Descriptive chart

Presentado por

CRISTIAN LEANDRO CASTRO GARCIA 670290

ADRIANA KATHERINE CLAROS COQUECO ID: 596802

MAYRA ALEJANDRA SÁNCHEZ BAHAMÓN ID: 641072

DOCENTE:

GINNA TATIANA

NRC. 8333

COORPORACION UNIVERSITARIA MINUTO DE DIOS

UNIMINUTO- NEIVA

2020-2
 ANALYSIS OF ARTICLES ACCORDING TO ESTABLISHED CRITERIA

Article title: _ Qualitative research to study the suicide attempt

in young people from Tabasco

APA standards reference: Ángela B. Martínez G1; Enrique Guinsberg B2 1 Doctorado en Ciencias en Salud

Colectiva. Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana- Xochimilco, México. Correo electrónico:

angelabeatrizma@gmail.com 2 Psicólogo, Maestro en Ciencias de la Comunicación. Doctor en Estudios

Latinoamericanos Comunicador e investigador del Departamento de Psicología, Universidad Autónoma

Metropolitana-Xochimilco, México. Correo electrónico: gbje1567@correo.xoc.uam.mx

Analysis chart:

Place a * if this criterion

is found, or an X if it
Elements was not included,
justify why not.
¿Is the general narrative logical and congruent? *

¿Is the document in order? *

¿Are all the necessary sections included? *

¿Is the wording appropriate for the readers or users of the report?
no, he explains very
confused, there are
some parts that are
not understood
¿Are transitions included between paragraphs? (spin paragraphs, sections, *
etc.).
¿Have yos checked for spelling, punctuation, and possible errors? *

¿Are the steps detailed when entering the environment or context? *

¿Are the cases defined and the sampling strategy detailed? *

¿Are the instruments for collecting the data explained and is their choice *
justified?
¿Is the data collection process detailed? *

¿Are the guides or protocols for interviews, observation, topics, etc. included?
no, there is only the
(in annexes)
 report of the article

as such

¿Were categories and topics illustrated with quotes or segments? *

¿Were the categories and topics related to each other in a coherent way to
no, as I said to
obtain a higher level of analysis and abstraction?
some things that
are not well
understood, it is a
bit tangled
¿Were graphical elements used appropriately to achieve a better visualization
no, nothing is shown
of the results? (tables, graphs and figures, as well as images and video)
above mentioned

¿Were the study products detailed? (development of a model or theory, an

No, almost
action plan, concrete measures, etc.)
everything, except

the concrete

measures

¿Are the strategies to achieve rigor in the study mentioned? (validate the *
results)

LINK
https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=12027106