You are on page 1of 17

Review

Perioperative care of the obese patient


M. Carron1 , B. Safaee Fakhr1 , G. Ieppariello1 and M. Foletto2
1 Department of Medicine – DIMED, Section of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, and 2 Department of Surgical, Oncological and Gastroenterological

Sciences, Section of Surgery, University of Padua, Padua, Italy


Correspondence to: Dr M. Carron, Department of Medicine – DIMED, Section of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, University of Padua, Via V.
Gallucci, 13, 35121 Padua, Italy (e-mail: michele.carron@unipd.it)

Background: Obesity has become an increasing problem worldwide during the past few decades. Hence,
surgeons and anaesthetists will care for an increasing number of obese patients in the foreseeable future,
and should be prepared to provide optimal management for these individuals. This review provides an
update of recent evidence regarding perioperative strategies for obese patients.
Methods: A search for papers on the perioperative care of obese patients (English language only) was
performed in July 2019 using the PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and Cochrane Library electronic
databases. The review focused on the results of RCTs, although observational studies, meta-analyses,
reviews, guidelines and other reports discussing the perioperative care of obese patients were also
considered. When data from obese patients were not available, relevant data from non-obese populations
were used.
Results and conclusion: Obese patients require comprehensive preoperative evaluation. Experienced
medical teams, appropriate equipment and monitoring, careful anaesthetic management, and an ade-
quate perioperative ventilation strategy may improve postoperative outcomes. Additional perioperative
precautions are necessary in patients with severe morbid obesity, metabolic syndrome, untreated or severe
obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome, or obesity hypoventilation syndrome; patients receiving home ven-
tilatory support or postoperative opioid therapy; and obese patients undergoing open operations, long
procedures or revisional surgery.

Paper accepted 7 November 2019


Published online in Wiley Online Library (www.bjs.co.uk). DOI: 10.1002/bjs.11447

Introduction It is projected that 60 per cent of the world’s population


(3⋅3 billion people) will be overweight (2⋅2 billion) or
Obesity is defined as abnormal or excessive fat accumu- obese (1⋅1 billion) by 2030 if recent trends continue1,2 .
lation that may impair health1,2 . BMI is a simple mea- Obesity is of major importance because of its association
sure for classifying overweight and obesity in adults: BMI with increased morbidity and mortality2 . In 2010, over-
over 25 kg/m2 and exceeding 30 kg/m2 respectively1,2 . weight and obesity were estimated to cause 3⋅4 million
The WHO1,2 categorizes obesity as grade I (BMI 30–34 deaths, 3⋅9 per cent of years of life lost and 3⋅8 per cent of
kg/m2 ), grade II (BMI 35–39 kg/m2 ) or grade III (BMI at disability-adjusted life-years worldwide1 . First-line treat-
least 40 kg/m2 ). ments for obesity include dietary modifications, physical
The incidence and prevalence of obesity continue activity and behaviour modification2 . Bariatric surgery is
to increase globally, in both developed and developing another option1,2 . An increasing number of obese patients
countries1 . The worldwide prevalence of obesity nearly will present for surgery in the coming years, and physi-
tripled between 1975 and 2016. Overall, approximately 13 cians should understand ways to optimize care for this
per cent of the world’s adult population (11 per cent of population.
men and 15 per cent of women) were obese in 20162 . The
USA has a particularly high prevalence of obesity: in 2013,
Methods
31⋅6 per cent of men and 33⋅9 per cent of women were
obese1 . In Europe, approximately 24 per cent of women PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and Cochrane Library
and 21 per cent of men were obese in the same year1 . electronic databases were searched in July 2019 using the

© 2020 BJS Society Ltd BJS 2020; 107: e39–e55


Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd
e40 M. Carron, B. Safaee Fakhr, G. Ieppariello and M. Foletto

Medical Subject Heading (MeSH) terms listed in Table S1 Fig. 1 PRISMA flow chart showing selection of studies for this
(supporting information). The following search limits were review
applied: English language, full text and studies in humans.
Studies were selected independently by two authors, who Records identified through

Identification
screened the titles and abstracts to identify studies concern- database searching n = 49 205
PubMed n = 8058
ing the perioperative care of obese adults. Disagreements Scopus n = 31 414
were resolved by consensus or consultation with another Cochrane Library n = 7739
Web of Science n = 1994
author. RCTs were sought. The results of meta-analyses
of RCTs were used when available, instead of considering Records excluded because
the results of individual RCTs addressing the same issue. In not focused on
the absence of data from RCTs, or to complement or inte- perioperative care

Screening
n = 46 616
grate the findings of RCTs, observational studies, reviews,
guidelines and other reports were also considered. Recordsd screened
n = 2589

Results and discussion Duplicate records excluded


n = 580
Article selection

Eligibility
Records screened after
Of the 49 205 reports initially identified, 445 articles were removal of duplicates
n = 2009
selected and considered for this review (Fig. 1). The num-
Articles excluded because
ber of relevant publications increased over time (Fig. S1, not RCTs
supporting information). n = 1564
Included

Studies evaluated for


qualittative synthesis
as RCTs
Pathophysiology of obesity n = 445
Fat distribution is an important aspect of obesity. Distri-
bution is classified as peripheral (gynaecoid, pear-shaped
or lower body obesity) or central (visceral, android,
apple-shaped or upper body obesity)3 . Central fat is
more important pathophysiologically because it is more obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome (OSAS), as well as
frequently associated with inflammation4 . Central adi- other obesity-related (Fig. 2) and non-obesity-related
pose tissue produces a number of bioactive substances conditions that may affect the perioperative course7 – 59 .
(adipocytokines or adipokines), which include chemokines Weight loss (such as 5–10 per cent) should be encour-
(such as leptin, resistin, visfatin, retinol binding protein aged before surgery65 to prevent or treat obesity-related
4) and cytokines (for example, tumour necrosis factor co-morbidities64 and to improve operating conditions
α, interleukin (IL) 1, IL-6, IL-18). These substances for the surgeon65 . Mean weight loss of 7⋅4 kg has been
trigger systemic inflammation and interact with various shown to improve hypertension, hyperlipidaemia and
processes in many different organs4 . Adipocytokines and insulin resistance before bariatric surgery66 . The authors
chronic inflammation have a role in the development of of a systematic review67 reported that low-calorie diets
obesity-related metabolic dysfunction4 , and may explain before bariatric surgery reduced the size of the liver (which
why obesity-related disorders are more common with was enlarged because of fat deposition) by an average
central, compared with peripheral, fat distribution3 – 6 . of 14 per cent. Alternative methods, such as use of an
Obesity-related diseases of relevance to anaesthetists and intragastric balloon or nutritional supplements, decrease
surgeons are shown in Fig. 2 and Appendix S1 (supporting liver size by 32 and 20–43 per cent respectively67 . Reduc-
information)7 – 59 . ing liver size improves liver retraction and access to the
gastro-oesophageal junction during laparoscopic bariatric
surgery67,68 .
Preoperative care
Tobacco and alcohol use should be stopped at least
Comprehensive medical management 4 weeks before surgery60,61 . In the general population of
A thorough history, physical examination and laboratory surgical patients, smoking cessation significantly decreases
assessment relevant to obesity should be obtained33,60 – 64 the risk of total perioperative complications69 . Current
(Table 1). Investigations should focus on identifying alcohol use is an independent predictor of postoperative

© 2020 BJS Society Ltd www.bjs.co.uk BJS 2020; 107: e39–e55


Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd
Perioperative care of the obese patient e41

Fig. 2 Main obesity-related diseases7 – 59

Major depression (OR 1·21) Obstructive sleep apnoea (OR 6·0 for ↑10% bodyweight)
Bipolar disorder (OR 1·47) DMV (OR 3·39), DEI (OR 3·46) or both (OR 4·12)
Alzheimer’s disease (RR 2·04); any dementia (RR 1·64) Postoperative desaturation (OR 2·27)
Postoperative cognitive dysfunction (RR 1·27) Postoperative respiratory failure (OR 2·43)
Postoperative reintubation (OR 2·05)
Postoperative cardiac adverse events (OR 2·07)
Hypertension (OR 4·8) Postoperative ICU transfer (OR 2·81)
Heart failure (RR 1·90 M; RR 2·12 F)
Ischaemic heart disease (adjusted HR 1·64)
Myocardial infarction (adjusted HR 2·02)
Atrial fibrillation (adjusted HR 1·52 M; adjusted HR 1·46 F) Obesity hypoventilation syndrome
Cardiac event or cor pulmonale (OR 9)
Postoperative respiratory failure (OR 10·9)
Diabetes mellitus (adjusted RR 7·28) Postoperative heart failure (OR 5·4)
Dyslipidaemia (adjusted OR 2·2) Postoperative prolonged intubation (OR 3·1)
Postoperative ICU transfer (OR 10·9)

Metabolic syndrome
Stroke (OR 2·16) Respiratory disease
Myocardial infarction (OR 2·01) Respiratory complications with severe ↓FEV1 (OR 2·97)
Atrial fibrillation (adjusted HR 1·52 M; adjusted HR 1·46 F) Cardiovascular complications with severe ↓FEV1 (OR 2·02)

Hypercoagulability Asthma (RR 2·7)


Stroke, myocardial infarction (OR 1·57) Postoperative respiratory complications (OR 2·94)
Deep venous thrombosis (RR 2·50)
Pulmonary embolism (RR 2·21) Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (OR 1·94)
Postoperative complications (OR 10·9)

Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (RR 4·6); cirrhosis (RR 4·1)


Osteoarthritis (RR 1·12 hip; RR 1·25 knee)
Gout (RR 2·67)
Renal disease (OR 1·38 hypertension; OR 1·4 type 2 diabetes)

Most of these are relevant to the anaesthetist because they are associated with an increased risk of perioperative complications. Ratio values are shown in
parentheses. OR, odds ratio; RR, relative risk; HR, hazard ratio; DMV, difficult mask ventilation; DEI, difficult endotracheal intubation; FEV1, forced
expiratory volume in 1 s. For more details see Appendix S1 (supporting information).

