Template feasibility studies and concept definition

Requirements:
1. Format must be simple to use
2. Own (report) identification
3. Summary of results on 1 A-4, further details in report
4. Template can be filled partly or totally (may be completed when more or changed info available)
Standaard Engineering Report format Teamcenter

Company/dept. : S/TECI Report no. :TE-xxxx

Ordernr. : YYYY Issue :1
Original release date : dd-mm-year Release date : dd-mm-year
Security class : Restricted Status :
ATA :
ECR :

Engineering Report
Feasibility Study/Concept Definition

Title

Prepared Function/Note Date

name dd-mm-year
Checked
name dd-mm-year
Approved
name dd-mm-year
Released
name dd-mm-year
Summary page
Ordernr. :
Input reference :
Customer :
Aircraft Type/Version(s) :
Aircraft Serial number(s):

Subject
-text-

Summary
-text-

Cost
ROM : -hours-
DOC : -Euros-

Lead time : -months-

Contents
1. Summary page……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….….
2. Revision history………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………...
3. Introduction……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………...
4. Requirements…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
a. Customer requirements…………………………………………………………………………………………….….
b. Airworthiness and environmental requirements……………………………………………………….….
c. Operational requirements………………………………………………………………………………………….…
d. Reliability requirements…………………………………………………………………………………………….….
e. Maintainability requirements…………………………………………………………………………………….….
5. Concept definition……………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…….
6. Trade-offs………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
7. Airworthiness…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
a. Certification……………………………………………………………………………………………………………….….
i. Classification…………………………………………………………………………………………………….
ii. Validation…………………………………………………………………………………………………………
b. Qualification/Military Certification……………………………………………………………………………….
i. Involved Airworthiness Authority…………………………………………………………………….
8. Assumptions, exclusions……………………………………………………………………………………………………………
9. Cost…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
10. Lead time………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
11. Risks………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
12. References…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

2. Revision history

Issue Changes
1 First release
3. Introduction
-description-

4. Requirements
4a. Customer requirements
-functional requirements specified by customer-

4b. Airworthiness and environmental requirements

Affected aspects:
Aspect Yes/No Aspect Yes/No

Flight Structures
Electrical systems Lights
Avionics systems Software
Complex electronic hardware Powerplant
Auxiliary power unit Fuel systems
Fireworthiness Cabin safety
Environmental control systems Ice and rain protection
Human factors Hydro/mechanical systems
Operating limitations and information Aircraft external noise
Emissions All weather operations
Lightning EMC
HIRF Instr. for cont’d airworthiness
Fuel tank safety EWIS

-determination of civil or military certification basis-

-determination of civil or military requirements-

4c. Operational requirements

-determination of applicable operational requirements-

4d. Reliability requirements

-assessment of reliability requirements-

4e. Maintainability requirements

-assessment of maintainability requirements-
5. Concept definition
-description of possible solutions-

6. Trade-offs
-description of trade-offs-
-determination of solution-

7. Airworthiness
7a Certification
-EASA certification (default) or other civil certification-

7a.i. Classification
The change to the type design should be classified ‘major’, in particular but not only, when one or more
of the following conditions are answered with “yes”.

Ref.: EASA Part 21, section A, subpart D, article 21A.91 and associated Guidance Material GM21A.91.

Condition YES / NO Remarks

A The change has an appreciable effect on the
mass, balance, structural strength, reliability,
operational characteristics, noise, fuel venting
or exhaust emission of the aircraft.

B The change requires an adjustment of the type-

certification basis (such as special condition,
equivalent safety finding, elect to comply,
exemption, reversion, later requirements).

C It is proposed to use new interpretation of the

type certification requirements, which has not
been published as AMC material or otherwise
agreed with the Agency.

D The methods used for demonstration of

compliance have not been previously accepted
as appropriate for the nature of the change.

E The extent of new compliance substantiation

data and the degree to which the original
substantiation data has to be re-assessed and
re-evaluated is considerable.
 F The change alters the Airworthiness Limitations
(ALI’s, CMR’s, SLI’s) or the Operating
Limitations.

G The change is made mandatory by an

airworthiness directive or the change is a
terminating action of an airworthiness directive.

H The change introduces or affects functions of

which the failure effect is classified as
catastrophic or hazardous.

Resulting certification classification: Minor/Major.

7a.ii. Validation
-specify if validation of EASA-approval needed-

7b Qualification/Military Certification
-specify if qualification/military certification involved-

7b.i. Involved Airworthiness Authority

-specify Airworthiness Authority involved in qualification/military certification-

8. Assumptions, exclusions
-specify all assumptions and exclusions related to the subject of this report-

9. Cost
-provide ROM in hours-
-provide information on DOC (direct order cost) in Euros-
-provide information on outsourcing-

10. Lead time

-specify information on lead time-

11. Risks
-specify risks-

12. References
-list references used-