You are on page 1of 5

1.

Name of the student: UPADHYE PRADEEP VARDHAMAN

2. Date of Registration: 29th September 2017

3. Whether the candidate

is attending regularly: Yes

If not, give reason:

4. Name of the guide: ASST. PROF.S.B.PATIL

5. Title of the work: REJECTION ANALYSIS AND IMPROVEMENT IN CASTING OF


PUMP COVER 0143133677 BY TAGUCHI METHODS.
6. Period of report: AUGUST 2019 – NOVEMBER 2020

7. Details of the work done: This Progress Report 1 contains the work done between the

month of December 2019 to January 2020 which was carried

out by following the guidelines given by guide and Activity

described in Activity Chart.

7.1 January 2020

7.1.1 Work Aimed – “To optimize the pouring Temperature of Cover 678”.

7.1.2 Activity performed –

I. Experimental Setup for different Temperature.

II. Collecting The data.

7.1.3 Experimental Set up


As per recommendation reset up experiment for the temperature between 1250°c-1350°c

7.1.3.1 Result

Sr. Group of Temperature Result After Machining of

No. 20Nos

1 1250°c -1350°c 19 Nos

7.1.3.2 Summery
So After Result we getting that the Temperature is in Between 1250°c to 1350°c is correct

and if the temperature will increases the amount of gas trapped also increases which cause the

blow hole generation in the casting surface


8.1 February 2020

8.1.1 Work Aimed – “To Analysis and remove the Wall issue.”

8.1.2 Activity performed –

I. Collection of data where wall thickness issue occurs.

II. Implementing Corrective Action for Cure this Issue.


8.1.2.1 Collection of data where wall thickness issue occurs.

Give Numbering to the each Wall and Measuring 15Nos for the Tracing the Part location where

the wall thickness is off

There is 15Pointof wall thickens which is to measure where gauge is ok or not

OK = NOGO and GO will pass

NOT OK = NOGO and Go will not pass


LOCATION
PART
L-
NO. L-1 L-2 L-3 L-4 L-5 L-6 L-7 L-8 L-9 L-10 L-11 L-12 L-14 L-15
13
NOT NOT NOT NOT
1 OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK
OK OK OK OK
NOT NOT
2 OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK
OK OK
NOT NOT
3 OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK
OK OK
NOT NOT
4 OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK
OK OK
NOT NOT
5 OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK
OK OK
NOT NOT NOT NOT
6 OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK
OK OK OK OK
NOT NOT
7 OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK
OK OK
NOT NOT
8 OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK
OK OK
NOT NOT NOT NOT
9 OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK
OK OK OK OK
10 OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK
NOT NOT
11 OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK
OK OK
NOT NOT NOT NOT
12 OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK
OK OK OK OK
NOT NOT
13 OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK
OK OK
NOT NOT
14 OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK
OK OK
NOT NOT
15 OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK
OK OK

8.1.3 CONCLUSION

From the data analysis we found that the location at the L-4 and L-14 are quite similar as well as
L-5 and L-10 also similar so we conclude that wall thickness issue will occure from the core
sliding in the moluld

You might also like