You are on page 1of 7

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/232739359

Spectrophotometric determination of trace amounts of phosphate in water


and soil

Article  in  Water Science & Technology · October 2012


DOI: 10.2166/wst.2012.468 · Source: PubMed

CITATIONS READS

35 40,178

6 authors, including:

Sandeep Ganesh Fahmida Khan


Hogeschool Utrecht National Institute of Technology Raipur
33 PUBLICATIONS   168 CITATIONS    66 PUBLICATIONS   457 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE

N.K. Pandey Kamachi Mudali U.


Indira Gandhi Centre for Atomic Research VIT Bhopal University
105 PUBLICATIONS   469 CITATIONS    624 PUBLICATIONS   8,120 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE

Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:

Rotary semi continuous dissolver View project

design optimisation of annular centrifugal extractors View project

All content following this page was uploaded by N.K. Pandey on 03 February 2014.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.


2653 © IWA Publishing 2012 Water Science & Technology | 66.12 | 2012

Spectrophotometric determination of trace amounts


of phosphate in water and soil
S. Ganesh, Fahmida Khan, M. K. Ahmed, P. Velavendan, N. K. Pandey
and U. Kamachi Mudali

ABSTRACT
S. Ganesh
A simple spectrophotometric method has been developed for the determination of phosphate
P. Velavendan
dissolved in soil and water. The method is based on the formation of phosphomolybdate with added N. K. Pandey
U. Kamachi Mudali
ammonium molybdate followed by reduction with hydrazine in acidic medium. Orthophosphate and Reprocessing Group,
Indira Gandhi centre for atomic research,
molybdate ions condense in acidic solution to give molybdophosphoric (phosphomolybdic) acid, Kalpakkam, 603102,
India
which upon selective reduction (perhaps with hydrazinium sulphate) produces a blue colour, due to
Fahmida Khan (corresponding author)
molybdenum blue of uncertain composition. The intensity of blue colour is proportional to the
Department of Chemistry,
amount of phosphate. If the acidity at the time of reduction is 0.5 M in sulphuric acid and National Institute of Technology,
GE Road, Raipur, 492010,
hydrazinium sulphate is the reductant, the resulting blue complex exhibits maximum absorption at India
E-mail: fkhan.chy@nitrr.ac.in
830 nm. The system obeys Lambert–Beer’s law at 830 nm in the concentration range of 0.5–5 μg/mL
M. K. Ahmed
of phosphate with a relative standard deviation (RSD) of 0.1% and correlation coefficient of 0.99. Nuclear Fuel Complex,
4 –1 –1
Molar absorptivity was determined to be 2.9 × 10 L mol cm at 830 nm. The method is also Hyderabad 500 062,
India
applicable for the determination of phosphate in nuclear reprocessing plants, medical science,
clinical science, agriculture, metallurgy and environmental science.
Key words | ion chromatography, molybdenum blue, phosphate, soil, spectrophotometry, water

INTRODUCTION

Phosphorus is the most abundant element on the surface phosphorus. The two most widely recognized procedures for
of the earth and is most commonly found as phosphate. determination of phosphate in soil are the sodium carbonate
It plays an important role in biochemical processes and fusion method and the perchloric acid digestion method
is a key factor in the eutrophication of surface water (Mendham et al. ). In recent years large quantities of phos-
(McCarty et al. ). Plants and animals depend on phos- phate have been used in beverages, detergents, fertilizer and
phate to perform photosynthesis and to respire. Increased also in sugar industries. Hence very sensitive analytical
phosphate concentrations are linked with increasing rates methods are required for the determination of phosphate in
of plant growth (Yaqoop et al. ). In soils, phosphate is soil and water. Analytical methods have been proposed for
usually insoluble, due to it being bound to calcium, iron, the determination of phosphate at higher concentrations
and aluminum, or incorporated into organic matter – using titrimetry (Susic et al. ) and complexo-gravimetry
human and animal wastes or decaying matter. Usually (Mamadal & Kundu ). At ppm levels of phosphate,
the concentration of phosphate in the water from low fer- methods suggested include colorimetry (Krishnamurthy &
tilized soils or forest soils is only a few (μg/mL) Suryanarayana ; Williams et al. ), atomic absorption
micrograms per mL (Kempers ). The analytical chem- spectroscopy (Christian & Feldman ), flow injection analy-
istry of phosphate is very important in many fields, for sis (Motomizu & Mitsuko ), high-performance liquid
example, medicine, clinical science, agriculture, metal- chromatography (HPLC) (Botker et al. ), ion chromato-
lurgy and environmental science (Motomizu et al. ). graphy (IC) (Ruiz-Calero & Galceran ; Nollet )
The determination of the phosphate in soil requires the and spectrophotometry (Hayashi et al. ; Borissova &
solubilization of phosphorus through the decomposition/ Mitropolitska ; Motomizu et al. ; Gutschik ;
destruction of materials in soil containing mineral and organic Smeller ; Mahadevaiah et al. ). Among such
doi: 10.2166/wst.2012.468
2654 S. Ganesh et al. | Spectrophotometric determination of phosphate in water and soil Water Science & Technology | 66.12 | 2012

