Professional Documents
Culture Documents
org
(Received 5 Jan 2011; accepted 9 Mar 2011; published online 7 April 2011.)
Abstract: In this contribution, a comparative study of metallic cobalt micro and nanoparticles obtained in
solution by four different chemical routes is reported. Classic routes such as borohydride reduction in aqueous
media and the so-called polyol methodology were used to obtain the cobalt nanostructures to be studied. Using
CTAB as surfactant, cobalt hollow nanostructures were obtained. The use of strong reducing agents, like sodium
borohydride, favors the formation of quasi-monodispersed nanoparticles of about 2 nm size but accompanied
with impurities; for hydrazine (a mild reducer), nanoparticles of larger size are obtained which organize in
spherical microagglomerates. Valuable information on the particles thermal stability and on nature of the
species anchored at their surface was obtained from thermogravimetric curves. The samples to be studied were
characterized from UV-vis, IR, X-ray diffraction, and electron microscopy images (scanning and transmission).
Keywords: Metallic Cobalt; Cobalt nanoparticles; Magnetic nanoparticles; Hollow magnetic microparticles
Citation: Marlene González Montiel, P. Santiago-Jacinto, J. A. I. Dı́az Góngora, E. Reguera and Geonel
Rodrı́guez-Gattorno, “Synthesis and Thermal Behavior of Metallic Cobalt Micro and Nanostructures”, Nano-
Micro Lett. 3 (1), 12-19 (2011). http://dx.doi.org/10.3786/nml.v3i1.p12-19
tive and quantitative analytical tool allowing the study oleic acid (Aldrich 90%) were added in order to allow
of decomposition and oxidation processes, specially the the vesicles formation [16]. Immediately NaOH (J.T.
thermogravimetric analysis which allows characterizing Baker 99.7%) is added to the solution until it reaches
the oxidation of many metals under accelerated condi- a pH value of 8 (value near the pKa of the oleic acid)
tions. Few works focused on the chemical quantification [17], it will help to stabilize the vesicles. Subsequently,
of unpurified products that results from the strong in- 0.2502 g of Na3 Cit·3H2 O were added to the solution
teractions at the interface: nanoparticle-media during and the mixture was sonicated for 15 minutes. After-
synthesis procedures. Therefore, in the present work ward, 0.0189 g of NaBH4 dissolved in 20 ml of deionized
the oxidation thermal profiles of metallic cobalt nano water were introduced, drop by drop, and this mixture
and micro particles obtained in colloidal dispersion is was then sonicated for 5 minutes. The dispersion color
explored. The micro and nano particles under study changes from pale milky pink into milky black.
were obtained using classical methods such as the re-
duction in aqueous media [8,9] and the so-called polyol Reduction method using hydrazine (polyol pro-
method [10-13]. Results show that strong reducing cess)
agent such as borohydride contaminates the products
CoCl2 ·6H2 O (0.0362 g) and CTAB (0.05466 g,
not necessarily forming borides, as has been reported
Aldrich 99%) were mixed and sonicated in 30 ml of
previously [8,9]. It was found that when CTAB is used
ethylene glycol (Aldrich 99.8%) during 40 minutes.
as template the system forms homogeneous microstruc-
Then, the appropriate amount of monohydrated hy-
tures distributions of secondary hollow particles with
drazine (Aldrich 98%) was added to the solution as soft
spherical morphology that organize in elongated meso-
reducing agent. The solution is then heated until the
scopic systems. The powders produced were character-
boiling point of the ethylene glycol (197℃) is reached
ized by means of UV-Vis and IR spectroscopies, X-ray
and is held at this temperature for 70 minutes. After
diffraction (XRD), Scanning and Transmission Electron
the reaction was completed, the solution is cooled to
Microscopies and High resolution Thermogravimetric
room temperature. For comparison purposes, sodium
(TG) Analyses.
citrate (Na3 Cit·3H2 O) was used also as capping agent
instead CTAB, under same conditions described above
Experimental part and just changing the heating time to 140 minutes. This
constitutes the fourth methodology (sample identifica-
Synthesis procedures tion: 2Polyol-Cit2).
In all cases the products were separated by centrifu-
Borohydride reduction in aqueous media gation and special attention was taken in washing pro-
cedure. The solid precipitate was washed with ethanol,
Using a strong reducing agent, for instance NaBH4 , methanol, diethyl ether and deionized water several
is well documented in literature as a fast and easy times to thoroughly remove residual contaminations,
method to obtain metallic nanoparticles [14]. The re- and finally the particles were dried at ambient condi-
duction of the starting salt CoCl2 ·6H2 O (Aldrich ≥ tions for 9 hrs.