pneumonia, sepsis, septic shock, superficial surgical-site of glycaemia47 – 49 . Patients with a perioperative blood
infection, wound disruption and prolonged hospital stay70 . glucose level exceeding 180 mg/dl have a significantly
Preoperative initiation of continuous positive airway increased risk of infection, reintervention and death48 .
pressure (CPAP), ideally at least 4 weeks before surgery, Standard fasting guidelines for adults recommend avoid-
may be considered, particularly if OSAS is severe or ing clear liquids for at least 2 h before surgery, and solids or
obesity hypoventilation syndrome is present, to attenu- non-human milk for 6 h or more75 . Obesity itself is not an
ate some of the cardiometabolic abnormalities of these independent predictor of pulmonary aspiration; thus, these
disorders71 . For patients who do not respond adequately to guidelines are appropriate for most obese patients, and rou-
CPAP, non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) tine aspiration prophylaxis is unnecessary76 . However, pro-
is an option13 . Preoperative inspiratory muscular training phylaxis should be considered when risk factors are present
can increase inspiratory muscular strength and improve (such as symptomatic gastro-oesophageal reflux, increased
postoperative oxygenation in obese patients72 . Conversely, gastric volume, anticipated difficult airway)57 . Oral carbo-
preoperative incentive spirometry does not significantly hydrate conditioning before major abdominal surgery has
improve respiratory function after bariatric surgery73 . metabolic and clinical benefits that may be useful for obese
It is recommended that chronic medications are con- patients61 .
tinued until the day of surgery and resumed promptly
thereafter to avoid withdrawal57 . Oral hypoglycaemic Airway assessment
agents (such as metformin) should be discontinued Obesity is associated with morphological features that may
1–2 days before operation and restarted when patients adversely affect airway management. Difficult mask ven-
resume eating. Long-acting insulin should be switched tilation has been reported in 8⋅8 per cent of obese77 and
to an intermediate-acting form 1–2 days before surgery, 11 per cent of morbidly obese78 patients. Reported diffi-
and perioperative intravenous insulin/glucose/potassium cult tracheal intubation rates vary widely79 – 87 , from 3⋅3
may be considered74 . Close perioperative blood glu- per cent86 to 16⋅7 per cent80 of obese patients. Predic-
cose monitoring is recommended to avoid extremes tors of difficult airways are similar to those in non-obese

© 2020 BJS Society Ltd www.bjs.co.uk BJS 2020; 107: e39–e55


Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd
e42 M. Carron, B. Safaee Fakhr, G. Ieppariello and M. Foletto

patients61 . In obese patients, male sex, presence of OSAS


Table 1 Preoperative assessment for obese patients undergoing and large neck circumference (over 40 cm) are the most
anaesthesia commonly reported independent risk factors for diffi-
cult airway management79 – 87 . Although preparations for
Physiological parameters
potentially difficult mask ventilation or intubation must
Fat distribution*
be considered in all obese patients, they are particularly
Waist circumference; waist-to-hip ratio†
important in patients with these risk factors60,61,88 .
Upper airway
Obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome‡
Laboratory tests§ Postoperative care planning
Electrocardiography The Obesity Surgery Mortality Risk Score was developed
Complete blood count to predict the risk of death in obese patients. It considers
Haemostasis five variables associated with perioperative mortality: BMI
Fasting serum glucose¶ at least 50 kg/m2 (odds ratio (OR) 3⋅60), age 45 years or
Lipid profile# more (OR 1⋅64), male sex (OR 2⋅79), hypertension (OR
Kidney function** 2⋅78) and susceptibility to pulmonary embolus (previous
Hepatic function††
thrombosis, pulmonary embolus, inferior vena cava filter,
Additional assessments (if indicated)
right heart failure, obesity hypoventilation syndrome) (OR
Echocardiography
2⋅62). Based on this risk score, the mortality risk is low (0⋅3
Ergometry
Chest radiography
per cent) with one variable, intermediate (1⋅9 per cent) with
Spirometry
two or three variables and high (7⋅6 per cent) with four
Arterial blood gas analysis or five variables89 . Postoperative care in a monitored set-
Polysomnography‡ ting should be planned for high-risk obese patients (older
Index of inflammation‡‡ patients, BMI at least 50 kg/m2 , moderate to severe OSAS,
Serum uric acid metabolic syndrome, obesity hypoventilation syndrome,
Endocrine function other major co-morbidities), especially after major, revi-
*Peripheral fat distribution describes a physique in which fat is located
sional or open surgery, or when parenteral opioids, or use
primarily in the arms, legs and buttocks, and the abdominal fat is pre- of CPAP or NIPPV, is anticipated after operation14,89,90 .
dominantly extraperitoneal. In contrast, central fat distribution describes
a physique in which excessive fat is located primarily in the trunk, with
Drug dosing
a high intraperitoneal fat content3 . †Waist circumference is highly cor-
related with intra-abdominal fat content. Central obesity is defined by Obesity is associated with physiological and anthropo-
a waist circumference of at least 94 cm in men and at least 80 cm in metric changes that alter the pharmacokinetics of most
non-pregnant women. Cut-off points indicating higher cardiometabolic drugs. Knowledge of optimal drug dosing scalars is nec-
risks are over 102 cm for men and over 88 cm for women. In the
presence of peripheral obesity, waist-to-hip ratios of less than 0⋅9 for essary for safe and effective anaesthesia91 . Except for
men and below 0⋅8 for women confer protection against cardiometabolic non-depolarizing neuromuscular blocking agents (for
risks62 – 64 . ‡The standard for diagnosing obstructive sleep apnoea syn- which ideal bodyweight may be appropriate) and succinyl-
drome (OSAS) is polysomnography12 – 14 . However, polysomnography is
choline and sugammadex (for which actual bodyweight is
time-consuming, expensive and frequently difficult to achieve. Alterna-
tively, several preoperative screening questionnaires have been developed recommended), lean bodyweight is the preferred dosing
to identify patients at highest risk of OSAS12 – 14 . The STOP-Bang (Snor- scalar for common anaesthetic agents, analgesics and local
ing, Tiredness, Observed apnoeas, raised blood Pressure, BMI over 35 anaesthestics91 .
kg/m2 , Age above 50 years, Neck circumference exceeding 40 cm (at least
41 cm for women and 43 cm for men), male Gender) questionnaire is
the most widely used tool to predict the syndrome. One point is assigned Equipment and monitoring
for each positive feature; a total score of 5 or more represents a signifi- Appropriate operating tables and other equipment
cant risk of OSAS15 . §Appropriate laboratory assessments used in obesity
management; the first five are the most important64 . ¶Blood glucose lev-
are required for safe anaesthesia in obese patients
els should be below 130 mg/dl before operation and maintained below (Fig. 3)57,60,61 . Minimum standards for monitoring all
180 mg/dl after surgery47 – 49 . #Lipid profile should include high-density patients during anaesthesia and recovery should be
lipoprotein–cholesterol and triglycerides50,51 . **Kidney function assess- followed97 . Monitoring depth of anaesthesia (for example,
ment should include at least serum creatinine measurement64 . ††Hepatic
function tests should include measurement of serum aspartate aminotrans- using a bispectral index monitor) should be considered
ferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels, and AST/ALT to avoid accidental awareness during surgery98 , particu-
ratio64 . ‡‡Index of inflammation should include high-sensitivity C-reactive larly when total intravenous anaesthesia is used or when
protein and ferritin assays64 .
end-tidal anaesthetic concentrations are not monitored
during inhalational anaesthesia in obese patients61,99 .

© 2020 BJS Society Ltd www.bjs.co.uk BJS 2020; 107: e39–e55


Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd
Perioperative care of the obese patient e43

Fig. 3 Obese patient positioning

Patient positioning Ramped position


Adequate immobilization (wide hook and loop Using ramping device/pillows and/or blankets under a patient’s
fastener strapping) head and shoulders
Arms and feet supported Configuring the operating table into a back-up position
Protection of pressure areas (gel pads and padding) Reverse Trendelenburg position
Prevention of neural injury Ear to sternal notch in the same horizontal plane

Bariatric operating table


High capacity operating table
Shoulder, leg and foot supports
Armboards and table extensions

The correct ramped position involves elevation of the upper body, neck and head so that an imaginary horizontal line can be drawn from the sternal notch
to the external ear92 . This position facilitates mask ventilation and improves intubating conditions (odds ratio 2⋅4)92 – 95 . The 30∘ reverse Trendelenburg
position improves lung volumes and pulmonary compliance3,19,96 . It provides a longer safe apnoea period than the 30∘ back-up Fowler or horizontal supine
position3,19,96 .

When neuromuscular blockade is planned, monitoring of In obese patients, a multimodal approach to PONV pro-
neuromuscular function (most commonly with a periph- phylaxis is preferred60 . A combination of dexamethasone,
eral nerve stimulator) is mandatory for the safe conduct ondansetron and haloperidol has been shown to signif-
of anaesthesia to reduce the likelihood of residual muscle icantly reduce PONV and rescue antiemetic use after
weakness after surgery100 . laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy107 .
Oral pregabalin and gabapentin are beneficial for post-
Preanaesthesia medications operative pain prophylaxis108,109 . In addition to improving
Obesity is a risk factor for nosocomial infections, par- sleep, melatonin can improve pain the day after surgery110 .
ticularly surgical-site infections. The frequency of these Venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis, including
infections in obese patients ranges from 1 to 21⋅7 per mechanical methods (thromboembolic stockings, sequen-
cent, depending on the procedure101 . Antibiotic prophy- tial alternating compressive devices), chemoprophylaxis
laxis significantly reduces surgical-site infections after elec- (low-dose subcutaneous unfractionated heparin or low
tive surgery101,102 and should follow standard guidelines molecular weight heparin (LMWH)) and early postop-
for perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis103 . Cefazolin erative mobilization, is recommended60,61,111 . The dose
2 g is widely used as antibiotic prophylaxis for many and duration of treatment should be individualized60 .
procedures102 but may be inadequate in patients with class Both once or twice daily LMWH may be suitable in
III obesity104 . For patients weighing 120 kg or more, 3 g obese patients112 ; however, no data support the need for
should be considered103 . twice-daily dosing for VTE prophylaxis60 . Fixed dosing
In the general population of surgical patients, preop- may be considered in obese patients113 . An increased dose,
erative dexamethasone 4–5 mg reduces the likelihood of adjusted to BMI, may be justified in obese patients with a
postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in the first high risk of VTE (men, older age, high BMI, OSAS, obe-
24 h after surgery (OR 0⋅31)105 . Dexamethasone is supe- sity hypoventilation syndrome, previous VTE)60,61 , with
rior to ondansetron for preventing nausea at 4–6 h, and no increased risk of bleeding112 . A prophylactic inferior
vomiting at 4–6 and 24 h after laparoscopic surgery106 . vena cava filter may be considered for patients with severe

