Professional Documents
Culture Documents
sciences
Article
The Effect of Accelerated Aging Conditions on the
Properties of Rigid Polyurethane-Polyisocyanurate
Foams Modified by Cinnamon Extract
Joanna Liszkowska 1, * , Krzysztof Moraczewski 2 , Marcin Borowicz 1 ,
Joanna Paciorek-Sadowska 1 , Bogusław Czupryński 1 and Marek Isbrandt 1
1 Department of Chemistry and Technology of Polyurethanes, Technical Institute, Faculty of Mathematics,
Physics and Technical Science, Kazimierz Wielki University, J. K. Chodkiewicza Street 30,
Bydgoszcz 85064, Poland
2 Department of Materials Engineering, Technical Institute, Faculty of Mathematics, Physics and Technical
Science, Kazimierz Wielki University, J. K. Chodkiewicza Street 30, Bydgoszcz 85064, Poland
* Correspondence: liszk@ukw.edu.pl; Tel.: +48-341-9382
Received: 30 May 2019; Accepted: 27 June 2019; Published: 29 June 2019
Keywords: rigid PU/PIR foam; DSC; FTIR; degradation; climatic chamber; flame retardant;
cinnamon extract
1. Introduction
The field of polyurethanes (PU) is one of the fastest growing fields of polymer technology. Intensive
research is conducted to modify their properties for meeting the requirements of customers [1]. Foams
used in civil engineering as construction or insulation materials require adequate strength, resistance to
aging and weather conditions, dimensional and thermal stability, and fire resistance [2,3]. The literature
presents issues related to the possibility of delaying the burning of foams, improving dimensional
stability, insulating and mechanical properties [4–6]. Possibility of modifying of polyol premixes by
biopolyols, improves some properties of PU foams [7–9]. Many renewable sources are used for the
development of polyurethane foams (PUF) and other PU products. Polyols, a raw material of PU
foam, have been also derived from different renewable sources, e.g., from vegetable oils, sugarcane
bagasse, and pine wood. These bioproducts are used to produce environmentally friendly PU products.
Additionally, ground coffee waste could be used in acid liquefaction polyhydric solvents (e.g., PEG
400/glycerol, 90/10 wt/wt) in the presence of sulfuric acid [10,11]. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA)
confirmed that these bio-based PUFs were thermally stable up to 190 ◦ C. Foams regained their original
shape even after 70% of creep compression, which showed their good elastic behavior. They can be
used as thermal and acoustic insulation, even in aeronautics.
Antioxidants (e.g., lactone-based, phenols in combination with phosphites or tioesters) could
decrease the scorch. A large number of factors may promote scorch in flexible foams: high water
content in the formulation, a high isocyanate index, FR additives, pigments, methylene chloride-based
blowing agent, high ambient humidity, collapsed foam layers, air flow, smaller size of cells, foam block
size, metal traces, hydroperoxides, or free ethylene oxide content of polyol. Pentabromodiphenyl oxide
blended with aromatic phosphates showed higher thermal and hydrolytic stability did not promote a
scorch of flexible PUFs [12].
Factors such as thermal, electrical, electrochemical aging, mechanical, environmental exposure,
and others have a significant influence on the decrease of the properties of insulating materials during
their handling. The phenomenon of decreasing properties with time lapse is called aging or lack of
resistance (durability) to climate change. In order to prevent it, additive agents (so-called antioxidants)
are added.
Aging of materials is structural changes occurring in the whole mass of the material, in the long
time. It usually leads to the decrease of their functional properties. The basic factors causing aging
are: temperature, sunlight, humidity, chemical agents, and microorganisms. The behavior of the
material under the influence of these factors during it using is difficult to predict [13,14]. It is difficult
to distinguish a dominant degradation factor during aging under natural climatic conditions, because
all of its affect simultaneously [15]. The most common changes occurring in the polymer during the
aging process are: crosslinking, oxidation (thermooxidation), degradation, and destruction.
The concepts of resistance and durability are very often used in the description of aging
materials. Hardiness is a material resistance that it puts into action by specific destructive chemical,
physico-chemical, physical, or biological factors. Durability is the average time after which the selected
material property becomes extremely permissive as a result of aging processes, i.e., it reaches a critical
level. The critical level is defined as the determined absolute value of the measured quantity or
the percentage change of this value in relation to its initial value. The aging time is also taken into
account [16].
Accelerated aging is the process that is most often carried out to estimate the resistance to a
decrease of the parameters of the tested material over time. This is a simulation of natural aging in a
shortened time. Subjecting plastics to accelerated aging causes a decrease in mechanical properties,
e.g., strength [3,17]. Aging of polyurethane foams is tested mainly by measuring changes of linear
dimension, geometric volume, and mass after 48 hours of thermostating in a dryer with forced
circulation [1,18]. The smallest change in dimensions or the volume of foam is extremely important in
using it as thermal insulation. Properly selected industrial insulation affects not only the saving of
energy costs, but also the correct operation of the technological installation [19].
