Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Nguyen Nhat Le, 2 Bìa Đỏ Mận Chín
Nguyen Nhat Le, 2 Bìa Đỏ Mận Chín
ENGLISH DEPARTMENT
GRADUATION THESIS
Class: 10A14
GRADUATION THESIS
Class: 10A14
I declare that this graduation thesis is original and has not been submitted
for assessment elsewhere.
First and foremost, I would like to take this opportunity to pay my deepest
regards to English Department, Hanoi University for granting me the honor of
writing a graduation thesis.
Last but not least, I want to extend my special thanks to my family and
friends for their continual encouragement during the stressful time I conducted this
study.
i
ABSTRACT
ii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT.......................................................................................i
ABSTRACT.............................................................................................................ii
TABLE OF CONTENTS.......................................................................................iii
LIST OF FIGURES.................................................................................................v
CHAPTER I: INTRODUCTION...........................................................................1
1.1. Rationale to the study................................................................................1
1.2. Aims of the study........................................................................................2
1.3. Research questions.....................................................................................3
1.4. Hypothesis...................................................................................................3
1.5. Scope of the study.......................................................................................3
1.6. Structure of the study................................................................................4
CHAPTER II: LITERATURE REVIEW.............................................................5
2.1. Listening comprehension...........................................................................5
2.1.1. Definition of listening and listening comprehension.........................5
2.1.2. Factors which obstruct listening comprehension..............................6
2.2. Dictation as a method to improve listening comprehension....................9
2.2.1. Definition and reasons why it is utilized in the classroom................9
2.2.2. Advantages of dictation.....................................................................10
2.2.3. Disadvantages of dictation................................................................13
2.2.4. Recommendations.............................................................................14
2.3. Literature gap...........................................................................................15
CHAPTER III: METHODOLOGY.....................................................................16
3.1. Subjects of the research...........................................................................16
3.2. Research instrument................................................................................16
3.3. Procedures................................................................................................17
CHAPTER IV: FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION................................................19
4.1. Findings.....................................................................................................19
4.1.1. Current situation of listening comprehension among English-
majored freshmen...........................................................................................19
4.1.2. The application of frequent dictation to enhance listening
comprehension among first-year students at English Department.............21
iii
4.1.3. Potential problems and solutions to promote dictation..................24
4.2. Discussions................................................................................................26
4.2.1. What are the obstructions to listening comprehension of freshmen
at English Department?..................................................................................26
4.2.2. Are there any correlations between the utilization of dictation and
listening comprehension of first-year English majors?................................28
4.2.3. What are the problems and solutions to improve this technique?.29
CHAPTER V: CONCLUSION............................................................................31
5.1. Conclusion................................................................................................31
5.2. Limitations of the study...........................................................................32
5.3. Recommendations....................................................................................33
REFERENCES.........................................................................................................i
APPENDIX..............................................................................................................v
iv
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1: Factors preventing listening comprehension……………………...……20
Figure 2: The rate of respondents who practice dictation outside the listening
classes……………………………………………………………………………....21
v
CHAPTER I: INTRODUCTION
1.4. Hypothesis
As for content, scope of the study focuses on three main issues: the factors
which negatively influence listening comprehension of first-year English majors,
the use of dictation to deal with listening comprehension problems, the advantages
as well as disadvantages of this method, and the suggestions to promote dictation.
As for target group, to achieve the target goals, this study chose to carry out
on English majors at Hanoi University, to be more specific, 80 first-year students,
which accounts for approximately one-fifth of the total number of students in
English Department. The reason lies in the fact that they have to go through the
3
process of adjustment to be familiar with tertiary education which may affect their
English skills in general and listening skills in particular. Moreover, there is no
doubt that there is not any other ideal subjects since English Department apply
dictation in listening classes specifically for first-year students in both means of
testing and practicing.
As for area, scope of the study was narrowed to English Department, Hanoi
University.
As for the time spent on conducting the study, it took place from March to
May, 2018.
4
CHAPTER II: LITERATURE REVIEW
In spoken form, words are different from their pronunciation when standing
alone. They are intended to be connected in order to help native speakers’
conversation more fluent and natural. Connected speech is depicted by Underhill
(1994) as "a flow of sounds which are modified by a system of simplifications
through which phonemes are connected, grouped and modified" (cited in
UKEssays, 2015, p.1). However, such changes may result in hindrance to listening
comprehension of not only low-level English learners but also people having high
level of proficiency in English (Maxwell, n.d.).