© 2020 BJS Society Ltd www.bjs.co.uk BJS 2020; 107: e39–e55


Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd
e44 M. Carron, B. Safaee Fakhr, G. Ieppariello and M. Foletto

venous stasis or previous VTE, or those with a high risk of were superior to a traditional Macintosh laryngoscope,
complications from anticoagulant treatment60 . increasing the success rate, reducing intubation time and
Oral benzodiazepines cause little or no respiratory improving glottic visualization.
depression and are generally appropriate for preoperative Second-generation supraglottic devices are preferred
anxiolysis in obese patients19,57 . If intravenous midazolam for both rescue airway and routine use, rather than
is used, obese patients should be closely monitored, with first-generation, non-gastric access devices127,132 – 136 .
supplementary oxygen immediately available57 . Ketamine Supraglottic devices have been used successfully as tem-
plus clonidine or dexmedetomidine are other options, with porary ventilatory devices before laryngoscope-guided
minimal adverse respiratory effects114,115 . tracheal intubation137 , conduits for endotracheal
tube insertion133,138 and primary airway devices dur-
Intraoperative care ing surgery132,134,136 . They are most appropriate in
highly-selected obese patients undergoing short proce-
A safety briefing is recommended before an obese patient dures in the reverse Trendelenburg or head-up position60,61
enters the operating room. The need for additional oper- and when used by experienced personnel136 .
ating room personnel (for example, to assist with posi- Awake flexible fibre-optic intubation is the standard for
tioning) should be identified. All operating room staff managing anticipated difficult intubation and is recom-
should also be made aware of the proper positioning, mended as an alternative to traditional laryngoscopy for
appropriate equipment, anaesthetic approach, specific sur- tracheal intubation in obese patients with a high risk of
gical procedure and plan for postoperative care, includ-
difficult intubation60,61,118 . Videolaryngoscopy may also be
ing airway and respiratory support, analgesic strategy and
considered for awake intubation in obese patients139,140 .
ultimate recovery location (regular ward, monitored unit
or ICU). Extra time should be allowed for positioning
the obese patient and initiation of anaesthesia57,60,61 . The Anaesthetic management
ramp position improves the likelihood of successful air- It is controversial whether rapid sequence induction of
way management in obese patients3,19,92 – 96 . The reverse anaesthesia with intravenous anaesthetic medications is
Trendelenburg position improves lung volume, oxygena- necessary in fasted obese patients with no aspiration risk
tion and respiratory mechanics, particularly during laparo- factors who are undergoing elective surgery141 . Rapid
scopic surgery116 (Fig. 3). sequence induction should be considered in those with
The surgical team should be aware of the basic aspects symptomatic gastro-oesophageal reflux or other conditions
of airway management. An inadequate approach, inexperi- predisposing to aspiration (such as diabetes mellitus, gas-
enced staff, poor communication, poor teamwork and task trointestinal disorders, emergency surgery). Cricoid pres-
fixation have been shown to lead to major airway manage- sure during rapid sequence induction is probably useful for
ment complications in obese patients117 . It is imperative to preventing gastric aspiration141 , but may increase the diffi-
establish a clear and appropriate management strategy and culty of airway management118 .
follow guidelines if difficulties occur88,118 . Appropriate air- Induction of general anaesthesia with propofol (one of
way equipment should be immediately available88,118 . the most commonly used induction agents) is ideally guided
Administering oxygen before induction of general anaes- by bispectral index monitoring142 . Propofol dosing based
thesia aims to increase oxygen reserve, thereby extend- on lean bodyweight may avoid hypotension143 , but addi-
ing the safe apnoea period (Fig. 4). Preoxygenation is tional propofol may be necessary to achieve adequate loss
enhanced by augmenting functional residual capacity using of consciousness142 .
non-invasive ventilation120 – 126 , which increases the safe The superiority of inhalational or intravenous medica-
apnoea period by 50 per cent123 . Use of second-generation tions for maintaining anaesthesia after induction has not
supraglottic devices before laryngoscope-guided intuba- been established in obese patients57,60,61 . Among inhala-
tion may extend the safe apnoea period by 50 per cent, com- tional anaesthetics, desflurane may be the best option, as its
pared with preoxygenation with CPAP127 . Apnoeic oxy- low lipophilicity and solubility limit distribution in adipose
genation should be considered during laryngoscopy128 – 130 ; tissues, promoting faster emergence and recovery144 – 149 .
buccal oxygen delivery has been shown to increase the safe A meta-analysis144 reported that times to eye opening
apnoea period 2⋅5-fold, significantly reducing the risk of on command and tracheal extubation were decreased by
desaturation130 . 37 and 33⋅6 per cent respectively in patients receiving
The choice of laryngoscope influences the likelihood of desflurane compared with sevoflurane. These advantages
successful tracheal intubation118 . A meta-analysis131 com- were confirmed for desflurane compared with propo-
bining data from 13 RCTs showed that videolaryngoscopes fol or isoflurane145 . Furthermore, desflurane anaesthesia

© 2020 BJS Society Ltd www.bjs.co.uk BJS 2020; 107: e39–e55


Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd
Perioperative care of the obese patient e45

Fig. 4 Perioperative respiratory support

Before operation: preoxygenation After operation: respiratory support

Deep breaths or tidal volume breathing 2 min Supplementary oxygen


CPAP 8–10 cmH2O) 2–5 min CPAP (8–12 cmH2O)
PS (5–10 cmH2O) + PEEP (5 cmH2O) 2–5 min NIPPV (BIPAP 12/4 cmH2O*; PSV 5–10/5–10 cmH2O†)
Apnoeic oxygenation

During operation: lung protective mechanical ventilation

Driving pressure < 13–15 cmH2O

Low tidal volume PEEP Recuritment manoeuvre


FiO2 Respiratory rate
(6–8 ml per kg (10–12 cmH2O) (after endotracheal
(0·3–0·8) (target normocapnia)
predicted bodyweight) intubation)

This figure summarizes strategies to minimize the risk of hypoventilation and atelectasis, as well as improve oxygenation and respiratory function, during
the perioperative period. Intraoperative lung protective mechanical ventilation is a key aspect of perioperative pulmonary care, which may be enhanced by
preoperative and postoperative non-invasive respiratory support. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) or non-invasive pressure positive ventilation
(NIPPV), delivered as bilevel positive airway pressure (BiPAP) or pressure support ventilation (PSV), may be considered for both prophylactic use in
high-risk obese patients (BMI over 50 kg/m2 , severe obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome, obesity hypoventilation syndrome, home CPAP therapy, opioid
therapy) and therapeutic use in the setting of oxygen desaturation, hypoventilation or respiratory failure. Values of CPAP and NIPPV suggested in the
literature119 are shown in parentheses. *With BiPAP: inspiratory peak airway pressure 12 cmH2 O and expiratory peak airway pressure 4 cmH2 O. †With
PSV: pressure support (PS) 5–10 cmH2 O and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) 5–10 cmH2 O. FiO2 , fraction of inspired oxygen.

has been associated with better early postoperative oxy- dexmedetomidine)114,158 – 161 , magnesium161 – 163 and local
genation and lung function than propofol anaesthesia149 . or regional anaesthesia164 – 168 . Intraperitoneal local anaes-
No differences between desflurane and propofol anaes- thetic (for example, 40 ml of bupivacaine 0⋅25 per cent)
thesia in incidence of rhabdomyolysis or postoperative reduces postoperative pain and opioid consumption166 – 168 .
cognitive dysfunction in older obese patients have been Ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane blocks
identified150,151 . Compared with sevoflurane or desflu- have been used successfully169 . If intraoperative opioids
rane, propofol anaesthesia has a lower risk of PONV are required, a short-acting opioid (such as remifentanil)
in the general population152 , but data are conflicting in is preferred for obese patients57,60,61 . Opioid-free anaes-
obese patients, with some studies finding benefit153,154 and thesia using propofol, ketamine and dexmedetomidine
others146 reporting no benefit. No significant differences reduces PONV compared with inhalational anaesthesia
have been observed in analgesia requirements or postanaes- and opioids170 . Regional anaesthesia may have several
thesia care unit (PACU) discharge times between inhala- advantages over general anaesthesia for selected surgi-
tional and intravenous anaesthesia in obese patients145 . cal procedures57,60,61 . Ultrasound guidance is useful for
regional techniques when the anatomy is unfavourable, as
Analgesia occurs more commonly with obesity57 .
Multimodal analgesia strategies should be adopted in
obese patients to reduce or eliminate use of opioids Neuromuscular blockade
after surgery155,156 . These strategies include use of Administration of neuromuscular blocking agents at induc-
non-opioid analgesics, such as intravenous acetaminophen tion of anaesthesia facilitates airway management171 . Both
(paracetamol) and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory succinylcholine and rocuronium may be used to rapidly
drugs, ketamine114,157 , α-2 agonists (clonidine, achieve favourable intubation conditions172 . However,

© 2020 BJS Society Ltd www.bjs.co.uk BJS 2020; 107: e39–e55


Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd
e46 M. Carron, B. Safaee Fakhr, G. Ieppariello and M. Foletto

succinylcholine may reduce the safe apnoea period173 , and distribution and oxygenation196,198 , and a PEEP of 16–18
rocuronium followed by reversal with sugammadex may cmH2 O may be more appropriate198 . Nevertheless,
allow earlier re-establishment of spontaneous ventilation increasing the PEEP may increase the risk of postoper-
(compared with succinylcholine) if airway management is ative pulmonary complications if a concomitant rise in
difficult174 . For laparoscopic bariatric surgery, deep neuro- airway plateau pressure increases the driving pressure187 .
muscular blockade improves operating conditions175 – 177 , Reducing intra-abdominal pressure during pneumoperi-
reducing complications related to poor surgical condi- toneum increases respiratory compliance and reduces
tions and postoperative pain compared with moderate airway pressures199 . Slow abdominal insufflation with a
blockade176,177 . Male sex and older age may concur to maximum intra-abdominal pressure of less than 15 mmHg
reduce surgeon satisfaction during laparoscopic bariatric is advised, when possible199,200 . High peak airway pressures
surgery under deep neuromuscular blockade178 . Com- and prolonged surgery have been associated indepen-
plete recovery from neuromuscular blockade should be dently with an increased risk of postoperative pulmonary
confirmed with a peripheral nerve stimulator before complications186,187 .
extubation97,179 – 181 . Sugammadex should be considered
for fast reversal of rocuronium-induced neuromuscular Fluid and temperature management
blockade182,183 . In the general population, sugammadex is Restrictive fluid management has been associated with
superior to neostigmine (the traditional reversal agent), fewer postoperative complications than liberal fluid man-
exhibiting greater efficacy and a lower likelihood of adverse agement in the general population201 . Proper fluid balance
events (OR 0⋅47), particularly respiratory (OR 0⋅36) is therefore suggested61 . Goal-directed fluid therapy may
and cardiovascular (OR 0⋅23) events, and postoperative be useful to optimize intraoperative fluid management202 .
weakness (OR 0⋅45)184 . Compared with a conservative/restrictive approach, liberal
intraoperative fluid management during bariatric surgery
does not reduce the incidence of rhabdomyolysis203 nor
Intraoperative lung ventilation
increase intraoperative urine output204 .
Optimal ventilation and oxygenation improve postopera-
Perioperative hypothermia should be avoided205 . Use of
tive outcomes19,185 . Protective intraoperative mechanical
standard intraoperative methods (active forced-air warm-
ventilation has been associated with a reduced incidence
ing, heated intravenous fluids) for preventing a decline in
of postoperative pulmonary complications, which can
body temperature is suggested in obese patients206,207 .
prolong hospital stay and increase mortality186,187 . Pro-
tective intraoperative mechanical ventilation is defined
as the combination of low tidal volume, appropriate Postoperative care
positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and low driv- Obese patients have an increased risk of extubation fail-
ing pressure (airway plateau pressure minus PEEP) ure, which can be reduced by careful intraoperative man-
(Fig. 4)19,185,187,188 . Temporary hyperinflation of the lungs agement and an appropriate awakening plan117,208,209 . Full
with recruitment manoeuvres reverses atelectasis and monitoring should be maintained until discharge from the
improves intraoperative oxygenation and respiratory PACU. The patient should be placed in a head-elevated
function19,185,188,189 . These manoeuvres are recommended or semiseated position57,61 . Standard oxygen therapy may
after induction of anaesthesia in haemodynamically stable be used to maintain preoperative arterial partial pressure
obese patients19,185,188,189 and whenever severe oxygen of oxygen levels60,61 . As the beneficial effects of protec-
desaturation occurs, and they may reduce the risk of tive intraoperative mechanical ventilation may be lost after
postoperative pulmonary complications188 . Limiting the extubation188,189 , CPAP or NIPPV may be considered after
fraction of inspired oxygen to below 0⋅8 is important, extubation185 . The safety and efficacy of CPAP or NIPPV
as higher levels can promote resorption atelectasis and have been established in the perioperative period210 , and
worsen inflammatory lung injury (Fig. 4)185 . they should be considered in high-risk obese patients
In obese patients, the ‘best PEEP’ – balancing main- (Fig. 4)61,119,211 . These modalities counteract upper air-
tenance of end-expiratory lung volume with avoidance way obstruction, reduce hypoventilation and atelectasis,
of hyperinflation – is a matter of debate. A PEEP of improve gas exchange and respiratory function, relieve dys-
10 cmH2 O is often used190 – 196 and has been shown to pnoea and decrease breathing effort in obese patients after
improve respiratory function19,197 , particularly when surgery. They may therefore lower the risk of acute respi-
applied after a recruitment manoeuvre19,185 . However, ratory failure after surgery119 . In obese patients requiring
higher PEEP levels may be necessary in some obese opioids, CPAP in the early postoperative period improves
patients to optimize lung volumes, regional ventilation sleep-disordered breathing and ameliorates the respiratory

