Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Chapter 1
- Cost & Benefit Analysis
Covering:
1. Cost & Benefit Analysis
2. Rationality Assumption
3. What is Modelling?
6. Opportunity Cost
2. Rationality Assumption
2. Maximize profit
But in fact, this is not the case. First of all, you will be full, and with each
bite, you will be more and more full, and your extra cost will be higher
and higher. Secondly, you will also gradually be more unhappy and more
unsatisfied, because you are more and more bored by it, and your extra
benefit will be smaller and smaller.
When you eat more and become more unhappy, more full, after a certain
amount of bites, you will stop.
That's how you instinctively think about the additional benefit and
additional cost in an economic mindset.
So, from an economic point of view, as long as MB(Q) > MC(Q), you
should continue to do it; if MB(Q) = MC(Q), you can consider whether to
do it or not, if MB(Q) < MC(Q), then you should not do it.
5. Incentives Matter
5. Incentives Matter
Choosing the top 4 allocation methods that will yield the highest
marginal benefits, we will allocate 1 officer to Causeway Bay and 3
to Mongkok.
6. Opportunity Cost
Also do not need to calculate Sunk Cost, the cost that have
become the past and will not affect our current decision
making. For example, you are now waiting for a cab. You
have already waited for a long time and still couldn't catch
one. Then you will start to think, should I keep waiting, or
leave? From an economic point of view, you need to put
aside your own personal feelings and know that the time
spent waiting for a taxi is already a sunk cost. So when
considering whether you should continue to wait, you
should not calculate the sunk cost, but rather consider the
factor of the late arrival of the taxi, how long it is expected
to take for the taxi to arrive, and what is the additional
return for me if I wait any longer. Simply put, Sunk Cost
means that even if I stop doing a certain thing now, I won't
be able to get back the sunk cost. For example, for non-
refundable movie tickets, I can't get back the cost of the
movie tickets if I don't go to watch the movie, so it should
not affect my decision of whether to go watch the movie or
not after buying the ticket.
First of all, the tuition and meal costs are the same for both schools, so it is the same wherever we go, there
is no additional benefit or cost to consider.
Then we have to look at what kind of opportunity we were losing by choosing OKU and how much extra
benefit that opportunity would bring us. We found that if we go to OKU, we have to pay $700 for textbooks,
$1500 for transportation, and $1000 for parking, for a total cost of $3200. If we go to MKU, the cost is $800
+ $3000, for a total of $3800.
Opportunity cost = additional cost of current option + benefits lost for not choosing the
next best alternative
The opportunity cost of attending OKU =
$700 textbook + $1,500 transportation cost + $1,000 parking fee
- $800 on other activities - $3,000 lodging fee
Since the consideration of opportunity cost will only be the next best alternatives, plus the
question says that no matter how , Hermione's ranking is unchanged, so we can directly
ignore the third choice.
I. There will be no increase in opportunity cost because if I have more money for my first
choice, I will not regret giving up other options.
II. Even if I can have a monthly income of 30 million tutoring people, it does not matter to me,
because it is not my next best choice.
III. Same logic as above, it will always be my third choice.
IV. The right answer. Because then I might feel that it's also pretty good to be a housewife, so
the opportunity cost for me to give it up would be higher.
Lucy believes soccer ticket worths $600; concert ticket worths $800.
Since tickets are non-refundable, they are sunk cost. The opportunity cost
should be calculated without considering the ticket cost.
So if Lucy insists on going to the soccer game, she will lose the opportunity to
see the concert, which is worth $800.
Opportunity cost = additional cost of current option + benefits lost for not choosing the
next best alternative
First of all, you will have to pay rent whether you go to Thailand or not, thus rent will be
a sunk cost and should not be a factor in the decision.
Secondly, by going to Thailand, you will lose the opportunity to work and earn money,
which worth $20*10 = $200.
The cost of going to Thailand = Flight ticket ($600) + More expensive meal ($300-75)
Revision!