99%) was carried out at 25℃ in aqueous media. First,
5 mmol of CoCl2 ·6H2 O (Aldrich ≥ 99%) and 5 mmol Characterization
of Na3 Cit·2H2 O (Aldrich ≥ 99%) were dissolved into
deionized water (30 ml) under vigorous stirring. After UV–Vis spectra were recorded on a Jazz spectropho-
10 min. of stirring, NaBH4 (Aldrich ≥ 96%) 0.0189 g tometer from Ocean Optics in the wavelengths interval
dissolved in 20 ml of deionized water were introduced of 200 to 800 nm. XRD powder patterns of the as-
drop by drop. The molar ratio of NaBH4 :CoCl2 was prepared samples were obtained using Bruker D8 Ad-
purposely made larger than two in orders to ensure vance Diffractometer and CuKα radiation, with angular
complete reduction of CoCl2 [15]. The solution color step of 0.025◦. The morphology of the as-prepared Co
changes from pale pink into black after approximately nanoparticles was initially characterized by an Scanning
10 min. Eventually, the proper amount of diethyl ether Electron Microscopy instrument SEM JEOL JEM6390
(8 ml) was then added under non-anaerobic conditions LV operating at an accelerating voltage interval of 15 ∼
in order to minimize the formation of boron-cobalt com- 20 kV and equipped with energy dispersive X-ray spec-
pounds [8,9]. troscopy (EDS) capabilities and a High resolution SEM
(HRSEM Nova 600 NanoLab, dual beam). The samples
Reduction method in aqueous media via vesicles with smaller particle sizes were analyzed by Transmis-
sion Electron Microscopy (TEM JEOL JEM 1010) and
First, 0.0729 g of CoCl2 ·6H2 O were dissolved in a High Resolution TEM (HRTEM JEOL 2010F), using
mixture of 25 ml deionized water and 5 ml methanol an accelerating voltage of 60 kV and 200 kV, respec-
(Fermont 99.9%) under constant stirring. Then 17 μl of tively. The thermogravimetric studies were performed
13
Nano-Micro Lett. 3 (1), 12-19 (2011)/ http://dx.doi.org/10.3786/nml.v3i1.p12-19
in a High Resolution TGA Q5000 IR at heating rates nique and Spectrum One spectrophometer (from Perkin
of 10℃/min under a continuous air flow (21% O2 ). IR Elemer).
spectra were recorded using the KBr pressed disk tech-
Table 1 Resume of the four methodologies and the corresponding sample identification (ID)
14
Nano-Micro Lett. 3 (1), 12-19 (2011)/ http://dx.doi.org/10.3786/nml.v3i1.p12-19
Fig. 3 (a) low resolution TEM, (b) HRTEM and (c) HAADF images of metallic cobalt obtained from vesicles. Inset in (c)
corresponds to the FFT of the selected area in this image.
For the cases where ethylene glycol was used as However, the study of these samples in SEM
solvent in the presence of hydrazine as reducer, shows that in both samples the secondary parti-
the products of both methodologies (using Sodium cle sizes oscillate between 0.5 and 1.5 μm, while
Citrate or CTAB as stabilizers) tend to be formed the apparent primary particle sizes are between 20
by spherical micro-agglomerates of metal particles to 45 nm for CTAB system and from 40 to 75 nm
(see Fig. 4(a) and 4(c)). for sodium citrate. The increasing in temperature
15
Nano-Micro Lett. 3 (1), 12-19 (2011)/ http://dx.doi.org/10.3786/nml.v3i1.p12-19
Fig. 4 (a) SEM images of sample obtained using CTAB as capping agent and hydrazine as reducing agent in ethylene glycol;
(b) Zoom in on selected particles observed in SEM micrographs that shows hollow morphology; (c) sample obtained under
similar conditions but using sodium citrate as capping agent.
and the use of softer reducing agent could be the tainly that weight gain due to oxidation of metal-
reason why the mean particle sizes is higher in lic cobalt is partially overlapped with weight loss
these cases. Both parameters probably favor the resulted from decomposition processes of organic
superposition of nucleation and growth processes phases. It is worth mentioning the fact that any
which don’t allow the obtaining of small parti- attempt to measure the samples under inert at-
cles. Additionally, for the sample obtained in mosphere complicates the further interpretation of
the presence of CTAB, the agglomerates organize the thermal profiles because of residual carbona-
to form hollow-elongated mesoscopic system (see ceous material that result from incomplete com-
Fig. 4(b)). This is very interesting since nanoengi- bustion of the organic phase.
neered colloidal particles with hollow morphology The unique sample showing almost no overlap-
may potentially find applications as delivery sys- ping of decomposition and oxidation processes was
tems especially those which are magnetic because obtained from hydrazine reduction in the presence
they can be directed by application of an external of citrate. This sample shows the largest exper-
magnetic field [25-27]. The obtaining of hollow mi- imental weight gain of 31.26% and the expected
crostructures is probably related to the formation theoretical value for pure metallic cobalt is 36.19%
of CTAB micelles in ethylene glycol [28]. The mi- according to:
celles act as template and deposition center dur-
ing nucleation and the growth of metallic cobalt 3Co(s) + 2O2(g) → Co3 O4(s) (1)
nanoparticles.