PUFs’ aging can also take place under conditions of simulated solar radiation, so-called
photodegradation [9], and in a climatic chamber [20]. Polyphenols contained in cinnamon extract are
used also in cosmetics, coffee, tea or cocoa, and as anti-oxidants to prevent the aging process [21,22].
Phenolic antioxidants are used for polyolefins [23].
The aim of the study was to determine the effect of cinnamon extract in synergy with a flame
retardant (Antiblaze TCMP) on the structure, aging, and mechanical and functional properties of
RPU/PIR foams. The influence of this biofiller on the properties of foams without flame retardant was
also examined. Antiblaze TCMP contains in its composition chlorine and phosphorus [24], compounds
of this type are currently limited due to the negative impact on the natural environment [25].
In relation with the above, the possibility of replacing a commercial flame retardant with a
cinnamon extract (used until now in the cosmetics industry) has also been checked. The obtaining
polyurethane-polyiscoyanurate (RPU/PIR) foams were also subjected to an accelerated aging tests two
ways (air dryer and air conditioner) [26,27]. Among others, the analysis of foams before and after aging
Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 2663 3 of 23
in infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) and the analysis of their structure by scanning electron microscopy
(SEM) was also performed.
2.1. Materials
Rokopol RF-551, a sorbitol oxyalkylation product (PCC Rokita S.A., Brzeg Dolny, Poland),
was used as a reference polyol (hydroxyl number 420 mg KOH/g, molecular weight = 650 g/mol,
functionality 4,5), to prepare RPU/PIR foams. Catalytic system in the RPU/PIR formulation were
33% solution of anhydrous potassium acetate (Chempur, Piekary Ślaskie, ˛ Poland) in diethylene
glycol (Chempur, Piekary Ślaskie,˛ Poland), as a trimerization catalyst and 33% solution of
DABCO—1,4-diazabicyclo[2.2.2]octane (Alfa Aesar, Haverhill, MA, USA) in diethylene glycol—as a
polyurethane bond catalyst. The stabilizer of the foam structure was poly (oxyalkilene siloxane)
surfactant Tegostab 8460 (Evonik, Essen, Germany). Carbon dioxide produced in situ in the
reaction between water and isocyanate groups was a blowing agent. Furthermore, a commercial
flame retardant, Antiblaze TCMP—tris-(2-chloropropyl) phosphate (Albemarle, Charlotte, NC,
USA)—was added into some of the foams. The isocyanate raw material was a technical polymeric
diisocyanate Purocyn B (supplied by Purinova, Bydgoszcz, Poland), whose main component was
4,4’-diphenyl-methane-diisocyanate (MDI). The density of Purocyn B at a temperature of 25 ◦ C was
1.23 g/cm3 , viscosity was 200 mPas, and content of –NCO groups was 31.0%. Polyether and diisocyanate
were characterized in accordance with appropriate standards like ASTM D 2849-69 and ASTM D
1638-70. Cinnamon extract—CE (Agrema Sp. z o.o., Wroclaw, Poland)—was used as a physical
filler. According to the manufacturer information, this extract contains 5% of polyphenols. The main
polyphenols in the cinnamon extract were, respectively, chlorogenic acid, flavonoids, and phenolic
acids. In this biofiller are also metals in trace amounts (Table 1). The rest of the extract was an
inert carrier of the active substances (polyphenols) [28]. Cinnamon was analyzed by FTIR technique
(Figure 1). Cellulose in cinnamon comes from the bark of a cinnamon tree.
Compound Content
(a) polyphenols
Chlorogenic acid together
5%
Flavonoids
Phenol acids
heavy metals
lead 0.49 ppm
(b) cadmium 0.15 ppm
arsenic 0.81 ppm
mercury 0.09 ppm
chromium 1.06 ppm
chloride 0.51 ppm
sulphate 3.00 ppm
(c) carrier of the active substance (cellulose) about 94.9%
FTIR analysis of cinnamon (Figure 1) showed the presence of groups –OH (3346.25 cm−1 ) and
–C-H (2928.26 cm−1 , 1416.64 cm−1 , 1367.87 cm−1 , 848.63 cm−1 ) derived from –CH2 OH or from the ring
in cellulose; the aromatic ring (1631.68 cm−1 , 763.47 cm−1 , and 707.31 cm−1 ) derived from cellulose,
flavonoids, and phenol acids; and 1152.23 cm−1 represents the aromatic ether from flavonoids. –OH
groups can be largely derived from cellulose.
Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 2663 4 of 23
Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, x 4 of 23
127
128 Figure1.1.FTIR
Figure FTIRanalysis
analysisofofcinnamon
cinnamonextract.
extract.
mass ratios and poured into an open cuboidal mold with internal dimensions of 190 × 190 × 230 mm.
Two series of modified foams (C and CU) and two reference foams (W and WU) were obtained.
2.3. Methods
l − l0
∆l = ·100% (3)
l0
where l0 is the length of the sample before thermostating, according to the direction of foam rise (mm),
and l is the length of the sample after thermostating, according to the direction of foam rise (mm).
V − V0
∆V = ·100% (4)
V0
where V0 is the geometrical volume of the sample before thermostating (mm3 ), and V is the geometrical
volume of the sample after thermostating (mm3 ).
m0 − m
∆m = ·100% (5)
m0
Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 2663 6 of 23
where m0 is the mass of the sample before thermostating (g), and m is the mass of the sample after
thermostating (g).
where ma is the mass of the sample before burning test (g), and mb is the mass of the sample after
burning test (g).
Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 2663 7 of 23
Flammability was tested based on a marker method in accordance with the PN–EN ISO 4589-2:2006
standard by a Limited Oxygen Index Module apparatus (Concept Equipment, Phoenix Court,
Rustington, Great Britain). This test determined the boundary percentile volume of oxygen in a
mixture of oxygen and nitrogen needed for sustaining the burning of the sample 150 × 13 × 13 mm in
dimension. The limited oxygen index in percentage by volume of oxygen in the mixture is determined
from Equation (7):
[ O2 ]
LOI = ·100% (7)
[ O2 ] + [ N2 ]
where O2 is the volumetric flow rate of oxygen (m3 /h), and N2 is the volumetric flow rate of
nitrogen (m3 /h).
Another burning test was conducted by using the horizontal method according to the PN-78
C-05012 standard. This method marked the speed of surface flame spreading on a sample
150 × 50 × 13 mm dimensions, which was placed horizontally and exposed to a flame at one of
end. The flame was also from the burner fueled by the propane-butane gas mixture. The speed
of surface flame spreading is a speed at which the head of the flame moved on the surface of the
flammable sample. During the test the sample foam was placed on a net in a horizontal position and a
burner was placed at one side of the foam’s end for 60 s. A line was drawn across the 125 mm mark
from the side where the burner was placed. The distance of the flame and the time to reach the marked
line need to be noted. If the foam extinguishes before the flame reaches the marker, then the foam is
categorized as self-extinguishing. If the foam keeps burning, an average burning time of the marked
distance can be determined or the speed of flame spreading (in mm/s) based on the distance the head
of the flame covers in a specific time. Flammability of foams was classified according to PN–EN ISO
3582:2002.
2.3.10. Brittleness
Brittleness was measured according to ASTM C-421-61. Based on the quoted norm, brittleness
was calculated as a percentage weight loss of 12 foam cubes (shape of cubes with a side of 25 mm). The
brittleness test was carried out in a normalized device, which was a cubic chest made from oak wood
with dimensions 190 × 197 × 197 mm. This device was rotated around the axis at 60 rpm. The filling
of the chest consisted of 24 oak cubes with side length of 20 mm. The loss of foam weight in percent
reflected the value of its brittleness. This parameter was calculated on the basis of Equation (11):
m1 − m2
K= ·100% (11)
m1
where m1 is the mass of the sample before test (g), and m2 is the mass of the sample after test (g).
Ramsey, NJ 07446 USA. The device gives the average of three measurements L, a, and b. The difference
between the two colors in the space (∆E) was calculated according to Equation (12):
q
∆E = (∆L)2 + (∆a)2 + (∆b)2 (12)
where L is the vertical axis of the coordinate system defining the brightness; a is the axis of the
coordinate the amount of red (positive “a” values), the amount of green (negative “a” values); and b is
the axis expressing the amount of yellow color (positive values) or blue (negative values) in color.
347
348 (a)
349
350 (b)
351 Figure
Figure2.2.Photography
Photographyofoffoam
foamseries:
series:(a)
(a)C_0t
C_0tand
andCU_0t
CU_0tnot
notdegraded;
degraded;and
and(b)
(b)C_48h
C_48hand
andCU_48h
CU_48h
352 aged in a hot air dryer (48 h, 120 °C).
◦
aged in a hot air dryer (48 h, 120 C).
