You are on page 1of 4

VOLUME 37, +UMBER 3 PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 19 Jvz.

v 1976

COMMENTS

Vacuum Periodicity in a Yang-Mills Quantum Theory*

R. Jackiw and C. Rebbi


Laboratory fox 1Vucleax Science and Physics Department, Massachusetts institute of Technology,
Cambridge, Massachusetts
(Beceived 1 June 1976)

Ke propose a description of the vacuum in Yang-Mills theory and arrive at a physical


interpretation of the pseudoparticle solution and the attendant violation of symmetries.
The existence of topologically inequivalent classical gauge fields gives rise to a family
of quantum mechanical vacua, parametrized by a CP-nonconserving angle. The require-
ment of vacuum stability against gauge transformations renders the vacua chirally non-
invariant.

A classical pseudoparticle solution to the SU(2) computations. Our considerations lead to a de-
Yang-Mills theory in Euclidean four-dimension- scription of the quantum mechanical vacuum
al space has been given by Belavin, Polyakov, state of a Yang-Mills theory which is unexpected-
Schwartz, and Tyupkin, ' with the suggestion that ly rich.
it be used to dominate the functional integral In the quantum field theory, a state of the sys-
which describes a quantum field theory continued tem can be represented by a wave functional
to Euclidean space. 't Hooft' has shown that %[A] of the field configuration. Having in mind a
these nontrivial minima of the action give non- Yang-Mills theory, we have taken the potentials
vanishing contributions to amplitudes which would A(x) (anti-Hermitian matrices in the space of the
be zero in the ordinary sector. Specifically in infinitesimal group generators) as argument of
a theory of fermions coupled to Yang-Mills fields, the functional, excluding the time components
with chiral U(1) and CI' symmetries, symmetry- A'(x), because they are dependent variables. In
nonconserving effects are found through the pres- defining scalar products and matrix elements of
sence of the axial-vector-current anomaly. ' Thus observables one must avoid infinities associated
he provides a possible resolution of the long- with the volume of the gauge group. Without re-
standing U(1) problem and an intriguing sugges- peating details of the well-kown gauge-fixing pro-
tion for the origin of CI' nonconservation. The cedure, let us only recall that it removes from
phenomena are 0(exp(- Sm'/g')), where g is the the functional integral over A configurations of
gauge coupling constant; they are nonperturba- the fields which can be joined by a continuous
tive. gauge transformation to configurations already
The fact that the classical field configuration counted. In particular, one does not integrate
which is responsible for the new results is in over potentials of the form
Euclidean four-dimensional space, i.e. , imagi-
A(x) =g '(x)vg(x), (1)
nary time, leads one to suspect that the pseudo-
particle is associated with quantum-mechanical where g is the unitary matrix of a gauge transfor-
tunneling by which field configurations in the ordi- mation that can be joined to the identity through
nary three-dimensional space are joined in the a one-parameter continuous family of transfor-
course of the (real-time) evolution through the mations g(x, a):
penetration of an energy barrier. ' Also the expo-
nentially small magnitude is indicative of tunnel- g(x, 1) =g(x); g(x, 0) = I.
ing. Here we wish to present a further explana- The potentials of Eq. (1) are of course gauge
tion of this point, which we hope, will clarify the equivalent to A=O.
physical interpretation of the pseudoparticle solu- But it is important to realize that there are val-
tion and will supplement 't Hooft's more formal ues of A that can be obtained from each other by
VOLUME 37, NUMBER 3 PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 19 JUz, v 1976

gauge transformations which cannot be continuously joined with the identity transformation. For in-
stance, we may consider
x —A.
g, ()--„, ~, --,
2jh. g ~
x

which gives origin to

A(x)=g, '(x)Vg, (x)= ~, , [o(X -x )+2x(o x)+2Axxo] (4)

and of course to vanishing field strengths I'


