Professional Documents
Culture Documents
TaU*p**»J r -
COLLEGE OF LAW S cM atei Tkiwaday Rao« 3M 7M -9iM F a
N a 9 Ctatrm] At o m , DHm *, Qmemm City aid Saturday Room 310 lr00-l«!*®»*
PROPERTY
f S E M - S - Y . 2018-2019
I. Overview of Claes
A. Coverage
a. Law on Property (NCC Arts. 414-773; 1106-1138)
B. Reading Materials
a. Civil Code of the Philippines
b. Jurisprudence and other relevant reference materials
II. Methodology
A. Reporting
B. Case method/Recitation
C. Quizzes and Exams
B. Exam
a. Midterm Exam (30%)
b. Final Exam (40%)
IV . Rule*
Page 1 of i
r
COURSE OUTLINE
g O T H T T ; « f f l ” TWH
B. AS TO OW NERSHIP
1. Res nullius
2. Public domain (cf. Patrimonial) (Arts. 419/420422,424)
a. Property of state-art 420422
i. For public use
ii. For public service
iii. For development of national wealth
b. Property of municipal corporations Art 424, par 1
i. For public use including public worts for public service
3. Private property
i. Patrimonial property of state-Art 424
ii. Patrimonial property of municipal corporations art 424, par 2
iii. Private property of private persons -art 425, par 2
4. Effect and significance of classification of property as property of
public dominion
a. Property outside the commerce of man
b. Property cannot be the subject of acquisitive prescription
c. Property cannot be attached or levied upon in execution
Page 2 o f*
M.W M U t M U R IU M M IIK IIW «U> * *M »t h t a m f M.
COUXV* OR LAW *WA«k IW *« r *•
Mitral «M feuife) »Uo- JI«M» IIM m
C. OTHER CLASSIFICATION
5. By reason of designation
a. Generic
b. Specific
7. Susceptibility to appropriation
a. Non appropriable
b. Appropriable
8. Susceptibility to commerce
a. Within the commerce of man
b. Outside the commerce of man
II. OWNERSHIP
A. Definitions
Ownership- It is the independent right of exclusive enjoyment and
control of a thing for the purpose of deriving therefrom ail the
advantages required by the reasonable naeds of the owner (or holder of
the right) and the promotion of the general welfare, but subject to the
restrictions imposed by law and rights of others ( JBL Reyes).
Pige 3 of 8
r
NSW LKA UNO UtMTY INSTRUCTOR: Ally, Rabta C. Taiaapaa. Jr.
COLLCUK OF LAW Scfcmtaic: Tfcwifey Ram M 7M-9Mpm
tm4 Saturday Ham IIS I M - I I M u
8. Bundle of rights Included In Ownership Art 429 -Jus utendl, fruendl
abutendl, disponendi, vindicandi, possidendl.
E. Right to Accession
1. Concept Art 440
2. General Principles of Accession
a. Accessory follows the principal
b. No unjust enrichment
c All works, sowing and planting are presumed made by owner and at
his expense, unless contrary is proved.
d. Accessory incorporated to principal such that it cannot be separated
without injury to work constructed or destruction to plantings,
construction or works-Art 447
e. Bad faith involves liability for damages and other dire consequences
f. Bad faith of one party neutralizes bad faith of the other - art 453
g. Ownership of fruits - to owner of principal thing: exceptions: i.
possession in good faith U) I usufruct iii) in tease iv) in antichresis
h. Obligations of receiver of fruits to pay expenses by 3rd person in
production, gathering, and preservation - art 443
i. Kinds of accession
1. Accession discreta
a. Natural
b. Industrial
c. civil
2. Accession continua
a. Over immovables
1. Artificial or industrial- building, planting,
sowing(bps)
2. Natural
a. Alluvium-art 457
b. Avulsion-
c Change in course of river-art 461-463
d. Formation of Wands-art 461-465 see PD
1067 Water Code
3. Other Movables
a. Conjuction and adjunction
b. Commotion and confusion
Page 4 ofS
N t» u u iM V tK S m
COLLEGE o » law
N*. * ( tm tn l Avraat, DiUaaa, Qmaam O y
c Specification
j. Quieting of Title
i. Differences between action to quiet title and action
ii. Prescription of action-imprescriptible if plaintiff is in possession; If
not, prescribes within period for filing action publidana, action'
reinvidicatoria
iii. Who are entitled to bring action? Rule 64 sec 1 par 2, rules of
court
iv. Notes
1. There is a cloud in title to real property or any Interest to
real property (art 476)
2. Plaintiff has legal or equitable tile to or interest in the
subject/real property
3. Instrument record claim etc must be valid and binding on
Its face but in truth and in fact invalid, in effective,
voidable or unenforceable
4. Plaintiff must return benefits received from defendant
III. CO-OWNERSHIP
i. DEFINITION
The right of common dominion which two or more persons have
in a spiritual part (or ideal portion) or a thing which is not
physically divided.
ii. Characteristics
1. The recognition of ideal shares, defined but not physically
identified
2. Each co-owner has absolute control over his ideal share
3. Mutual respect among co-owners in regard to use,
enjoyment and preservation of thing as a whole
iii. Differences between co-ownership and joint tenancy.