2.1.2.2. Accents
Among the factors which cause listening comprehension difficult, the rate of
delivery is believed to have certain impact on listening comprehension. It is a
common knowledge that in aural communication, the rate of speaking tend to be
much faster which positively result in the inability of listening comprehension
(Underwood, 1989). It can be referred that the listeners are likely to face failure in
following the entire speech as a consequence of not being able to control the pace of
the talk and may miss numerous details (Gilakjani & Ahmadi, 2011). Moreover, the
task of the listeners can be more challenging in case the speakers talk a lot slower
than average or pause too many times (Hwaider, 2017; Zakaria, 2014).
2.1.2.5. Concentration
9
Using dictation to assist language learning has been popular for several
centuries. In general, dictation can be denoted as an activity in which learners have
to convert the sounds into written language (Davis & Rinvolucri, 2002). According
to British Council (2005), dictation indicates the term “dictation” in the scale of a
classroom. The pupils copy what the instructors have said, then comparing to the
original and editing their works. This method is mostly and specifically used in the
language classroom for some reasons. Dictation is favored by the teachers because:
First, it is suitable for “any level” language learners and “multi-level” class (British
Council, 2005, p.2); Second, it minimizes preparations for teaches and saves time
for other activities. In addition, it is a practical tool to value students’ language
proficiency (Savignon, 1982). As for students, dictation is an effective tool to
improve all four language skills comprehensively (British Council, 2005).
Especially, a large body of literature has approved its profound influence on
enhancing listening comprehension in language classes (Kiany & Shiramiry, 2002;
Yonezaki, 2014; Kavaliauskiene & Darginaviciene, 2009; Kondo, 2012; Kazazoglu,
2013). In fact, it has been trusted and put into practice by more than a half of the
teachers in European countries (Davis & Rinvolucri, 2002).
Listening for specific information like names, numbers, objects, time and so
on is often regarded as a secondary skill and belittled. Sometimes, it is hard to
convey the message if listeners constantly miss out the details. Moreover, in some
cases, small pieces of information may carry the implications of the speaker. To
determine problems of teaching as well as studying English in Vietnam, Kazantseva
and Nguyen (2015) in their study reported that Vietnamese undergraduates find it
difficult to catch up with details while listening and come up with the action of
dictating words down to solve this matter. Since dictation exercises stand in need of
language learners to memorize and copy exactly each saying word by word,
sentence by sentence. Consequently, they are required to have powers of
concentration to make sure all specific information is accurate with respect to
semantic, lexical and grammatical aspects. In previous research findings of David
and Rinvolucri (2002) leap to a conclusion that with constant practice, dictation
seems to progressively strengthen listening comprehension in general and the skill
of paying attention to details in particular.
Particularly, the main cause of this problem roots from lack of knowledge or
experience of the listeners. However, dictation is believed to help students become
more familiar with regional accents of English because of a wide range of listening
materials in different fields which are conveyed by speakers from every corners of
the world (Kiany & Shiramiry, 2002). Moreover, thanks to writing down the input
sounds, listeners have the opportunity to identify how speech is connected.
According to Chen (2011), for college students, dictation practice, specifically,
post-dictation exercise is proved to be advantageous in enhancing awareness about
phonetic complexity.
2.2.4. Recommendations
Even though there has been a vast amount of research conducted on dictation
in English language acquisition, most of them are about utilizing dictation as an
indicator of overall language proficiency or a language learning tool in general.
Only a small number of studies have investigated the effect of dictation practice on
listening comprehension. Moreover, the results still remains ambiguous and
paradoxical.
As there is no research that has been carried out to study the correlation
between dictation practice and listening comprehension in Vietnam, this study only
uses research information from international sources.
While the subjects from previous research vary from non-English majors to
English majors in different age groups, my research is for English Department’s
freshmen in Hanoi University who have been practicing dictation in listening
classes for several months. In addition, it will focus on finding the impact of
dictation practice on listening comprehension, potentials problems and infer several
effective strategies to better this teaching device from the finding of the research.
