Date ODUCHONS Vs. TUPGE CH PULONG 460 scra 305 commercial viewing of tne propercd motion picture entitied “the four day evolution” the MREG and Remas Bo vignitred the approval gf thc Intended film production. Enrile did not BPRFOve OF iF Bnd he will MDF SPPYOVE the WE, BPpropiotin Fepreduchion sed exhiition of his name and famity Invoking Wnt right 40 privacy: Wenether oF not facedem of exprewien of the Product! on wos violated: Precdom of vpecch and expression include: tre frecdem 4o Film 2nd produce motion Pictures and exhibit motion Pichuees IN theaters or to drphue them through tele Puttrermore the Citcumst ance thet the productions mation pioture Films ie 9 commercial retivity expected to yield monetary Profit, Ar not @ Aiea vi cetion for Qvailing freedom of speech and of cEPression. The projected motion picture Wes a yet Uncmpleted and Merce any Pdience. There was mo words no “clear and present danger” of any Violation of any right $2 Privacy.