A growing number of people feel that animals should not be exploited by

people and that they should have the same rights as humans, while others
argue that humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs,
including uses for food and research.
Discuss the arguments in favour of both these positions and state your own
position on the issue.

Animal exploitation is part of the trade, goods, services and food that humans
consume, in spite of, in my point of view i’m part of those who claim there must be
limits or a sort of control against mass animal violence, but human rights cannot be
the same as animals these are resources that nature gives us as a provision, this
refers to analyzing to whom the benefit was granted of misuse, on account of this
mess and how it is possible continue these common activities with the use of
animals.
First of all the food industry and laboratories as involved, which commonly use
animals as their main resource, norms and regulations are made to limit or do not
allow acts of violence against animals for fun or aesthetics, eitheral trying makeup
on rabbits or condemn immoral acts on animals. This has an impact on the
ecosystem that puts species at risk and also the environment in which they are,
however, in the food industry violence and abuse is not the central theme, since
they do not use endangered species and have more control as for the process of
your meat. For this reason, it depends on whether the animal is a resource or a
fundamental part of the ecosystem. Since the rights of animals cannot be equal to
those of humans because even animals are part of the human food chain, what is
not correct is to evade all morals against species that should not be part of it.

In sum up, the abuse against animals must be controlled, although it need to
defend their dignified life, it is not logical to consider in my concept that human
rights are equal for animals, since many of the effects to satisfy humans also
satisfy animals for their due care.