15
CHAPTER III: METHODOLOGY
This chapter states all the methods taken to investigate research problems
and specific procedures to answer the research questions mentioned in Chapter I:
“What makes listening comprehension difficult for freshmen at English
Department?”, “Is dictation practice beneficial for freshmen at English Department
to enhance their listening comprehension?” ,and “What are the drawbacks and
recommendations to better this teaching device?”. Linked back to theories in
Literature review, all aspects of methodology involving target group of the study,
research instrument, and work progress to final findings will be introduced and
justified in Chapter III.
The respondents of this study are 80 students who are randomly chosen from
about 350 first-year English majors. It is up to the participants to participate in the
study and the questionnaires do not require their personal information.
There are several research methods that can be used to gather information
investigating the link between frequent dictation and improvement in listening
comprehension among freshmen majoring in English. However, questionnaire was
the best method to choose as it met the requirements of collecting both quantitative
and qualitative data. Moreover, it is easily delivered to the participants and brings
results for the researcher to analyze immediately after the paper is completed.
16
The questionnaire contains 7 questions in forms of multiple-choice, ranking,
close-ended and open-ended questions whose answers are anticipated to resolve the
three research questions mentioned above.
3.3. Procedures
At first, not until the pilot questionnaires that were conducted online using
Google forms among 8 freshmen did the official version of the survey was
launched. Fortunately, I realized that the survey had some problems with the
question instructions and wording after I collected the questionnaire and comments
from those students. Hence, I made several changes to correct minor mistakes,
provide some explanations for a few terminologies and guarantee it is
understandable for respondents.
Then, the researcher went to random classes to deliver the paper form of the
questionnaire. There was no limitation in the time for the participants to complete
all the questions, yet, it took them approximately three to four minutes to answer.
The sample of the questionnaire is included in the Appendix at the end of the thesis.
Any query for clarification was responded immediately to avoid misunderstanding
but most students had no difficulty in completing the questionnaire. All students
were thanked for their participations and cooperation after they finished. 63 out of
17
80 given handouts were usable and all the information in their papers was kept
confidential. After collecting all 80 copies of the questionnaire, set to work on data
analysis. The results of the survey were presented in bar and pie charts with
explanation and comparison with the theories mentioned in Chapter II.
18
CHAPTER IV: FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION
This chapter will demonstrate all collected data from the questionnaires
based on responses to answer to the three research questions stated in Chapter I. In
addition, the findings of the research which are relevant to hypothesis posed in the
literature review will be exhaustively discussed in order that new understandings or
insights about the investigated research problem will also be brought to light.
4.1. Findings
4.1.1. Current situation of listening comprehension among English-
majored freshmen
19
87%
Limited short-term
57%
memory
39%
Regional accents 60%
53%
Connected speech 24%
53%
None of the above
0%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
20
learning process in the study of Juan and Abidin (2013) among China’s student
learning English in Malaysia. Nearly 40% of the freshmen at English Department
considers inconsistent rate of delivery as one of the hindrances. However, in
relevant research of Nowrouzi et al. (2015), it was reported as the greatest problems
to their subjects and high speed of talking fueled fears the most to all listeners
during English listening comprehension.
29%
Yes No
71%
The pie chart indicates the rate of freshmen studying at the faculty of English
who utilize dictation technique to practice at home besides dictating in listening
classes. It can be referred from the chart that the majority of first-year students
practicing dictation both in listening class and at home accounts for 71% of the total
number, equally 45 out of 63 participants. There is an explanation for this amazing
21
figure is that after experiencing dictation at school, they recognized the enormous
advantages of dictation on their listening ability. On the other hand, approximately
one-third of the subjects practiced this learning method only in the classroom
because it was a compulsory part in listening lessons. There is not any available
studies which can provide the exact reasons why dictation has never been favored
for self-practice at home by English majors. Fortunately, from this finding, it will
create an opportunity to discuss this issue thoroughly in the following part.
35 33
30
25
Number of respondents
20
15
15
9
10
5 3 3
0
Not at all A bit Comparatively Greatly Extremely
Degree of effectitiveness
22
The bar chart indicates how the subjects evaluate the effectiveness of
dictation in listening comprehension improvement. The majority of respondents,
which accounts for nearly a half of 63 surveyed freshmen, highly appreciated the
positive influence of dictation on listening comprehension. Followed after, the
number of freshmen who valued that the utilization of this technique made a fairly
progressive impact on their aural comprehension is significantly lower, at 15.
