Professional Documents
Culture Documents
VIA COURIER
Dear Sir/Madam:
Re: 1188042 Ontario Inc. and Central Meat Market (Kitchener) Limited v.
Regional Municipality of Waterloo
Partial expropriation of 760 King Street West, Kitchener
Please find enclosed our client's Notice of Arbitration and Statement of Claim together
with Affidavit of Service. We also enclose our firm’s cheque in the amount of $300.00
representing the required filing fee.
Sincerely,
SORBARA, SCHUMACHER, McCANN LLP
David Sunday
Encls.
LPAT File No.
B E T W E E N:
Claimants
and
Respondent
NOTICE OF ARBITRATION
1. Take notice that the Claimants, 1188042 Ontario Inc. (“118”) and Central
Meat Market (Kitchener) Limited (“Central”) (collectively the “Claimants”), require that
the compensation claimed herein from the Respondent, the Regional Municipality of
Waterloo (the "Respondent”), with respect to the lands described below be determined
Part of Lots 13, 14, and 29, Subdivision of Lot 15, German
Company Tract, Part of Linwood Avenue and Part of Lot 21,
Plan 413, being Parts 3, 4, 5, 6 and 10 on Expropriation Plan
WR726569, all in the City of Kitchener, Regional Municipality
of Waterloo, being part of PIN 22327-0216 (LT)
3. The Claimants claim compensation for the market value of the Expropriated
Lands, as well as compensation for damages which are the natural and reasonable
4. Further and in the alternative, the Claimants claim compensation for injurious
5. The Expropriated Lands and the Remaining Lands are referred to herein
STATEMENT OF CLAIM
7. The Subject Lands were purchased by Central on the 18th day of September
1986 for the purpose of operating a grocery store which it opened in or about 1986.
8. On the 28th of January 1998, Central transferred the Subject Lands to 118,
which is the parent company of Central. Both Central and 118 are owned and controlled
by Mike Williamson and Benjamin Pino, who are each principals of both companies.
9. At the time of the expropriation in 2012, Central was occupying the Subject
Lands as a tenant for the purpose of operating its grocery store business thereon. Central
has continued in occupation of the Remaining Lands without interruption since the date
of the expropriation and continues to operate its grocery store business thereon, but with
10. Central’s grocery business was heavily traffic dependent and benefitted from
being located upon a busy four-lane arterial road (King Street West) in a built-up area of
Kitchener known as midtown (due to its location between Downtown Kitchener and
Uptown Waterloo). The Subject Lands were proximate to the Grand River Hospital, the
11. Before the expropriation, the Subject Lands had a site area of approximately
2.77 acres and were improved with a grocery store building having an area of
approximately 21,000 square feet (branded as “Central Fresh Market”) and a separate
-4-
1.5 storey residential dwelling addressed as 33 Linwood Avenue. The residential dwelling
Expropriated Lands in 2012. The Expropriated Lands were required for construction and
operation of a new light rail transit system in the Region of Waterloo, which was to include
Fairview Park Mall in Kitchener (the "LRT Works"). The LRT Works included
reconstruction and reconfiguration of King Street West between Victoria Street and Union
Street.
13. The Respondent served the Claimants with a Notice of Application for
14. The Respondent approved the expropriation on or about the 29th day of
August 2012.
15. The Respondent registered a plan of expropriation in the Land Registry Office
for Waterloo (LRO #58) on the 22nd day of November 2012 as Instrument No. WR726569,
16. The Expropriated Lands comprised approximately 0.029 acres (1,263 square
17. The Respondent served its Notice of Expropriation on or about the 14th day
18. The Claimant did not deliver a Notice of Election. As such, the effective date
for the purpose of this claim is the date of registration of the plan of expropriation, being
LRT Works
19. Prior to the Expropriation and construction of the LRT Works, King Street
West in the vicinity of the Subject Lands was a four-lane arterial Regional Road linking
20. As a result of the construction of the LRT Works, King Street West in the
vicinity of the Remaining Lands is now a two-lane street with LRT tracks located between
21. As a result of the construction of the LRT, there are additional stop lights to
22. The LRT tracks are separated from motor vehicle traffic by a raised median
which prevents left turns from King Street West in most areas between Victoria Street
and Union Street. Left turn movements have also been specifically restricted at most
intersections along King Street West in the same area. Left turn movements from Victoria
23. Central’s grocery store business is heavily reliant on and sensitive to changes
24. The LRT Works have reduced motor vehicle traffic on King Street West in
front of the Remaining Lands by over 50%. Further reductions in motor vehicle traffic may
25. As a result of the expropriation and the LRT Works, including the physical
and intersection changes to King Street West, vehicle traffic has been largely diverted
26. The construction or use, or both, of the LRT Works have substantially
reduced customer traffic to Central’s grocery store and permanently reduced Central’s
Mitigation Efforts
27. Soon after the start of the LRT Works on King Street West between Victoria
Street and Union Street, Central’s customer traffic, sales and profits declined significantly.
28. Central increased its advertising spending during 2015 and 2016. Its
advertising included maps showing customers how to get to Central Fresh Market.
from planning promotions or advertising to coincide with the completion of a part of the
30. Central reduced wages, benefits and bonuses in response to the decline in
sales caused by the expropriation, construction, and use of the LRT Works.
along key routes to make up for deficiencies in the Respondent’s detour signage.
Central’s signage used the Central Fresh Market branding and included directional arrows
of Central’s directional signs, such that regular maintenance and replacement by Central
was required.