Values of the potentials like those of Eq. (4), al-
„ n adiabatically from —2 to+ &. Now the field
though gauge equivalent to A = 0, should not be re- strength is nonvanishing, but proportional to &
moved from the integrations over the field config- —a'. The energy, —8 fd'x TrF, &I'"~0, becomes
urations by the gauge fixing procedure, and in- proportional to (a2- ~)' and exhibits a barrier
deed we shall argue that physical effects are as- shape as o. varies from —2 to 2.
sociated with them. In the quantum theory, tunneling will occur
Before proceeding, let us characterize the across this barrier. It is well known that a semi-
classes of gauge-equivalent, but not continuously classical description of tunneling can be given by
gauge-equivalent, potentials. We study effects solving the classical equations of motion with
which are local in space and therefore, when we imaginary time, thus achieving an evolution which
consider a gauge transformation g, we require would be classically forbidden for real time. '
The pseudoparticle solution' serves precisely
g(x) (, ( this purpose: It carries zero energy (the Eucli-
dean stress tensor vanishes); it can be arranged
Thus g defines a mapping of the three-dimension-
to connect@=g, at g4=-it=-~ withg=I atx4=~.
al space, with all the directions at ~ identified,
The physical implication of the pseudoparticle
into the group space. From the topological point
solution is that the quantal description of the vac-
of view, the Euclidean space Z' with points at ~
uum state cannot be limited to fluctuations around
identified is equivalent (homeomorphic) to a
any definite classical configuration of zero ener-
three-dimensional sphere S'; but the manifold of
SU(2) is also homeomorphic to S', so that@ de- gy.
fines a mapping
I et us now describe in greater detail the nature
of the vacuum wave functional. Consider any of
S3 S3. the field configurations
It is known that these mappings fall into homotopy A„(x) =g„'(x)Vg„(x) (8)
classes (mappings belonging to different classes
cannot be continuously distorted into each other)
with vanishing I ". Neglecting
tunneling effects
we might expect the vacuum to be of the form
classified by an integer n,
g„[A] =cp [A —A„],
g„(x) = [g, (x)]"
where the wave functional q is peaked about zero
with@, given in Eq. (3) being a representative of and has a spread due to quantum fluctuations and
the nth class. any A„can be chosen as representative of the
We can make contact now with the pseudoparti- classical vacuum, i.e. , the classical zero-energy
cle solution. ' Observe that the field configura- configuration.
tion of Eq. (4) has zero potential energy, and that But the pseudoparticle solution connects A„with
there is no energy-conserving evolution of the A„+„giving origin to tunneling between the differ-
system which adiabatically connects that configu- ent g„. The true quantal vacuum state will there-
ration with A = 0. Such an evolution should be a fore be a superposition of the form
continuous gauge transformation; but this is im-
possible because g, and the identity belong to dif- %[A] =Z„~„P„[A)+O(exp(- 8~'/g')). (10)
ferent homotopy classes. All paths joining the To determine the coefficients c„ in this equation
two field configurations in real time must go over let us observe that the finite gauge transforma-
an energy barrier. To exemplify this, let us mul- tion g, changes P„ into P„+,. Requiring the vac'-
tiply the potentials of Eq. (4) by & —n and increase uum state to be stable against gauge transforma-

i73
VOL UM E )7, NUMBER 3 PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 19 Jvr, v 1976

tions determines the coefficients to be may be given. The tunneling process between ad-
cn =e' jacent vacuum components g„[A] and g„+,[A] is
equivalent to a gauge transformation g, which
Thus we find a family of vacua, parametrized by changes Q, —Q, by two units; see Eq. (14). But
an angle 0, where under the gauge transformation Q, is conserved, and therefore sQ, = —2.
Finally, we remark that, whereas in the mass-
less case conservation of Q, renders all vacua
we[A];e ' we[A]. (12)
degenerate, we expect that if the fermions are
The occurrence of multiple vacua is intriguing massive, so that Q, is no longer conserved, dif-
and is reminiscent of the situation encountered in ferent values of 8 define nonequivalent theories
the Schwinger model. ' as in the Schwinger model. ' A nonzero value of
The significance of the phase 0 in Eqs. (10) and 0 could describe CP nonconservation, ' but in the
(11) becomes apparent when massless fermions theory as developed thus far there is no indica-
are coupled to the Yang-Mills fields. One may tion how to compute O.
then introduce the U(1) axial-vector current We are happy to acknowledge our indebtedness
to G. 't Hooft, whose calculations made our ob-
servations possible. We also thank S. Coleman
which however is not conserved because of the and L. Susskind for discussions.
anomaly. ' A conserved, but gauge-variant, cur- —
Added note. After completion of this manu-
rent is given by script, we received a paper by C. Callan, R. Dash
p g5 p 4~ 2g pvOLB
en, and D. Gross (to be published) who arrive at
5
conclusions similar to ours.
x Tr(A, 8 A. e+-', A„A~A e) (13a)
and the conserved axial charge is
Q = Jd'xZ' (13b)
To exhibit the gauge dependence of Q„we per- *This work is supported in part through funds provid-
ed by the U. S. Energy Research and Development Ad-
form a finite gauge transformation@, with ministration under Contract No. E(11-1)-3069.
g(x) =
I, and find A. Belavin, A. Polyakov, A. Schwartz, and Y. Tyup-
kin, Phys. Lett. 598, 85 (1975); A. Polyakov, Phys.
bQ, = d x Tre),.„(g '8;g)(g '8;g)(g 's„g) Lett. 598, 82 (1975).
2Q. 't Hooft, Phys. Rev. Lett. 37, 8 (1976), and lec-
l~

tures at various universities.