iv. Differences between partnership and co-ownership
v. Sources of co-ownership
a. Law
b. Contract
c. Succession
d. Chance (commixtion, hidden treasure)
e. Occupation (harvesting and fishing)
vi. Rights of each co-owner as to thing owned in common
vii. Implications of co-owners right over his ideal share
viii. Rules on co ownership not applicable to conjugal partnership of
gains or absolute community of property
ix. Special rules on ownership of different stories of a house as
differentiated from provision of condominium, (act 4726)
x. Extinguishment f co-ownership
IV. POSSESSION
Page 5 o ft
r
»KW IMA U M V U SITY
COLLEGE OF LAW W *m *TO Ik AU)r KaWa C. TaUapM. Jr
Na.9 ( t a t r a l A* Tfcaofcy I m MM TitMiiOfM
M4 aMwiay R « « )!•
V. USUFRUCT
A. Concept-Art 562
Usufruct is a real right, temporary in character that authorizes the holder to
enjoy all the advantages derived from a normal exploitation of another's
property, according to its destination or purpose, and imposes an obligation
of restoring at the time specified, either the thing itself or its equivalent
B. Historical Considerations
C. Characteristics of usufruct
D. Usufruct distinguished from lease; from servitude
E. Casses of usufruct
F. Rights of usufructuary
G. Rights of the naked owner
H. Obligations of usufructuary
I. Special cases of usufruct
J. Extinguishment of usufruct (art 603)
Page 6 of I
r
M W U U L M V lJ tS m
college or law M n w a O S ) AM,- U m C. T a U a » u . J r.
* ( ratrai Avraac. DUiaaa. Q m h m CHy k M r i n Thandajr Ki m MS pm
•M telarWay fe w * J i t t i t t - l M t a a
VII. NUISANCE
A. Voluntary M odes
1. Abandonment
2. Alienation
3. Voluntary destruction
B. Involuntary M odes
1. Fortuitous loss or destruction
2. Accession contlnua
3. Rescissory actions
4. Judicial decree
5. By operation of law
Page 7of 8
* * w EUA IfNIVWUUlV
<t>ui!U( or »-^w DWT»UCTO« i Any. KOTm C. TatoapM . Jr.
No. » ( ratral Avcmiw, I City ■«**■••* T W irfjy lUwa JOT
••4 U lartU y iUwa J |* I O T K M m
LIST OF CASES
1. BERKENKOTTER VS CU UNJIENG 61 PHIL 663 ( Immovable/Movable)
2. TU M ALAD VS VICENCIO, 2 1 S C R A 143 (Immovable/Movable)
3. NAVARRO VS PINEDA, 9 SCRA 631 (Immovable/Movable)
4. SERGS' PRODUCTS VS PCI LEASING AN D FINANCE INC, 338 SCRA S04, 22 AUG
2000 (Immovable/Movable)
5. DAVAO SAW MILL VS. CASTILLO 61 PHIL 709 (Immovable/Movable)
6. MO N TAN O VS INSULAR GOVERNMENT, 12 Phil. 572 (Public/Prlvate Land)
7. LAUREL VS GARCIA, GR NO 92013,15 JULY 1990 (Public/Private Land)
8. G EM INIANO ET AL VS CA, GR 120303, 24 JULY 1996 (Art 448/Builder in good
faith)
9. M ENDOZA VS DE GUZMAN , 52 Phil. 164 (Builder In bad faith)
10. V DA DE NAZARENO VS COURT OF APPEALS, 257 SCRA 589 (Public/Private Land)
11. AGUSTIN VS IAC, GR NO 66075, 05 JULY 1990 (Accretion)
12. GRANDE VS COURT OF APPEALS, 115 Phil. 521 (Alluvion)
13. GALA VS RODRIGUEZ, 70 PHIL 124 ( Co-ownership)
14. ADILLE VS. CA, GR 44546, 29 JANUARY 1988 (Co-ownership)
15. PARDELL VS BARTOLOME, 23 Phil 450 (Co-ownership)
16. GUILLEN VS CA, G.R. No. 83175, Dec. 4,1989 (Co-ownership)
17. DE GARCIA VS CA, 37 SCRA 129 (Possession)
18. DIZON VS. SUNTAY, 47 SCRA 16 (Possession)
19. EDCA PUBLISHING AND DISTRIBUTING CORP VS SANTOS, GR 80298, 26 April
1990 (Possession)
20. DIZON VS SUNTAY, 47 SCRA 16 (Possession)
21. CHUA KAi VS KAPUNAN, 104 Phil. 110 (Possession)
22. V DA DE ALBAR VS FABJE 106 PHIL 855 (Usufruct)
23. GABOYA VS. CUI, 27 SCRA 85 (Usufruct)
24. GARGANTOS VS TAN YANON, 108 Phil 888 (Easement/Servitude)
25. VALDEZ VS TABISULA, GR 175510, 28 July 2008 (Easement/servitude)
26. STERNBERG VS SORIANO, 41 Phil 210 ( Easement/Servitude)
27. LOCSIN VS CUMACO, 26 SCRA 816 (Easement/Servitude)
28. REMEGIO RAMOS, SR. VS GATCHAUAN REALTY, INC., ASPREC, ET AL, G.R. NO.
75905, October 12,1987 (Easement/Servitude)
29. VELASCO VS MANILA ELECTRIC CO. 40 SCRA 342 (Nuisance)
30. HIDALGO ENTERPRISES VS BALANDAN, 91 PHIL 488 (Nuisance)
31. MAGLASANG VS HEIRS OF CORAZON CABATINGAN, GR 131953, 05 June 2002
(Donation)
32. PUIG VS PENAFLORIDA, 15 SCRA 276 (Donation)
33. HEMEDES VS CA ET AL GR 107132,08 October 1999 (Donation)
34. KAPUNAN VS CASILAN, 109 PHIL 889 (Donation)
35. ABRAGAN VS DE CENTENERA, 46 PHIL 213 (Donation)
Page I of S