The differences between experimental and theo-
Thermogravimetric profiles retical weight gain are usually assumed as result
from metal surface oxidation [30]. Intriguingly, no
Pure metallic bulk cobalt starts to oxidize in
traces of cobalt oxide were observed in XRD pat-
air at approximately 350℃ [29]. However, cobalt
terns which is probably related to low cristallinity
nanoparticles obtained via physical methods, with
of this compound. The existence of cobalt oxide
mean particle size in the range of 20 ∼ 57 nm,
(CoO) in metallic cobalt samples implies that its
starts to oxidize in air at temperatures as low as
150℃ [30,31]. In Fig. 5(a) the thermogravimetric oxidation to Co3 O4 contributes with a fraction to
curves of the four as prepared samples are shown the total oxygen uptake along the thermal profiles
and in the Table 2 the weight gain/loss for each according to:
sample and a proposal of the processes involved 1
are summarized. Two general behaviors can be 3CoO(s) + O2(g) → Co3 O4(s) (2)
2
clearly distinguished depending on reducing agent
used. Although all samples show a weight loss in especially in the range from 400 to 900℃ [32].
the temperature ranges from 30 to 350℃ (related An interesting feature of the thermal profiles in
to dehydration and decomposition of the organic samples obtained from hydrazine reduction is the
phase) the less unpurified samples are those ob- existence of a well defined weight loss at 905℃
tained from hydrazine reduction. It is almost cer- which undoubtedly corresponds to the process
16
Nano-Micro Lett. 3 (1), 12-19 (2011)/ http://dx.doi.org/10.3786/nml.v3i1.p12-19
130 160
Aqueous Reduction
Vesicles 150
120 Poly-ol-CTAB
Poly-ol-Cit 140
Weight (%)
Weight (%)
110 130
120
100
110
90 100
447°C
(a) (b)
90
100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800
Temperature (°C) Temperature (°C)
100
90
80
70
Weight (%)
60
50
40
30
Na3Cit
20 CTAB
10 Oleic Acid
(c)
0
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700
Temperature (°C)
Fig. 5 (a) Thermogravimetric plots of the four as-prepared Co nanoparticles; (b) Thermogravimetric curve of the sodium
borohydride; (c) Thermogravimetric curves of sodium citrate, CTAB and oleic acid (major probable impurities on samples).
Table 2 Resume of the weight gain/loss for each sample and a proposal of the processes involved
17
Nano-Micro Lett. 3 (1), 12-19 (2011)/ http://dx.doi.org/10.3786/nml.v3i1.p12-19
18
Nano-Micro Lett. 3 (1), 12-19 (2011)/ http://dx.doi.org/10.3786/nml.v3i1.p12-19
[3] R. P. Cowburn, Mater. Today 6, 32 (2003). http:// [19] C. F. Bohren and D. R. Huffman, “Absorption and
dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1369-7021(03)00730-2 scattering of light by small particles”, Wiley, New
[4] C. Scherer and A. M. Figueiredo Neto, Braz. J. York, (1983).
Phys. 35, 718 (2005). http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/ [20] H. C. Van de Hulst, “Light Scattering by Small Par-
S0103-97332005000400018 ticles”, Dover Publications, New York (1981).
[5] Halit S.Gokturk, Thomas J. Fiske and Dilhan M. Ka- [21] J. A. Creighton and D. G. Eaton, J. Chem. Soc. Fara-
lyon, J. Appl. Phys. 73, 5598 (1993). http://dx.doi. day Trans. II 87, 3881 (1991). http://dx.doi.org/
org/10.1063/1.353663 10.1039/ft9918703881
[6] G. Schmid, “Applied Homogeneous Catalysis with [22] S. H. Sun and C. B. Murray, J. Appl. Phys. 85, 4325
Organometallic Compounds”, Eds, B. Cornils and W. (1999). http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.370357
A. Herrmann, Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, vol.
2, pp. 636-644 (1996). [23] D. P. Dinega and M. G. Bawendi, Angew. Chem.