7t
dp, (g) =2n, 3S. L. Adler, in LecAcxes on Elementary Particles
and QNantum Eield Theory, edited by S. Deser, M. Qri-
where dp, (g) is the invariant measure of the group saru, and H. Pendleton (The MIT Press, Cambridge,
and n is the integer which characterizes the homo- Mass. , 1970); B. Jackiw, in I-ectmes on Cm~~ent Al-
topy class of g. (g belongs to the nth homotopy gebra and Its Applirations, edited by S. Treiman,
class when it is continuously deformable to g„.) B. Jackiw, and D. Gross (Princeton Univ. Press,
The fact that Q, commutes with the Hamiltonian,
Princeton, ¹ J., 1972).
4H. Pagels, Phys. Bev. D 13, 343 (1976).
and that it changes by two units under the gauge Use of imaginary time in discussions of tunneling
transformationg„ together with Eq. (11), im- is well known; see, e.g. , K. Freed, J. Chem. Phys.
plies that 56, 692 (1972); D. McLaughlin, J. Math. Phys. (N. Y.)
13, 1099 (i972).
exp( 2 & 9'Qg)4'e[A] = 4e+ ei[A] (») 6J. Schwinger, Phys. Bev. 128, 2425 (1962); J. Lo-
which in turn shows that all the vacua are degen- wenstein and A. Swieca, Ann. Phys. (¹Y. ) 68, 172
(1971); S. Coleman, B. Jackiw, and L. Susskind, Ann.
erate in energy and define the same theory. Equa- Phys. (N. Y.) 93, 267 (1975). (This analogy was devel-
tion (15) also demonstrates the possibility of sym- oped in conversations with Coleman and Susskind. )
metry breaking without Goldstone bosons: This There is no pseudoparticle solution for sPinox elec-
may provide a solution to the U(1) problem. "' trodynamics in two space-time dimensions. However,
An explanation of the nonconservation of the by adding to the model charged spinless fields, with a
gauge-invariant fermionic axial charge Higgs potential and minimal electromagnetic coupling,
a pseudoparticle solution exists in Euclidean two-di-
Q~(f) = J d xcT~ (t, x) mension space-~t is just the Nielsen-Olesen string
VOLUME 37, NUMBER 3 PHYSICAL RKVIKW LKTTKRS 19 JUz, v 1976

tNuc1. . Phys. 861, 45 (1973)]. The topologically con- tor current; K. Johnson, Phys. Lett. 5, 253 (1963);
served object is fd xe»F", snd e»E& is also pro- R. Jsckiw, in Lares of Hadronio Matter, edi«d by
portional to the anomalous divergence of the axial vec- A. Zichichi (Academic, New York, 1975).

Direct Evidence for the Bose-Einstein Effect in Inclusive Two-Particle Reaction Correlations'
N. N. Biswas, J. M. Bishop, N. M. Cason, V. P. Kenney, and%. D. Shephard
Dejartment of Pilysics, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana 46556

L. R. Fortney, A. T. Goshaw, J. W. Lamsa, J. S. Loos, W. J. Robertson, and W. D. Walker


Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27706

and
G. Levman, V. A. Sreedhar, and T. S. Yoon
University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

G. Hartner and P. M. Patel


McGill University, Montreal, QNebec, Canada
(Received 5 April 1976)
Two-particle correlations are studied as a function of tg2, the square of the difference
of the four-momentum of the particles. We observe that the m. ~ correlation differs
from the m x+ correlation only at low values of t&&. This difference can quantitatively be
understood as a consequence of Bose-Einstein statistics.

Short-range correlations for particles produced brid system. Experimental details have been re-
in high-energy inclusive reactions are known to ported elsewhere. ' The data sample consists of
exist. Various models for multiparticle-produc- - 17000 events of all topologies.
tion processes, e.g. , clustering, ' have been con- The normalized two-particle correlation func-
sidered to account for the observed correlations. tion is given by
These models yield correlations arising from dy-
namical production processes which have a range R(y y y q q )
-t 2(y»»~+~Q»Q2) ]
of 1-2 units of rapidity and are essentially inde- Vi(yi, Qi) ai(y2, Q2)
pendent of the azimuthal angle between the trans- Here p, and p, are the two-particle and single-
verse momenta. Both of these features are ob- particle densities, respectively, y is the center-
served for correlations involving unlike pions; of-mass-system rapidity, Q is the magnitude of
when the pion pairs have like charges, however, the transverse momentum, and the azimuthal an-
a striking narrow correlation (width -0.4 units of gle y is defined by cosy =Q, Q, /Q, q, . We inte-
rapidity) for small azimuthal-angle separation is grate Eq. (1) over y, and consider the resulting
observed. "' It has been suggested that this nar- (Rby, y, q„q, ), where by =y, -y, . We denote
row correlation may be a Bose-Einstein (BE) the correlations for s s (like charges) and for
symmetry effect, ~ rather than a consequence of m m' (unlike charges) as R(- -)
and R(-+), re-
charge-structure dynamics in particle production. spectively.
Experimental evidence supporting this explana- In Fig. 1, we present R(- —) and R(-+) as a
tion has so far been lacking. We present here an function of by for various choices of y and Q.
analysis which shows evidence for the presence The values of R, summed over all Q, and Q„
of both dynamical and BE symmetry effects for are shown for three regions of y (0'-45', 45'-
like charges. 135, and 135 -180 ) in Figs. 1(a) (like charges)
The data presented here are obtained from s P and l(b) (unlike charges). As noted in Ref. 2,
interactions at 200 GeV/c using the Fermilab 30- R(- -) and R(-+) manifest different characteris-
in. bubble-chamber, wide-gap spark-chamber hy- tics in the cp dependence of the rapidity correla-

You might also like