methods, spectrophotometry involving molybdovanadate and Ion chromatographic conditions


ammonium molybdate is the most commonly used method. In
the spectrophotometric method using ammonium molybdate, Ion chromatograph: Metrohm modular Ion chromato-
different reductants such as tin (II) chloride (Yathirajam & graphy system
Dhamija ), ascorbic acid (Theodore ), hydrazine sul- Analytical column: Metrosep A Supp 5-250, 250 mm
phate (Mendham et al. ; Carter & Gregorich ), and L × 4.0 mm ID
1-amino-2-naphthol-4-sulfonic acid (Burton ) have been
Guard column: Metrosep A Supp 4/5
employed; some of these methods also involve complicated
Eluent concentration: 3.2 mM Na2CO3 þ 1.0 mM NaHCO3
and expensive equipment and need an extraction procedure
Eluent flow rate: 0.7 mL/min
(Botker et al. ) and such techniques are usually not avail-
Pressure: 13.5 MPa
able in common laboratories. Therefore, a standardized,
sensitive, simple spectrophotometric procedure to be used in Detector: Suppressed conductivity
routine process control analysis was required. Analytical mode: Isocratic
Injection loop: 20 μL
W
Temperature: Ambient (25 C)
Run time: 28 min
EXPERIMENTAL
Quantitation: Peak area
Reagents

Reagents used, namely potassium di-hydrogen phosphate,


PROCEDURE
ammonium molybdate and hydrazine sulphate, were of
analytical reagent grade obtained from M/s Sarabhai M
To suitable aliquots of stock standard solution, 1 mL of
chemicals, Baroda, India. Water double distilled in glass
ammonium molybdate and 0.4 mL of hydrazine sulphate
was used. To start the process 14.325 mg of (100 μg/mL)
were added and the solution was made up to 10 mL with
potassium dihydrogen phosphate was weighed and trans-
double distilled water in a standard measuring flask. The
ferred into a 100 mL standard measuring flask; it was
standard measuring flasks were kept in a water bath for heat-
dissolved in water and then diluted to the mark with distilled
ing for 30 min. The temperature of the water bath was set to
water. Then 1.7081 g of ammonium molybdate was dis- W
60 C. While heating, a blue colour develops due to the for-
solved in about 150 mL of warm water; a slightly milky
mation of ammonium phosphomolybdate complex. After
solution resulted which was cooled to room temperature.
heating for 30 min the solution was cooled and its
It was then transferred into a 250 mL standard volumetric
absorbance was measured at wavelength 830 nm. An exper-
flask and diluted to the mark with water. Then 0.125 g of
imental blank solution was used for carrying out correction
hydrazine sulphate was transferred into a clean 100 mL
for the baseline.
beaker. It was dissolved in about 50 mL of water and then
Water and soil samples were collected from various
the solution was transferred into a 100 mL standard measur-
locations in Chhattisgarh State, India. A water sample was
ing flask. The beaker was washed three to four times with
filtered through Whatman filter paper and collected. Ali-
water and washings were also transferred into the flask
quots of the sample were used for its phosphate analysis.
and the solution was diluted to the mark with water.
Soil samples were digested, filtered and used for phosphate
Nitric acid (3.0 M) was prepared by suitable dilution of con-
analysis. In the perchloric digestion method, 2 g of accu-
centrated nitric acid (∼16 M) with double distilled water.
rately weighed soil sample was taken in a 250 mL
Erlenmeyer flask and heated in a hot plate or by using an
Instrumentation aluminum block digestor with a 250 mL digestion tube,
then 20 mL of concentrated nitric acid was added into the
A UV-VIS Spectrophotometer UV5704SS was used for flask and mixed well. To achieve oxidation, the organic
W
absorbance measurements. The wavelength range of this matter in the sample was heated to approximately 130 C.
spectrophotometer is 340–900 nm. All the absorbance Organic matter oxidation was complete when the dark
measurements were recorded by placing the sample tube colour due to organic matter in the sample disappeared.
containing the solution. The soil-HNO3 mixture was allowed to cool slightly. In
2655 S. Ganesh et al. | Spectrophotometric determination of phosphate in water and soil Water Science & Technology | 66.12 | 2012

