Diane Khyla Laurente

BSA

CASE ANALYSIS RECOMMENDATION:

Knowing that the APV and PV were not signed, it means that it was not thoroughly checked
and therefore it is not valid. It is important to have the signatures of the proper verifier and
checker in order to validate if all the transactions are correct and properly handed. In
connection, I recommend that a proper handling of roles must be observed by the company
through monitoring and checking of controls. The responsibilities of each personnel must
be strictly followed and they should abide by all the rules and regulations of the company.

It was also stated that the supporting documents are incomplete. Based on that, it shows
that there’s a mishandling of information thus can result in poor invoices. I recommend that
there should be a proper handling of documents to secure and avoid faulty information.
Also, I recommend having a complete and well organized document to easily track and
manage all the necessary information.

The invoice #0191 and 0186 LDMC indicates that the documents weren't checked and
handled very well. I recommend that before preparing the RFP the assigned employee must
check all the necessary information. I also recommend having a proper assigned role to
avoid fraud in the future.

The invoice 0108327 MC was not closed and adjusted from the period year. Also the invoice #1402
RSAS doesn't follow their assigned roles so I recommend that all employees must be properly
segregated to perform well in their roles and responsibilities.