Professional Documents
Culture Documents
By
Jeremy Shiman
Aural Spatialities
An Investigation of the Architectural Implications of Aural Perception
By
Jeremy Shiman
Committee in charge:
Professor Raveevarn Choksombatchai
Professor Roddy Creedon
Spring 2016
Look around you.
How does our perception of sound influence our perception of space? How does our aural experience
affect our spatial experience? Hearing is an integral aspect of spatial perception, arguably even more
important than sight. Sound is immersive and perceptible to everyone.
Unfortunately, sound is often overlooked or undervalued in the design process. How can we,
as designers, understand the sonic implications of architectural decisions at every stage of the
design process? Taken further, can we make sonic and aural investigations fundamental to the
design process? This thesis places sound at the center of architectural inquiry and explores the
repercussions of sound as a design driver.
It is worth noting at the outset that while this project primarily relates to the hearing population, the
deaf also perceive sound, though not in the form of hearing. The vibrations created by sound waves
can be perceived by those without the ability to hear. One example that illustrates this point across
the spectrum of hearing ability is that sound waves at very low frequencies can be felt physically
vibrating rooms, even though they do not create sound audible to the human ear.
Lastly, the immersive aspect of sound became a driver for much of the thinking that was the
underpinning for the thesis. As such, this book takes the form of sound in certain ways, rarely coming
from a single source, often scattering, but ultimately creating a unified, cohesive whole. The thesis,
which might traditionally be seen as a linear narrative, will be dispersed. An introduction has instead
been scattered throughout as a series of musings on how sound has traditionally and untraditionally
been thought about and placed within the larger context of the body and built environment. Studies
of artists and architects, both the people and the work, find themselves juxtaposed, sometimes
awkwardly, sometimes pleasantly, but never predictably. Full scale installations were a large
portion of the thesis project and appear intermittently. Finally, a design proposal for New York City’s
Pennsylvania Station serves as one answer to the question, “how can sound drive the design process
through sound, the sonic, and the aural?”
JEREMY SHIMAN 1
Experiential Sound Matrix
EAR
3 14 1 7 2 15
14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14
AURAL
ACOUSTIC
14 14 4 6 11
13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13
REFERENCES
HEARING
1 - DANIEL LIBESKIND - CHAMBERWORKS: HORIZONTAL ii & xi
2 - BERNHARD LEITNER - TONE ROOM BERLIN & TONE LINE SCULPTURE
3 - M W BURNS - SINKER
4 - JANET CARDIFF - 40 PART MOTET
5 - JOHN CAGE - POEM TO ELIZABETH MARTIN
6 - IANNIS XENAKIS - POLYTOPES CLUNY
7 - HANS-CHRISTOPH STEINER - SOLITUDE
8 - ANDREA GALVANI - A CUBE, A SPHERE, AND A PYRAMID
9 - CHRISTOPHER JANNEY - REACH NY
10 - AALTO - VIIPURI LIBRARY
11 - RENZO PIANO - PROMETEO MUSICAL SPACEALVAR
LISTENING
12 - FALLING WATER - FRANK LLOYD WRIGHT
13 - ST PETER’S CHAPEL - PETER ZUMTHOR
14 - GLASS HOUSE - PHILIP JOHNSON
15 - PIANO
16 - NOISE, INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR
17 - REVERBERATION
13 13 3 14
12 16 3 8 4 17 1
15 12 11 16 9 13
2 4 14 6 15 10 16
EYELIDS
EARLIDS?