Among all respondents, 9 people, who acquired dictation to self-study at home,
claimed that frequent dictation practice had the capability of strengthening their
listening performance. Meanwhile, the number of students, who made light of the
effectiveness of this learning tool, occupies about 9.5% of the total number. These
people refused to have additional dictation practice at home because they believed
that dictation had no or little influence on advancing their listening competence.
The bar chart describes several benefits that dictation practice provides to
their users in improving their listening performance. As can be seen from the graph,
the most enormous advantage of this old-fashioned teaching device believed by
23
almost 70% of English-majored freshmen is that it helps them notice features of
connected speech which obstructs aural comprehension such as assimilation,
elision, and linking. In addition, speech familiarity is likely to be efficiently
improved as the more they listen to different authentic materials during their
practice, the more dialects they are exposed to. Ranking on the second place,
vocabulary expansion benefits a great number of respondents, which is a little bit
more than 65%. Improving short-term memory is another remarkable benefit of
frequent dictation, which is slightly lower than the previous element, at 62%. On the
other hand, two less striking impacts of dictation in handling listening problems,
which make up 49.2% and 36.5%, are strengthening listening for details and
cultivating active listening respectively. Surprisingly, two of the participants, which
accounts for 3.2% of the sampling population, found no benefits from dictation. The
reasons behind this will be discussed in the next section and a part of limitation of
this thesis.
In spite of its numerous benefits, dictation currently lose favor in the eyes of
many language users since it is considered as “old-fashioned” and “teacher-
centered” (Kavaliauskiene & Darginaviciene, 2009, p.2). Therefore, it is vital to
find out the drawbacks and solutions to exploit this method as much as possible.
Boredom
Lack of interaction
24
Figure 5 shows the collected data which reveals major limitations of
dictation technique. The chief problem indicated by three-fourths of total number of
participants is tediousness. This finding is also advocated by British Council (2005),
and Kavaliauskiene and Darginaviciene (2009). The state of feeling bored is the
leading drawback that dictation brings about to most of their practitioners. Another
disadvantage that comes in the second place is lack of interaction. It was received
approval from more than 50% of the total respondents. Meanwhile, the rate of
language learners who view dictation negatively as a result of lack of efficiency in
comprehension is slightly lower, at 46%. Lastly, one first-year student, which
accounts for almost 2%, believed that dictation was only useful for basic users who
needed to improve all language skills comprehensively.
4.2. Discussions
4.2.1. What are the obstructions to listening comprehension of freshmen
at English Department?
4.2.2. Are there any correlations between the utilization of dictation and
listening comprehension of first-year English majors?
The key target of this thesis is to demonstrate the link between dictation
practice and its influences on improving aural comprehension of first-year English
majors. Question 3 is conducted to discover whether the subjects take advantage of
this traditional method to self-practice at home or not, while question 4 performs the
rate of the effectiveness of dictation on aural comprehension from the perspective of
respondents. In addition, question 5 investigates on what aspects of listening
comprehension that dictation can enhance.
However, 3.2% of the respondents made the different choice from others,
which is “none of the above” benefits. Maybe, these students gain no benefits from
dictation practice. On the other hand, they could not find the benefit they attain
from this technique among the provided ones. This choice actually indicates a
suggestion for further research to find out other potential advantages of this method.
4.2.3. What are the problems and solutions to improve this technique?
29
However, the most noticing disadvantage, which was voted by three-fourths of the
total number of participants, is tediousness. This problem was also noted in the
findings of British Council (2005), and Kavaliauskiene and Darginaviciene (2009)
as the most influential reason why it used to be neglected by many language users.
To overcome this issue, suggested solutions like “the topic should be more
interesting and trending”, “creative activities should be added” is provided by the
respondents. The solution for more additional activities is also believed to be the
key to solve the issue, which is lack of interaction.
Additionally, the role of the teachers in the class is also important when
many participants agreed that the teachers should choose the suitable text difficulty.
If the text difficulty is appropriate, it will not only prevent the boredom but also can
help students to broaden their knowledge. Methods to apply dictation more
effectively and listening materials should be recommended frequently by the
teachers to make sure students are on the right track.
