ARCH1334/1439
Assessment Task 2
Part A – Investment Logic Map (ILM)
Programme Name: Partnerships Addressing Disadvantage
Project Name: Housing and Education Centre with Integrated Rehab for Disadvantaged Youths
PROBLEM BENEFIT
IMPROVED
INTERACTION WITH
ECONOMIC: NO FUTURE
THE EDUCATION
JOBS // Youth
disengagement with
SYSTEM
education leads to 20%
unemployment and KPI 1: Improved
worsening of socioeconomic
academic performance
risks and disadvantages
in NAPLAN results and
throughout adulthood. Year 12 completion rate
KPI 2: Reduced school
absenteeism and
reported incidents
ECONOMIC: SOCIAL INCREASED
SERVICES // Unresolved EMPLOYMENT AND
social implications effect
REDUCED BUDGET
increase service usage of
health, human, and justice EXPENDITURE
services which result into 20%
broader costs to the
KPI 1: Reductions cost
community of downstream health
and social services
(crime, homelessness,
use of emergency
hospital/health care,
substance abuse)
KPI 2: An increase in
employment rates
IMPROVED OF
SOCIAL/HEALTH: OVERALL HEALTH
SOCIAL ISOLATION // AND WELLBEING
Lack of support and failure
30%
to respond to social
implications lead to the KPI 1: Decrease in
progression into mental interaction with the
illness, substance abuse, justice system within the
homelessness, and crime. cohort group
KPI 2: Decrease in
Mental illness, substance
abuse and suicide rates.
TARGETED DESIGN TO
SUIT COMMUNITY
ENVIRONMENTAL: NEEDS
GENERALISED DESIGN 15%
// Generalized social
housing blocks are unable KPI 1: Increase
Employment opportunities
to meet changing needs of
of staff through new
cohort groups and lead to
program areas and
poor living conditions and
upgraded facilities
the progression of the
KPI 2: Improvement of
effects of disadvantage.
general living conditions
and the availability of
affordable sustainable and
appropriate housing
SUSTAINABLE-BUILT
ENVIRONMENTAL:
UNSUSTAINABLE
OUTCOMES
BUILT OUTCOMES // 15%
Unsustainable and KPI 1: Decreased
outdated infrastructure management and repair
become costly to costs
maintain, a health and
environmental hazard,
KPI 2: No demolition or
renovation of the build for
and will require
demolition or renovation the next 30 years
early in their lifetime.
Student Name: Gan, Michelle
Student Number: s3492888
Student Name: Fatekhova, Ekaterina
Student Number: s3542790
RESPONSE SOLUTION
CHANGES ASSETS
EDUCATIONAL Introduction of new New Schools
education system
INTERVENTION:
Targeted schooling
system for
disadvantaged Integrated one on one
youth, mentoring mentoring program
programs
Expansions to
existing schools
School integrated
Careers counselling
into future pathways
COMMUNITY
INTEGRATION FOR
EMPLOYMENT: upskilling and
training programs
Provision of training and
community networks that
facilitate working company reward
infrastructure forming schemes for
and future employment disadvantages
employment
New relief funds for
disadvantaged
REHABILITATION: groups
Provision of financial aid
and rehabilitation
services for mental Rehabilitation
illness, drug abuse. programs for mental Rehabilitation Centres
illness and
substance abuse
Provision of personal
case management,
COMMUNITY specialised support,
INTEGRATION and care
THROUGH HOUSING
SUPPORT: Providing Accessibility to free
housing to cohort On site clinics
on-site health services
groups to alleviate
disadvantages.
Security design and
Targeted multi-res public
housing precinct
service requirements
USER INFORMED
HOUSING
INTERVENTION: co-
design and planning USER integrated
with stakeholders – to project development
understand cohort and employment of
interests, priorities, and target cohorts in
skills for fit for purpose construction/operation
infrastructure.
COHORT GROUP Stakeholder
CONSULTATION: engagement in project
Research into specific development with
requirements of groups continuous user
creating greater feedback integration.
targeted efficiency.
Development of
RESEARCH AND various appropriate
Targeted single
FEEDBACK and sustainable
dwelling social
INTEGRATION: housing models.
housing
Research based
design in the Creation of new
provision of fit for social housing design
purpose housing. codes and guidelines
applicable to all new
projects.
REPURPOSE
EXISITNG
BUILDINGS:
Improvement of Merging and
program or existing revising of program
in existing buildings
facilities. Extensions Upgraded Facilities
made on existing to accommodate
greater scope
infrastructure:
adaptive reuse
Post occupation Adaptive Reuse of
evaluation: user infrastructure as
ADAPTIVE
DESIGN: Designing groups satisfaction extension of public
quality fit for purpose due to their interests housing
facilities to support and needs being
growing/changing encapsulated within
user needs the infrastructure