Date, Z BINPY vs- POMINGO he Murieipatity Of Mati pawed 2 Carolution extending fin aac! >I pivtance 40 2 Wereaved family wore gras income doc nor exceed Prox 2 month: The feluon way Preferred to respondent com for its crpected Dl2wance in BUdit. However, COM dirmpproved the raelution and Seaiswed in Pudit She ditburrement of unde for the wmolementation Yaereot- COR’: olojecHiOn w Of the Parition thot there is no percepiible conneetion or relation between 4ne objective sought yo be ab4zined under dhe eetolution and tre ileged public satety, general welfare che of He tnbabitents of ma kali \ssue® Whether Hc dauiFicotion of pamper WcnetieiSries & violative of the equal protetion Clause 1 the conetitution. RULING: Ho. There i no Violation of tne caval protection clowe in clawifying pwpene as subject of \ngivlatien: Poupenr may be rewonvbly ciawitied. Different groups my YUEIVE verying Jeeviment. Preciow te He feorts of our Legivieters, down 40 our ‘ecal crundleas) We tre wiellere of the pabpes. Thur ctohutes fove been Paned giving righty Ind beneSits to tne aw ebled, cmnancipriing 4ve denant- former Som ne wondage of Ye oil, hewing He urloen Poor: