Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1. What are the factors to consider in determining attorney’s fees? (Canon 20, Rule 20.01)
- The TIME spent and the EXTENT of the SERVICES rendered;
- The NOVELTY and DIFFICULTY of the QUESTIONS involved;
- The IMPORTANCE of the SUBJECT MATTER;
- The SKILL demanded;
- The PROBABILITY OF LOSING OTHER EMPLOYMENT as a result of acceptance of
the proffered case;
- The CUSTOMARY CHARGES for similar services and the SCHEDULE OF FEES of
the IBP chapter to which he belongs;
- The AMOUNT INVOLVED IN THE CONTROVERSY and the BENEFITS resulting to
the client from the services
- The CONTINGENCY or CERTAINTY of COMPENSATION;
- The CHARACTER OF EMPLOYMENT whether occasional or established and
- The PROFESSIONAL STANDING of the lawyer
2. What are the two concepts of attorney’s fees?
- Ordinary Concept: Is the reasonable compensation paid to a lawyer for the legal
services he has rendered to a client. The BASIS of the compensation is the FACT OF
EMPLOYMENT by the client.
- Extraordinary Concept: An attorney’s fees is an indemnity for damages ordered by
the court to be paid by the losing party to the prevailing party in a litigation. The
BASIS of this is any of the CASES AUTHORIZED BY LAW and is payable not to the
lawyer but to the client, unless they have agreed that the award shall pertain to the
lawyer as additional compensation or as part thereof.
3. What is the legal basis of a lawyer’s right to demand compensation?
- The FACT OF EMPLOYMENT as lawyer by the client. No formal contract is
necessary to effectuate employment.
4. What is the rationale of Adequate Compensation?
- Adequate compensation is necessary in order to enable the lawyer to serve his client
effectively and to preserve the integrity and independence of the profession.
- The protection of attorney’s lien by the court is necessary to preserve the decorum
and respectability of the profession.
5. Is there a specific form needed for a lawyer’s contract of employment?
- No. The contract may either be oral or express.
- The contract is ORAL when the counsel is employed without a written agreement,
but the conditions and amount of attorney’s fees are agreed upon. The written
agreement is not necessary to prove a client’s obligation to pay attorney’s fees.
- It is EXPRESS when the terms and conditions including the amount of fees, are
explicitly stipulated in a written document which may be a private or public
document.
6. When is the proper time to fix attorney’s fees?
- At the commencement of the lawyer-client relationship
7. When is a contract of employment IMPLIED?
- When there is no agreement, whether oral or express but the client ALLOWED the
lawyer to render legal services not intended to be gratuitous without objection and
the client is benefitted by reason thereof
8. What is the effect of an unjustified dismissal of an attorney?
- The lawyer shall be entitled to recover from the client full compensation stipulated in
the contract.
9. What are some situations when counsel cannot recover full amount despite a written
contract for attorney’s fees?
- When there is a justified dismissal of the attorney, the contract will be nullified and
payment will be on the basis of quantum meruit.
- When the stipulated attorney’s fees are in excess of what is expressly fixed by law.
- When the counsel’s services are worthless because of his negligence.
10. What are the kinds of payment which may be stipulated?
- A fixed or absolute fee which is payable regardless of the result of the case;
- A contingent fee that is conditioned to the securing of a favourable judgment and
recovery of money or property and the amount which may be on a percentage basis;
- A fixed fee payable per appearance;
- A fixed fee based on piece work
11. What is a RETAINER?
- This is the act of the client by which he employs a lawyer to manage for him a cause
to which he is a party; or otherwise to advise him as counsel.
- Retainer is also used to refer to the fee which the client pays his attorney, whom he
retains, that is, the retaining fee.
12. What are the kinds of Retainer Agreements on Attorney’s Fees?
- General Retainer or Retaining Fees: is the fee paid to a lawyer to secure his future
services as general counsel for any ordinary legal problem that may arise in the
ordinary business of the client and referred to him for legal action.
- Special Retainer: Fee for a specific case or service rendered by the lawyer for a client
13. What is a Champertous Contract?
- It is where the lawyer agrees to spend for all the litigation expenses in consideration
for a bigger percentage as fees on the property subject of litigation. It is void for
being against public policy.
