökdogan S,
(1960). A distillation method for the quantitative deter-
Etyemez M, et al. (2012). Effect of the icing with rosemary
mination of malonaldehyde in rancid foods. Journal of
extract on the oxidative stability and biogenic amine for-
American Oil Chemists Society 37: 44–48.
mation in sardine (Sardinella aurita) during chilled stor-
age. Food and Bioprocess Technology 5: 2777–2786.

10

You might also like