the HClO4 fume hood, 30 mL HClO4 was added to the give molybdophosphoric (phosphomolybdic) acid, which
sample at boiling temperature ∼200 C for 20 min. During
W
upon selective reduction (perhaps with hydrazinium sul-
that time dense white fumes appear and the insoluble solid phate) produces a blue colour, due to molybdenum blue of
material is left in the bottom of the flask. When necessary, uncertain composition. The intensity of blue colour is pro-
a little extra HClO4 was used to wash down any black par- portional to the amount of phosphate initially
ticles that had stuck to the sides of the flask. After incorporated in the heteropolyacid. If the acidity at the
allowing the mixture to cool for another 10–15 min, the mix- time of reduction is 0.5 M in sulphuric acid and hydrazi-
ture was transferred to a 250 mL volumetric flask and made nium sulphate is the reductant, the resulting blue complex
up to the mark with distilled water. Sediment was allowed to exhibits maximum absorption at 820–840 nm (Carter &
settle before taking the aliquot for analysis. Gregorich ):
From these solutions, a suitable aliquot was taken and
þ 72Hþ ! 7[PMo12 O40 ]
1 mL of ammonium molybdate and 0.4 mL of hydrazine 6 3
7PO3
4 þ 12[Mo7 O24 ] þ 36H2 O
sulphate were added, it was made up to the mark with 3
2[PMo12 O40 ] ! P2 O5  24MoO3 þ 6NH3 ↑ þ3H2 O
water in a 10 mL flask and heated for 30 min in a water
W
bath maintained at 60 C. After blue colour developed,
the solution was cooled and its absorbance measured at Controlled heating in a water bath alone provided the
830 nm as mentioned above. All solutions, namely exper- uniform colour development and consistent results. Under
imental blanks, standards and unknown samples were optimized experimental conditions, with fixed concen-
run in duplicate. tration of molybdate and reducing agent, the colour
intensity was found to be proportional to the amount of
Ion chromatography phosphate present in disodium hydrogen phosphate. The
reaction conditions, as well as the various experimental par-
In order to compare the results obtained by spectrophoto- ameters affecting the formation and stability of the coloured
metric analysis with those of the ion chromatographic complex, were carefully investigated and optimized for
technique, experiments were conducted for the determi- quantitative determination of phosphate in various samples.
nation of phosphate present in environmental samples by The experimental variables such as concentration of
the IC technique using a conductivity detector. Various ammonium molybdate and concentration of reducing
phosphate standards of known concentrations (0.1–10 μg/ agent, order of addition of the reagents and also colour stab-
mL) were prepared by dissolving standard potassium di- ility of the complex were optimized for the effective
hydrogen phosphate (KH2PO4) in Millipore water. Twenty determination of phosphate (Ganesh et al. ). Figure 1
microlitres of these solutions were injected directly into provides the data on the optimum quantity of 0.7%
the IC column connected to the conductivity detector. A
mixture of 3.2 mM sodium carbonate and 1.0 mM sodium
bicarbonate solution is used as a mobile phase with a flow
rate of 0.7 mL/min. A calibration graph was made for the
concentration range of inorganic phosphate from 0.1 to
10 μg/mL with an RSD of 2.239% and a correlation coeffi-
cient of 0.9994. Unknown samples were filtered and 20 μL
injected directly into the IC column for the determination
of phosphate concentration.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The developed method is based on the formation of phos-


phomolybdate complex due to the reaction between
molybdate and phosphate, followed by its reduction with
hydrazine sulphate in aqueous acidic medium. Orthopho-
sphate and molybdate ions condense in acidic solution to Figure 1 | Effect of ammonium molybdate.
2656 S. Ganesh et al. | Spectrophotometric determination of phosphate in water and soil Water Science & Technology | 66.12 | 2012

