e e e e eo e e @ e e e e e @ e@ e é é econ CE290319/9 REPORT ON SUB SOIL INVESTIGATION AND RECOMMENDATION FOR THE FOUNDATION OF BRIDGE ACROSS GODAVARERIVER | MULAKALLANKA SEFTHANAGARAM MANDAL — EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT — A P LOCATION BRIDGE ACROSS GODAVARI RIVER ON THE ROAD FROM R & B ROAD TO MULAKALLANKA OF SEETHANAGARAM MANDAL EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT — ANDHRA PRADESH Gi M/S RBS INFRA ENGINEERS VIJAYAWADA SOIL TESTING & REPORT BY DEPARTMENT OF-CI VIL ENGINEERING V R SIDDHARTHA ENGINEERING COLLEGE VUAYAWADAeu . OCS e88GRD REPORT ON SUB SOIL INVESTIGATION AND RECOMMENDATION FOR THE, FOUNDATION OF PROPOSED BRIDGE ACROSS GODAVARI RIVER ON THE ROAD FROM R&B ROAD TO MULAKALLANKA OF SEETHANAGARAM MANDAL IN EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT ~ AP. | INTRODUCTION M/S RBS Infra Engineers, Vijayawada requested the Civil Engineering Department of V.R.Siddhartha Engineering College, Vijayawada to conduct necessary soil tests on soil samples collected by M/S Sree Devi Engineering Enterprises, Vijayawada and to recommend suitable foundation and bearing capacity of soil for the proposed Bridge across Godavari River on the road from R & B Road to Mulakallanka of Seethanagaram Mandal in East Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh The following are the responsibilities of M/S RBS Infra Engineers, awada and Panchayat Raj Department, AP. * Soil boring of 150 mm diameter upto 40 metres depth in 13 locations as specified by the client [ 2 abutment and 11 pier locations]. * Collection of undisturbed and disturbed soil samples from the bores * Conducting Standard Penetration Test (SPT) at regular intervals within the bores. + Testing of undisturbed and disturbed soil samples collected from the bore in the laboratory. + Recommendation of suitable bearing capacity and type of foundation for the proposed structure. MIS Sree Devi Engineering Enterprises, Vijayawada did the soil boring, sample collection and field testing on behalf of M/S RBS Infra Engineers, Vijayawada and Panchayat Raj Department, AP. This report contains the results of field and laboratory tests. Recommendations on bearing capacity of soil and type & depth for foundation for the proposed Bridge are also included,e e e e e e e e » e 2 2 2 e e e e e e e e e e © THE STRUCTURE AND LOCATION a Bridge across a Major River, support piers and abutments. The proposed structure is to be built across Godavari River on the anka Of Seethanagaram Mandal in road from R & B Road to Mulaka Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh 3 FIELD SOM. INVESTIGATION PROCEDURES The following methods were adopted for sub-soil investigations as per IS: 1892-1979, Thirteen soil investigation bores of 150 mm diameter upto a depth of 40 metres were proposed and drilled within the proposed structure locations. Boring was done using combination of shell and auger methods with casing pipe to depending upon the type of strata met with in the bore hole location using hand boring machine. Bore holes of 150 fate collection of Undisturbed and mm diameter with casing pipe were drilled to faa Disturbed soil samples and to conduct Standard Penetration Tests. Standard Penetration Tests (SPT) were Conducted at 1.0 meter intervals wit 22131-1981, Number of disturbed but in cach bore, These tests were conducted as per I representative soil samples were collected fromm the auger cuttings sand bailers for identification and for conducting laboratory tests. Undisturbed soil samples were also collected from the boreholes. The bore holes were advanced upto a depth of 50 metres below the existing ground level A Strata is considered to be hard, when the standard penetration test value, N ie. the number of blows required for 300 mm penetration of the SPT spoon beyond a seating penetration of 150 mm in the strata is more than 100 (Clause 3.3.3 of I$:3132-1981). If the penetration of the spoon is less than 300 mmm more than 50 blows, the N value is written as N>100. Calyx core drilling using TC/Diamond drill bits method was adopted in drilling SDR/SR/HR. The depth of water table at the end of boring is observed. All the -13) results obtained from the field operations are shown in the log of bore (Figure: 4 LABORATORY TESTS Indices tests such as natural moisture content, liquid limit, plastic limit and unit weight were conducted on DS/UDS soil samples as per Indian Standard to identify and establish the consistency of these soils. Sieve analysis tests were also conducted on stribution and classification of soil sandy/gravelly soil for knowing the particle size dUnconfined compressive strength tests and direct Sshear tests were conducted on UDS soil sample to know the shear strength of soil. The res 5 SUB SOIL PROFILES ullts are given in Table | to 26 The Sub soil profile at the bore hole locations, bassed on the identification of soil samples and the results of tests (both field and laboratow-y) are indicated in Figure 1- 13. The ides d design soil parameters are given in Tabl © 1, 3, 5,7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, 23 and 25 5.1 Bore Hole Number: 1 — Abutment, Al Reduced Level of the bore = + 17.576 m Bed level = (+) 17.576 m Depth Below Soil Type and Classi fication | Recorded SPT _ Ground Level _ LN" Value 0.00-1.00 | Yellowish brown silty fine to medium sand, SM-SP 16 1.00-3.00 | Yellowish brown fine to medium sand, SP 15 3.00 —5.00 Dark brown plastic silty clay {MH-CH] 7,9 5.00 —7.00 Dark brown plastic silty clay (MH-CH] | 78 7.00 — 10.00 Dark brown plastic silty clay (MH-CH] 11,10 10.00—1 | Dark brown plastic siltyclay(MI-CH] | ———«9,11S—«Y 12.00-15.00 | Dark brown plastic silty Clay (MIF-CH] “12,13 —~*| 15.00 — 16.00 24 16.00 - 18.00 29, 28 18.00 19.00 — 2 | 19.00 21.00 | Yellowish brown sandy silty 35,30 “Ti00~ 24.00 | Yellowish brown sandy sity Clay 7 38,43, a7 24.00 32.00 | Greyish white brown coarse to medium sand, SP | 58,62,68,72, 82 32.00 - 33.00 | Greyish white brown soft rock fragments, SDR $5, >100 | 33.00 - 34.00 | Soft disintegrated Rock ESDR/SR] | RQD 0% 34.00- 35.00 | Soft disintegrated Rock [SDR/SR] | RQD = 0% L The silt factor, f as per Lacy’s equati can be calculated from the sieve analysis of soil samples using weighted mean grain size. Lacy’s Silt factor, f will be 1.76 V Dm where Dm = weighted mean grain sizefollows: @ 00 [SM-sP/sP) foo 0.0 mt e Size [2] | - — ~~ Percent wei Px B) {| retained (3] @ i 75mm - ne Oo | e 375 mm - - - i = - 0 23mm pO 41 49.733 @ 050mm | - 54 13.50 ‘| @ 0.075 mm ~ - — 03 0225 Sum Total e size, dinmm [63 58/100) 0.63458 QI 176 — 318 1.402 TT ft for the silty s — silty clay will have a very low silt upto 3 to 15.0m dept! =m = ie 25 per sediment tH —— =a nsport equation. More over, IS : 3955- @ We list of bed mate——— ial [ Table | — Silt factor for coarse silt 2 asilt factor, f= 1.0@mmmm is proposed for the silty clay @ vier, Pr + 16.800 m Bed level = (+) 12.944 m DInhpal —_ Fication Recorded SPT SN” Value ® brown silty fi @iish brown 0S ium sand, SM-SP 18 20 ium sand, SP 20,22 : brown plastic aay [MH-CH] 68 ark brown plastic silty ¢ SME "ay [MICH] 78 @ own plostic sity c= ay [MACH] aT) lastic si ay(MH-CH] [911 — say [MI-CH 13, 13 silty cl silty @h brown plastic18.00 19.00 | Yellowish brown sandy silty <=lay / clayey sand 20 19.00 21.60 | Yellowish brown sandy silty «clay / clayey sand 30, 32 21.00. 24.00 | Yellowish brown sandy silty «lay /clayey sand 35,37,38 ‘| | 34.00 32.00 | Greyish white brown coarse 1 um sand, SP | 36,3840, 46, 50 | | 32,00 33.00 | Greyish white brown soft roc I< fragments, SDR 3,>100 | | 33.00 34.00 | Soft disinte 1— (SDRISR} RQD = 0% | 34.00 35.00 | Soft disintegrated Rocke [SDRISR] RQD=0% | A silt factor, f= 1.40 is proposed for the silty ssa nd However, for design purpose a silt factor, {= 1.0CB is proposed for the silty clay 5.3 Bore Hole Number: 3 — Pier, P2 Reduced Level of the bore = + 16.800 m River Bed level = (+) 14.231 m Depth Below Soil Type and Class # fication Recorded SPT |_Ground Level - _ SN" Value 0.00 - 2.00 Yellowish brown fine to m€=dium sand, SP 16, 18 2.00 ~ 5.00 Yellowish brown fine to me=dium sund, SP 14, 15 5.00 6.00 Dark brown plastic silty © Tay [MH-CH] 6 6.00 - £00 Dark brown plastic silty © Hay [MH-CH] 7B 8.00 — 10.00 Blackish brown plastic silty’ clay [MH-CH] 8 10.00 12.00 Blackish brown plastic silty Clay [MH-CH] 9,10 12,00 14.00 Blackish brown plastic silty Clay (MH-CH] 78 “14.00— 15.00 Blackish brown plastic silty lay [MH-CH] 10 15.00 19.00 Blackish brown plastic silty clay [(MH-CH] 98,8 19.00—21.00 | Yellowish brown plastic silts clay [MH-CH] 2 21.00 — 22.00 Yellowish brown plastic silts” clay [MH-CH] 15 72.00 -23.00 | Yellowish brown plastic silt” clay [MH-CH] 20 23.00 — 25.00 Yellowish brown plastic silts” clay [MH-CH] 24,26 25,00 — 28.00 ~~ Brownish fine to mediur-m sand(SP]—«{|_18,20,22 28.00 34.00 | Yellowish greyish white sand with pebbles, SP__| 36,42,46,48,50,52 | 34.00 35.00 | Yellowish grey white soft disintegrated rock, SDR | 35.00-37.00 | ___-Soft disintegrated ro= K [SDR] + 37.00 40.00 Sofi disintegrated roe kK [SDR] ec3aeceoeevneeoeeaeeneeseenseneee®and A silt factor, £= 1.80 is proposed for the silty However, for design purpose a silt factor, {= 1.00 is proposed for the silty clay 5.4 Bore Hole Number: 4 ~ Pier, P3 Reduced Level of the bore = + 16.800 m River Bed level = (+) 14.355 m Depth Below | ____Soil Type and Classi Recorded SPT Ground Level | _ N” Value _| 900-200 | Yellowish brown fine to medium sand, SP 118 2.00 ~ 5.00 Yellowish brown fine to medium sand, SP ty elary [MH-CH] y clay [MH-CH] 5.00 ~ 6.00 Brownish pla 6.00 8.00 Brownish plast “eeeevseeeecoevece 8.00 — 10.00 Blackish brown plastic silty clay [MH-CH] 8 10.00 — 12.00 Biackish brown plastic silty clay [MH-CH] 9,10 112.00-14.00 | Blackish brown plastic silty clay [MH-CH] 14.00 — 13.00 Blackish brown plastic silty clay [MH-CH] 0 ~ 19. ~~ Blackish brown plastic silty clay (MH-CH] 19.00 — 21.00 Yellowish brown plastic silty clay [MH-CH] 13 21.00 — 22.00 Yellowish brown plastic silty clay [MH-CH} 16 22.00 — 23.00 Yellowish brown plastic silty clay [(MH-CH] 22 } 23.00 ~ 25.00 ‘Yellowish brown plastic silty clay [MH-CH] 28,30 25.00 ~ 28.00 | Brownish fine to medium sand [SP] _ 21,27, 24 28.00 34.00 | Yellowish greyish white sand with pebbles, SP__| 3842,44,46,48,54 34.00 —35.00 | Yellowish grey white soft disintegrated rock, SDR 80, >100 35.00 — 37.00 Soft disintegrated rock [SDR] S100 37.00 40.00 Soft disintegrated rock [SDR] RQD= 0% A silt factor, f= 1.80 is proposed for the silty sand 00 is proposed for the silty clay