17 13 16 4 13
3 - only heard 5 13 13 12
40 Part Motet
Janet Cardiff
4 AURAL SPATIALITIES
4
JEREMY SHIMAN 5
4
6 AURAL SPATIALITIES
4
JEREMY SHIMAN 7
9
8 AURAL SPATIALITIES
Reach
Chrisopher Janney
JEREMY SHIMAN 9
3
10 AURAL SPATIALITIES
Sinker
M. W. Burns
JEREMY SHIMAN 11
3
12 AURAL SPATIALITIES
3
JEREMY SHIMAN 13
14 AURAL SPATIALITIES
JEREMY SHIMAN 15
16 AURAL SPATIALITIES
In the 20th century, architectural theorists began considering the implications of sound (as well as
the other senses) as they affect the built environment. Steen Eiler Rasmussen in his seminal text
Experiencing Architecture was among the first to actively acknowledge the importance of other
senses in modern architectural theory. The current champion of multi-sensory architecture is Juhani
Pallasmaa. His writings on phenomenology and ways to experience architecture not solely based in
sight have become a beacon for those interested in the non-visual aspects architecture. Pallasmaa
himself has designed some buildings with these ideas in mind, but does not have a large presence
in the architectural community as far as design is concerned. He readily acknowledges this and
advocates for the work of extremely famous architects who are much more widely known – Daniel
Libeskind, Steven Holl, and Peter Zumthor, among others. These architects certainly have different
styles and contribute in different ways to the conversation about phenomenology and the non-visual
in architecture.
JEREMY SHIMAN 17
18 AURAL SPATIALITIES
Sound Chambers
These four boxes are physical manifestations of
four distinct wall sections. The project explores how
slight differences in construction while maintaining
the same physical dimension can alter perceived
ambient noise. Each of these boxes is 2’ x 2’ x 2’,
even though the spatial volume of a room or area
is as important to its sonic qualities as the wall
construction.
The interior of each is painted black, or of a black
material, to focus the attention on the sonic
qualities, rather than creating objects to be looked at
from the inside.
Box 1 [left most]: 3/4” plywood :: 3/4” spacers :: 3/4”
articulated wood panelling
Box 2: 3/4” plywood :: 1/16” felt :: 3/4” spacers :: 3/4”
spaced wood panelling
Box 3: 3/4” plywood :: 1/16” felt
Box 4 [right most]: 3/4” plywood
JEREMY SHIMAN 19
20 AURAL SPATIALITIES
JEREMY SHIMAN 21
Box 1, looking up
22 AURAL SPATIALITIES
Box 1, looking forward
JEREMY SHIMAN 23
Box 2, looking up
24 AURAL SPATIALITIES
Box 2, looking forward
JEREMY SHIMAN 25
Box 3, looking up
26 AURAL SPATIALITIES
Box 3, looking forward
JEREMY SHIMAN 27
Box 4, looking up
28 AURAL SPATIALITIES
Box 4, looking forward
JEREMY SHIMAN 29
Details of boxes 1 and 2
30 AURAL SPATIALITIES
Detials of boxes 3 and 4
JEREMY SHIMAN 31
32 AURAL SPATIALITIES
The importnace and ability of the ear is often overlooked. Its importance to the human psyche is
well documented. There are significantly higher rates of extreme mental illness among people who
have lost the use of their ears as compared to those who have lost the use of their eyes. There is also
anecdotal evidence of humans learning how to echo-locate, much like a dolphin or bat. Some people
have attuned their hearing to such an extent that they are able to tell the size and shape of a traffic
sign by how it effects the ambient noise around it. While cases like these are quite rare and indicate
extreme aural acuity, all people interpret a great deal about the world around them through the use
of their ears. Most people are intuitively able to discern between a small room like a bathroom, a
very large room like a cathedral nave, and being outdoors. With practice and attention, or for those
who use their ears more often, musicians for example, these abilities can be heightened.
JEREMY SHIMAN 33
14
14
34 AURAL SPATIALITIES
Glass House
Philip Johnson
JEREMY SHIMAN 35
14
14
36 AURAL SPATIALITIES
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
JEREMY SHIMAN 37
14
38 AURAL SPATIALITIES
14
JEREMY SHIMAN 39
40 AURAL SPATIALITIES
“Hearing is associated with invisible boundaries that demark the region within which a listener can
hear people and events.”
