Theanalysisf r

om theCommonweal t
hConstit
uti
onisthati
tdoesnotonlydet erminestheduti
es
andpower soft hegover
nmentbutitalsoembodiesr
ightsofpeopl
e.Forinstance,ini
ti
allyt
he
ri
ghtofsuffragewasexclusiv
elyexer
cisedbymen.Howev er,twoyear
saf t
ert headoptionof
theconst
itution,TheNati
onalAssemblyext
endedthi
sr i
ghtstowomen.(Arti
cl eV.Sec.1)

Itcanbeseent
hatt
heCommonweal
thConst
it
uti
onf
avor
swomen`
spar
ti
cipat
ioni
nPhi
l
ippi
ne
poli
ti
cs.

[however
,therei
ssti
lli
nequal
i
typresentinthe1935const
ituti
onwit
hregar
dstother
ight
sof
suffr
agebecauseiti
sli
mitedonl
ytoi ndi
vidual
swhoareli
terateort
hosewhocanbeableto
readandwr i
te]

Apar
tfr
om that
,Dur
ingCommonweal
ther
a,Fi
l
ipi
nosbenef
it
edf
rom t
heAmer
icanpol
i
cyort
he
Actt
hathasbeenpassedcal
l
edt
he

Or
gani
cactwhi
chai
dst
heFi
l
ipi
nosdur
ingt
hatt
imet
opr
otectt
hei
rbasi
cri
ght
s

Fil
i
pinosduringCommonweal t
hera,somehowwasabl etoexerci
seandexperi
encedemocr acy.
ThroughtheOr gani
cActthepeopl
ebenefi
ttedfrom i
tbecausethedemocracywasi nt
roduced
tothepeople.Democracywasmadeappl i
cabletoall
theciti
zenofthePhi
li
ppines.Thr
ought hi
s
passedAct,itaidst
heFil
ipi
nostoprot
ectandf r
eel
yexercisethei
rri
ght
s.Thishasgavebirthto
whatweknownowasBI LLOFRIGHTS