However, for design purpose a sill factor, £ pee eee ©0886 0 e-5.5 Bore Hole Number: 5 ~ Pier, P4 Reduced Level of the bore = + 16.800 m River Bed level = (+) 12.899 m Depth Below Soil Type and Classification Recorded SPT Ground Level “N” Value (0.00 - 2.00 14,18 2.00 ~ 5.00 13,12 5.00 — 6.00 Brownish plastic silty clay [MH-CH] a - 6.00— 8.00 Brownish plastic silty clay [MF-CH] [ 8.00 - 10.00 Blackish brown plastic silty clay [MH-CH] 10.00— 12.00 Blackish brown plastic silty clay [MH-CH] 12.00 - 14.00 Blackish brown plastic silty clay [MH-CH] 14.00 - 15.00 Blackish brown plastic silty clay [MH-CH] 9 15.00 — 19.00 Blackish brown plastic silty clay [MH-CH] 87.8 19.00-21.00 | Yellowish brown plastic silty clay [MH-CH] 12 21.00— 22.00 Yellowish brown plastic silty clay [MH-CH] 18 22.00 — 23.00 Yellowish brown plastic silty clay (MH-CH] 25 | 23.00 25.00 Yellowish brown plastic silty clay [MH-CH] 28,31 25.00 - 28.00 ~ Brownish fine to medium sand [SP] 21,27, 24 28.00 34.00 | Yellowish greyish white sand with pebbles, SP | 40,42,44,51,57,54 34.00 35.00 | Yellowish grey white soft disintegrated rock, SDR 85, >100 35.00 — 37.00 | ~ Soft disintegratedrock [SDR] S100 37.00-40.00 | Soft disintegrated rock [SDR] RQD=0% T al — silty fine to medium sand [SM-SP] from 0.00 m to 5.00 m — Taveras ~Persent weight [Bx BY retained (3) | 6.00 — 4.75 mm 4.75 mm 0 0 — 4.75 mm—2.00mm_ | 3.375mm 0 er) 2.00mm - 0.425 mm 123mm p83 | 100.679 | 0.425 mm- 0.075 mm 0. m | +14 [Ts Below 0.075 mm 0.075 mm 03 0.225 Sum Total 104.404Weighted mean grain size, din mm [10 ©.404/100} Asilt factor, f Bed material Silty clay upto 5 to 15.0m dept_h_ Silt factor, f= 1.76 Vd — 1.76% Vl 044 - | = 1.80 is proposed for the silly = 22nd 1.044 1798 silly clay will have a very low silt factor. The clay is not erodible as per sediment t= ransport equation. More over, IS : 3955- 1967 there is no provision in the list of bed mate=rial [ Table | ~ Silt factor for coarse silt to gravel ] However, for design purpose a silt factor, 5.6 Bore Hole Number: 6 — Pier, P5 Reduced Level of the bore = + 16.800 m Dis proposed for the silty clay River Bed level = (+) 12.760 m A silt factor, f= 1.80 is proposed for the silty s=and Depth Below Soil Type and Classi fication Recorded SPT | Ground Level _ “N” Value 0.00 2.00 Yellowish brown fine to mm edium sand, SP 14, 18 2.00-5.00 Yellowish brown fine to m= edium sand, SP 15, 16 5.00— 6.00 Brownish plastic silty cL ay [MH-CH] 6 6.00 8.00 Brownish plastic silty el ay [MH-CH] 7,8 8.00— 10.00 Blackish brown plastic silt clay [MH-CH] 8 10.00 — 12.00 Blackish brown plastic silty» clay [MH-CH] 9, 10 12.00 14.00 Blackish brown plastic silt» clay [MH-CH] 1.6 14.00- 15.00 Blackish brown plastic silts clay [MH-CH] 10 15.00— 19.00 Blackish brown plastic silty” clay [MH-CH] 9,8 19.00 21.00 Yellowish brown plastic silt -y clay [MH-CH] 12 21.00 — 22.00 Yellowish brown plastic silt -y clay [MH-CH] 16 22.00 — 23.00 Yellowish brown plastic silt y clay [MH-CH] 20 23.00 — 25.00 Yellowish brown plastic silt >y clay [MH-CH] 27, 280 25.00—28.00 | Brownish fine to mediu aM sand [SP] ~~ 24, 27, 30 28.00 — 34.00 Yellowish greyish white sand with pebbles, SP 36,40,42,44,46,48 | 34.00 —35.00 | Yellowish grey white soft disine tegrated rock, SDR 78, >100 | 35.00 - 37.00 ‘oft disintegratedroc=k [SDR] oo. 4 37.00 — 40.0 integrated rock [SDR] RQD-0% |However, for design purpose a silt factor, OO is proposed for the silty clay 5.7 Bore Hole Number: 7 ~ Pier, P6 Reduced Level of the bore = + 16.800 m River Bed level = (+) 12.867 m [ Depth 1 "Soil Type and Classi fic: Recorded SPT _] Ground Level | _ - __ | SN" Value 0.00 - 2.00 Yellowish brown fine to medium sand, SP 18, 19 ~ 2.00 5.00 lowish brown jumsand, SP | «16,17 5.00 6.00 sh plastic silly clay [MH i? 7 6.00-8.00 | Brownish plastic silty clavy [MH 8 8.00- 10.00 | Blackish brown plastic silty clay [MI-CH] 6 10.00 12.00 | Blackish brown plastic silty clay [MH-CH] | 9, 10 | 12.00—14.00 Blackish brown plastic silty clay ([MH-CH] | 7,6 14.00 - 15.00 Blackish brown plastic silty clay(MH-CH] | 10 15.00— 19.00 Blackish brown plastic sity” clay [MH-CH] | 9,8 19.00 21.00 Yellowish brown pla: ity clay(MH-CH} | 3B 21.00 - 22.00 | Yellowish browm plastie sity clay [MECH] | 15 22.00 — 23.00 | Yellowish brown plastic silt2y clay [MH-CH] 1 21 23.00 — 25.00 Yellowish brown plastic silty clay [MH-CH] 28, 29 25.00 — 28.00 Brownish fine to mediuam sand [SP] 26, 27,30 28.00 34.00 | Yellowish greyish white sand with pebbles, SP__| 35,42,43,45,46,.8 | 34.00 — 35.00 | Yellowish grey white soft disin tegrated rock, SDR 73,100 |°35.00 = 37.00 Soft disintegrated rock [SDR] >100 37.00 ~ 40.00 Soft disintegrated rock [SDR] RQD=0% A silt factor, f = 1.80 is proposed for the silly sand However, for design purpose a silt factor, f= 1.00. is proposed for the silty clay 5.8 Bore Hole Number: 8 ~ Pier, P 7 Reduced Level of the bore = + 16.800 m River Bed level = (+) 12.737 m { Depth Below | ~~ Soil Type and Classification Recorded SPT | Ground Level “N Value I 0.00- 5.00 “ish brown fine to medium sand, SP ~18,17,15,16,19 i 5.00- 8.00 | Brownish plastic silty clay [MH-CH] O88 x00- 12.00 | Blackish brown plastic silty clay [MH-CH] 12, 12,1312.00 15.00 air Blackish brown plastic silty clay [MH-CF ~ Brownish silty fine to medium sand [SM-SP] q] "1,10, 