My most salient question:

What information is included, and what is left out?

I find that in my articles, information is altered, some changed, but mostly the most factual parts
are left out as it goes down the line. People insert their own information, or twist the meaning of
the original article, thus losing factual accuracy as well.

In my primary source, I found that it had a detailed list of information where scientific evidence
was present, however, in the secondary source, it was more paraphrased. This leaves more
room for error, and I found there was an instance or two where this occurred.

Overall, I found that the secondary source could have been a bit more careful in the choosing of
information in their presentation.