ammonium molybdate needed for effective determination of


phosphate. In this experiment, the different volumes of
ammonium molybdate were added to the solution contain-
ing a constant volume of 0.4 mL hydrazine sulphate and
1.3 ppm of phosphate. From the figure, it was obvious that
1 mL of 0.7% ammonium molybdate is enough to determine
the presence of phosphate. When higher volumes of
ammonium molybdate were added, there was no change
in absorbance. The maximum volume of hydrazine sulphate
required for the determination of phosphate is presented in
Figure 2. From this it was found that 0.4 mL of 0.12% hydra-
zine sulphate is sufficient for reduction and even if the
volume of hydrazine sulphate is increased beyond 0.4 mL
this has no effect on the phosphate estimation. The colour
is stable with no difference in absorbance being detectable
when phosphate standards were kept for up to 24 h. Figure 3
Figure 3 | Calibration graph for phosphate ion at 830 nm.
shows the calibration graph obtained at the wavelength of
maximum absorption at 830 nm for standard phosphate sol-
utions. At this wavelength the system obeys Lambert–Beer’s Table 1 | Typical results of phosphate in soil

law in the concentration range of 0.5–5.0 μg/mL of phos-


S. No Absorbance Conc. of phosphate (μg/mL)
phate. Molar absorptivity was determined to be 2.9 × 104
S-1 0.892 2.942
L mol–1 cm–1. Results obtained by using this methodology
and instrumentation for the determination of phosphate in S-2 0.928 3.061

soil/water samples are reported in Tables 1 and 2. The S-3 0.609 2.001
results obtained are reproducible with a standard deviation S-4 0.525 1.732
of 0.1% and correlation coefficient of 0.9995. The metal S-5 0.198 0.637
ions such as Mg2þ, Ca2þ, Mn2þ, Co2þ, Ni2þ, Zn2þ, Cd2þ, S-6 0.325 1.072
Pb2þ, Hg2þ, Fe3þ, Al3þ, Cr3þ and UO2þ 2 do not interfere S-7 0.389 1.283
with the determination of phosphate in concentrations up S-8 0.274 0.904
to 100 μg/mL. The presence of more than 500 molar S-9 0.468 1.544
amounts of As5þ can be tolerated by adding hydrazine S-10 0.555 1.831

Soil samples were collected from various sites located in Chhattisgarh state, India.

Table 2 | Typical results of phosphate in water

S. No Absorbance Conc. of phosphate (μg/mL)

W1 0.411 1.356
W2 0.292 0.963
W3 0.310 1.022
W4 0.642 2.118
W5 0.788 2.600
W6 0.175 0.577
W7 0.243 0.802
W8 0.364 1.201
W9 0.511 1.685
W10 0.812 2.678

Figure 2 | Effect of hydrazine sulphate. Water samples were collected from various sites located in Chhattisgarh state, India.
2657 S. Ganesh et al. | Spectrophotometric determination of phosphate in water and soil Water Science & Technology | 66.12 | 2012

sulphate solution (Ohashi et al. ). The accuracy of the Table 3 | Comparison of two different analytical techniques

present method was checked by determining phosphate in


Concentration of phosphate (μg/mL)
various samples by both the present method and by an inde-
pendent technique, namely, IC. A typical chromatogram and Ion-chromatographic
S. No. Present method technique
a calibration curve are shown in Figures 4 and 5. The results
obtained for phosphate by the proposed method and by the 1 3.588 3.609
IC method agreed well within the limits of experimental 2 1.080 1.107
error and are reported in Table 3. 3 4.111 4.230
4 2.218 2.275
5 0.803 0.717
CONCLUSION 6 0.140 0.132

A modified spectrophotometric method for the determi-


nation of phosphate in soil is proposed. It is simple, fast of phosphate in sediments, soil, plants and ores as well as in
and accurate. On the basis of recent investigations, this biological materials such as urine and blood serum.
method shows potential for application to the determination