12 17.00 — 18.00 Brownish silty fine to medium sand [SM-SP] 18 18.00 19.00 16 | 19.00-21.00 [10,11 21.00 - 24.00 12, 13, 12 24.00 =26.00 | Yellowish brown plastic sandy silly clay [MH-CH] 16 26.00- 28.00 | Yellowish brown plastic sandy silly clay [MH-CH] 21, 22 28.00=31.00 | Yellowish brown plastic sandy silly clay [MH-CH] 24, 25, 26 31.00~ 33.00 | Brownish silty medium to fine sand [SM — SP] 34, 33 33.00 =35.00 | Yellowish brown plastic silly clay [MH-CH], stiff 46, 49 35.00-36.00 | Yellowish brown plastic silly clay [MH-CH], stiff 60 7 36.00 - 37.00 |” Yellowish brown clayey sandy ‘pebbles, refusal 74, >100 37.00-38.00 |” Yellowish brown clayey sandy pebbles, refusal 102, >100 38.00—40.0 Soff disintegrated rock [SDR] S100 Bed Material — silty fine to medium sand [SM-SP] from 0.00 m to 5.00 m Size Range [1] Average Size [2] Percent weight (2) xB) retained [3] 6.00— 4.75 mm 475mm 0 0 4.75 mm ~2.00mm 3.375 mm 0 0 2.00mm — 0.425 mm 1213 mm 2 fl 99.466 0.425 mm 0.075 mm 0.250 mm: 14 35 Below0.075mm | 0.075 mm. 04 0.30 | Sum Total 103.266 Weighted mean grain size, d in mm [103.26/100} 1.0326 Silt factor, f= 1.76 Vd = 1.76 x V0.94616 1.788 L A silt factor, f= 1.78 is proposed for the silly sand Bed material Silty clay upto 5 to 15.0m dept h_~ silty clay will have a very low silt factor. The clay is not erodible as per sediment transport equation. More over, IS : 3955- 1967 there is no provision in the list of bed material { Table 1 to gravel } Silt factor for coarse siltHowever, for design purpose a silt factor, f= 1.00 is proposed for the silty clay 5.9 Bore Hole Number: 9 ~ Pier, P8 Reduced Level of the bore = + 16.800 m River Bed level = (+) 12.757 m Depth Below Soil Type and Classification Recorded SPT Ground Level SNEWalue, 0.00- 5.00 "Yellowish brown fine to medium sand, SP 16,17,14,13,15- | | 5.00—8.00 “Brownish plastic silty clay [MH-Cl] 98,7 8.00 — 12.00 Blackish brown plastic silty clay[MH-CH] | __13, 12, 13 | 12.00—15.00 Blackish brown plastic silty clay (MH-CH] 10, 6, 10 15.00 - 17.00 Brownish silty fine to medium sand [SM-SP] 15, 17 17.00— 18.00 | Brownish silty fine to medium sand [SM-SP] 9 | 18.00— 19.00 Blackish brown plastic silty clay [CH] 13 19.00— 21.00 Blackish brown plastic silty clay [CH] 10, 11 21.00 — 24.00 Blackish brown plastic silty clay [CH] 97,9 24.00 — 26.00 | Yellowish brown plastic sandy silty clay [MH-CH] 12, 14 26.00 - 28.00 | Yellowish brown plastic sandy silty clay [MH-CH] 20, 22 28.00— 31.00 | Yellowish brown plastic sandy silty clay [MI-Cl] | 26, 24,26 31.00—33.00 | Brownish silty medium to fine sand [SM - SP] 33,31 | 33.00—35.00 | Yellowish brown plastic silty clay [MH-CH], 42, 49 35.00-36.00 | Yellowish brown plastic silty clay [MH-CH], stiff 6 36.00 37.00 | Yellowish brown clayey sandy ~rpebbles, refusal 85, >100 37.00 38.00 | Yellowish brown clayey sandy + pebbles, refusal 105, >100 | 38.00-40.0 "Soft disintegrated rock [SDR] >100 Bed Material = silty fine to medium sand [SM-SP] from 0.00 mo 5. 5.00.m Size Range [1] | Average Size [2] Percent weight Ix By) retained [3] 6.00 - 4.75 mm 475mm 0 0 4.75 mm — 2.00mm ~- 3.375 mm 0 “| 0 2.00mm—0.425mm | 1.213mm 82 99.466 0.425 mm— 0.075 mm 0.250mm of 4 ~~ Below 0.075 mm 0.075 mm —_ 0.15Se eee Oe FT SF e'ererouwuosoe oro oeoeee se Sum Total 103.616 Weighted mean grain size, din mm [103.616/100] 1.03616 Silt factor, F= 1.76 Vd = 1.76 x V1.036 1.791 A silt factor, f= 1.79 is proposed for the silly sand Bed material — Silty clay upto $ to 15.0m depth ~ silty clay will have a very low silt factor. The clay is not erodible as per sediment transport equation. More over, IS : 3955- 1967 there is no provision in the list of bed material [ ‘Table 1 — Silt factor for coarse silt to gravel ]. However, for design purpose a silt factor, 0 is proposed for the 5.10 Bore Hole Number: 10 Pier, P 9 ity clay Reduced Level of the bore = + 16.800 m River Bed level = (+) 13.962 m Depth Below Soil Type and Classification Recorded SPT Ground Level - “N” Value 00 = 5.00 Yellowish brown fine to medium sand, SP 17,15,16,19 | 5.00-8.00 Brownish plastic silty clay [MH-CH] 98,7 | 8.00-12.00 Blackish brown plastic silty clay [MH-CH] 13, 13,13 12.00-15.00 |” Blackish brown plastic silty clay [MICH] ~ 11, 10,12 15.00— 17.00 Brownish silty fine to medium sand [SM-SP] 20, 24 17.00 — 18.00 Brownish silty fine to medium sand [SM-SP] 18 18.00 — 19.00 Blackish brown plastic silty clay [CH] 15 | 19.00 = 21.00 Blackish brown plastic silty clay [CH] 10,11 21.00=24.00 |" _Blackish brown plastic silty y [CH] 12, 13, 12 24,00 26.00 | Yellowish brown plastic sandy silty clay [MI-CH] ~ 15,16 4 "26.00 28.00 | Yellowish brown plastic sandy silly clay [MICH] | 20,22 28.00 31.00 | Yellowish brown plastic sandy silty clay [Mi -CH] 26, 24, 26 [31.00 —33.00 Brownish silty medium to fine sand [SM SF | a) 33.00 35,00 | Yellowish brown plastic silty clay [MH-CI I, suff [~~ 42,49 35.00 - 36.00 |” Yellowish brown plastic silty clay (MF-CH], stiff} ~ 62 36.00 37.00 | Yellowish brown clayey sandy + pebbles, refusal | 82, >100 | 37.00 38.00 | Yellowish brown clayey sandy + pebbles, refusal | 102, 5100 38.00 — 40.0 Soft disintegrated rock [SDR] | 100A silt factor, f= 1.79 is proposed for the silty sand However, for design purpose a silt factor, f= 1.00 is proposed for the silty clay 5.11 Bore