Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Group10 Assessment1 O&SCM v1.0 Consolidated
Group10 Assessment1 O&SCM v1.0 Consolidated
Management
Assessment-1
Answer 1:
1(a) Compute and analyze the set of critical performance metrics for each
scheduling process.
Summary
Avg Compl. Utilization Avg no of Avg Job
Rule Sequencing
Time metric jobs in sys Lateness
FCF
A-B-C-D 36.25 41.37931034 2.416666667 11.25
S
SPT A-D-C-B 28.75 52.17391304 1.916666667 6.25
EDD A-D-B-C 30 50 2 6.25
LPT B-C-D-A 46.25 32.43243243 3.083333333 18.75
CR B-C-D-A 46.25 32.43243243 3.083333333 18.75
Conclusion:
Shortest Processing Time (SPT) is most feasible to adopt for scheduling process.
Best priority rule should have lowest average completion time, highest average utilization factor,
average no.of lowest jobs in system and less average delay. From the summary gird, Shortest
Processing Time (SPT) Rule has lowest average completion time - 28.75; highest average utilization
factor - 52.17; average no.of jobs in system - 1.91; average delay - 6.25. Average delay is same for
SPT and EDD but other metrics of SPT is better. Out of the four jobs, three jobs are processed
within the deadline whereas only job B is delayed which clearly states that when processing the
shortest processing time jobs first the metrics are relatively good when compared to other priority
rules EDD, LPT, and CR.
1(c). Comment on the outcomes from other than the best priority rules.
EDD:
Earliest Due Date processes jobs in increasing order of their due dates resulting in a total delay of
25hours with average job lateness of 6.25hours. EDD is very close to SPT but not feasible to deal
with earliest as this rule will delay other jobs. In EDD, the job B is delayed by 5 hours and job C is
delayed by 20 hours whereas in SPT, only one job B is delayed by 25 hours and other jobs are
completed within the deadline. The other metrics like utilization metric and average completion
time is slightly higher than SPT. But EDD outperforms other priority rules, LPT and CR
LPT:
Longest Processing Time(LPT) processes the job with higher processing time and that leads to a
total delay of 75hours with average job lateness of 18.75hours. It is not feasible to process the
longest processing time job first as it will affect the other job’s deadlines. Only the job B is
processed within the delay resulting a delay in jobs C, D, A with a delay of 5, 30, 40 hours
respectively. Due to this all the metrics are severely affected.
CR:
Critical Ratio is an index number computed by dividing the time remaining until due date by the
work time remaining. There is a total delay of 75hours with average job lateness of 18.75hours.
Owing to the high metrics this rule also is not feasible. Similar to LPT, three jobs are delayed and
job B alone is processed within the deadline.
Question 2
2(a). Should Titan produce & manage both brands with the same operational
supply chains? Why?
Answer 2(a)
Nebula: Nebula, crafted in solid 18 Karat gold, is the most prestigious collection under the Titan
umbrella which celebrates Indian grandeur across its collections.
India's first solid gold watch brand, which is available at a price band of Rs.29,000 to
Rs.6.25 lakhs.
The Nebula collection comprises a variety of exquisite watches in 18k and 22k gold, both
plain as well as embellished with pearls and diamonds.
The above comparison is taken from the brands official page and the statements clearly
differentiates the target segments. While “Sonata” is a brand for common man, Nebula is
exclusively targeting the rich/the upper segments.
Supply chain is a system of Organizations, People, Activities, Information and Resources
involved in supplying a product or service to a customer.
From the above comparison, it is evident that both the products (Sonata & Nebula) have different
target segments and would require different raw materials, Quality inspections, Security aspects,
Packaging and different logistics mechanisms and different pricing. These clear differentiators help
to conclude that Titan should not have the same operational supply chains for Sonata and Nebula.
But in real-time it may not be possible to completely have 2 different supply chain operations for
the same Brand “Titan-Watches”.
Typical Supply Chain network for Watch Industry
Customer Order –
The customer can place orders directly through the website or ecommerce platforms like
Amazon, Flipkart etc. Also, they can buy watches from shops or company outlets. From both the
channels, the orders get placed at the Production Facility.
