Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Plaintiff,
Defendant.
x-----------------------------------------x
COMPLAINT
Plaintiff, TERESA AMELIA GARCIA (“Plaintiff Garcia”), by
counsel, respectfully states:
I
THE PARTIES
II
1
FACTS
1
A copy of the Contract of Lease is attached as Annex “A”.
2
Section 7. Should the contract of lease ends
without any unpaid liabilities and without any
damages necessitating repairs of the
condominium unit, the remaining deposit of PhP
85,000.00 shall be returned to the LESSEE on the
last day of the lease period.
2
A copy of the official receipts are attached as Annex “B”, “C”, “D”, “E”, “F”, “G”, “H”, “I”, “J”, “K”, “L”,
respectively.
3
Demand Letter dated 20 January 2021 is attached as Annex “M”
4
Demand Letter dated 15 February 2021 is attached as Annex “N”
3
13. Defendant Bereza promised to pay the remaining
deposit when her means permit her to do so.
III
CAUSES OF ACTION
19. Article 1170 of the New Civil Code states: “Those who
in the performance of their obligations are guilty of fraud,
negligence, or delay, and those who in any manner contravene
the tenor thereof, are liable for damages.”
4
return of the security deposit, however, Defendant Bereza failed
to comply. As a result, the latter incurred delay. Consequently,
she is liable for damages.
5
G.R. No. 97412, July 12, 1994, 234 SCRA 78
5
25. The Defendant is also liable for Attorney’s Fees.
Under Article 2208, it is provided that in the absence of
stipulation, attorney's fees and expenses of litigation, other than
judicial costs, cannot be recovered, except:
IV
COMPLIANCE WITH RULE 7, SECTION 6 OF THE 1997 RULES
OF CIVIL PROCEDURE AS AMENDED
6
the defendant, and that the
latter refused without valid
and sufficient cause. She will
also substantiate the damages
she has suffered due to
defendant’s refusal to return
the security deposit.
2 ANDREA ZOBEL Ms. Zobel will testify that she
personally saw the plaintiff
and defendant execute the
Contract of Lease dated 28
December 2019. She will also
testify with respect to relevant
information and identify the
documents which she has
personal knowledge.
3 REPRESENTATIVE FROM The representative shall testify
THE COURIER that the Demand Letters which
were sent through their service
were successfully delivered to
the Defendant. He/She will
likewise authenticate the
records of delivery and the
mailing receipts upon which
the Defendant signed when
she received the documents
(letters).
7
“C”, complied with condition to pay
“D”, the initial rental fee and the
“E”, required security deposit
“F”, worth two (2) months rent. It
“G”, will also prove that Plaintiff
“H”, had religiously paid her rents,
“I”, “J”, and thus strengthen the
“K”, position that she did not leave
“L” outstanding obligations that
would sanction Defendant to
refuse the return of the
security deposit
“M” Demand Letters To show that the Plaintiff tried
“N” dated 20 January to peaceably ask for the return
2021 and 15 of the deposit but to no avail
Febraury 2021 which prompted her to resort
to this civil case
“O” Employment To prove the Plaintiff’s
Contract of Teresa employment and salary which
Amelia Garcia shall strengthen her claim that
isssued by Banco De she has not been delinquent in
Oro her obligations with the
Defendant
“P” Business Permits To prove that Plaintiff has
issued by the City other sources of income which
Government of shoulders her living expenses
Makati’s Permits thereby strengthening claim
Office that she has not been
delinquent in her obligations
with the Defendant
“Q” Official Receipt To prove that she has not left
issued by Internet any outstanding obligation
Service Provider which would warrant
evidencing payment withholding of the security
of outstanding deposit
liabilities
“R” Disconnection To prove that she has not left
Confirmation issued any outstanding obligation
by the Internet which would warrant
Service Provider withholding of the security
deposit
“S” Courier’s Record of To prove that the Defendant
8
Deliveries with received the first Demand
Mailing Receipts Letter coursed through a
dated 21 January courier.
2021
“T” Screenshot of Text To prove that the Defendant
Message from received the first Demand
Courier stating Letter coursed through a
successful delivery courier.
on 21 January 2021
“U” Courier’s Record of To prove that the Defendant
Deliveries with received the second Demand
Mailing Receipts Letter coursed through a
dated 16 February courier
2021
“V” Screenshot of Text To prove that the Defendant
Message from received the second Demand
Courier stating Letter coursed through a
successful delivery courier
on 16 February
2021
“W” Judicial Affidavit of To establish in detail other
Teresa Amelia facts and circumstances
Garcia surrounding the Contract of
Lease
“X” Judicial Affidavit of To establish that a Contract of
Katherine Mendoza Lease was executed by the
parties
“Y” Judicial Affidavit of To establish that the Demand
a Representative Letters were successfully
from the Courier delivered to the Defendant; to
company authenticate the records of
delivery and the mailing
receipts where the Defendant
signed upon receiving the
Demand Letters
9
by A.M. No. 19-10-20-SC, and as may be permitted by the
Honorable Court.
V
PRAYER
BY:
10
FOR THE FIRM:
Jenica B. Eva
JENICA B. EVA
PTR No. 5913409; 07/03/20; Makati City
IBP No. 088237; 05/03/20; Makati City
Roll of Attorneys No. 23748
MCLE Compliance – Admitted to the Bar 2016
11
REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES }
CITY OF MAKATI } S.S.
VERIFICATION AND
CERTIFICATION OF NON-FORUM SHOPPING
12
Teresa Amelia Garcia
TERESA AMELIA GARCIA
Annalise Kiting
ANNALISE KITING
Notary Public for Makati City
IBP No. 61956; 01-30-20;
Makati City
PTR No. 061596; 02-01-20;
Makati City
Roll of Attorney’s No. 36854
MCLE Exemption No. VI-
009876
13