Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Part 3 Ip Syllabus
Part 3 Ip Syllabus
II. Methodology. The course will be taught through lectures and class
recitation.
1. Attendance will be called at the start of the class. Those who are late
will be considered absent.
2. Students must turn on their cameras for class.
3. Students will be called at random for recitation. Any student who is
absent/offline at the time he/she is called will get a grade of 60 for
that recitation. The same rule will apply for quizzes/any other class
activity.
4. Any form of cheating shall be dealt with severely.
5. No prescribed textbook, but students must have a copy of the codal
provisions of R.A. 8293, and other related laws which may be directed
in the Course Outline.
V. Course Outline.
B. Patents
Pearl Dean (Phil.) Inc. vs Shoemart, Inc., G.R. No. 148222, 15 August 2003
3. Ownership of a Patent
i. Right to a Patent (Section 28, IPC)
- Literal Infringement
Godines vs CA, G.R. No. 97343, 13 September 1993
- Doctrine of Equivalents
Smith Kline Beckman Corp. vs CA, G.R. No. 126627, 14 August 2003
3
9. Licensing
ii.
Compulsory (Sections 10.1, 93, 97, 100 IPC; Section 10, RA
9502)
Smith Kline & French, Ltd. vs. CA, G.R. No. 121267, 23 October 2001
Parke Davies & Co. vs. Doctors Pharmaceuticals, Inc., G.R. No. L-22221, 31
August 1965
C. Trademarks
Kabushi Kaisha Isetan vs. The Intermediate Appellate Court, G.R. No. L-75420,
15 November 1991
Levi Strauss & Co. vs. Clinton Apprelle, G.R. No. 138900, 20 September 2005 246
Corporation vs. Hon. Daway, et al, G.R. No. 157216, 20 November 2003
Esso Standard Eastern, Inc. vs. CA, G.R. No. L-29971, 31 August 1982
Dermaline, Inc. vs. Myra Pharmaceuticals, Inc., G.R. No. 190065, 16 August 2010
Birkenstock Orthopaedie Gmbh et al vs. Philippine Shoe Expo Marketing Corpo.,
G.R. No. 194307, 20 November 2013
i. Dominancy test
Kolin Electronics Co., Inc. v. Kolin Philippines International, Inc., G.R. No.
228165, 9 February 2021
Mang Inasal Phils., Inc. vs. IFP Manufacturing Corp., G.R. No. 221717, 19 January
2017
Skechers USA, Inc. vs. Inter Pacific Industrial Trading Corp., G.R. No. 164321, 23
March 2011
Philippine Nut Industry, Inc. vs. Standard Brands Incorporated et al, G.R. No. L-
2305, 31 July 1975
McDonalds Corporation vs. Macjoy Fastfood Corporation, G.R. No. 166115, 2
February 2007
Del Monte Corporation et al vs. CA et al, G.R. No. L-78325, 25 January 1990
Emerald Garment Manufacturing Corp. vs. CA et al, G.R. No. 100098, 29
December 1995
Bristol Myers Company vs. Director of Patents, G.R. No. L-21587, 19 May 1966
D. Copyrights
Pearl Dean (Phil.) Inc. vs Shoemart, Inc., G.R. No. 148222, 15 August 2003
Kho vs. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 115758, 19 March 2002
Unilever Phils. Inc. vs. Court of Appeals et al G.R. No. 119280, 10 August 2006
Joaquin et al vs. Hon. Drilon et al, G.R. No. 108946, 28 January 1999
ABS-CBN Broadcasting Corp. vs. Philippine Multi-Media System, Inc. et, G.R. No.
175769-70, 19 January 2009
Filipino Society of Composers, Authors, and Publishers, Inc. vs. Tan, G.R. No. L-
36402, 16 March 1987
Rappler, Inc. vs. Andres D. Bautista, G.R. No. 222702, 5 April 2016
ABS-CBN Corporation vs. Gozon, et al, G.R. No. 195956, 11 March 2015
Columbia Pictures et al vs. Court of Appeals et al, G.R. No. 110318, 28 August
1996
Habana et al vs. Robles et al, , G.R. No. 131522, 19 July 1999
NBI-Microsoft Corporation vs. Hwang et al, G.R. No. 147043, 21 June 2005
Olano et al vs. Co, G.R. 195835, 14 March 2016
F. Jurisdiction
UFC Philippines, Inc. vs. Barrio Fiesta Manufacturing Corporation, G.R. No.
198889, 20 January 2016
In-n-Out Burger, Inc. vs. Sehwani Incorporated and/or Benita’s Frites, Inc., G.R.
No. 179127, 24 December 2008
Phil Pharmawealth Inc. vs. Pfizer, Inc. And Pfizer (Phil.) Inc., G.R. No. 167715,
17 November 2010
Samson vs. Hon. Daway et al, G.R. No. 160054-55, 21 July 2004
Levi Strauss (Phils.), Inc. Vs. Vogue Traders Clothing Company, G.R. No. 32993,
29 June 2005
E.Y. Industrial Sales, Inc. et al vs. Shen Dar Electricity And Machinery Co., Ltd.,
G.R. No. 184850, 20 October 2010