14. When is Quantum Meruit authorized?
- When there is no express contract for payment of attorney’s fees agreed upon
between the lawyer and the client;
- When although there is a formal contract for attorney’s fees, the fees stipulated are
found unconscionable or unreasonable by the court
- When the contract for attorney’s fees is void due to purely formal matters or defects
of execution
- When the counsel, for justifiable cause, was not able to finish the case to its
conclusion
- When the lawyer and the client disregard the contract for attorney’s fees and place
themselves as though there was no express stipulation as to the attorney’s fee
15. Can legal interest be imposed upon attorney’s fees?
- No. Legal services stand upon an entirely different footing from contracts for the
payment of the compensation for any other services.
16. Are attorney’s fees always awarded in cases?
- No. There is a policy stating that no premium should be placed on the right to
litigate. In Labor Cases, the attorney’s fees should not exceed 10%.
IV. QUIZZES:
A. QUIZ # 1 (CANONS 20-22)
1. When is recovery of attorney’s fee on the basis of quantum meruit
authorized?
a. There is no express contract for payment of attorney’s fees agreed upon between the
lawyer and the client
b. When although there is a formal contract for attorney’s fees, the fees stipulated are
found unconscionable or unreasonable by the court
c. When the contract for attorney’s fees is void due to purely formal matters or defects of
execution
d. When the counsel, for justifiable cause, was not able to finish the case to its
conclusion
e. When lawyer and client disregard the contract for attorney’s fees.
2. What are the two kinds of retainer agreement?
a. General Retainer – is the fee paid to a lawyer to secure his future services as general
counsel for any ordinary legal problem that may arise in the ordinary business of the client
and referred to him for legal action.
b. Special Retainer – is a fee for a specific case or service rendered by the lawyer for a client.
3. What are the factors in determining attorney’s fee?
A lawyer shall be guided by the following factors in determining his fees
a. the time spent and the extent of the service rendered or required;
b. the novelty and difficulty of the questions involved;
c. The importance of the subject matter;
d. The skill demanded;
e. The probability of losing other employment as a result of acceptance of the proffered
case;
f. The customary charges for similar services and the schedule of fees of the IBP
chapter to which he belongs;
g. The amount involved in the controversy and the benefits resulting to the client from
the service;
V. ADDITIONAL NOTES:
1. Executive Pardon
A. In re: Marcelino Lontok
- The cases are not altogether clear as to just what effect a pardon has on the right of a
court of disbar an attorney for conviction of a felony. On close examination, however,
it will be found that the apparent conflict in the decisions is more apparent than real,
and arises from differences in the nature of the charges on which the
proceedings to disbar are based. Where proceedings to strike an
attorney's name from the rolls are founded on, and depend alone, on a
statute making the fact of a conviction for a felony ground for
disbarment, it has been held that a pardon operates to wipe out the
conviction and is a bar to any proceeding for the disbarment of the
attorney after the pardon has been granted. (In re Emmons [1915], 29 Cal.
App., 121; Scott vs. State [1894], 6 Tex. Civ. App., 343). But where proceedings
to disbar an attorney are founded on the professional misconduct
involved in a transaction which has culminated in a conviction of felony,
it has been held that while the effect of the pardon is to relieve him of the
penal consequences of his act, it does not operate as a bar to the
disbarment proceedings, inasmuch as the criminal acts may
nevertheless constitute proof that the attorney does not possess a good
moral character and is not a fit or proper person to retain his license to
practice law. (People vs. Burton [1907], 39 Colo., 164; People vs. George
[1900],186 Ill., 122; Nelson vs. Com. [1908],128 Ky., 779; Case of In re ————
[1881],86 N.Y., 563.)
- The celebrated case of Ex parte Garland [1866], 4 Wall., 380, is directly in point. The
petitioner in this case applied for a license to practice law in the United States courts,
without first taking an oath to the effect that he had never voluntarily given aid to
any government hostile to the United States, as required by statute. The petitioner, it
seems, had been a member of the Conferate Congress, during the secession of the
South, but had been pardons by the President of the United States. It was held, buy a
divided court, that to exclude the petitioner from the practice of law for the offense
** Keyword ni sir: Professional Misconduct, In re: Gutierrez 5 SCRA 663, Pineda, pp. 447**
2. MCLE
A. Compliance:
- The initial compliance period shall be from April 15, 2001 up to April 14, 2004. All
succeeding compliance periods shall begin the day after the end of the preceding
compliance period. The initial compliance period for members newly admitted or
readmitted to the IBP shall begin on the first day of the month of admission or
readmission and shall end on the same day as that of all other members.