Hole Number: 11 — Pier, P10 Reduced Level of the bore = + 16.800 m River Bed level = (+) 15.945 m Depth Below Soil Type and Classification ‘| Recorded SPT. | Ground Level | _ |_SN" Value 0.00 ~ 2.00 | lowish brown silty fine to medium sand, SM-SP_| 2.00 5.00 | Yellowish brown fine to medium sand, 5.00 - 8.00 | Yellowish brown fine to mediuum sand, SM-SP 8.00- 10.00 | Yellowish brown plastic silty clay (MH-CH] | 10.00- 12.00 Yellowish brown plastic silty clay [MH-CH] 12.00— 13.00 ‘Yellowish brown plastic silty clay [MH-CH] 12 13.00— 15.00 Blackish brown plastic silty clay [CH] 9,10 15.00- 17.00 Blackish brown plastic silty clay [CH] 8,9 “17.00 — 19.00 Blackish brown plastic silty clay [CH] n 19.00 = 23.00 | Brownish silty fine to medium sand [SM-SP} 11,12,13,15 23.00-30.00 | Brownish silty fine to medium sand [SM-SP] 26, 28,30,32,34 30.00=31.00 | Yellowish brown clayey sandy soil [SC-Cl) 28 31.00 32,00 | Yellowish brown plastic sandy silty clay [MF-CIT] 30 | 32.00- 33.00 | Yellowish brown sandy silty clay [MH-CH] 31 33.00 ~ 34.00 | Yellowish brown sandy silty clay [MH-CH} 34 | 34.00-36.00 | Yellowish brown sandy silly clay [MH-CH] 72 | 36.00 — 37.00 Yellowish brown soft disintegrated rock, SCCVSDR >100 37.00 — 40.0 Soft disintegrated rock [SDR] >100 Bed Material — silty fine to medium sand [SM-SP] from | 0.00 mto 2.00 m Size Range(1] | Average Size (2) Percent weight (2)x B) retained (3] 6.00=4.75 mm 4.75 mm 0 0 “4.75 mm — 2.0mm 3.375 mm 0 0 | 2.0mm — 0.425 mm 1213 mm p38 46.004 | (0.425 mm 0.075 mm | 0.250 mm ® 10s| Below 0.075 mm 0.075 mm T 20 Jy 4s0 ] Sum Total 138.094 I Weighted mean grain size,d in mm [58.094/100) SC. S8094 [— Silt factor, f= 1.76 Vd = 1.76 x YO.58094 Tl a — Asilt factor, f = 1.34 is proposed for the silty s: Bed_material ~ Silty clay upto 8 to 19.0m depth ~ silty clay will have a very low silt nsport equation, More over, IS : 3955- factor. The clay snot erodible as per sediment t 1967 there is no provision in the list of bed material [ Table | — Silt factor for coarse silt to gravel ] However, for design purpose a silt factor, £ 5.12 Bore Hole Number: 12 ~ Pier, P 11 00 is proposed for the silty clay @eeeeeeeone-eene ee 6 Reduced Level of the bore = + 17.714 m River Bed level = (+) 17.714 m Depth Below Soil Type and Classification Recorded SPT | Ground Level sz “N” Value 0,00 — 1.00 _| Yellowish brown silty fine to medium sand, SM-SP 10 1.00=5.00 |” Yellowish brown fine to medium sand, SM-SP 20, 22,21 | 5.00-8.00 Yellowish brown fine to medium sand, SM-SP 17,16 8.00— 10.00 Yellowish brown plastic silty clay [MH-CH] 6.8 10.00 — 12.00 Yellowish brown plastic silty clay [MH-CH] 11,10 12.00- 13.00 | Yellowish brown plastic silty clay [MH-CH] 9 13.00 - 15.00 Blackish brown plastic silty clay [CH] 39 15.00 17.00 Blackish brown plastic silty clay [CH] 78 e 17.00- 19.00 | ——_Blackish brown plastic silty clay [CH] 10 19.00 — 23.00 ‘Brownish silty fine to medium sand [SM-SP] 10, 12, 13, 15 e | 23.00 — 30.00 Brownish silly fine to medium sand [SM-SP] 24,26,29,30,34 e 30.00 — 31.00 Yellowish brown clayey sandy soil [SC-Cl} 2 31.00 = 32.00 | Yellowish brown plastic sandy silty clay [MH-Cl}] 30 e 32.00 33.00 | Yellowish brown sandy silty clay [MH-CH] 7 33.00 34.00 | Yellowish brown sandy silty clay [MICH] _ e | 34.00 36.00 | Yellowish brown sandy silty clay [MICH] 36.00 ~ 37.00 ‘Yellowish brown soft disintegrated rock, SC-CVSDR mm l meee - ——- e ®"37.00 - 40.0 | ft disintegrated rock [SDR] >100 | “Bed Mi Ity fine -SP] from 0.00 m to 1.00 m Size Range [1] ~ Percent weight 21x BY] retained [3] 6.00 4.75 mm 0 2 | [4.75 mm—2.00mm | - 0 | 2.00mm—0.425mm | 12i3mm |G 0.425 mm- 0.075 mm 0.250 mm — 45 2s Below 0.075 mm. 0.075 mm 19 1.425 ‘Sum Total] | 56.343 Weighted mean grain size, din mm [56.343/100] 0.56343 Silt factor, f= 1.76 Vd = 1.76 x YO.56343 1321 A silt factor, f = 1.32 is proposed for the silty sand Bed material — Silty clay upto 8 to 19.0m depth ~ silty clay will have a very low silt factor. The clay is not erodible as per sediment transport equation. More over, IS : 3955- 1967 there is no provision in the list of bed material [ Table 1 ~ Silt factor for coarse silt to gravel J However, for design purpose a silt factor, £ 5.13 Bore Hole Number: 13 — Abutment, A 2 00 is proposed for the silty clay Reduced Level of the bore = + 20.630 m River Bed level = (+) 20,630 m Depth Below Soil Type and Classification S| Recorded SPT Ground Level _ “N” Value ] 0.00 ~ 1.00 Yellowish brown plastic silty clay [MH-CH] iB 1.00- 5.00 Yellowish brown fine to medium sand, SM-SP 15,17, 16 5.00 ~ 8.00 Yellowish brown fine to medium sand, SM-SP 17,16 8.00 — 10.00 68 10.00 12.00 | [MICH] Ti, 10 12.00- 13.00 ay [MI-CH] 9 13.00 15.00 | Blackish brown plastic silty clay [CH] 85 | 15.00-17.00 | Blackish brown plastic Ity clay [CH] 7,8jC VCevvwswewvssesovTcvserseoeoewuervrw sees 17.00 - 19.00 Blackish brown plastic silty clay [CH] T io | 1900-2300 Brownish silty fine to medium sand [SM-SP] | 9,13,13.18 23.00 30.00 Brownish silty f medium sand [SM-SP] 26.23.2834 | 30.00 31.00 | Yellowish brown clayey sandy soil (SC-Cl]__| 27 | | 31.00 ~ 32.00 | Yellowish brown plastic sandy silly clay [MA-CH] 2 | 32.00 33.00 | Yellowish brown sandy silty clay [MH-CH] 22 | 33.00 — 34.00 | Yellowish brown sandy silty clay [MH-CH] | 32 | 3400-3600 | Yellowish brown sandy silty clay [MH-CH] 7 36.00 37.00 | Vellowish brown sof disintegrated rock, SCCTSDR 37.00 40.0 | "Soft disintegrated rock [SDR] aut : cae ia: Se ae Bed M: rial ~ silty fine to medium sand [SM-SP] from 1.00 m to 8.00 m ‘Size Range [1] ‘Average Size [2] Percent weight 2x By | retained [3] 6.00 —4.75 mm 475mm 0 0 | 4.75 mm — 2.00mm 3.375 mm 0 o 2.00mm ~ 0.425 mm 123mm | 67 81.271 0.425 mm- 0.075 mm 0250mm «|B | 7 Below 0.075 mm 0.075 mm 05 0.375 a Sum Total - 88.646 ~ Weighted mean grain size, d in mm [88.616/100) 0.88616 . Silt factor, F= 1.76 Vd = 1-76 x VO.88616 1.657 A silt factor, f= 1.66 is proposed for the ity sand ~ Bed material — Silty clay upto 8 to 19.0m depth ~ silty clay will have a very low silt factor. The clay is not erodible as per sediment transport equation. More over, IS : 3955- 1967 there is no provision in the list of bed material | Table 1 — Silt factor for coarse silt to gravel} However, for design purpose a silt factor, .00 is proposed for the si clay6 SELECTION OF FOUNDATION AND BEA RING CAPACITY OF SOIL Since the proposed structure is a Bridge across a major river and the soil is silty sandy upto 8.0 m depth followed by silty clay / silty sand/ silty clay, SDR, deep foundation in the form of Bored Pile foundation for the structure is ideal and hence proposed The size and depth of foundation can be decided based on loading and soil characteristics. The depth of foundation should satisfy the following, requirements. It should rests on sound strata of adequate bearing capacity and safe from settlement considerations also It should have adequate embedded length so as to resist the overturning moments due to horizontal forces and scour. ‘The allowable bearing capacity of soil is calculated as per IS 6403 specification considering the shear failure and settlement failure criterion. Deep Foundation in the form of Bored cast im situ pile foundation is ideal for this location. The length and size & its load carrying capacity can be obtained from the soil properties given above In case of pile foundation, the load carrying capacity of the pile can be calculated using the static formula given by IS:2911- 2010. con! ring both friction and bearing r stance. The allowable load is normally obtained by using an overall factor of safety of 2.5. The load carrying of pile can also be obtained from the SPT, N values. For the correlation of cohesion and unconfirred compressive strength, static cone resistance from N values, 1S:2911-1979 is followed. Unconfined compressive strength = qc = N Cohesion, ¢ = qel2 Static cone resistance = 2N Pile foundation in the form of Bored Cast in-situ piles are preferable in this location. Suitable pile size and length is obtained from the soil profile. 1200 mm diameter piles are considered for the piers and abutments. the ultimate load carrying capacity of single pile Can be obtained from Static Formula as ven in IS 2911(Part 1/Sec3) ~ 2010 for bored piles considering Skin Friction and 4 resistanceiles in Cohesive Soil { Clay ] Qu=Ap.Ne.Cp + a .C.As Ap = Cross sectional area of the pile toe Ne ~ Bearing capacity factor usually taken as 9 for deep foundation Cp = Average cohesion at pile tip @_ = reduction factor [ usually 0.3 to 1 depends <>1 the strength of clay } out the length of apile a) C = Average cohesion thro: i) {Sancd ] Qu=Ap.Pd.Nq + SK. Pdi.tané Asi Ap = Cross sectional area of the pile toe Pd = effective overburden pressure at pile toc Nq = bearing capacity factor depends upon the arm g2le of intemal friction, & K = coefficient of earth pressure Pdi = effective overburden pressure for the layer <>oncerned & = angle of wall friction between the soil and j>» ile — usually taken as 2/36 to Asi = surface area of pile stem for the layer conce=rned 1 For Abutment, Al 0.00 m [+17.576 m] Cohesion, C Angle of friction, § 3.00 metres Cohesion, C Angle of friction, § 7.00metres Cohesion, C = 5.25um? Clay Angle of friction, 6 = Odeg N=11,10, 9, 11 ~ 12.00 metres Cohesion, C 25 um? SHY Angle of friction, @ =32deg N= 12,13, - 15.00metres Angle of friction, § =Odeg = N=24 16.00metres Cohesion, C =13.0vm? = N~=29,28 Angle of friction, § = 8 deg sandy clay~ - —-- 18.0 metres Cohesion, C Angle of friction, @ N=22 clayey sane a 19.0 metres Cohesion, C 25, 30 Angle of friction, 6 = 34 deg clayey sane —-- 21.0 metresvuwweeweweewvy 2 >: > bad Cohesion, ( 940um? = N= 38.42.47 Angle of friction, @ = M deg Clayey sand 24.0 metres N= 58,62,68,72,82 Cohesion, C 0.00 vm Angle of friction, = 38 deg Cohesion, C Angle of friction, ¢ Total length 32 & 32.5 metres below the bore level are consi carrying capacity calculation Scour Depth = 15.00 metres [ considered} Submerged unit weight of soil, yup = 1.0 vm? Diameter of pile = 1200 mm a | depth, De = 15 times the diameter of pile = 18.0 m but limited to 12 m Pd at the tip = 12.0 vm? Top Level of the abutment = + 23.389 m Pile cap bottom level +17.600 m Bore level 17.576 m 1. Fora pile of 1200 mm diameter and 32 metres long, the ultimate load will be Depth {fm} | Length] Skin Friction / Bearing Total [m] Bearing _ - {tonnes} 0.00 -15.00m_| 15.00 m_| Neglected due to scour 0 7 15.00 -16.00 1.00m 3.14x1.2x1x IEx 0.3 12.434 m 16.00-18.00 [200m |3.14x1.2x2x 19x03 29.390 3.14x12x2x 2x tan8 3.14x 1.2x1x5.8x 04 314x1.2x1x 3x tan34 