Date
ODUCHONS Vs. TUPGE CH PULONG
460 scra 305
commercial viewing of tne propercd motion picture entitied
“the four day evolution” the MREG and Remas Bo vignitred
the approval gf thc Intended film production. Enrile did
not BPRFOve OF iF Bnd he will MDF SPPYOVE the WE, BPpropiotin
Fepreduchion sed exhiition of his name and famity Invoking Wnt
right 40 privacy:
Wenether oF not facedem of exprewien of the Product! on wos
violated:
Precdom of vpecch and expression include: tre frecdem
4o Film 2nd produce motion Pictures and exhibit motion
Pichuees IN theaters or to drphue them through tele
Puttrermore the Citcumst ance thet the productions mation
pioture Films ie 9 commercial retivity expected to yield
monetary Profit, Ar not @ Aiea vi cetion for Qvailing
freedom of speech and of cEPression. The projected motion
picture Wes a yet Uncmpleted and Merce
any Pdience. There was mo words no “clear and present danger”
of any Violation of any right $2 Privacy.