B. Compliance Procedure/Failure to comply:
- Each member not otherwise exempt under the Rules or whose exempt status the
Committee may take judicial notice of, shall secure from the MCLE Committee a
Compliance Card before the end of his compliance period. He shall complete the
card by attesting under oath that he has complied with the education requirement or
that he is exempt, specifying the nature of the exemption. Such Compliance Card
must be returned to the Committee not later than the day after the end of the
member’s compliance period
- Each member shall maintain a sufficient record of compliance or exemption, copy
furnished the MCLE Committee. The record or certificate issued by the provider to
all participants identifying the time, date, location, subject matter and length of the
activity shall be a sufficient record of attendance at such participatory activity. A
record of non-participatory activity shall also be maintained by the member.
Problem Areas in Legal Ethics, Judge Bellosillio Page 11
Dumaual, Jeanne Pauline 2018-2019
-
If a lawyer fails to comply with any requirement under the Rules, the Committee will
send him/her a notice of non-compliance on any of the following deficiencies:
o Failure to complete the education requirement within the compliance period;
o Failure to provide attestation of compliance or exemption;
o Failure to provide satisfactory evidence of compliance (including evidence of
exempt status) within the prescribed period;
o Failure to satisfy the education requirement and furnish evidence of such
compliance within sixty (60) days from receipt of a non-compliance notice;
and
o Any other act or omission analogous to any of the foregoing or intended to
circumvent or evade compliance with the MCLE requirements.
o A member failing to comply with the continuing legal education requirement
will receive a Non-Compliance Notice stating his specific deficiency and will
be given sixty (60) days from the receipt of the notification to explain the
deficiency or otherwise show compliance with the requirements. Such notice
shall be written in capital letters as follows:
YOUR FAILURE TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE JUSTIFICATION FOR
NON-COMPLIANCE OR PROOF OF COMPLIANCE WITH THE MCLE
REQUIREMENT WITHIN 60 DAYS FROM RECEIPT OF THIS NOTICE,
SHALL BE A CAUSE FOR LISTING YOU AS A DELINQUENT MEMBER
AND SHALL NOT BE PERMITTED TO PRACTICE LAW UNTIL SUCH
TIME AS ADEQUATE PROOF OF COMPLIANCE IS RECEIVED BY THE
MCLE COMMITTEE.
- The Member may use the 60-day period to complete his compliance with the MCLE
requirement. Credit units earned during this period may only be counted toward
compliance with the prior compliance period requirement unless units in excess of
the requirement are earned, in which case the excess may be counted toward
meeting the current compliance period requirement.
- A member who is in non-compliance at the end of the compliance period shall pay a
non-compliance fee of P1,000.00 and shall be listed as a delinquent member of the
IBP by the IBP Board of Governors upon the recommendation of the MCLE
Committee, in which case Rule 139-B of the Rules of Court shall apply
3. Notarial Practice
- Signature Witnessing: The term signature witnessing refers to a notrial act which an
individual on a single occasion:
1. Appears in person before the notary public and presents an instrument
or document;
2. Is personally known to the notary public or identified by the notary
public through competent evidence of identity as defined by these
Rules; and
3. Signs the instrument or document in the presence of the notary public
- Disqualifications: A notary public is disqualified from performing a notarial act if
he:
1. Is a party to the instrument or document that is to be notarized;
2. Will receive, as a direct or indirect result, any commission, fee,
advantage, right, title, interest, cash, property, or other consideration,
except as provided by these Rules and by law; or
3. Is a spouse, common-law partner, ancestor, descendant, or relative by
affinity or consanguinity of the principal within the fourth (4 th) civil
degree.
- Refusal to Notarize: A notary public shall not perform any notarial act described in
these Rules for any person requesting such an act even if he tenders the appropriate
fee specified by these Rules if:
The notary knows or has good reason to believe that the notarial act or
transaction is unlawful or immoral;
The signatory shows a demeanor which engenders in the mind of the
notary public reasonable doubt as to the former’s knowledge of the
consequences of the transaction requiring a notarial act; and
In the notary’s judgement, the signatory is not acting of his or her own
free will
4. What is the difference between direct contempt and indirect contempt? (Funa Book,
pp 162, Lorenzo Shipping Co, vs. Distribution Management Association of the
Philippines, G.R. No. 155849)
- Indirect or constructive contempt, the contemnor may be punished only after charge
in writing has been filed, and an opportunity given to the accused to be heard by
himself or counsel. It is wilful disobedience of the law process or order of the court.
- Direct Contempt, on the other hand, the respondent may be summarily adjudged in
contempt. The judgment in cases of indirect contempt is appealable whereas in cases
of direct contempt only judgments of contempt by MTCs, MCTCs, and MeTCs are
appealable. It is committed in the presence of or so near the judge as to obstruct him
in the administration of justice.