Alderslade v. Hendon Laundry Ltd. (1945) 1 KB 189, 193 (CA).

B.V. Nagaraju v. Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. (1996) 4 SCC 674,

Modi Rubber Ltd. v. Guardian International Corp. 2007 (2) RAJ 556.
Freeth v. Burr [1874-80] All ER Rep 751
AKTION MARITIME CORPORATION OF LIBERIA v. S. KASMAS & BROTHERS LTD.
AND OTHERS [1987] 1 Lloyd's Rep 283.
SUMITOMO HEAVY INDUSTRIES LIMITED V OIL AND NATURAL GAS
CORPORATION LIMITED, 2010 11 SCC 296
MODI ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK AND ANOTHER v W.S.G. CRICKET PTE. LTD
(2003) 4 SCC 341
SWASTIK GASES PRIVATE LIMITED v. INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LIMITED [(2013) 9
SCC 32]
John Reginald Stott Kirkham v Trane US Inc [2009] 4 SLR(R) 428
Baker Hughes Singapore Pte v. Shiv-Vani Oil and Gas Exploration Services Ltd.
2015(1)ABR133
Assam State Electricity Board and Ors. v. Buildworth Pvt. Ltd., AIR 2017 SC 3336.
NTPC Ltd. v. Deconar Services Pvt. Ltd., AIR 2021 SC 2588.
State of West Bengal v. Pam Developments Pvt. Ltd.MANU/WB/1044/2016
M/S Venkateswara Minerals v. Jugalkishore Chiranjitlal, AIR 1986 Kant 14
Tan Ah Boon v. State of Johore, AIR 1936 PC 236
M/s. Halliburton Offshore Services Inc v. Vedanta Limited & Anr, (O.M.P (I) (COMM.) No.
88/2020 & I.A. 3696-3697/2020
Shiv Kirpal Singh v. V.V. Giri, AIR 1970 SC 2097.
Orissa Textile Mills Ltd. and Ors. v. Ganesh Das Ramkishun, AIR 1961 Pat 107
Titanium Tentalum Products Ltd. v. Shriram Alkali & Chemicals, (2006) 3 RAJ 253 (Del)
Kamal Krishna Kundu Chowdhury v. Chattoorbhuj Dassa and Ors. 78 IC 962
Barclay v. Messenger [1874] 43 L.J. Ch. 449.
Haji Fakir Mohammed v. Shaik Abdulla,12 Bom 658 at p. 672 (F)
Bhudar Chandra v. Betts AIR 1916 Cal 901 at p. 902 (E).
H.P. Gupta v. Hiralal AIR 1971 SC 206
Kirke La Shelle Co. v. Paul Armstrong Co., 2 263 N.Y. 79, 188 N.E. 163 (1933)
Narendra Lal Khan v. Manmotha Ranjan Pal and Ors, AIR 1919 Cal 1000
Tan Ah Boon v. State of Johore, AIR 1936 PC 236
Deva Builders v. Nathpa Jhakri Joint Venture, 2002 (3) ShimLC 11
D.L.F. Universal Limited v. Atul Limited, (2010) 51 GLR 762
Deva Builders v. Nathpa Jhakri Joint Venture, 2002 (3) ShimLC 11
Chilean Nitrate Sales v. Pansuiza Compania de Navegacion SA (The Hermosa) & Marine
Transportation Co [1982] 1 Lloyd's Rep 570;
(1956) 19 MLR 26. (1961) 77 LQR 98
(2015) 27 SAcLJ 438-461
Also HALSBURY’S LAWS OF ENGLAND, 4th Edn., Vol. 9, para 481.
INDIAN CONTRACTS ACT, 1872, S. 50
Chitty on Contracts, twenty-eighth edn, p 1097, para 22-001
INDIAN CONTRACT ACT, S. 73
14 of the Moot Proposition.
INDIAN CONTRACTS ACT, 1872, S. 39.
INDIAN CONTRACTS ACT, 1872, S. 41.
Clause 6, JWA
Mulla, Indian Contracts Act, Chapter VI Of the Consequences of Breach of Contract.

Clause 6 of the JWA

INDIAN CONTRACTS ACT, 1872, S. 55
INDIAN CONTRACTS ACT, 1872, S. 7(1)
Artcile 2.1.6 UNDROIT PRINCIPLES
A.G. Guest, Fundamental Breach of Contract, .
L.W. Melville, The Core of a Contract,
Avatar Sing, Contracts and Specific Relief, Page 79.
ICA, 39
ICA, 55
Avatar Singh, Contracts and Specific Relief, 12th ed. Page 91
Anti-suit Injunctions Issued by Arbitrators by Emmanuel Gaillard, INTERNATIONAL
COUNCIL FOR COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION 2006:
BACK TO BASICS?
Anti-suit injunctions in aid of international arbitration,
, Also see, Interim Reliefs in Arbitral Proceedings Powerplay between Courts and Tribunals
January 2020 (Nishith Desai)