© 2020 BJS Society Ltd www.bjs.co.uk BJS 2020; 107: e39–e55


Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd
Perioperative care of the obese patient e47

depressant effects of these drugs212 . Use of a continuous References


high-flow nasal cannula is another option in selected obese 1 Ng M, Fleming T, Robinson M, Thomson B, Graetz N,
patients213 . Margono C et al. Global, regional, and national prevalence
When intravenous opioids are required after operation, of overweight and obesity in children and adults during
patient-controlled analgesia (such as fentanyl or morphine) 1980–2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of
is recommended, instead of a continuous infusion. A longer Disease Study 2013. Lancet 2014; 384: 766–781.
than usual lock-out period between doses should also be 2 WHO Fact Sheet. Obesity and Overweight; 2018.
considered61 . Analgesia by the enteral route should be https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/
commenced as early as possible61 . obesity-and-overweight [accessed 20 July 2019].
Before discharge to the regular surgical ward, all obese 3 Adams JP, Murphy PG. Obesity in anaesthesia and
intensive care. Br J Anaesth 2000; 85: 91–108.
patients should be observed in the PACU for at least
4 Jung UJ, Choi MS. Obesity and its metabolic
1 h when unstimulated for evidence of hypoventilation,
complications: the role of adipokines and the relationship
such as oxygen desaturation or apnoeas or hypopneas between obesity, inflammation, insulin resistance,
with associated desaturation14,60 . When routine PACU dis- dyslipidemia and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Int J Mol
charge criteria are met, many obese patients can be dis- Sci 2014; 15: 6184–6223.
charged safely to an unmonitored hospital bed. However, 5 Mattu HS, Randeva HS. Role of adipokines in
all high-risk obese patients should be assessed by an anaes- cardiovascular disease. J Endocrinol 2013; 216: T17–T36.
thetist to determine the need for additional respiratory sup- 6 Bluth T, Pelosi P, de Abreu MG. The obese patient
port and/or monitoring60,61 . undergoing nonbariatric surgery. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol
2016; 29: 421–429.
7 Simon GE, Von Korff M, Saunders K, Miglioretti DL,
Overview Crane PK, van Belle G et al. Association between obesity
and psychiatric disorders in the US adult population. Arch
Obese patients undergoing surgery require comprehen- Gen Psychiatry 2006; 63: 824–830.
sive preoperative evaluation. Obesity-related conditions 8 Anstey KJ, Cherbuin N, Budge M, Young J. Body mass
that may affect the perioperative course should be inves- index in midlife and late-life as a risk factor for dementia: a
tigated. Obese patients should be prepared well in advance meta-analysis of prospective studies. Obes Rev 2011; 12:
of surgery. Anaesthesia and surgical staff experienced in e426–e437.
caring for obese patients should manage these individuals. 9 Feinkohl I, Winterer G, Pischon T. Obesity and
Specialized equipment is required, and proper monitor- post-operative cognitive dysfunction: a systematic review
ing is recommended for safe anaesthesia. The anaesthetic and meta-analysis. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2016; 32:
approach, specific surgical procedure and plan for post- 643–651.
operative care should be shared with the entire operating 10 Brown C IV, Deiner S. Perioperative cognitive protection.
room team before the patient enters the room. Appropri- Br J Anaesth 2016; 117(Suppl 3): iii52–iii61.
11 Wolk R, Shamsuzzaman AS, Somers VK. Obesity, sleep
ate airway management, careful anaesthetic management
apnea, and hypertension. Hypertension 2003; 42:
and an adequate ventilation strategy (extending beyond the
1067–1074.
immediate postextubation period) may improve postoper- 12 Adesanya AO, Lee W, Greilich NB, Joshi GP.
ative outcomes for obese patients. Additional periopera- Perioperative management of obstructive sleep apnea.
tive precautions are necessary to reduce complications in Chest 2010; 138: 1489–1498.
patients with severe morbid obesity, metabolic syndrome, 13 American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on
untreated or severe OSAS, or obesity hypoventilation syn- Perioperative Management of Patients with Obstructive
drome; those receiving home ventilatory support or post- Sleep Apnea. Practice guidelines for the perioperative
operative opioid therapy; and obese patients undergoing management of patients with obstructive sleep apnea: an
open operations, long procedures or revisional surgery. updated report by the American Society of
Anesthesiologists Task Force on Perioperative
Management of Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea.
Acknowledgements Anesthesiology 2014; 120: 268–286.
14 Seet E, Chung F. Management of sleep apnea in
The authors thank G. Bizzotto, anaesthetist, for invalu- adults – functional algorithms for the perioperative period:
able contributions to the graphics in this paper. M.C. continuing professional development. Can J Anaesth 2010;
has received payments for lectures from Merck Sharp & 57: 849–864.
Dohme (MSD), Rome, Italy. 15 Chung F, Yegneswaran B, Liao P, Chung SA,
Disclosure: The authors declare no other conflict of interest. Vairavanathan S, Islam S et al. STOP questionnaire: a tool

© 2020 BJS Society Ltd www.bjs.co.uk BJS 2020; 107: e39–e55


Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd
e48 M. Carron, B. Safaee Fakhr, G. Ieppariello and M. Foletto

to screen patients for obstructive sleep apnea. Anesthesiology 30 Kenchaiah S, Evans JC, Levy D, Wilson PW, Benjamin EJ,
2008; 108: 812–821. Larson MG et al. Obesity and the risk of heart failure.
16 Nagappa M, Wong DT, Cozowicz C, Ramachandran SK, N Engl J Med 2002; 347: 305–313.
Memtsoudis SG, Chung F. Is obstructive sleep apnea 31 Thomsen M, Nordestgaard BG. Myocardial infarction and
associated with difficult airway? Evidence from a systematic ischemic heart disease in overweight and obesity with and
review and meta-analysis of prospective and retrospective without metabolic syndrome. JAMA Intern Med 2014; 174:
cohort studies. PLoS One 2018; 13: e0204904. 15–22.
17 Kaw R, Chung F, Pasupuleti V, Mehta J, Gay PC, 32 Wang TJ, Parise H, Levy D, D’Agostino RB Sr, Wolf PA,
Hernandez AV. Meta-analysis of the association between Vasan RS et al. Obesity and the risk of new-onset atrial
obstructive sleep apnoea and postoperative outcome. Br fibrillation. JAMA 2004; 292: 2471–2477.
J Anaesth 2012; 109: 897–906. 33 McGlinch BP, Que FG, Nelson JL, Wrobleski DM, Grant
18 Pan L, Xie X, Liu D, Ren D, Guo Y. Obstructive sleep JE, Collazo-Clavell ML. Perioperative care of patients
apnoea and risks of all-cause mortality: preliminary undergoing bariatric surgery. Mayo Clin Proc 2006;
evidence from prospective cohort studies. Sleep Breath 81(Suppl): S25–S33.
2016; 20: 345–353. 34 Wesselink EM, Kappen TH, Torn HM, Slooter AJC,
19 Pelosi P, Gregoretti C. Perioperative management of obese van Klei WA. Intraoperative hypotension and the risk of
patients. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 2010; 24: 211–225. postoperative adverse outcomes: a systematic review. Br
20 Duong M, Islam S, Rangarajan S, Leong D, Kurmi O, J Anaesth 2018; 121: 706–721.
Teo K et al; PURE investigators. Mortality and 35 Camilleri M, Malhi H, Acosta A. Gastrointestinal
cardiovascular and respiratory morbidity in individuals complications of obesity. Gastroenterology 2017; 152:
with impaired FEV1 (PURE): an international, 1656–1670.
36 Tilak A, Ramirez AG, Turrentine FE, Sohn MW,
community-based cohort study. Lancet Glob Health 2019; 7:
Jones RS. Preoperative gastroesophageal reflux disorder is
e613–e623.
associated with increased morbidity in patients undergoing
21 Chau EH, Lam D, Wong J, Mokhlesi B, Chung F. Obesity
abdominal surgery. J Surg Res 2018; 232: 587–594.
hypoventilation syndrome: a review of epidemiology,
37 Marchesini G, Moscatiello S, Di Domizio S, Forlani G.
pathophysiology, and perioperative considerations.
Obesity-associated liver disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab
Anesthesiology 2012; 117: 188–205.
2008; 93(Suppl 1): S74–S80.
22 Berg G, Delaive K, Manfreda J, Walld R, Kryger MH. The
38 Carron M, Parotto E, Ori C. Prolonged neuromuscular
use of health-care resources in obesity–hypoventilation
block associated to non-alcoholic steatohepatitis in
syndrome. Chest 2001; 120: 377–383.
morbidly obese patient: neostigmine versus sugammadex.
23 Kaw R, Bhateja P, Paz Y, Mar H, Hernandez AV,
Minerva Anestesiol 2012; 78: 112–113.
Ramaswamy A, Deshpande A et al. Postoperative
39 Kramer H, Luke A, Bidani A, Cao G, Cooper R,
complications in patients with unrecognized obesity
McGee D. Obesity and prevalent and incident CKD: the
hypoventilation syndrome undergoing elective noncardiac
Hypertension Detection and Follow-Up Program. Am
surgery. Chest 2016; 149: 84–91. J Kidney Dis 2005; 46: 587–594.
24 Sideleva O, Dixon AE. The many faces of asthma in 40 Jiang L, Rong J, Wang Y, Hu F, Bao C, Li X et al. The
obesity. J Cell Biochem 2014; 115: 421–426. relationship between body mass index and hip
25 Tantisira KG, Weiss ST. Complex interactions in complex osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Joint
traits: obesity and asthma. Thorax 2001; 56(Suppl 2): Bone Spine 2011; 78: 150–155.
ii64–73. 41 Jiang L, Tian W, Wang Y, Rong J, Bao C, Liu Y et al. Body
26 Iyer US, Koh KF, Chia NC, Macachor J, Cheng A. mass index and susceptibility to knee osteoarthritis: a
Perioperative risk factors in obese patients for bariatric systematic review and meta-analysis. Joint Bone Spine 2012;
surgery: a Singapore experience. Singapore Med J 2011; 52: 79: 291–297.
94–99. 42 Aune D, Norat T, Vatten LJ. Body mass index and the risk
27 Csige I, Ujvárosy D, Szabó Z, Lörincz I, Paragh G, of gout: a systematic review and dose–response
Harangi M et al. The impact of obesity on the meta-analysis of prospective studies. Eur J Nutr 2014; 53:
cardiovascular system. J Diabetes Res 2018; 2018: 3407306. 1591–1601.
28 Alpert MA, Omran J, Bostick BP. Effects of obesity on 43 Jeong H, Jeon CH. Clinical characteristics and risk factors
cardiovascular hemodynamics, cardiac morphology, and for gout flare during the postsurgical period. Adv
ventricular function. Curr Obes Rep 2016; 5: 424–434. Rheumatol 2019; 59: 31.
29 Nguyen NT, Magno CP, Lane KT, Hinojosa MW, Lane 44 Chakravartty S, Sarma DR, Patel AG. Rhabdomyolysis in
JS. Association of hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, and bariatric surgery: a systematic review. Obes Surg 2013; 23:
metabolic syndrome with obesity: findings from the 1333–1340.
National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1999 45 Kokkoris P, Pi-Sunyer FX. Obesity and endocrine disease.
to 2004. J Am Coll Surg 2008; 207: 928–934. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 2003; 32: 895–914.

