Professional Documents
Culture Documents
INTRODUCTION
The bundle of right of a person over a thing gives him ownership of the thing and the control so
exercised by the person over that thing makes the thing the property of that person. The
concept of ownership is of both legal and social interest. Not only have court utilized the idea in
such a way as to give effect to views of changing individual and social interest, bur so great are
its potentialities that in recent times it has become the focus of government policy.
Etymological and legal meaning
The earliest known use of the word ‘owner’, according to Maitland, quoting Dr. Murray,
occurred in 1340, and ‘ownership’ in 1583. ‘Early law’ says Holdsworth, ‘does not trouble itself
complicated theories as to the nature and meaning of ownership and possession.
First, the conception of the possession came into being, and then the conception of the
ownership came into being, and then ownership developed due to changes in the economic
structure of the society. In Roman law, as well as in ancient Hindu law, possession and
ownership were recognized as two separate and distinct conception.
Hindu Law
The law of prescription, bailment, and sale without ownership, under the ancient Hindu laws,
was based on the distinction of possession and ownership. The ancient Hindu lawgivers like
Manu, Yajnavalakya, Vyasa, and Narada pointed out that possession of landed property for
twenty years, and of chattels for ten years, by a person created title by prescription. Possession
was proof of ownership through pure title. As regards to the sale without ownership, Narada
and Yajnavalakya said that when an article or a chattel has been sold by a person who is not the
owner, the rightful owner should obtain it from the purchaser.
The concept of ownership which is highly developed one in the ancient laws of the Hindus has
been spoken of as a special capacity produced by the acts of purchase, acceptance, and the
inheritance, gain, purchaser, conquest, investment of Health, employment.
Definition of Ownership
Austin- “a right indefinite in point of user unrestricted in point of disposition and unlimited in
point of duration over a determinate thing.”
According to Austin, there are three elements of ownership-
Indefiniteness in point of user
He says, no one can exhaustively enumerate the various ways in which the owner may make
use of his property. Bur unrestricted user in all system of laws is qualified by the law of nuisance
in accordance with the maxim ‘sic utereturat alienum leadas’ (so use your own property as not
injure your neighbors). Again, an owner’s indefinite user is restricted by encumbrances in
favour of other persons and again limited by any restriction which the state may care to impose
in the interest of community by such statues as Town planning Acts, etc.
Unrestricted in point of disposition
He says, the owner can make any kind of alienation, whether by way of gift, sale, exchange or
lease or in any other manner permitted by the law. But it is not true in any system of law, such
as, in English law, the inheritance (family provision) Act of 1938. In India, the Marumakkathyam
law, alienation of ancestral immovable property in Mitakshra law. In Germany, division of small
farms beyond a particular limit is not permissible. Further, the Government may acquire any
property for public purposes irrespective of the owner’s dissent.
“Ownership in most comprehensive sense denotes relation between a person and a right that is
invested in him.”
Thus, according to Salmond, ownership is, therefore, ‘incorporeal’. He then went to say that to
speak of the ownership of physical objects is a figure of speech. What is meant is that certain
claims are vested in a person.
Duguit has criticized Salmond’s definition and asserted that what a person really owns is a
‘thing’ and not a ‘right’. Cook has characterized Salmond’s definition of ownership as an
‘unnecessary confusion’.
Analysis of ownership
The main rights of ownership are there-
1. The right of possession of the property owned,
2. The right of enjoyment of the property; it includes the power to deal with the property
as the owner pleases (in accordance with the manner prescribes)
3. The power to dispose of the property.
There are certain restrictions upon the property; it includes the power to use it.
Article 19 of the constitution says-
All citizens shall have the right,
The state cannot deprive anyone of the property owned by him except in the manner and for
the purpose prescribed by law.
• Ownership in English law can only be vested in a person.
• Ownership is needed to give effect to the idea of ‘mine’ and ‘not mine’ or ‘thine’. One
aspect of it is that the idea becomes necessary only when there are some relations
between persons.
• The right of ownership comprises benefits and burdens. The former consists of claims,
liberties, powers, and immunities, but the advantage these gives are curtailed by duties,
liabilities, and disabilities.
• Ownership is a social institution. The extent of the rights, privileges, powers, and
immunities that are exercisable by an owner reflect the social policy of the legal system.
• Ownership arises only in such a way as are specified by each legal system, as, in classical
Roman law for the transfer of ownership in certain kinds of things, special ceremonies
were required.
• Ownership is a source of social power. Social reformers, notably those who accept the
teaching of Karl Marx of ownership.
In the Bank Nationalization case 1970, Supreme Court held that property includes not only
tangible things but also intangible things, (Rustom Cavasjee Cooper v. Union Of India (1970 AIR
564, 1970 SCR (3) 530). Likewise, the Supreme Court has held privy purses as property within
the meaning of Article 19 and 31 of the constitution.
Kinds of Ownership
On the basis of English law, the ownership is classified in the following ways:
In contingent ownership, the property is owned conditionally. It means that the investitive facts
are incomplete, but it may be completed in the future. Till then the ownership is contingent and
when the required condition is fulfilled, it becomes complete or vested.
In India, a vested or contingent interest takes place on a transfer of property, is given in the
place on a transfer of property, is given in the ‘Transfer of Property Act (Act IV of 1882)
In Shashi Kanta v. Pramod Chandra (A.I.R. 1932 Cal. 609), their lordship of the Calcutta High
Court pointed out the distinction between a vested and contingent interest
Method of Ownership
Broadly speaking, there are two modes of acquiring, namely,
1. Original;
2. Derivative.
Original
Original acquisition of ownership takes place when ownership is acquired by some personal
acts on the part of the acquirer. It is of three kinds-
Absolute– when a thing is acquired which has no previous owner (res nullius), it is done in two
ways-
• Occupation – for a thing of which there is no owner, as a bird in the air and a fish in the
water, the general rule of Roman law that the first occupier became the owner. In
Roman law, the property obtained by conquest was treated as res nullius, and therefore
it rules applied. Manu recognized conquest as a mode of acquisition. And also, if anyone
found the treasure on its land, he took whole.
• Specification- If a person by working upon a material belonging to another made it into
something new, he became the owner of the new product. For ex- if a sculptor made a
statue. There are no such rules in modern times.
Extinctive- when a person by some act on his ownership of the previous owner and acquires its
ownership himself, it is called extinctive acquisition. For example, acquisition of ownership by
prescription is 12 years in India.
Accessory- This is called accessory acquisition that is when the ownership of a property is
acquired by way of accession to some existing property. Examples are produced of land or
animals or fruits of trees. Manu has termed this mode of acquisition as ‘property’ which means
acquiring by accession.
Derivative Acquisition
when ownership is derived from a previous owner, it is called derivative acquisition of
ownership. It takes place when ownership is acquired by inheritance or gift or purchase etc.
2. Ownership cannot be last without the consent of the owner whereas accident may be
lost either by accident or by the wrongful act of another.
3. There may be ownership without possession of a debt which is capable of being owned
but not possessed.
Conclusion
Like other countries recognizes the right to ownership in property in India. It is guaranteed and
protected right by the Constitution (300A). The right of ownership is subjected to many
statutory laws and regulations e.g., sale and transfer of land, land reforms act. The town
planning and slum clearance legislation acquiring urban land for public purposes the
landholding ceiling legislation which regulates the possession laws as other laws derived from
English law, although we had legacy of that laws.