Int. Ed. 38, 1788 (1999). http://dx.doi.org/10.
[7] Yang Xu, Meena Mahmood, Zhongrui Li, Enkeleda
1002/(SICI)1521-3773(19990614)38:12$<$1788::
Dervishi, Steve Trigwell, Vladimir P. Zharov, Nawab
AID-ANIE1788$>$3.0.CO;2-2
Ali, Viney Saini, Alexandru R Biris, Dan Lupu,
Dorin Boldor and Alexandru S. Biris, Nanotechnol- [24] H. T. Yang, C. M. Shen, Y. G. Wang, Y. K. Su, T. Z.
ogy 19, 435102 (2008). http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/ Yang and H. J. Gao, Nanotechnology 15, 70 (2004).
0957-4484/19/43/435102 http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/15/1/014
[8] George N. Glavee, Kenneth J. Klabunde, Christo- [25] Dobson, J. Nanomedicine (Lond) 1, 31 (2006).
pher M. Sorensen and George C. Hadjapanayis, Lang- http://dx.doi.org/10.2217/17435889.1.1.31
muir 8, 771 (1992). http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ [26] Manuel Arruebo, Rodrigo Fernández-Pacheco, M.
la00039a008 Ricardo Ibarra and Jesús Santamarı́a, Nano To-
[9] George N. Glavee, Kenneth J. Klabunde, Christo- day 2, 22 (2007). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/
pher M. Sorensen and George C. Hadjipanayis, Lang- S1748-0132(07)70084-1
muir 9, 162 (1993). http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ [27] Lin Guo, Fang Liang, Xiaogang Wen, Shihe Yang,
la00025a034 Lin He, Wangzhi Zheng, Chinping Chen and Qunpeng
[10] G. Viau, F. Fiévet-Vincent and F. Fiévet, Solid State Zhong, Adv. Funct. Mater. 17, 425 (2007). http://dx.
Ionics 84, 259 (1996). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ doi.org/10.1002/adfm.200600415
0167-2738(96)00005-7
[28] S. K. Kor, R. R. Yadav, and D. Singh, Mol. Cryst. Liq.
[11] L. Poul, N. Jouini and F. Fiévet, Chem. Mater. 12, Cryst. 392, 75 (2002). http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/
3123 (2000). http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/cm991179j 10587250216176
[12] F. Fiévet, M. Figlarz and J. P. Lagier, “Process for
[29] A. Magdziarz, I. Suliga and Z. Kalicka, J. Therm.
the reduction of metallic compounds by polyols, and
Anal. Calorim. 74, 647 (2003). http://dx.doi.org/
metallic powders obtained by this process”, U. S.
10.1023/B:JTAN.0000005206.63933.2f
Patent 4539041 (1985).
[30] Robert N. Grass and Wendelin J. Stark, J. Mater.
[13] F. Fiévet, J. P. Lagier and B. Blin, Solid State Ionics
Chem. 16, 1825 (2006). http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/
198, 32 (1989).
b601013j
[14] L. Cushing Brian, V. L. Kolesnichenko and Charles J.
O’Connor, Chem. Rev. 104, 3893 (2004). [31] Hari Bala, Wuyou Fu, Yanhui Yu, Haibin Yang and
[15] A. M. L. Jackelen, M. Jungbauer and G. N. Glavee, Yishun Zhang, Appl. Surf. Sci. 255, 4050 (2009).
Langmuir 15, 2322 (1999). http://dx.doi.org/10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2008.10.
1021/la9807311 119
[16] M. L. Rogerson, Brian H. Robinson, Seyda Bucak and [32] Chih-Wei Tang, Chen-BinWang and Shu-Hua Chien,
Peter Walde, Colloids Surf. B 48, 24 (2006). http:// Thermochim. Acta. 473, 68 (2008).
dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2006.01.001 [33] Barbara Prochowska-Klisch and Andrzej Malecki,
[17] C. L. Apel, M. N. Mautner and D. W. Deamer, Thermochim. Acta. 335, 99 (1999). http://dx.doi.
Biochim. Biophys. Acta. Gen. Subj. 1559, 1 (2002). org/10.1016/S0040-6031(99)00154-9
[18] L. Ward, “Handbook of Optical Constants of Solids [34] Nianqiang Wu, Lei Fu, Ming Su, Mohammed Aslam,
II” Ed, Edward D. Palik, Elsevier Science, vol. 2, pp Ka Chun Wong and Vinayak P. Dravid, Nano Lett. 4,
435-448 (1991). 383 (2004). http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/nl035139x
19