© 2020 BJS Society Ltd www.bjs.co.uk BJS 2020; 107: e39–e55


Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd
Perioperative care of the obese patient e49

46 Abdullah A, Peeters A, de Courten M, Stoelwinder J. The 59 Divatia JV, Ambulkar R. Anesthesia and cancer recurrence:
magnitude of association between overweight and obesity what is the evidence? J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol 2014;
and the risk of diabetes: a meta-analysis of prospective 30: 147–150.
cohort studies. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2010; 89: 309–319. 60 Members of the Working Party, Nightingale CE,
47 Mechanick JI, Youdim A, Jones DB, Timothy Garvey W, Margarson MP, Shearer E, Redman JW, Lucas DN et al.;
Hurley DL, Molly McMahon M et al. Clinical practice Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain; Ireland
guidelines for the perioperative nutritional, metabolic, and Society for Obesity and Bariatric Anaesthesia.
nonsurgical support of the bariatric surgery patient – 2013 Peri-operative management of the obese surgical patient
update: cosponsored by American Association of Clinical 2015: Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and
Endocrinologists, the Obesity Society, and American Ireland Society for Obesity and Bariatric Anaesthesia.
Society for Metabolic & Bariatric Surgery. Surg Obes Relat Anaesthesia 2015; 70: 859–876.
61 Thorell A, MacCormick AD, Awad S, Reynolds N,
Dis 2013; 9: 159–191.
Roulin D, Demartines N et al. Guidelines for perioperative
48 Kwon S, Thompson R, Dellinger P, Yanez D, Farrohki E,
care in bariatric surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
Flum D. Importance of perioperative glycemic control in
(ERAS) Society recommendations. World J Surg 2016; 40:
general surgery: a report from the Surgical Care and
2065–2083.
Outcomes Assessment Program. Ann Surg 2013; 257:
62 Committee on Standards and Practice Parameters,
8–14.
Apfelbaum JL, Connis RT, Nickinovich DG; American
49 Janković D, Wolf P, Anderwald CH, Winhofer Y, Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Preanesthesia
Promintzer-Schifferl M, Hofer A et al. Prevalence of Evaluation, Pasternak LR et al. Practice advisory for
endocrine disorders in morbidly obese patients and the preanesthesia evaluation: an updated report by the
effects of bariatric surgery on endocrine and metabolic American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on
parameters. Obes Surg 2012; 22: 62–69. Preanesthesia Evaluation. Anesthesiology 2012; 116:
50 Tung A. Anaesthetic considerations with the metabolic 522–538.
syndrome. Br J Anaesth 2010; 105: i24–i33. 63 Yumuk V, Tsigos C, Fried M, Schindler K, Busetto L,
51 International Diabetes Federation. The IDF Consensus Micic D et al; Obesity Management Task Force of the
Worldwide Definition of the Metabolic Syndrome. https://www European Association for the Study of Obesity. European
.idf.org/e-library/consensus-statements/60-idfconsensus- guidelines for obesity management in adults. Obes Facts
worldwide-definitionof-the-metabolic-syndrome.html; 2015; 8: 402–424.
2006 [accessed 3 August 2019]. 64 Durrer Schutz D, Busetto L, Dicker D,
52 Ninomiya JK, L’Italien G, Criqui MH, Whyte JL, Farpour-Lambert N, Pryke R, Toplak H et al. European
Gamst A, Chen RS. Association of the metabolic syndrome practical and patient-centred guidelines for adult obesity
with history of myocardial infarction and stroke in the management in primary care. Obes Facts 2019; 12: 40–66.
Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. 65 Owers CE, Abbas Y, Ackroyd R, Barron N, Khan M.
Circulation 2004; 109: 42–46. Perioperative optimization of patients undergoing bariatric
53 Campello E, Spiezia L, Zabeo E, Maggiolo S, Vettor R, surgery. J Obes 2012; 2012: 781546.
Simioni P. Hypercoagulability detected by whole blood 66 Edholm D, Kullberg J, Karlsson FA, Haenni A,
thromboelastometry (ROTEM®) and impedance Ahlström H, Sundbom M. Changes in liver volume and
body composition during 4 weeks of low calorie diet before
aggregometry (MULTIPLATE®) in obese patients.
laparoscopic gastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2015; 11:
Thromb Res 2015; 135: 548–553.
602–606.
54 Mitchell AB, Cole JW, McArdle PF, Cheng YC, Ryan KA,
67 van Wissen J, Bakker N, Doodeman HJ, Jansma EP,
Sparks MJ et al. Obesity increases risk of ischemic stroke in
Bonjer HJ, Houdijk AP. Preoperative methods to reduce
young adults. Stroke 2015; 46: 1690–1692.
liver volume in bariatric surgery: a systematic review. Obes
55 Stein PD, Beemath A, Olson RE. Obesity as a risk factor in
Surg 2016; 26: 251–256.
venous thromboembolism. Am J Med 2005; 118: 978–980. 68 Iannelli A, Martini F, Schneck AS, Ghavami B, Baudin G,
56 Seidel AC, Belczak CE, Campos MB, Campos RB, Harada Anty R et al. Preoperative 4-week supplementation with
DS. The impact of obesity on venous insufficiency. omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids reduces liver volume
Phlebology 2015; 30: 475–480. and facilitates bariatric surgery in morbidly obese patients.
57 Ogunnaike BO, Jones SB, Jones DB, Provost D, Whitten Obes Surg 2013; 23: 1761–1765.
CW. Anesthetic considerations for bariatric surgery. Anesth 69 Mills E, Eyawo O, Lockhart I, Kelly S, Wu P, Ebbert JO.
Analg 2002; 95: 1793–1805. Smoking cessation reduces postoperative complications: a
58 Renehan AG, Tyson M, Egger M, Heller RF, Zwahlen M. systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Med 2011; 124:
Body-mass index and incidence of cancer: a systematic 144.e8–154.e8.
review and meta-analysis of prospective observational 70 Nath B, Li Y, Carroll JE, Szabo G, Tseng JF, Shah SA.
studies. Lancet 2008; 371: 569–578. Alcohol exposure as a risk factor for adverse outcomes in

© 2020 BJS Society Ltd www.bjs.co.uk BJS 2020; 107: e39–e55


Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd
e50 M. Carron, B. Safaee Fakhr, G. Ieppariello and M. Foletto

elective surgery. J Gastrointest Surg 2010; 14: 84 Sheff SR, May MC, Carlisle SE, Kallies KJ, Mathiason
1732–1741. MA, Kothari SN. Predictors of a difficult intubation in the
71 Romero-Corral A, Caples SM, Lopez-Jimenez F, Somers bariatric patient: does preoperative body mass index
VK. Interactions between obesity and obstructive sleep matter? Surg Obes Relat Dis 2013; 9: 344–349.
apnea: implications for treatment. Chest 2010; 137: 85 De Jong A, Molinari N, Pouzeratte Y, Verzilli D,
711–719. Chanques G, Jung B et al. Difficult intubation in obese
72 Lloréns J, Rovira L, Ballester M, Moreno J, patients: incidence, risk factors, and complications in the
Hernández-Laforet J, Santonja FJ et al. Preoperative operating theatre and in intensive care units. Br J Anaesth
inspiratory muscular training to prevent postoperative 2015; 114: 297–306.
hypoxemia in morbidly obese patients undergoing 86 Riad W, Vaez MN, Raveendran R, Tam AD, Quereshy FA,
laparoscopic bariatric surgery. A randomized clinical trial. Chung F et al. Neck circumference as a predictor of
Obes Surg 2015; 25: 1003–1009. difficult intubation and difficult mask ventilation in
73 Cattano D, Altamirano A, Vannucci A, Melnikov V, morbidly obese patients: a prospective observational study.
Cone C, Hagberg CA. Preoperative use of incentive Eur J Anaesthesiol 2016; 33: 244–249.
spirometry does not affect postoperative lung function in 87 Dohrn N, Sommer T, Bisgaard J, Rønholm E, Larsen JF.
bariatric surgery. Transl Res 2010; 156: 265–272. Difficult tracheal intubation in obese gastric bypass
74 Dagogo-Jack S, Alberti KGMM. Management of diabetes patients. Obes Surg 2016; 26: 2640–2647.
mellitus in surgical patients. Diabetes Spectrum 2002; 15: 88 Apfelbaum JL, Hagberg CA, Caplan RA, Blitt CD, Connis
44–48. RT, Nickinovich DG et al.; American Society of
75 American Society of Anesthesiologists Committee. Practice Anesthesiologists Task Force on Management of the
guidelines for preoperative fasting and the use of Difficult Airway. Practice guidelines for management of
the difficult airway: an updated report by the American
pharmacologic agents to reduce the risk of pulmonary
Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Management of
aspiration: application to healthy patients undergoing
the Difficult Airway. Anesthesiology 2013; 118: 251–270.
elective procedures: an updated report by the American
89 DeMaria EJ, Portenier D, Wolfe L. Obesity surgery
Society of Anesthesiologists Committee on Standards and
mortality risk score: proposal for a clinically useful score to
Practice Parameters. Anesthesiology 2011; 114: 495–511.
predict mortality risk in patients undergoing gastric bypass.
76 Warner MA, Warner ME, Weber JG. Clinical significance
Surg Obes Relat Dis 2007; 3: 134–140.
of pulmonary aspiration during the perioperative period.
90 Morgan DJ, Ho KM, Armstrong J, Baker S. Incidence and
Anesthesiology 1993; 78: 56–62.
risk factors for intensive care unit admission after bariatric
77 Leoni A, Arlati S, Ghisi D, Verwej M, Lugani D, Ghisi P
surgery: a multicentre population-based cohort study. Br
et al. Difficult mask ventilation in obese patients: analysis of
J Anaesth 2015; 115: 873–882.
predictive factors. Minerva Anestesiol 2014; 80: 149–157.
91 Ingrande J, Lemmens HJ. Dose adjustment of anaesthetics
78 Riad W, Vaez MN, Raveendran R, Tam AD, Quereshy FA,
in the morbidly obese. Br J Anaesth 2010; 105(Suppl 1):
Chung F et al. Neck circumference as a predictor of
i16–i23.
difficult intubation and difficult mask ventilation in 92 Greenland KB, Edwards MJ, Hutton NJ, Challis VJ, Irwin
morbidly obese patients: a prospective observational study. MG, Sleigh JW. Changes in airway configuration with
Eur J Anaesthesiol 2016; 33: 244–249. different head and neck positions using magnetic resonance
79 Brodsky JB, Lemmens HJ, Brock-Utne JG, Vierra M, imaging of normal airways: a new concept with possible
Saidman LJ. Morbid obesity and tracheal intubation. clinical applications. Br J Anaesth 2010; 105: 683–690.
Anesth Analg 2002; 94: 732–736. 93 Adnet F, Baillard C, Borron SW, Denantes C, Lefebvre L,
80 Juvin P, Lavaut E, Dupont H, Lefevre P, Demetriou M, Galinski M et al. Randomized study comparing the ‘sniffing
Dumoulin JL et al. Difficult tracheal intubation is more position’ with simple head extension for laryngoscopic view
common in obese than in lean patients. Anesth Analg 2003; in elective surgery patients. Anesthesiology 2001; 95:
97: 595–600. 836–841.
81 Kim JA, Lee JJ. Preoperative predictors of difficult 94 Rao SL, Kunselman AR, Schuler HG, DesHarnais S.
intubation in patients with obstructive sleep apnea Laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation in the head-elevated
syndrome. Can J Anaesth 2006; 53: 393–397. position in obese patients: a randomized, controlled,
82 Neligan PJ, Porter S, Max B, Malhotra G, Greenblatt EP, equivalence trial. Anesth Analg 2008; 107: 1912–1918.
Ochroch EA. Obstructive sleep apnea is not a risk factor 95 Collins JS, Lemmens HJ, Brodsky JB, Brock-Utne JG,
for difficult intubation in morbidly obese patients. Anesth Levitan RM. Laryngoscopy and morbid obesity: a
Analg 2009; 109: 1182–1186. comparison of the ‘sniff’ and ‘ramped’ positions. Obes Surg
83 Kim WH, Ahn HJ, Lee CJ, Shin BS, Ko JS, Choi SJ et al. 2004; 14: 1171–1175.
Neck circumference to thyromental distance ratio: a new 96 Boyce JR, Ness T, Castroman P, Gleysteen JJ.
predictor of difficult intubation in obese patients. Br A preliminary study of the optimal anesthesia positioning
J Anaesth 2011; 106: 743–748. for the morbidly obese patient. Obes Surg 2003; 13: 4–9.