- Barry Blesser and Linda-Ruth Salter, Sound and Architecture, page 56
JEREMY SHIMAN 41
11
11
42 AURAL SPATIALITIES
Prometeo Musical Space
Renzo Piano
JEREMY SHIMAN 43
10
44 AURAL SPATIALITIES
Sketch of Viipuri Library Meeting Hall
Alvar Aalto
JEREMY SHIMAN 45
46 AURAL SPATIALITIES
There are many distinctions between the ear and the eye. One of the most interesting is the fact that
humans are unable to close their ears. Unless aided by an outside mechanism, there is no way not to
hear. Ears perform many functions that are more vital to human existence than eyes. In addition to
providing balance, they are the body’s alarm system.
Whereas the eye picks up information from what you are looking at and approximately 60˚ to the
left, right, top, and bottom, the ear does not discriminate based on direction. In addition to the
fact that the ear hears in every direction, it also informs the brain of the direction from which the
sound came. The anatomy of the eye causes it to relay information from the world in relatively
uniform [something]. The ear reacts to exterior stimuli, with each additional sound causing it
to relay something new, rather than a different version of what was already there. In this sense,
the eye portrays what can be considered a landscape, a single compilation of the colors, shades,
and distances independent of motion, change, or [sth] in the visual field; and the ear reveals an
eventscape, an additive environment exclusive to things that are actually happening, and, therefore,
making noise.
JEREMY SHIMAN 47
15
15
15
48 AURAL SPATIALITIES
Steinway Model D Piano
3 Ways
JEREMY SHIMAN 49
Poem
John Cage
50 AURAL SPATIALITIES
the arts are not isolated,
new kinds
of spAtial
phenomenoN, however each art
can Do
what
An
otheR
Cannot
in Has been
predIctable
therefore, thaT
nEw
musiC will be answered by
The new
architecUre -
woRk we have
not yet seEn
- only heard 5
JEREMY SHIMAN 51
16
16
52 AURAL SPATIALITIES
JEREMY SHIMAN 53
54 AURAL SPATIALITIES
Two specific words are of extreme importance when considering how the ear relates to architecture
and the built environment: acoustic and aural. The two are inextricably related, and yet they present
two extremely different views of the role of the ear.
Acoustic relates to the physical properties of sound waves and, in relation to architecture, how the
built environment alters these waves as they move from their source to their receptor. Aural, on the
other hand, refers to the experiential qualities of sound in a space.
This distinction allows the most important questions of architecture to enter into the conversation
about how the ear exists in the built environment. Instead of being concerned with numbers,
coefficients, and factors, thinking about the aural begs more human questions.
How do different sounds or noises interact with the space? How might people experience sound in
a room, building, or city? What is it like to inhabit the space when it sounds a certain way? Are there
certain sounds or noises that are better suited to certain areas within a bulding or certain buildings?
How does the placement of a wall or the choice of a material influence noise and sound in a space?
JEREMY SHIMAN 55
13
56 AURAL SPATIALITIES
St. Peter’s Chapel, Zumvitg, Switzerland
Peter Zumthor
JEREMY SHIMAN 57
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
58 AURAL SPATIALITIES
13
JEREMY SHIMAN 59
13
13
60 AURAL SPATIALITIES
13
13
JEREMY SHIMAN 61
62 AURAL SPATIALITIES
Sound as a driving force for an architectural thesis comes with certain concerns and potential
problems, most importantly issues of representation and issues of proof. Visual questions are more
readily proven through traditional architectural means, as they require visual representations. To
represent sound, and more specifically to represent ideas about sound in space, ideas about sound
and noise, a medium that is experienced not only in the three dimensions we live in but also in
time, must be transformed into two dimensions in a meaningful and comprehensible way. The idea
of proof when investigating sound needs to be carefully considered. Unfortunately, there isn’t a
meaningful way to experience the effect of a sound or series of sounds in a space without actually
being in that space.
