Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Problem 4
I. OBLIGATIONS S sold a parcel of land to B for P240,000 payable in
CHAPTER 1- General installments of P20,000 a year. The land was delivered to B
Provisions who obtained ownership thereof. After B had paid P200,000,
Problem 1
CHAPTER 4 – Extinguishment of Obligations T (third person) tells C (creditor) that T will pay the
debt of D (debtor). C agrees. Is D released from his obligation
Problem 1 to C?
D (debtor) owes C (creditor) P10,000 with G as Problem 2
guarantor. On the due date of the obligation, T, a third person, Suppose in the above problem, D proposed to C that
offered to pay the obligation of D. Can C legally refuse to T would substitute D as the new debtor to which C agreed. Is
accept the payment? How about an offer of payment from G? D still liable to C in case of insolvency of T?
Problem 2
M (maker) issued a promissory note for P10,000 in
favor of P (payee) who lost the note which was found by T II. CONTRACTS
who demands payment from M. M did not know that the note CHAPTER 1 – General Provisions
was lost by P. Is M justified in paying T?
Problem 1
A and B entered into a contract not specifically
CHAPTER 4, Section 2 – Loss of the Thing provided in the Civil Code. Is the contract valid and binding.
Problem 2
Due Problem 2 S (seller) and B (buyer) entered into a contract of
X obliges himself to deliver a specific thing to Y on a sale. It was agreed that the price shall be determined by T, a
certain date. The thing was lost by X without his fault and third person. Can S or B refuse to be bound by T’s
before he has incurred in delay. Does it mean that X is already determination of the price if he does not agree with the amount
exempt from liability? thereof?
Problem 3
Suppose in the preceding problem, the thing was lost
through the fault of Z, a third person. State the effect of the CHAPTER 2 – Essential Requisites of Contracts
loss as far as X, Y, and Z are concerned.
Problem 1
In a contract containing an option period, when is the Problem 2
offerer not allowed to withdraw his offer even before Suppose in the same example, S was intending to sell
acceptance by the offeree? When is the offerer allowed to his horse “Y”. Give the three (3) cases when he can ask for the
withdraw his offer even after acceptance? reformation of the contract.
Problem 5
Suppose in the same problem, what S sold to B,
hardware owner, are 500 bags of cement. S had every reason CHAPTER 5 – Interpretation of Contracts
to believe that the price of cement would go down. After two
weeks, it did go down. Has B the right to have the sale Problem 1
annulled? S sold to B his condominium unit “including all its
contents.” In the unit, there is an antique chair belonging to X
which X agreed to sell to S. Is the chair to be included in the
CHAPTER 2, Section 2 – Object of sale of the unit?
Problem 3
Contracts Problem 1 Suppose in the same problem, the professional fee
S sold to B for P100,000 a parcel of land belonging was agreed upon, but it is not clear from the written contract
to S located in his hometown without specifying its exact prepared by X upon the request of Y whether it should be the
location and area. Is the sale valid? fixed amount of P200,000 or 6% of the cost of construction.
Problem 2 How much is Y liable to pay?
S has several pigs. Under a contract of sale, S binds
himself to deliver a pig to a B for P30,000 if the pig has a
weight of at least 30 kilos. State the binding effect of the sale. CHAPTER 6 - Rescissible Contracts
Problem 1
CHAPTER 2, Section 3 – Cause of D owes C P100,000. Since D fails to pay, C
expressed its willingness to accept the car of D, with the same
Contracts Problem 2 value, more or less, in payment of his debt. D, in bad faith,
S sold to B a specific parcel of land for P500,000. B sold the car to X. Has C the right to ask for the rescission of
failed to pay. Has C the right to have the sale declared void by the sale?
the court on the ground of absence of cause for non-payment
of the price? CHAPTER 7 – Voidable Contracts
Problem 3
X grave P10,000 to Y who signed a receipt stating: Problem 2
“This is to acknowledge payment by X in the amount of In the same problem, suppose S, upon reaching the
P12,000.” X later complains that he received nothing from Y age of majority, decided to ratify or respect the contract. Has B
for the P10,000. Is Y bound to return the P10,000? the right to refuse the ratification and demand mutual
restitution of the property and the price?
CHAPTER 3, Form of Contracts
CHAPTER 8 – Unenforceable Contracts
Problem 1
S (seller) and B (buyer) entered into a contract of sale Problem 1
of a parcel of land. The sale is embodied only in a private I, an insane person, entered into a contract with M, a
document and not in a public instrument because it was not minor. What is the effect of ratification
acknowledge before a notary public as required by law. Is the (a) By either; and
sale valid? (b) By both, after becoming incapacitated?
Problem 2 Problem 3
In the same example, what rights, if any, are acquired S orally agreed to sell his piano for P7,000 to B who
by the contracting parties? made a partial payment of P1,000. Later, S denied there was
such a sale. Can B enforce the sale considering that the
CHAPTER 4 – Reformation of Instruments contract was oral and the price was more than P500?
Problem 1
S sold his horse “X” to B under a written contract of CHAPTER 9 – Void or Inexistent Contracts
sale. What B thought S was selling him is horse “Y”. Can S
ask for the reformation of the contract against the objection of Problem 2
B who is agreeable to the sale of horse “X”?
In consideration of P10,000 given bu X to Y, the
latter agreed to burn the house of Z. Later, X told refused. Is
X entitled to recover from Y?
Problem 2
M, a minor, bought a bicycle for P2,000 from N, who
is not a minor. Under the law, the contract is voidable because
M is incapacitated to give consent because of his minority.
Give the situation by reason of which M cannot recover the
P2,000 from N.
XYZ CASE
Assume you are Z, an ECE engineer. What will you
do, and why? Explain from both deontological and
teleological perspectives.
BAYANI CASE
Manuel Rizal and Bonifacio are both ECE engineers.
Rizal from MIT and Bonifacio from the other MIT. Bonifacio
also has an MBA from Ateneo. State the core ethics problem
then solve.