© 2020 BJS Society Ltd www.bjs.co.uk BJS 2020; 107: e39–e55


Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd
Perioperative care of the obese patient e51

97 Checketts MR, Alladi R, Ferguson K, Gemmell L, Handy post-operative pain in laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery.
JM, Klein AA et al.; Association of Anaesthetists of Great Anesth Pain Med 2012; 2: 12–16.
Britain and Ireland. Recommendations for standards of 109 Rupniewska-Ladyko A, Malec-Milewska M, Kraszewska E,
monitoring during anaesthesia and recovery 2015: Pirozynski M. Gabapentin before laparoscopic sleeve
Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland. gastrectomy reduces postoperative oxycodone
Anaesthesia 2016; 71: 85–93. consumption in obese patients: a randomized double-blind
98 Linassi F, Zanatta P, Tellaroli P, Ori C, Carron M. Isolated placebo-controlled trial. Minerva Anestesiol 2018; 84:
forearm technique: a meta-analysis of connected 565–571.
consciousness during different general anaesthesia 110 Ivry M, Goitein D, Welly W, Berkenstadt H. Melatonin
regimens. Br J Anaesth 2018; 121: 198–209. premedication improves quality of recovery following
99 Bellamy MC, Margarson MP. Designing intelligent bariatric surgery – a double blind placebo controlled
anesthesia for a changing patient demographic: a consensus prospective study. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2017; 13: 502–506.
statement to provide guidance for specialist and 111 Gould MK, Garcia DA, Wren SM, Karanicolas PJ, Arcelus
non-specialist anesthetists written by members of and JI, Heit JA et al. Prevention of VTE in nonorthopedic
endorsed by the Society for Obesity and Bariatric surgical patients: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention
Anaesthesia (SOBA). Perioper Med (Lond) 2013; 2: 12. of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest
100 Brull SJ, Kopman AF. Current status of neuromuscular Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines.
reversal and monitoring: challenges and opportunities. Chest 2012; 141(Suppl): e227S–e277S.
Anesthesiology 2017; 126: 173–190. 112 Steib A, Degirmenci SE, Junke E, Asehnoune K, Figier M,
101 Fischer MI, Dias C, Stein A, Meinhardt NG, Heineck I. Pericard C et al. Once versus twice daily injection of
Antibiotic prophylaxis in obese patients submitted to enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis in bariatric surgery:
bariatric surgery. A systematic review. Acta Cir Bras 2014; effects on antifactor Xa activity and procoagulant
29: 209–217. microparticles. A randomized controlled study. Surg Obes
102 Gulluoglu BM, Guler SA, Ugurlu MU, Culha G. Efficacy Relat Dis 2016; 12: 613–621.
of prophylactic antibiotic administration for breast cancer 113 Forestieri P, Quarto G, De Caterina M, Cuocolo A,
surgery in overweight or obese patients: a randomized Pilone V, Formato A et al. Prophylaxis of
controlled trial. Ann Surg 2013; 257: 37–43. thromboembolism in bariatric surgery with parnaparin.
103 Bratzler DW, Dellinger EP, Olsen KM, Perl TM, Obes Surg 2007; 17: 1558–1562.
Auwaerter PG, Bolon MK et al.; American Society of 114 Sollazzi L, Modesti C, Vitale F, Sacco T, Ciocchetti P,
Health-System Pharmacists; Infectious Disease Society of Idra AS et al. Preinductive use of clonidine and ketamine
America; Surgical Infection Society; Society for Healthcare improves recovery and reduces postoperative pain after
Epidemiology of America. Clinical practice guidelines for bariatric surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2009; 5: 67–71.
antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery. Am J Health Syst 115 Jayaraman L, Sinha A, Punhani D. A comparative study to
Pharm 2013; 70: 195–283. evaluate the effect of intranasal dexmedetomidine versus
104 Edmiston CE, Krepel C, Kelly H, Larson J, Andris D, oral alprazolam as a premedication agent in morbidly obese
Hennen C et al. Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis in the patients undergoing bariatric surgery. J Anaesthesiol Clin
gastric bypass patient: do we achieve therapeutic levels? Pharmacol 2013; 29: 179–182.
Surgery 2004; 136: 738–747. 116 Valenza F, Vagginelli F, Tiby A, Francesconi S, Ronzoni G,
105 De Oliveira GS Jr, Castro-Alves LJ, Ahmad S, Kendall Guglielmi M et al. Effects of the beach chair position,
MC, McCarthy RJ. Dexamethasone to prevent positive end-expiratory pressure, and pneumoperitoneum
postoperative nausea and vomiting: an updated on respiratory function in morbidly obese patients during
meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Anesth Analg anesthesia and paralysis. Anesthesiology 2007; 107:
2013; 116: 58–74. 725–732.
106 Maitra S, Som A, Baidya DK, Bhattacharjee S. Comparison 117 Cook TM, Woodall N, Harper J, Benger J; Fourth
of ondansetron and dexamethasone for prophylaxis of National Audit Project. Major complications of airway
postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing management in the UK: results of the Fourth National
laparoscopic surgeries: a meta-analysis of randomized Audit Project of the Royal College of Anaesthetists and the
controlled trials. Anesthesiol Res Pract 2016; 2016: 7089454. Difficult Airway Society. Part 2: intensive care and
107 Benevides ML, Oliveira SS, de Aguilar-Nascimento JE. emergency departments. Br J Anaesth 2011; 106: 632–642.
The combination of haloperidol, dexamethasone, and 118 Frerk C, Mitchell VS, McNarry AF, Mendonca C,
ondansetron for prevention of postoperative nausea and Bhagrath R, Patel A et al; Difficult Airway Society
vomiting in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a randomized intubation guidelines working group. Difficult Airway
double-blind trial. Obes Surg 2013; 23: 1389–1396. Society 2015 guidelines for management of unanticipated
108 Alimian M, Imani F, Faiz SH, Pournajafian A, Navadegi difficult intubation in adults. Br J Anaesth 2015; 115:
SF, Safari S. Effect of oral pregabalin premedication on 827–848.

© 2020 BJS Society Ltd www.bjs.co.uk BJS 2020; 107: e39–e55


Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd
e52 M. Carron, B. Safaee Fakhr, G. Ieppariello and M. Foletto