314x12x2x5x tan34 18.00 to 19.00 19.00-21.00 3.14 x 1.2x2x 8x 0.3 21.00— 24.00 | 314x12x3x 94x 03 a _ — [3.14 x 1.2x3x7xtan34x08 | 42.698 [J 24.00- 32.00 ]8.00m |3.14x1.2x8x 12x O8xtan38 | 29609 |] otal skin friction resistance upto 32 m - _ | 403.375 |Pesseeeeeeeoovoneaooveneeeesneacc 132.0 m level [03.14 x 1.20 x1.2}/4 x 12x 25] | 339.12 [matans | 12 x08x45 | 21.704 Is 079 11103319 J 32.60 in SDR B14 x 12x06 0 x1.23/4 x 12 x 50) | 678.24 Bearing at 32.6mlevel | ({3.14x12 s Tong, the ultimate load will be ‘of 1200 mm diameter and 32 metr Qu = 403,375 + 339.12= 742.495 Qs = Qu/FS 5 + (339.12/3)] = 161.35 + 113.04 For a pile of 1200 mm diam Qs = Qu/FS = [403.375/2.5 + 21.704/10 + ( 678.24/5] = 161.35 + 2.17 + 135.65 = 274.39 say 274 = [403.375/ 32.6 metres Long, the ultimate load will be = 163.52 + 135.65 = 299.17 t say 299 Itis proposed to place the pile at (-) 15.000 metres level * A safe Vertical load carrying capacity of 274 tonnes is proposed for 1200 mm diameter pile of 32 metres long @ (-) 14.424 m level. * A safe Vertical load carrying capacity of 299 tonnes is proposed for 1200 mm diameter pile of 32.6 metres long @ (-) 15.000 m level. The lateral load carrying capacity of the pile depends on size of the pile and fixity of the pile ie free or fixed. The lateral load carrying capacity may be obtained from the equations given in IS: 2911 (Part 1/see 2) considering the pile has been fixed. The lateral load carrying capacity of vertical pile will be approximately 5 to 10 % vertical load carrying capacity. For lateral load on piles, IS: 2911-2010 proposed. a method for the determination of depth of fixity of pile required for design. ap at the top, the piles are assumed as Since the piles are connected by means of fixed cantilever. ‘The value of constant modulus of horizontal subgrade reaction, ny ,or the modulus of subgrade reaction K of the soil may be estimated from Table 3 or Table 4 of IS: 2911- 2010 [Annex C] for sands and clay respectively. The value of L, the equivalent length of cantilever giving the same deflection at the and 3, ground level as the actual pile may be obtained from graphs given inFor lateral load on piles, 1S: 2911 (Part 1 ‘Se 2) - 2010 proposed a method for the determination of depth of fixity of pile required for design Since the piles a connected by means of pile cap at the top, the piles are assumed as fixed cantilever. The value of constant modulus of horizontal svabgrade reaction, ny , or the modulus of subgrade reaction K of the soil may be estimate=d from Table 3 or Table 4 of 1S: 2911 (Part 1 /See 2) - 2010 [Annex C] for sands and cl zay respectively. ‘The value of L, the equivalent length of cantilever giving the same deflection at the ground level as the actual pile may be obtained fr-om graphs given in Figure 2 and 3. Since the soil at the top is silty clay, constant n-odulus of horizontal subgrade reaction, K1 = 18 x 10° is proposed for this soil condition namely silty clay having a N value of 12 ‘The constants, KI and K2 for sand and clay respectively can be obtained ftom Table 3 and Table 4 of IS:2911-2010 [ Appendix — C : Cl ause 5.5.2 ~ Determination of Depth of Fixit , Lateral Deflection and maximum moment of laterally loaded piles} The depth of fixity is depends on the size of pile cand length of pile [ L/T or L/R] It is proposed to place the pile at [-]15.000 met res level. Pile cap bottom level = +17.600m Foundation Level = (15.000 m Length of pile = 32.6 metres Calculation of Lateral Load Cart Grade of Concrete = M 35 Concrete Elastic Modulus [E] = 5000 {feck }' = 29580 N/mm? Moment of Inertial {1} = 0.10174 m* For KI = 18.0 K =(18/ 1.5) x (0.3/1.2)=3 Stiffness factor, R in{m) = [E1/K By! [(29580x 0.10174/ (3 x 1.2)" T =5.377m say 5.4meeeecseseeevedneoeeeeoouvoeoeesneees Length of pile = L = 32.6m LIT ~ 32.6/ 5.4~ 6.037 hence it is long column Assuming L1 = 15.00 m Lf=17.6m Depth of fixity for long piles and fixed at top with pile cap For Fixed end pile and Pre loaded clay, ZR = 1.9 for LUR = 2.78 Z_= 1.90 x $4 = 10.26 m which is less than 17.6 m [available] and hence O.K. Allowable deflection (y) in mm = 1.0 % pile diameter at the scour level as per IRC 78 - 2000 Allowable deflection (y) = 12 mm €= [ 23.369 ~ 19.400] = 3.989 m Lateral load carrying capacity of fixed pile = (12 y EI} / (Li? = [(12x 12 x 29580 x 0.10174V/(10.26 + 3.989) ] Q = 149.75 KN = 14.98 tonnes say 15.0 tonnes. Size of the pile | Length of pile and level Safe load carrying | Safe Lateral | capacity in Load Compression carrying _ ___|_ Capacity 1200 mm 24mlevel] | 274 tonnes 15.00 diameter pile 5.000 m level] 299 tonnes tonnes {Abutment, A 1] Depth of fixity WL l a _| 10.3 metres ‘The above load carrying of piles are based on Soil properties and obtained using the Static equation as given in I ifications. Casing/ liner is required in this location due 1© the presence of silty sand? silty clay and construction point of view Casing/ Liner of 6 mm thickness upto (-) 8.150 m level is proposed,6.2 For Pier, PL ==-+ 0.00 m [+16.800 m] Cohesion, C = 0.0 vm? Angle of friction, @ = 36 deg N=18 1.00 metres Angle of friction, - 3.00 metres Cohesion, C Angle of fi 7.00metres Cohesion, C Angle of friction, N=7,8 - --—-~ 9.00 metres Cohesion, C Angle of friction, N=10,9,1 1 12.00metres ~ 15.0 metres Angle of