JEREMY SHIMAN 63
0 10,000’ 30,000’ 60,000’
64 AURAL SPATIALITIES
Re-Sounding Penn Station
New York City’s Penn Station is the point of entry
into Manhattan for hundreds of thousands of people
every day. This study focuses on how to re-imagine
the interior of the station by focusing on the sonic
qualities and intentions of the designed space before
more traditional spatial qualities.
The design process results from a series of steps in
scale, zooming in to specific areas of Penn Station as
existing conditions, then altering them at the scale of
a detail section, before zooming back out to consider
the larger-scale architectural implications.
JEREMY SHIMAN 65
66 AURAL SPATIALITIES
0 1,250’ 2,500’ 5,000’
JEREMY SHIMAN 67
0’ 25’ 50’ 100’
68 AURAL SPATIALITIES
0’ 25’ 50’ 100’
JEREMY SHIMAN 69
Existing Transverse Section, Looking West
70 AURAL SPATIALITIES
0’ 32’ 64’
JEREMY SHIMAN 71
0’ 16’ 32’
0’ 16’ 32’
72 AURAL SPATIALITIES
0’ 16’ 32’
JEREMY SHIMAN 73
Detail Section of Existing Entry at 8th Avenue
74 AURAL SPATIALITIES
Detail Section of Proposed Entry at 8th Avenue
JEREMY SHIMAN 75
0’ 16’ 32’
0’ 16’ 32’
76 AURAL SPATIALITIES
0’ 16’ 32’
JEREMY SHIMAN 77
Existing Transverse Section, Looking West
78 AURAL SPATIALITIES
0’ 32’ 64’
0’ 32’ 64’
JEREMY SHIMAN 79
0’ 16’ 32’
0’ 16’ 32’
80 AURAL SPATIALITIES
0’ 16’ 32’
JEREMY SHIMAN 81
Detail Section of Existing Ticketing Area and
Track Level
82 AURAL SPATIALITIES
Detail Section of Proposed Ticketing Area and
Track Level
JEREMY SHIMAN 83
0’ 16’ 32’
0’ 16’ 32’
84 AURAL SPATIALITIES
0’ 16’ 32’
JEREMY SHIMAN 85
86 AURAL SPATIALITIES
How can architects understand the spatial qualities of sound and use them to make the ear a
more conscious and integral part of experiencing the built environment? There are certainly many
difficulties that arise when asking this question, but they must be harnessed and understood in such
a way that they make the overall understanding of this phenomenon stronger.
JEREMY SHIMAN 87
12
12
12
88 AURAL SPATIALITIES
Falling Water
Frank Lloyd Wright
JEREMY SHIMAN 89
90 AURAL SPATIALITIES
There are many theorists outside the realm of traditional architecture who have recently begun to be
included in the discussion of sound and the built environment. Barry Blesser and Linda-Ruth Salter
have worked together to define ‘aural architecture’ as a means to qualify, quantify, and examine
the sonic experience of the built environment. They consider five different spatialities of sound:
social, navigational, symbolic, aesthetic, and music. These five different spatialities separate sound
into distinct arenas, but there is a common thread throughout – sound and the aural experience are
relative to a specific person in a specific place at a specific time.
JEREMY SHIMAN 91
1
92 AURAL SPATIALITIES
Chamberworks: Horizontal ii & xi
Daniel Libeskind
JEREMY SHIMAN 93
6
94 AURAL SPATIALITIES
Polytopes Cluny
Iannis Xenakis
JEREMY SHIMAN 95
2
96 AURAL SPATIALITIES
Tone Room Berlin & Tone Line Sculpture
Bernhard Leitner
JEREMY SHIMAN 97
Bibliography
Oscar Lopez. “AD Classics: Expo ‘58 + Philips Pavilion / Le Corbusier and Iannis Xenakis” 25 Aug 2011.
ArchDaily. Accessed 9 Sep 2015. http://www.archdaily.com/157658/ad-classics-expo-58-philips-pavil-
ion-le-corbusier-and-iannis-xenakis/
“Philips Pavilion” Wikipedia. Accessed 9 Sep 2015. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philips_Pavilion
Aesthetics of total serialism: contemporary research from music to architecture / Markus Bandur
Basel: Birkhauser, 2001 ISBN
Architecture as a translation of music / Elizabeth Martin New York: Princeton Architectural Press,
1994 (Pamphlet Architecture 16) ISBN 1568980124
Architecture of sound: designing places of assembly / Peter Lord, Duncan Templeton London: Archi-
tectural Press, 1986 ISBN 0851397263
Architettura & musica: sette cantieri per la musica dall’Ircam di Parigi all’Auditorium di Roma = Ar-
chitecture & music : seven sites for music from the Ircam in Paris to the Auditorium in Rome / Renzo
Piano Building Workshop Milan: Edizioni Lybra Immagine, 2002 ISBN
Arts and architecture: the Entenza years / Arts and Architecture London MIT Press, 1990 ISBN
0262071312
Buildings for music: the architect, the musician and the listener from the a century to the present day
/ Michael Forsyth Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985 ISBN 0262060892
Formalized music: thought and mathematics in music / Iannis Xenakis ISBN 0253323789
Frank Gehry: the city and music / Jeremy Gilbert-Rolfe with Frank Gehry London: Routledge, 2002
ISBN 0415290082
Hans Scharoun: the Berlin Philharmonic Concert Hall, Berlin / text by Hiroshi Sasaki / Global Architec-
ture 21 Tokyo: ADA Edita, 1973
Jorn Utzon: the Sydney Opera House / Francoise Fromonot Corte Madera, CA : Electa/Gingko, 1998
ISBN 3927258725
Mark Fisher: staged architecture / Eric Holding Chichester: Wiley-Academy, 2000 ISBN 0471987069
Music architecture / edited by Roland Ritter and Michael Haberz Graz: Haus der Architektur, 1997
ISBN 3901174265
Site of sound: of architecture and the ear / Brandon Labelle, Steve Roden Los Angeles, CA : Errant
Bodies Press in association with Smart Art Press, 1999 ISBN 0965557022
Sonic process : a new geography of sounds / Christine van Assche Barcelona, Actar, 2002 ISBN
8495951134
Sound and the visual arts / Jean-Yves Bosseur Paris: DisVoir, 1993 ISBN 2906571261
Soundscape of modernity: architectural acoustics and the culture of listening in America, 1900-1933 /
Emily Thompson Cambridge, MA : MIT Press, 2002 ISBN 0262201380
Soundspace: architecture for sound and vision / Peter Grueneisen Basel: Birkhauser, 2003 ISBN
3764369752 Basel: Birkhauser, 2003 ISBN 3764369752
98 AURAL SPATIALITIES
Space calculated in seconds: the Philips Pavilion, Le Corbusier, Edgar Varese New Jersey: Princeton
University Press, 1996 ISBN 0691021376
What a wonderful world: music videos in architecture Groningen: Groninger Museum / Dienst Ruim-
telijke Ordening Gemeente Groningen, 1990
Xenakis / Nouritza Matossian London: Kahn & Averill, 1986 ISBN 0900707828
Jong, Klaas De., ed. Music, Space and Architecture. Trans. Billy Nolan. Amsterdam: Amsterdam
Academy of Architecture, 2012.
http://www2.cpdl.org/wiki/index.php/Spem_in_alium_(Thomas_Tallis)
http://www.charlespetzold.com/blog/2013/09/The-Immersive-and-Transcendent-Forty-Part-Motet.
html
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/03/21/opinion/arieff-the-search-for-silence.html?_r=2
JEREMY SHIMAN 99