REFERENCES

Borissova, R. & Mitropolitska, E.  Spectrophotometric


determination of phosphate ions with the system cerium (III)-
Arsenazo III. Talanta 26, 543–547.
Botker, H. E., Kimose, H. H., Helligso, P. & Nielsen, Y. T. 
Analytical evaluation of high energy phosphate
determination by high performance liquid chromatography
in myocardial tissue. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 26, 41–48.
Burton, J. D.  Problems in the analysis of phosphorous
compounds. Water Res. 7, 291–307.
Carter, M. R. & Gregorich, E. G.  Soil Sampling and Methods
of Analysis, 2nd edition. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group,
London, p. 265.
Christian, G. D. & Feldman, F. J.  Determination of nonmetals
Figure 4 | Typical ion chromatogram for phosphate ion. by atomic absorption spectrophotometry. Anal. Chem. Acta
40, 173–179.
Ganesh, S., Velavendan, P., Nair, B. S., Selvi, T., Ahmed, M. K. &
Geetha, R.  IGC Technical Report-302. Indira Gandhi
Centre for Atomic Research Internal Technical Report,
Kalpakkam, India.
Gutschik, V. P.  Occurrence of consistent nM levels of
phosphate in doubly demineralized and demineralized-
distilled water. Talanta 32, 93–94.
Hayashi, K., Dazuka, T. & Ueno, K.  Spectrophotometric
determination of phosphate using lanthanum chloranilate.
Talanta 4, 244–249.
Kempers, A. J.  Determination of submicroquantities of plant-
available phosphate in aqueous soil extracts. Plant Soil 42,
423–427.
Krishnamurthy, K. & Suryanarayana, A. V.  New spot test for
phosphate. Fresenius Z. Anal. Chem. 312, 546–546.
Mahadevaiah, M. S., Yokendra, K., Mansour, S., Abdul, G.,
Suresha, M. S., Sathish, M. A. & Nagendrappa, G.  A
simple spectrophotometric determination of phosphate in
sugarcane juices, water and detergent samples. E. J. Chem. 4,
Figure 5 | Calibration graph for phosphate ion by the ion chromatographic (IC) technique. 467–473.
2658 S. Ganesh et al. | Spectrophotometric determination of phosphate in water and soil Water Science & Technology | 66.12 | 2012

Mamadal, S. & Kundu, D.  J. Indian Chem. Soc. 82, 1030– Ruiz-Calero, V. & Galceran, M. T.  Ion chromatographic
1031. separations of phosphorus species: a review. Talanta 66,
McCarty, C., McCarty, P. & Parkin, G. F.  Chemistry for 376–410.
Environmental Engineering and Science, 5th edition. Tata Smeller, J. M.  Comparison of sample preparation methods for
McGraw-Hill Publishing Company Ltd., Noida, p. 677. the spectrophotometric determination of phosphorus in soil
Mendham, J., Denney, R. C., Barnes, J. D. & Thomas, M.  and coal fly ash. Analyst 120, 207–210.
Vogel’s Text book of Quantitative Chemical Analysis, 6th Susic, S. K., Njengovan, V. N. & Solaja, B. Z.  Űber die
edition. Longmans, London, pp. 473 and 672. Verwendung von Hexamethylentetramin zur
Motomizu, S. & Mitsuko, O.  Spectrophotometric gravimetrischen Trennung dreiwertiger Kationen von den
determination of phosphorus as orthophosphate based on zweiwertigen. Z. Anal. Chem. 183, 412–416.
solvent extraction of the ion associate of molybdophosphate Theodore, G. T.  Determination of aqueous phosphate by
with malachite green using flow injection. Analyst 112, ascorbic acid reduction of phosphomolybdic acid. Anal.
295–300. Chem. 58, 223–229.
Motomizu, S., Wakimoto, T. & Kyoji, T.  Solvent extraction- Williams, K. E., Haswell, S. J., David, A. B. & Preston, G. 
spectrophotometric determination of phosphate with Determination of total phosphate in waste waters by on-line
molybdate and malachite green in river water and sea-water. microwave digestion incorporating colorimetric detection.
Talanta 31, 235–240. Analyst 118, 245–248.
Nollet, M. L. N.  Handbook of Water Analysis, 2nd edition. Yaqoop, M., Nabi, A. & Paul, J. W.  Determination of
CRC Press, Taylor and Francis Group, London, 284 pp. nanomolar concentrations of phosphate in fresh waters using
Ohashi, K., Enomoto, T. & Yamamoto, K.  Dual-wavelength flow injection with luminal chemiluminescence detection.
spectrophotometric determination of trace amounts Anal. Chimica Acta. 510, 213–218.
of phosphate in the presence of large amounts of Yathirajam, V. & Dhamija, S.  Extractive separation and
silicate using molybdenum blue. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 54, spectrophotometric determination of tungsten as
1889–1890. ferrocyanide. Talanta 24, 317–321.

First received 24 December 2011; accepted in revised form 27 June 2012

View publication stats

You might also like