Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Construction-Laying The Tracks of Recovery-MIDF-070322
Construction-Laying The Tracks of Recovery-MIDF-070322
How much would it cost? When the project was scraped in 2018, it was speculated that the cost was about RM40b
to RM50b. Going by previous news reports, the revised cost of MRT3 could range from between RM27b and RM32b. In
comparison, the Putrajaya Line, better known as the MRT2, costs RM30.5b with its alignment of 57.7km comprising
44.2km of elevated tracks and 13.5km underground with 36 stations. We opine that the final cost for MRT3 may come
up higher than MRT2 due to its higher underground portion of 40% as compared to 23.4% of the MRT2, as tunneling
works are more labour intensive, coupled with the high cost of heavy machineries needed such as the tunnel boring
machines. The underground portion of MRT2 costs RM13.1b while its elevated tracks cost RM17.4b. Using this as a like-
for-like comparison, MRT3 could potentially cost RM31.22b in our view, which is RM19.4b for the underground portion
and RM11.82b, based on the cost of RM970.4m per km underground and RM393.7m per km of elevated track. The cost
may potentially be higher for MRT3 than what was previously speculated due to the surge in prices of raw materials.
MRT Corp has previously proposed a hybrid financing model for the project where it may be expected to tap on the
private financing initiative (PFI).
Potential beneficiaries. The announcement of the MRT3 approval has come in timely as a short in the arm for the
rather muted construction sector where most firms are all dressed up with nowhere to go in recent years. Considering
the sheer size of the MRT3 project, we opine that the contract would be awarded in packages, such as what was seen
in MRT2, which was split into the underground segment, stations, segmental box girders, viaducts and others. The
underground package will most likely be the largest contract and we expect the major early beneficiary to be Gamuda
(BUY, TP: RM3.63), which would also go on to hold the lion’s share of MRT3. The group, which is the largest
construction company in the country based on market capitalisation, is as good as shovel ready for the project, premised
on its JV outfit MMC-Gamuda with vast experiences in MRT1 and MRT2. Just recently, Gamuda was also awarded a
RM6.5b tunneling project in Sydney and a RM1.45b contract to build a station and two tunnels in Singapore, together
with its Singapore JV partner, which are testaments to its tunneling expertise. Another potential front runner is IJM Corp,
which is no stranger to mega projects like this. We like IJM due to its strong portfolio of undertaking rail projects such
as the excavation of underground tunnels for a portion of LRT3, and also the construction of MRT stations and viaducts.
Among other beneficiaries include those that were previously involved in MRT2, such as Sunway Construction (BUY,
TP: RM1.80), WCT Holdings (BUY, TP: RM0.80), Gabungan AQRS (BUY, TP: RM0.64), MRCB (NEUTRAL, TP:
RM0.36) and Malayan Cement (BUY, TP: RM3.00).
Upgrade to POSITIVE. A stated in our 2022 outlook for the construction sector, MRT3 is a potential rerating catalyst
of the sector. We opine that the earliest we may see the first MRT3 contract would be in 2023, taking into consideration
Construction Sector Update
the tender process and the finalisation of the Government’s public private partnership (PPP) 3.0 model, which is expected
to be announced in mid-2022. Once the MRT3 ball starts rolling, it is expected to keep the construction players busy for
the next decade with strong order book replenishments whilst providing them with the earnings visibility. While there
could potentially be delays in the roll out of the project due to multiple factors, we believe that the improving inflow of
jobs, domestically and overseas, will be able to keep most of the construction companies under our coverage engaged
until they are able to start reaping the fruits of MRT3. For example, Gamuda (BUY, TP: RM3.63), which remains our
clear favourite, has bagged about 73.7% of its orderbook replenishment target for FY22, just from overseas projects.
IJM Corp (BUY, TP: RM1.90), boasts a sizeable outstanding order book of RM4.51b, giving it an earnings visibility
over the next three to four years. Construction activities, which are now allowed to resume in full force, will also speed
up the progress billings of ongoing projects. We also have BUY calls on Sunway Construction (TP: RM1.80),
Gabungan AQRS (TP: RM0.64) and Malayan Cement (TP: RM3.00). All factors considered, we are upgrading our
recommendation on the sector from NEUTRAL to POSITIVE on the back of our optimistic outlook on the sector.
Construction Sector Update
MIDF RESEARCH is part of MIDF Amanah Investment Bank Berhad (197501002077(23878 – X)).
(Bank Pelaburan)
(A Participating Organisation of Bursa Malaysia Securities Berhad)
Readers should be fully aware that this report is for information purposes only. The opinions contained in this report are based on
information obtained or derived from sources that MIDF Investment believes are reliable at the time of publication. All information,
opinions and estimates contained in this report are subject to change at any time without notice. Any update to this report will be solely
at the discretion of MIDF Investment.
MIDF Investment makes no representation or warranty, expressed or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness or reliability of the
information contained therein and it should not be relied upon as such. MIDF Investment and its affiliates and related compan ies and
each of their respective directors, officers, employees, connected parties, associates and agents (collectively, “Representatives”) shall not
be liable for any direct, indirect or consequential loess, loss of profits and/or damages arising from the use or reliance by anyone upon
this report and/or further communications given in relation to this report.
This report is not, and should not at any time be construed as, an offer, invitation or solicitation to buy or sell any securities, investments
or financial instruments. The price or value of such securities, investments or financial instruments may rise or fall. Further, the analyses
contained herein are based on numerous assumptions. This report does not take into account the specific investment objectives , the
financial situation, risk profile and the particular needs of any person who may receive or read this report. You should therefore
independently evaluate the information contained in this report and seek financial, legal and other advice regarding the appropriateness
of any transaction in securities, investments or financial instruments mentioned or the strategies discussed or recommended in this report.
The Representatives may have interest in any of the securities, investments or financial instruments and may provide services or products
to any company and affiliates of such companies mentioned herein and may benefit from the information herein.
This document may not be reproduced, copied, distributed or republished in whole or in part in any form or for any purpose wi thout
MIDF Investment’s prior written consent. This report is not directed or intended for distribution to or use by any person or entity where
such distribution or use would be contrary to any applicable law or regulation in any jurisdiction concerning the person or entity.
STOCK RECOMMENDATIONS
Stock price is expected to rise by >10% within 3-months after a Trading Buy rating has been assigned due to
TRADING BUY
positive newsflow.
NEUTRAL Total return is expected to be between -10% and +10% over the next 12 months.
Stock price is expected to fall by >10% within 3-months after a Trading Sell rating has been assigned due to negative
TRADING SELL
newsflow.
SECTOR RECOMMENDATIONS
POSITIVE The sector is expected to outperform the overall market over the next 12 months.
NEUTRAL The sector is to perform in line with the overall market over the next 12 months.
NEGATIVE The sector is expected to underperform the overall market over the next 12 months.
☆☆☆☆ Top 25% by ESG Ratings amongst PLCs in FBM EMAS that have been assessed by FTSE Russell
☆☆☆ Top 26-50% by ESG Ratings amongst PLCs in FBM EMAS that have been assessed by FTSE Russell
☆☆ Top 51%- 75% by ESG Ratings amongst PLCs in FBM EMAS that have been assessed by FTSE Russell
☆ Bottom 25% by ESG Ratings amongst PLCs in FBM EMAS that have been assessed by FTSE Russell
* ESG Ratings of PLCs in FBM EMAS that have been assessed by FTSE Russell in accordance with FTSE Russell ESG Ratings Methodology