Answer 2(b)
Yes, Titan as both the sub brands have seen a double digit growth in the last year, Titan
should make sure each and every product rolled out should be double checked and offers the best
quality to its buyers. The manufacturing facilities and production process can be shared but the
quality assurance systems including customer service should be different because for a
premium brand the quality produced should be top notch.
Like Tata Foods & Beverages which is manufactured under the same production facilities, Titan
watches can also get produced under the same roof. Provided, there are clear differentiators as
shown above. Let’s discuss the key differentiators in detail.
Facility Layout for Sonata would be Product Layout- which is more of repetitive and focus on bulk
volume production, whereas Nebula will be Process Layout which is non-repetitive(batch type)
and low volume and high mix production.
Sonata Nebula
Product Normal Watch Premium Watch
Target Segment Common-Man Premium/High-income levels
Raw Materials Leather, Steel etc Gold, Diamond, Pearl etc
Vendor Supplies the raw materials forSupplies the raw materials for
manufacturing Sonata manufacturing Nebula
Sub-Contracting May not be required Can Sub-Contract certain items like
gold/diamond dials, user specific
customizations etc
Skills Normal skills for manufacturing the watch Specialized skillset for
manufacturing Nebula
Quality Inspection Generic Inspection to meet spec High value watch demands niche
finish and customer satisfaction.
Quality needs to be utmost
importance to retain premium
customers
Answer 2(c)
Everything except the customer relation management systems can be similar for both the sub
brands.
Packaging:
Though the supplier can be consolidated from operation cost efficiency, Quality of packaging
should be different for both the sub brands and hence ensuring best packaging is provided for
Nebula, because premium product would need premium packaging to ensure customer
sentiments and value perception is intact from order booking until delivery to the end customer.
Warehousing:
Both the sub brands can share a common warehouse where both of them are stored differently to
avoid confusion. Nebula watched being premium can employ highest security standards within
same warehouse facility.
Transportation:
Both the sub brands can share a common transportation channel to avoid extra costs in terms of
logistics and man power. This would leverage multiple orders being consolidated based on the
end customer location.
As highlighted in the above 2 answers, Sonata and Nebula are two different products which has
differentiated targets.
As stated in the Titan website, “Sonata offers a watch for every wrist and occasion”. Sonata is for
the common man and the regular income level segments. Being a product for the common man,
there should be mass production capabilities and is highly customizable as per customer needs.
Sonata can be customized specifically based on gender, color, materials (Leather, Bimetal, Metal,
PU, Plastic, Stainless Steel), functions (Analog, Analog with date, Analog with day & date, Smart,
Multifunction), Collections (CSK, Elite, NXT etc), Movement (Quartz). The general market trend
is known (Historical Data) and accordingly can be produced in mass and stored in their
warehouses (Upstream or Downstream locations). Company can provide attractive offers,
discounts to boost the sales especially during the festival seasons.
The packing can be made attractive with differentiated colors but can still have the regular
packing materials. Transportation can be managed through Titan’s regular logistics arrangements
or can be done through delivery partners (BlueDart, DTDC, Amazon etc).
Nebula completely differs from Sonata with respect to the raw materials used like Gold, Diamond,
Special Stones etc. Due to the high price, Handling of Special stones, gold etc cannot be like that
of Sonata raw materials. This would require special care and handling including the security, purity
of metals, skilled resources for production etc. Premium packing will be required to attract the
premium segments and to ensure the safety, avoid any damages during transportation etc. Like
other premium brands, the
Nebula can be shipped inside a Wooden or Steel boxes with attractive designs. The same
warehouse facility can be used if they have special zones for storing premium items. There should
be dedicated transportation/logistic mechanisms (Insured) to ensure safety and on-time delivery
of the product. The upper customer segment would expect premium treatments in packing,
delivery, user experience etc.
The customer relationship management (CRM) for Sonata and Nebula can remain the same as
they are trained/experts in handling all segments of customers. Irrespective of the products, the
customer satisfaction, experience, support should be the best in class as this impacts the Titan
company as a whole and not just the product.
References:
Management Discussion and Analysis, Tata Company Limited