33. The rear of the Remaining Lands abuts Linwood Avenue, but the site plan for
the Remaining Lands does not permit access from the Remaining Lands' parking lot to
Linwood Avenue. With the permission of the City of Kitchener, Central opened a rear
34. Central paid to cut a concrete curb to open the rear entrance and ensured its
directional signs were placed in appropriate locations to point customers to the new rear
entrance. The rear entrance remained open until the 6th day of January 2017 when the
35. While aware that Central's business losses continued to mount and knowing
that construction on King Street West between Union Street and Victoria Street were
incomplete, the Respondent refused Central’s request that the Respondent intervene with
-8-
the City of Kitchener to keep the rear entrance open subsequent to the 6th day of January
2017.
36. In or about May 2017, the City of Kitchener authorized the reopening of the
rear entrance solely for the duration of 7 p.m. to 7 a.m. nighttime construction closures of
King Street West. The rear entrance was permanently closed upon completion of the
Market Value
37. 118 claims $86,000 for the market value of the Expropriated Lands, less
Disturbance Damages
personal and business damages arising from the construction or use, or both, of the LRT
Works as the Respondent would be liable for if the construction or use were not under
39. Specifically, the Claimants plead that that Central has suffered damages as
(a) Construction of the LRT Works commenced on the 23rd day of March 2015
and were not substantially completed until the 28th day of July 2017, over
28 months later;
-9-
(b) Access to the Subject Lands and use of King Street West by Central’s
Street West in the vicinity of the Remaining Lands for over 17 months
from the West along King Street West for an unreasonably long
period even though other nearby parts of King Street West retained
zone of the LRT Works at certain times and/or for extended periods;
-10-
(v) the detouring of two major public transit bus routes off King Street
West thereby interfering with the use of the bus stop located directly
(vii) the closure of King Street West from Union Street to Victoria Street
(viii) restricting passable parts of King Street West to local use only for
students; and,
(ix) the closure of a potential alternate route around the work on the
2015;
(c) there was interference with vehicular, pedestrian and transit-user access to
(d) there were substantial reductions in customer traffic and sales, resulting in
(e) there were intermittent lane closures, short-term lane restrictions, 7 p.m. to
increased the interference with the access to the Remaining Lands and the
(f) traffic levels in front of the Remaining Lands were reduced by over 70%,
some cases in error. Such signage also normally routed customers along
longer detour routes than necessary and which still ultimately required travel
(h) The Respondent planned to commence LRT operations in 2017, but it has
repeatedly delayed launch which is presently scheduled for the 21st day of
June 2019;
Remaining Lands were substantial and unreasonable due to extended closures and
delays, including:
(c) The lengthy delay in the restoration of two-way traffic in front of the
Remaining Lands;
(d) The delayed start and completion of the grade separation works between
Victoria Street and Moore Avenue, and associated delays in the Moore
(f) Extensive delays in the reconstruction of King Street West between Union
(h) The Respondent detoured drivers away from King Street West to Weber
(i) Further interference with access to the Remaining Lands was caused by
the detouring of bus routes. Route 7 Mainline, a major bus route that had
travelled along King Street West and stopped directly in front of the
-13-
Remaining Lands prior to construction, was detoured off King Street West
for over 29 months and the nearest stop during that time was approximately
400 metres from the Remaining Lands. The 200 iXpress route, which
was permanently detoured off of King Street West between Union Street
(j) Other delays and closure extensions as may be proven by the Claimants.
41. The Claimants therefore plead that the Respondent carried out the
of compliance with industry standards for same) and/or unreasonably interfered with
Central’s normal use of the Remaining Lands constituting nuisance at law. The
Central caused by the expropriation and the construction or the use, or both, of the LRT
Works.
42. Furthermore, the LRT Works have substantially and unreasonably interfered
with access to the Remaining Lands and Central’s use of the property for a grocery store.
goodwill.
43. Central therefore claims against the Respondent for the permanent loss of
goodwill or for the future loss of income subsequent to January 20, 2019 as disturbance
-14-
damages or, in the alternative, future business losses in the nature of damages for
injurious affection.
pursuant to Section 13(2)(b) of the Expropriations Act or, alternatively, injurious affection
(a) $3,500,000 for loss of income, out of pocket costs (including the costs of
from the 23rd of March 2015 through to the 20th of January 2019; and
(b) $3,500,000 for permanent loss of goodwill or, alternatively, future loss of
(c) In the alternative to (a) and (b), Central states that the expropriation and the
45. Central states that the Disturbance Damages were the natural and
construction or use, or both, of the LRT Works. Central further states that, but for the
expropriation and construction or use, or both, of the LRT Works, Central would not have
Damages suffered by Central also represent damages to 118 and are claimed by 118
Summary of Claim
47. The Claimants therefore claim compensation for the following items which
(a) 118 claims $86,000 for the market value of the fee simple interest
(b) Central claims $3,500,000 for disturbance damages for loss of income, out
of pocket costs, and other business losses from the 23rd of March 2015
Expropriations Act;
(c) Central claims $3,500,000 for disturbance damages for permanent loss of
(i) $3,500,000 for damages for injurious affection for loss of income
from the 23rd of March 2015 through to the 20th of January 2019,
(ii) $3,500,000 for damages for injurious affection for permanent loss of
Expropriations Act;
(e) In the further alternative to (b), (c), and (d) above, Central claims
(f) All legal, appraisal, and other consultant costs for the claim for
(h) Such other and further relief as counsel may advise and this Tribunal deem
just.
48. This notice is given by Sorbara, Schumacher, McCann LLP, solicitors for the
Claimant. The address at which documents may be served on the Claimant is:
Dated at Waterloo this 28th day of May 2019. SORBARA, SCHUMACHER, MCCANN LLP
31 Union Street East
Waterloo ON N2J 1B8
SCHEDULE “A”
1188042 ONTARIO INC. and CENTRAL MEAT MARKET -and- THE REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF WATERLOO
(KITCHENER) LIMITED
Claimants Respondent
LPAT File No. .