119 Carron M, Zarantonello F, Ieppariello G, Ori C. Obesity a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Anesth 2018;
and perioperative noninvasive ventilation in bariatric 44: 69–75.
surgery. Minerva Chir 2017; 72: 248–264. 132 Natalini G, Franceschetti ME, Pantelidi MT, Rosano A,
120 Cressey DM, Berthoud MC, Reilly CS. Effectiveness of Lanza G, Bernardini A. Comparison of the standard
continuous positive airway pressure to enhance laryngeal mask airway and the ProSeal laryngeal mask
pre-oxygenation in morbidly obese women. Anaesthesia airway in obese patients. Br J Anaesth 2003; 90: 323–326.
2001; 56: 680–684. 133 Dhonneur G, Ndoko SK, Yavchitz A, Foucrier A,
121 Coussa M, Proietti S, Schnyder P, Frascarolo P, Suter M, Fessenmeyer C, Pollian C et al. Tracheal intubation of
Spahn DR et al. Prevention of atelectasis formation during morbidly obese patients: LMA CTrach vs direct
the induction of general anesthesia in morbidly obese laryngoscopy. Br J Anaesth 2006; 97: 742–745.
patients. Anesth Analg 2004; 98: 1491–1495. 134 Zoremba M, Aust H, Eberhart L, Braunecker S, Wulf H.
122 Gander S, Frascarolo P, Suter M, Spahn DR, Comparison between intubation and the laryngeal mask
Magnusson L. Positive end-expiratory pressure during airway in moderately obese adults. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand
induction of general anesthesia increases duration of 2009; 53: 436–442.
nonhypoxic apnea in morbidly obese patients. Anesth Analg 135 Weber U, Oguz R, Potura LA, Kimberger O, Kober A,
2005; 100: 580–584. Tschernko E. Comparison of the i-gel and the
123 Edmark L, Östberg E, Scheer H, Wallquist W, LMA-Unique laryngeal mask airway in patients with mild
Hedenstierna G, Zetterström H. Preserved oxygenation in to moderate obesity during elective short-term surgery.
obese patients receiving protective ventilation during Anaesthesia 2011; 66: 481–487.
laparoscopic surgery: a randomized controlled study. Acta 136 Carron M, Veronese S, Gomiero W, Foletto M, Nitti D,
Anaesthesiol Scand 2016; 60: 26–35. Ori C et al. Hemodynamic and hormonal stress responses
124 Georgescu M, Tanoubi I, Fortier LP, Donati F, Drolet P. to endotracheal tube and ProSeal Laryngeal Mask
Efficacy of preoxygenation with non-invasive low positive Airway™ for laparoscopic gastric banding. Anesthesiology
pressure ventilation in obese patients: crossover 2012; 117: 309–320.
physiological study. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim 2012; 31: 137 Keller C, Brimacombe J, Kleinsasser A, Brimacombe L.
e161–e165. The Laryngeal Mask Airway ProSeal™ as a temporary
125 Harbut P, Gozdzik W, Stjernfält E, Marsk R, Hesselvik JF. ventilatory device in grossly and morbidly obese patients
Continuous positive airway pressure/pressure support before laryngoscope-guided tracheal intubation. Anesth
pre-oxygenation of morbidly obese patients. Acta Analg 2002; 94: 737–740.
Anaesthesiol Scand 2014; 58: 675–680. 138 Carron M, Freo U, Ori C. Bronchoscope-guided
126 Futier E, Constantin JM, Pelosi P, Chanques G, intubation through a Laryngeal Mask Airway Supreme in a
Massone A, Petit A et al. Noninvasive ventilation and patient with a difficult-to-manage airway. J Anesth 2009;
alveolar recruitment maneuver improve respiratory 23: 613–615.
function during and after intubation of morbidly obese 139 Abdelmalak BB, Bernstein E, Egan C, Abdallah R, You J,
patients: a randomized controlled study. Anesthesiology Sessler DI et al. GlideScope® vs flexible fibreoptic scope
2011; 114: 1354–1363. for elective intubation in obese patients. Anaesthesia 2011;
127 Sinha A, Jayaraman L, Punhani D. ProSeal™ LMA 66: 550–555.
increases safe apnea period in morbidly obese patients 140 Rosenstock CV, Thøgersen B, Afshari A, Christensen AL,
undergoing surgery under general anesthesia. Obes Surg Eriksen C, Gätke MR. Awake fiberoptic or awake video
2013; 23: 580–584. laryngoscopic tracheal intubation in patients with
128 Altermatt FR, Muñoz HR, Delfino AE, Cortínez LI. anticipated difficult airway management: a randomized
Pre-oxygenation in the obese patient: effects of position on clinical trial. Anesthesiology 2012; 116: 1210–1216.
tolerance to apnoea. Br J Anaesth 2005; 95: 706–709. 141 Freid EB. The rapid sequence induction revisited: obesity
129 Baraka AS, Taha SK, Siddik-Sayyid SM, Kanazi GE, and sleep apnea syndrome. Anesthesiol Clin North Am 2005;
El-Khatib MF, Dagher CM et al. Supplementation of 23: 551–564, viii.
pre-oxygenation in morbidly obese patients using 142 Subramani Y, Riad W, Chung F, Wong J. Optimal
nasopharyngeal oxygen insufflation. Anaesthesia 2007; 62: propofol induction dose in morbidly obese patients: a
769–773. randomized controlled trial comparing the bispectral index
130 Heard A, Toner AJ, Evans JR, Aranda Palacios AM, and lean body weight scalar. Can J Anaesth 2017; 64:
Lauer S. Apneic oxygenation during prolonged 471–479.
laryngoscopy in obese patients: a randomized, controlled 143 van Kralingen S, Diepstraten J, van de Garde EM, van der
trial of buccal RAE tube oxygen administration. Anesth Lely AJ, van Dongen EP, van Ramshorst B et al.
Analg 2017; 124: 1162–1167. Comparative evaluation of propofol 350 and 200 mg for
131 Hoshijima H, Denawa Y, Tominaga A, Nakamura C, induction of anaesthesia in morbidly obese patients: a
Shiga T, Nagasaka H. Videolaryngoscope versus Macintosh randomized double-blind pilot study. Eur J Anaesthesiol
laryngoscope for tracheal intubation in adults with obesity: 2010; 27: 572–574.

© 2020 BJS Society Ltd www.bjs.co.uk BJS 2020; 107: e39–e55


Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd
Perioperative care of the obese patient e53

144 Singh PM, Borle A, McGavin J, Trikha A, Sinha A. 156 Andersen LP, Werner MU, Rosenberg J, Gögenur I.
Comparison of the recovery profile between desflurane and Analgesic treatment in laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery:
sevoflurane in patients undergoing bariatric surgery – a a systematic review of randomized trials. Obes Surg 2014;
meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Obes Surg 24: 462–470.
2017; 27: 3031–3039. 157 Hasanein R, El-Sayed W, Nabil N, Elsayed G. The effect
145 Liu FL, Cherng YG, Chen SY, Su YH, Huang SY, Lo PH of combined remifentanil and low dose ketamine infusion
et al. Postoperative recovery after anesthesia in morbidly in patients undergoing laparoscopic gastric bypass. Egypt
obese patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of J Anaesth 2011; 27: 255–260.
randomized controlled trials. Can J Anaesth 2015; 62: 158 Naja ZM, Khatib R, Ziade FM, Moussa G, Naja ZZ, Naja
907–917. AS et al. Effect of clonidine versus dexmedetomidine on
146 Juvin P, Vadam C, Malek L, Dupont H, Marmuse JP, pain control after laparoscopic gastric sleeve: a prospective,
Desmonts JM. Postoperative recovery after desflurane, randomized, double-blinded study. Saudi J Anaesth 2014;
propofol, or isoflurane anesthesia among morbidly obese 8(Suppl 1): S57–S62.
patients: a prospective, randomized study. Anesth Analg 159 Bakhamees HS, El-Halafawy YM, El-Kerdawy HM,
2000; 91: 714–719. Gouda NM, Altemyatt S. Effects of dexmedetomidine in
147 La Colla L, Albertin A, La Colla G, Mangano A. Faster morbidly obese patients undergoing laparoscopic gastric
wash-out and recovery for desflurane vs sevoflurane in bypass. Middle East J Anaesthesiol 2007; 19: 537–551.
morbidly obese patients when no premedication is used. Br 160 Salama AK, Abdallah NM. Multimodal analgesia with
J Anaesth 2007; 99: 353–358. pregabalin and dexmedetomidine in morbidly obese
148 McKay RE, Malhotra A, Cakmakkaya OS, Hall KT, patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a
McKay WR, Apfel CC. Effect of increased body mass prospective randomized double blind placebo controlled
index and anaesthetic duration on recovery of protective
study. Egypt J Anaesth 2016; 32: 293–298.
airway reflexes after sevoflurane vs desflurane. Br J Anaesth
161 Zarif P, Abdelaal Ahmed Mahmoud A, Abdelhaq MM,
2010; 104: 175–182.
Mikhail HMS, Farag A. Dexmedetomidine versus
149 Zoremba M, Dette F, Hunecke T, Eberhart L,
magnesium sulfate as adjunct during anesthesia for
Braunecker S, Wulf H. A comparison of desflurane versus
laparoscopic colectomy. Anesthesiol Res Pract 2016; 2016:
propofol: the effects on early postoperative lung function
7172920.
in overweight patients. Anesth Analg 2011; 113: 63–69.
162 El Mourad MB, Arafa SK. Effect of intravenous versus
150 Lehavi A, Sandler O, Mahajna A, Weissman A, Katz YS.
intraperitoneal magnesium sulfate on hemodynamic
Comparison of rhabdomyolysis markers in patients
parameters and postoperative analgesia during laparoscopic
undergoing bariatric surgery with propofol and
sleeve gastrectomy – a prospective randomized study.
inhalation-based anesthesia. Obes Surg 2015; 25:
J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol 2019; 35: 242–247.
1923–1927.
163 Kizilcik N, Koner O. Magnesium sulfate reduced opioid
151 Tanaka P, Goodman S, Sommer BR, Maloney W,
consumption in obese patients undergoing sleeve
Huddleston J, Lemmens HJ. The effect of desflurane versus
propofol anesthesia on postoperative delirium in elderly gastrectomy: a prospective, randomized clinical trial. Obes
obese patients undergoing total knee replacement: a Surg 2018; 28: 2783–2788.
randomized, controlled, double-blinded clinical trial. J Clin 164 Alkhamesi NA, Kane JM, Guske PJ, Wallace JW, Rantis
Anesth 2017; 39: 17–22. PC. Intraperitoneal aerosolization of bupivacaine is a safe
152 Sneyd JR, Carr A, Byrom WD, Bilski AJ. A meta-analysis and effective method in controlling postoperative pain in
of nausea and vomiting following maintenance of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. J Pain Res 2008; 1:
anaesthesia with propofol or inhalational agents. Eur 9–13.
J Anaesthesiol 1998; 15: 433–445. 165 De Oliveira GS Jr, Duncan K, Fitzgerald P, Nader A,
153 Honca M, Honca T. Comparison of propofol with Gould RW, McCarthy RJ. Systemic lidocaine to improve
desflurane for laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in morbidly quality of recovery after laparoscopic bariatric surgery: a
obese patients: a prospective randomized trial. Bariatr Surg randomized double-blinded placebo-controlled trial. Obes
Pract Patient Care 2017; 12: 49–54. Surg 2014; 24: 212–218.
154 Elbakry AE, Sultan WE, Ibrahim E. A comparison 166 Ruiz-Tovar J, Gonzalez J, Garcia A, Cruz C, Rivas S,
between inhalational (desflurane) and total intravenous Jimenez M et al. Intraperitoneal ropivacaine irrigation in
anaesthesia (propofol and dexmedetomidine) in improving patients undergoing bariatric surgery: a prospective
postoperative recovery for morbidly obese patients randomized clinical trial. Obes Surg 2016; 26: 2616–2621.
undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a 167 Alamdari NM, Bakhtiyari M, Gholizadeh B, Shariati C.
double-blinded randomised controlled trial. J Clin Anesth Analgesic effect of intraperitoneal bupivacaine
2018; 45: 6–11. hydrochloride after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a
155 Alvarez A, Singh PM, Sinha AC. Postoperative analgesia in randomized clinical trial. J Gastrointest Surg 2018; 22:
morbid obesity. Obes Surg 2014; 24: 652–659. 396–401.