friction, @ sandy clasvey « -— 16.0 metres Cohesion, C Angle of friction, @ clayey sarad ~ —-- 18.0 metres 20 Clayey saand -- 19.0 metres N=30, 32 Angle of friction, @ Clayey samid L 21.0 metres ‘Cohesion, C 35,37, 38 Angle of friction, Clayey sasnd 24.0 metres Cohesion, 36,38, 42,46,50 Angle of friction, 6 = Sand 32.0 metres Cohesion, Angle of fi SDR ° 35.0 metres Total length = 32 metres below the bore lewel are considered for load carrying apacity calculation“@eeenvoeeeeaoen: >SoeooouonBeoeeaeoeso0e Scour Depth ~ 15.00 metres | considered] Submerged unit weight of soil, Yua = 1.0 Um? Diameter of pile ~ 1200 mm Critical depth, De = 15 times the diameter of pile = 18.0 m but limited to 12m Pd at the tip = 12.0 Um? Top Level of the abutment = + 23.389 m Pile cap bottom level +17.000 m Bore level +16.800 m 1. Fora pile of 1200 mm diameter and 32 metres_1ong, the ultimate load will be [Depth {my_ eth | Skin Friction / Beari ng, Total | Im} Bearing {tonnes} 0.00-15.00m | 15.00m_| Neglected due to scour, Oo 15.00-16.00m ]1.00m | 3.14x12x1xl0x O03 [11.304 16.00-18.00 m | 2.00m__[3.14x12x2x 13 x 03 z = | 73.14x12x2x2x €an8 [18.00 to 19.00 | 1.00m_[3.14x1.2x1x5.6 x 04 - [3.14 x12x1x3x tan 30 | 19.00-21.00 m [200m | 3.14x1.2x2x5x_tan32 | —_ 3.14 x 1.2x2x7.8 2 0.3 __ 17s 21.00 24.00 |3.00m_[3.14x1.2x3x9.2 x 03 31.199 _ - 3.14x12x3x7x tan 32x08 39.557 24.00 — 32.00 |8.00m | 3.14x12x8x12x O8xtan33_| 187.927 Total skin friction resistance upto 32 m 357.641 Bearing at 32.0 m level] [{3.14 x 1.20x1.2}/4 x 12 x 25] 339.12] 696.761 1. For a pile of 1200 mm diameter and 32 metres_long, the ultimate load will be Qu = 357.641 + 339.12= 696.761 Qs = Qu/FS = [357.641/2.5 + (339.12/3)] = 143.06 + 113.04 t= 256.09 say 250 ¢ It is proposed to place the pile at (-) 15.000 metres level * A safe Vertical load carrying capacity of 250 tonnes is proposed for 1200 mm diameter pile of 32 metres long @ (-) 15.000. m level. Since the soil at the top is silty clay, constant mm Odulus of horizontal subgrade reaction, K1 = 18 x 10° is proposed for this soil condition namely silty clay having a N value of 11, 13The constants, KI and K2 for sand and clay res= Pectively can be obtained from Table 3 and Table 4 of 18:2911-2010[ Appendix —C: CI =tuse 5.5.2 ~ Determination of Depth of Fixity, Lateral Deflection and maximum momen ——® of laterally loaded piles} The depth of fixity is depends on the size of pile ====and length of pile [ L/T or LR] It is proposed to place the pile at [-]15.000 met "es level. Pile cap bottom level = + 17.000 m Foundation Level = (15.000 m Length of 32.0 metres Calculation of Lateral Load Carrying Capacit———y 1200 mm diameter Pile: Grade of Concrete = M 35 Concrete Elastic Modulus [E] = 5000 {feck 3" = 29580 N/mm? Moment of Inertial {1} = 0.10174 pm For K1=18.0 K=(18/1.5)x 0.3/1.2)=3 Stiffness factor, R in (m] = [E1/K B]'* =[(29580x 0.10174/ (3 x12)" T =5377m say 4m Length of pi 2.0m L/T = 32,0/ 5.4= 5.926 hence it is long column Assuming LI ~ 15.00 m Lf=17.0m Depth of fixity for long piles and fixed at top withe— pile cap For Fixed end pile and Pre loaded clay, Z0/R = 1. > for LUR = 2.78 Z= 1.90 x 5.4 = 10.26 m which is less than 17.6 ™ [available] and hence O.K. Allowable deflection (y) in mm = 1.0 % pile diar meter at the scour level per IRC 78 - 2000a ee Allowable deflection (y) = 12 mm = [23.369 19.400) - 3989 m Lateral load carrying capacity of fixed pile = (12 YEN} /(Ld° [ (12x 12 x 29580 x 0.10174)/(10.26 + 10.445)" ] Q = 48.82 KN=4.88 tonnes say 4.90 tonnes Size of the pile Length of pile and level afe Lateral capacityin | Load Compression carrying — — | ———- |_ Capacity 1200 mm | 32.0 m{ () 15.000 m level] 250 tonnes | 4.90 tonnes diameter pite | Depth of (Pier, P1] | | Casing/ liner is required in this loca and construeti point of view. Casing/ Liner of 6 mm thickness upto (-) 8.150, m level is proposed. 3 For Pier, P2 — 0.00 m [+16.800 m] Cohesion, C 0.0 vm? Angle of friction,@ =36deg N= 16,18 2.00 metres Cohesion, C 0.0vm Angle of friction, 6 = 34 deg. N-14, 15 5.00metres Cohesion, C Angle of friction, ~ Odeg N=6 7 - 6.00 metres Cohesion, Angle of fiction, @ = 0 de; N=7,8 — 8.00metres Cohesion, C Angle of | : - 10.00metres Cohesion, C Angle of friction, @ = O.deg Clay Cohesion, C Angle of fiction, @ = 0 de clay 2 - 14.0 metres 12.0 metresCohesion, C N=10 Angle of fri Clay = --- 15.0 metres Cohesion, C N=9,88 Angle of fi Clay _ —--- 19.0 metres Cohesion, C = 6: 2 Angle of friction, 6 ~-- 21.0 metres Cohesion, C Angle of fricti Odeg Clay —- 22.0 metres Cohesion, C =10.0vm? = N=20 Angle of friction, @ = 0 deg Clay -- 23.0 metres Cohesion, C : N=24,26 Angle of friction, @ =O deg Clay -- 25.0 metres Cohesion, C 0.0m N=18,20, 22 Angle of friction, @ = 31 deg Sand 28.0 metres Cohesion, C . N= 36,42, 46,48, 54 Angle of friction, @ = 34 deg Sand —- 34.0 metres Cohesion, C 1.00vm? = N=>100 Angle of friction, @ = 42 deg SDR Total length = 32 metres below the bore le—vel are considered for load carrying capacity calculation Scour Depth = 15.00 metres [ considered] Submerged unit weight of soil, Ysup = 1.0 t/m> Diameter of pile ~ 1200 mm Critical depth, De = 15 times the diameter of pile = 18.0 m but limited to 12m Pd at the tip = 12.0 Ym? Top Level of the Pier cap = + 23.389 m Pile cap bottom level 17.000 m Bore level +16.800 m