Professional Documents
Culture Documents
TIFs Edited
TIFs Edited
Student’s Name
Institutional Affiliation
TAX INCREMENT FINANCING 2
Tax increment financing (TIFs) is a public interest that touches on public and private
development. It can play a critical role in urban renewal under the Urban Renewal Law whereby
when a city finds a slum of blighted areas that they recognize to jeopardize the community's
public health, safety, and morals, the city can declare the area blighted (Policy Council, n.d).
Later, the city develops a workable program that utilizes public and private resources to create
commercial and industrial properties. According to Healey and McCormick (1999), Chicago had
initiated three lender-backed micro-TF investment fund programs that benefit some of TIFs to
small businesses, small-scale, downtown projects, and homeowners. They further mention that
the Small Business Improvement Fund (SBIF) reimburses business and building owners eligible
for TIF investment that improves neighborhood appearance, preserves building stock, and
The TIF targeted projects that could retain or create jobs and finance historically
significant buildings. After a given area is declared blighted, a public hearing is held to discuss
the renewal plan. The city approves the project when there is a reasonable method to help
families who have been displaced; the program conforms to the city's plans as a whole. The
project provides a maximum opportunity for development to be carried out. Once the renewal
plan is in place, the city can use tax increment financing to pay off any expenditures associated
with the renewal plan. TIFs can help developers develop commercial and industrial properties as
The creation of TIF was an effective scheme to finance private capital with public funds.
For example, when one wants to open a grocery store and grow, a city council member can
suggest using the TIF to finance the project. TIF is a method that developers employ to reinvest
into their property. The higher taxes they would normally pay when development takes place, the
incentive aims to encourage economic growth and create jobs by allowing developers to pursue
projects that would not normally occur if they had to fund the projects on their own (Columbian
Missourian, n.d). The developer has to prove to the city and the tax increment financing
commission that the property one is targeting is blighted or in need of conservation to avoid
becoming blighted. One cannot afford to do the project on their financing will benefit the entire
community.
The City of Chicago had a policy decision prohibiting issuing general obligation bonds
from funding projects in the TIF districts directly. As the individual companies and developers
needed up-front funding to complete their deal, other initiatives have to be taken to keep the City
of Chicago competitive and attracting development. Chicago allocated about $25 million from
the citywide general obligation bond issue for economic development funding. The allocated
funds helped attract and retain other large companies, including Luster products, Culinary Foods,
Farley Candy, and National Wide Service. When these projects are completed, together with the
real estate increment numbers, the TIF funds are issued to the Reed-Dunning, Stockyards, and
Ship Canal TIF districts. The proceeds obtained from the bonds were then used to repay the
Mediating for TIFs can be an enormous problem as it highly involves multiple groups,
including the county and municipality, and it can affect one's competitors. A challenging
mediation for TIFs can slow one's project and bring it to a stop. Secondly, the development
proposals don't get the green light from municipalities as there is a change in the economic
conditions, and there can be heat in the public debate eventually, the TIF process can be long and
drawn out, which can sabotage a deal and cause the project to go either way. Therefore, it is
important to understand that TIFs can be complex, and despite one's efforts, the deal might fall
off. Also, there might be a backlash in securing TIFs as several states have a clause, "But for"
that require developers to certify the projects would not move forward "but for" the TIF.
It can also backlash as public funds come with various public viewpoints, some of which
can be held by other competitors, and the general public might fight for TIF financing.
Therefore, developers should be ready to face public feedback that might not be favorable. TIFs
affect the tax rates as it relies on the property tax revenue developed from the increase in the
taxable assessed value in a given area. Also, it involves some of the taxpayers more than others.
Also, there is a doubt whether the tax increment financing could induce an economic
development project. Also, there can be a lack of transparency, especially when TIF funds are
References
https://www.youtube.com/embed/LoS2excxVuY
Haeley, L., & McCormick J. F., (1999). Urban Revitalization and Tax Increment Financing in
https://www.cdfa.net/cdfa/cdfaweb.nsf/ord/ac3442e8843ece3688257936005f0c13/$file/
urbanrevitalizationandtifinchicago.pdf
https://www.youtube.com/embed/0u5aPAyeXGQ