© 2020 BJS Society Ltd www.bjs.co.uk BJS 2020; 107: e39–e55


Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd
e54 M. Carron, B. Safaee Fakhr, G. Ieppariello and M. Foletto

168 Omar I, Abualsel A. Efficacy of intraperitoneal instillation 179 Plaud B, Debaene B, Donati F, Marty J. Residual paralysis
of bupivacaine after bariatric surgery: randomized after emergence from anesthesia. Anesthesiology 2010; 112:
controlled trial. Obes Surg 2019; 29: 1013–1022.
1735–1741. 180 Carron M, Parotto E, Ori C. The use of sugammadex in
169 Wassef M, Lee DY, Levine JL, Ross RE, Guend H, obese patients. Can J Anaesth 2012; 59: 321–322.
Vandepitte C et al. Feasibility and analgesic efficacy of the 181 Eikermann M, Vogt FM, Herbstreit F, Vahid-Dastgerdi M,
transversus abdominis plane block after single-port Zenge MO, Ochterbeck C et al. The predisposition to
laparoscopy in patients having bariatric surgery. J Pain Res inspiratory upper airway collapse during partial
2013; 6: 837–841. neuromuscular blockade. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2007;
170 Ziemann-Gimmel P, Goldfarb AA, Koppman J, Marema 175: 9–15.
182 Gaszynski T, Szewczyk T, Gaszynski W. Randomized
RT. Opioid-free total intravenous anaesthesia reduces
comparison of sugammadex and neostigmine for reversal of
postoperative nausea and vomiting in bariatric surgery
rocuronium-induced muscle relaxation in morbidly obese
beyond triple prophylaxis. Br J Anaesth 2014; 112:
undergoing general anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth 2012; 108:
906–911.
236–239.
171 Lundstrøm LH, Duez CH, Nørskov AK, Rosenstock CV,
183 Carron M, Veronese S, Foletto M, Ori C. Sugammadex
Thomsen JL, Møller AM et al. Avoidance versus use of allows fast-track bariatric surgery. Obes Surg 2013; 23:
neuromuscular blocking agents for improving conditions 1558–1563.
during tracheal intubation or direct laryngoscopy in adults 184 Carron M, Zarantonello F, Tellaroli P, Ori C. Efficacy and
and adolescents. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017; safety of sugammadex compared to neostigmine for
(5)CD009237. reversal of neuromuscular blockade: a meta-analysis of
172 Tran DT, Newton EK, Mount VA, Lee JS, Wells GA, randomized controlled trials. J Clin Anesth 2016; 35: 1–12.
Perry JJ. Rocuronium versus succinylcholine for rapid 185 O’Gara B, Talmor D. Perioperative lung protective
sequence induction intubation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev ventilation. BMJ 2018; 362: k3030.
2015; (10)CD002788. 186 Ball L, Hemmes SNT, Serpa Neto A, Bluth T, Canet J,
173 Taha SK, El-Khatib MF, Baraka AS, Haidar YA, Abdallah Hiesmayr M et al.; LAS VEGAS investigators; PROVE
FW, Zbeidy RA et al. Effect of suxamethonium vs rocuro- Network; Clinical Trial Network of the European Society
nium on onset of oxygen desaturation during apnoea fol- of Anaesthesiology. Intraoperative ventilation settings and
lowing rapid sequence induction. Anaesthesia 2010; 65: their associations with postoperative pulmonary
358–361. complications in obese patients. Br J Anaesth 2018; 121:
174 Sørensen MK, Bretlau C, Gätke MR, Sørensen AM, 899–908.
Rasmussen LS. Rapid sequence induction and intubation 187 Writing Committee for the PROBESE Collaborative
with rocuronium–sugammadex compared with Group of the PROtective VEntilation Network
succinylcholine: a randomized trial. Br J Anaesth 2012; (PROVEnet) for the Clinical Trial Network of the
108: 682–689. European Society of Anaesthesiology, Bluth T, Serpa
Neto A, Schultz MJ, Pelosi P, Gama de Abreu M. Effect of
175 Baete S, Vercruysse G, Vander Laenen M, De Vooght P,
intraoperative high positive end-expiratory pressure
Van Melkebeek J, Dylst D et al. The effect of deep versus
(PEEP) with recruitment maneuvers vs low PEEP on
moderate neuromuscular block on surgical conditions and
postoperative pulmonary complications in obese patients: a
postoperative respiratory function in bariatric laparoscopic
randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2019; 321: 2292–2305.
surgery: a randomized, double blind clinical trial. Anesth
188 Wang C, Zhao N, Wang W, Guo L, Guo L, Chi C et al.
Analg 2017; 124: 1469–1475.
Intraoperative mechanical ventilation strategies for obese
176 Torensma B, Martini CH, Boon M, Olofsen E, In ‘t patients: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Veld B, Liem RS et al. Deep neuromuscular block improves Obes Rev 2015; 16: 508–517.
surgical conditions during bariatric surgery and reduces 189 Aldenkortt M, Lysakowski C, Elia N, Brochard L, Tramèr
postoperative pain: a randomized double blind controlled MR. Ventilation strategies in obese patients undergoing
trial. PLoS One 2016; 11: e0167907. surgery: a quantitative systematic review and meta-analysis.
177 Fuchs-Buder T, Schmartz D, Baumann C, Hilt L, Br J Anaesth 2012; 109: 493–502.
Nomine-Criqui C, Meistelman C et al. Deep neuromuscular 190 Valenza F, Vagginelli F, Tiby A, Francesconi S, Ronzoni G,
blockade improves surgical conditions during gastric Guglielmi M et al. Effects of the beach chair position,
bypass surgery for morbid obesity: a randomised controlled positive end-expiratory pressure, and pneumoperitoneum
trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2019; 36: 486–493. on respiratory function in morbidly obese patients during
178 Aceto P, Modesti C, Sacco T, De Cicco R, Perilli V, anesthesia and paralysis. Anesthesiology 2007; 107: 725–732.
Raffaelli M et al. Patient-related factors predicting 191 Talab HF, Zabani IA, Abdelrahman HS, Bukhari WL,
workspace conditions during laparoscopic bariatric surgery. Mamoun I, Ashour MA et al. Intraoperative ventilatory
Obes Surg 2018; 28: 3172–3176. strategies for prevention of pulmonary atelectasis in obese

© 2020 BJS Society Ltd www.bjs.co.uk BJS 2020; 107: e39–e55


Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd
Perioperative care of the obese patient e55

patients undergoing laparoscopic bariatric surgery. Anesth index during laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass
Analg 2009; 109: 1511–1516. surgery in morbidly obese patients. Obes Surg 2018; 28:
192 Reinius H, Jonsson L, Gustafsson S, Sundbom M, 358–363.
Duvernoy O, Pelosi P et al. Prevention of atelectasis in 203 Wool DB, Lemmens HJ, Brodsky JB, Solomon H, Chong
morbidly obese patients during general anesthesia and KP, Morton JM. Intraoperative fluid replacement and
paralysis: a computerized tomography study. Anesthesiology postoperative creatine phosphokinase levels in laparoscopic
2009; 111: 979–987. bariatric patients. Obes Surg 2010; 20: 698–701.
193 Karsten J, Luepschen H, Grossherr M, Bruch HP, 204 Matot I, Paskaleva R, Eid L, Cohen K, Khalaileh A,
Leonhardt S, Gehring H et al. Effect of PEEP on regional Elazary R et al. Effect of the volume of fluids administered
ventilation during laparoscopic surgery monitored by on intraoperative oliguria in laparoscopic bariatric surgery:
electrical impedance tomography. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand a randomized controlled trial. Arch Surg 2012; 147:
2011; 55: 878–886. 228–234.
194 Futier E, Constantin JM, Pelosi P, Chanques G, 205 Mason DS, Sapala JA, Wood MH, Sapala MA. Influence of
Massone A, Petit A et al. Noninvasive ventilation and a forced air warming system on morbidly obese patients
alveolar recruitment maneuver improve respiratory undergoing Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg 1998; 8:
function during and after intubation of morbidly obese 453–460.
patients: a randomized controlled study. Anesthesiology 206 Fernandes LA, Braz LG, Koga FA, Kakuda CM, Módolo
2011; 114: 1354–1363. NS, de Carvalho LR et al. Comparison of peri-operative
195 Stankiewicz-Rudnicki M, Gaszynski W, Gaszynski T. core temperature in obese and non-obese patients.
Assessment of ventilation distribution during laparoscopic Anaesthesia 2012; 67: 1364–1369.
bariatric surgery: an electrical impedance tomography 207 Sessler DI. Complications and treatment of mild
study. Biomed Res Int 2016; 2016: 7423162. hypothermia. Anesthesiology 2001; 95: 531–543.
196 Eichler L, Truskowska K, Dupree A, Busch P, Goetz AE, 208 Cavallone LF, Vannucci A. Review article: extubation of
Zöllner C. Intraoperative ventilation of morbidly obese the difficult airway and extubation failure. Anesth Analg
patients guided by transpulmonary pressure. Obes Surg 2013; 116: 368–383.
2018; 28: 122–129. 209 Difficult Airway Society Extubation Guidelines Group,
197 Coussa M, Proietti S, Schnyder P, Frascarolo P, Suter M, Popat M, Mitchell V, Dravid R, Patel A, Swampillai C
Spahn DR et al. Prevention of atelectasis formation during et al. Difficult Airway Society Guidelines for the
the induction of general anesthesia in morbidly obese management of tracheal extubation. Anaesthesia 2012; 67:
patients. Anesth Analg 2004; 98: 1491–1495. 318–340.
198 Nestler C, Simon P, Petroff D, Hammermüller S, 210 Carron M, Zarantonello F, Tellaroli P, Ori C.
Kamrath D, Wolf S et al. Individualized positive Perioperative noninvasive ventilation in obese patients: a
end-expiratory pressure in obese patients during general qualitative review and meta-analysis. Surg Obes Relat Dis
anaesthesia: a randomized controlled clinical trial using 2016; 12: 681–691.
electrical impedance tomography. Br J Anaesth 2017; 119: 211 Soghier I, Brozek̇ JL, Afshar M, Tamae Kakazu M, Wilson
1194–1205. KC, Masa JF et al. Noninvasive ventilation versus CPAP as
199 Nguyen NT, Wolfe BM. The physiologic effects of initial treatment of obesity hypoventilation syndrome. Ann
pneumoperitoneum in the morbidly obese. Ann Surg 2005; Am Thorac Soc 2019; 16: 1295–1303.
241: 219–226. 212 Zaremba S, Shin CH, Hutter MM, Malviya SA, Grabitz
200 Atkinson TM, Giraud GD, Togioka BM, Jones DB, SD, MacDonald T et al. Continuous positive airway
Cigarroa JE. Cardiovascular and ventilatory consequences pressure mitigates opioid-induced worsening of
of laparoscopic surgery. Circulation 2017; 135: 700–710. sleep-disordered breathing early after bariatric surgery.
201 Schol PB, Terink IM, Lancé MD, Scheepers HC. Liberal Anesthesiology 2016; 125: 92–104.
or restrictive fluid management during elective surgery: a 213 Stéphan F, Bérard L, Rézaiguia-Delclaux S, Amaru P;
systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Anesth 2016; BiPOP Study Group. High-flow nasal cannula therapy
35: 26–39. versus intermittent noninvasive ventilation in obese subjects
202 Demirel İ, Bolat E, Altun AY, Özdemir M, Beştaş A. after cardiothoracic surgery. Respir Care 2017; 62:
Efficacy of goal-directed fluid therapy via pleth variability 1193–1202.

Supporting information
Additional supporting information can be found online in the Supporting Information section at the end of the
article.

© 2020 BJS Society Ltd www.bjs.co.uk BJS 2020; 107: e39–e55


Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd

You might also like