You are on page 1of 1
Date: © CewtemL Genk employees we. BRNGeO wENTRAL KO PILIPL NAS Frets |) Filed 2 petition fir ponititinn Rreestive Seeretsry of tne Office Of $e Presidente Tesievin respondents From furtner \m plementing the (304 peovicion in Section (5, Article © Of RA No 1853, on the ground that it U untenittuional Wnetner “Phe (e4 -porageopn of Seotion 18.6, Btlele Hof BA Mo 153; curs oul of the conctituHton®l mandate thot “Mo. pervon vhati oe denied quai protection of the Irwe" Yes. the (+ paragraph of section IBC, Article HOF RA Ne 1683/14 Un conedihation al: wits the pawage of the sibscquent laws amending -the charter of the government financial initudutions, dhe continued opermion of the laut provision of See 1S, Prt of RA Ho WUS3. constitutes Invidous discrimindsion en $e 2,494 rank and- file employee of Banvo Senter rg Bi nzé, The prior View on tne constitution ality of RR 53 was antined to an evaluation of 1 clawi¢icotlen betw cen fhe eank- and- file and the officers of tre BP, found remenauie Wccouce Here Were ububantial dietinction dnat made real differenees between the 2 clewes. a

You might also like