CHAPTER V: CONCLUSION
30
In chapter 5, a synthesis of main points, limitations of the study,
suggestions for further research will be included in order to develop dictation
practice with an aim to dealt with listening comprehension problems stated above.
5.1. Conclusion
31
majors. Moreover, it is concluded that dictation can improve students’ vocabulary,
ability to concentrate, awareness of phonetic complexity, short-term memory
capacity and ability of listening for specific information. Last but not least, despite
of its benefits, dictation has several problems which make language users have an
aversion for frequent practice. Accordingly, it is necessary for the teachers to guide
and make some changes to better this method.
It can be inferred from this study several limitations owing to time limit and
insufficient experience of the researcher.
First, the study was limited to a small number of first-year students in Hanoi
University, which accounts for only one-fifth of the total number of students.
Besides, this research only focuses on the attitude of first-year English majors at
Hanoi University towards the importance of listening comprehension and dictation
activities. If this paper was conducted in a larger scale, the reliability and accuracy
could be correspondingly enhanced.
Third, this research focuses on the students’ attitude toward the research
problems while it is necessary to discover teachers’ perspective on dictation practice
in the research setting. Accordingly, this is actually a drawback when this thesis is
unlikely to provide a more comprehensive view on the research problems.
32
for further research to investigate gender differences in problems they face during
listening, the effectiveness of dictation on listening comprehension and other
advantages of frequent dictation can be brought to light as well.
5.3. Recommendations
First of all, the lack of practice surely results in poor performance in all
aspects in life. Therefore, in order to be proficient in listening, students should
invest at least several hours a day self-studying and try to find out their own method
to enhance their aural comprehension. Meanwhile, since dictation is proved to be
efficient to listening comprehension, first-year students should employ this method
to practice at home, carefully follow the instructions from the teachers and make
suitable adaptation for themselves.
Finally, for further studies which share the same interest in studying dictation
and aural comprehension, several suggestions are made based on the finding and
33
limitations of the paper. Further studies are recommended to investigate gender-
based differences in the problems in listening comprehension and the effect of
dictation in improving listening comprehension because the number of female
respondents at English Department outweighs the male ones. Furthermore, it can be
inferred from the finding that a small number of participants gain benefits from
dictation practice which is not included in the provided choices. These limitations of
this study indicate some aspects for further research to investigate gender
differences in problems they face during listening, the effectiveness of dictation on
listening comprehension and other advantages of frequent dictation can be brought
to light as well.
34
REFERENCES
Ahmed, R. (2015). Five essential listening skills for English learners. Retrieved 14
May, 2018 from https://www.britishcouncil.org/voices-magazine/five-
essential-listening-skills-english-learners
Davis, P., & Rinvolucri, M. (2002). Dictation: New methods, new possibilities (13th
ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Delu, Z., Xingwei, M., Ning, L. X., Guo, G. Y., Hua, C. G. & Ming W. C. (2005).
Functional Linguistics and Foreign Language Teaching. Beijing: Foreign
Language Teaching and Research Press.
Gilakjani, A., & Ahmadi, A. (2011). A study of factors affecting EFL learners'
English listening comprehension and the strategies for improvement. Journal
of Language Teaching and Research, 2(5), 977-988.
i
Hwaider, S. M. (2017). Problems of teaching the listening skill to Yemeni EFL
learners. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 7(6),
140-148. Retrieved 14 May, 2018 from http://www.ijsrp.org/research-paper-
0617/ijsrp-p6619.pdf
Nation, I. S. P. (2006). How large a vocabulary is needed for reading and listening?
The Canadian Modern Language Review, 63(1), 59-82. Retrieved 14 May,
2018 from https://www.lextutor.ca/cover/papers/nation_2006.pdf
Nowrouzi, S., Tam, S. S., Zareian, G. & Nimehchisalem, V. (2015). Iranian EFL
students’ listening comprehension problems. Theory and practice in language
studies, 5(2), 263-269. doi: 10.17507/tpls. 0502.05
iv
APPENDIX
QUESTIONNAIRE
Dear respondents,
If you have any problems, feel free to ask me for help or explanations at any time or
contact me via email: nhatlenguyenn47@gmail.com
v
Yes
No
4. How effective is dictation in developing listening comprehension?
1 2 3 4 5
Not at all A bit Comparatively Greatly Extremely
vi
~~~~The end~~~~
Thank you!
vii