353 The surface color of foams, which were irradiated by UV rays in the climate chamber, was
354 changed from light yellow to orange (series C_1t on Figure 2). After that, the surface was exposed to
355 UV radiation, humidity, and temperature. The surface of C_1t and W_1t foams became brittle after
356 degradation than the surface of CU_1t and WU_1t foams. The following dependence was observed:
357 CU_0t foams not contained the flame retardant (FR) were more brittle than the C_0t foams that
Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 2663 11 of 23
Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, x 13 of 23
420
421 Figure 3. Foams of series 1t, degraded in the climatic chamber (one week).
Figure 3. Foams of series 1t, degraded in the climatic chamber (one week).
422
The surface color of foams, which were irradiated by UV rays in the climate chamber, was changed
423 Table 6. Compressive strength (CS) and compressive strength ratio (CV): CS_0t—measured before
from lightcondition;
424 yellow toCS_1t—measured
orange (series after
C_1tone-week
on Figure 3. After that, the surface was exposed to UV radiation,
condition.
humidity, and temperature. The surface of C_1t and W_1t foams became brittle after degradation
than the surface of CU_1t andFoam WU_1t foams. CS_0tThe followingCS_1t dependence CV was observed: CU_0t foams
(kPa) (kPa) (%)
not contained the flame retardant (FR) were more brittle than the C_0t foams that contained FR.
W 251.6 ± 6 140.5 ± 4 74.7 ± 2
Degradation caused the opposite effect. Crumbling of the surface of a series of foams (CU_1t, without
WU 361.4 ± 9 256.2 ± 6 70.9 ± 2
flame retardant after one weekC5 of degradation)
212.7 ± 6
slightly increased. 94.1
200.1 ± 5
Surface
±2
of C_1t foams subjected to
one week of degradation was much C10 more destroyed
160.4 ± 4 than the
143.9 ± 4surface of foams
89.7 ± 2 from before degradation
(C_0t). Based on the organoleptic C15assessment,
147.3 ±it 3could126.6be assumed
±4 that ±the
86.0 2 removal of flame retardant
from cinnamon-based foams should CU5 improve
121.4 ±the 3 strength
151.1 ±of4 the bonds
124.4 ± 3responsible for reducing the
crumbling of CU_1t foams in relation CU10 to the109.4 ± 2 series132.8
C_1t ±4
subjected to121.4
aging± 3in the climatic chamber. The
CU15 91.9 ± 2 109.6
color change can be caused by thermal-oxidation degradation of the foams ± 3 119.2 ± 3 surface, hence, the color
change in the case of thermostating (foams on Figure 3).
425 3.6. FTIR Analysis
Wirpsza [29] reports that PU obtained from aromatic MDI turn yellow under the influence of
426 Susceptibility
light. Colorful to degradation
quinonoimide depends
groups are formed onon theitspresence
surface. of specific chemical
Yellowing does not groups in strength
affect the the
427 molecule.
properties, Thedecreases
it only easily hydrolysable
the propertiesester, amide, and urea groups accelerate the polymer
of coatings.
428 A decomposition
different color [39,40]. Sinceorange)
(yellow, photodegradation
was observed of polymeric materialsoftakes
on the surface place most
conditioned intensively
foams (Figure 3)
429 in the surface layer, up to approx. 10 μm [41], the surface of degraded foams was scraped (1t series)
depending on whether the foam contained a flame retardant (yellow) or not (orange). This dependence
430 and FTIR spectra of 1t foams were compared with the 0t series spectra (not subjected to degradation).
was already observed in reference foams (W_1t and WU_1t) even before the addition of cinnamon
431 On the basis of the FTIR analysis (Figure 3a,b), the following groups (Table 7) can be distinguished
extract.
432 Softconstruction
in the segments of of the foams,N–H,
all foams: which
CH,are aliphatic
–N=C=O, polyethers
–N=C=N, C=O in and aliphatic
urethane, polyesters,–C=N
isocyanurate, are more
susceptible
433 to oxidation and affect discoloration (change of color) [12]. Aromatic
in the trimer, and C–O. The polyurethane-polyisocyanurate structure of the obtained foams has been amines are produced
434
in theconfirmed
reaction of the isocyanate with water. They are easily oxidized to chromophores could make
[1,5,8].
to contribution towards change of color of foams. The changed color on the surface of C_0t series
435
can be caused by presence of phosphate Table 7.flame
Resultsretardant.
of the FTIR These
analysis.compounds can decompose giving
red and blue color increased in them. Foams conditioned in the air conditioner (series 1t) resulted in
the reduction of the L factor (50.78–57.285) and in the increase in parameter a in the range from 13.68
to 21.635 in relation to a parameter of the 0t series (from −3.625 to 3.420). The ∆E parameter of 48 h
thermostated foams was from 68.138 to 77.132 and conditioned foams (1t series) was from 59.998 to
62.444 in relation to the value of ∆E of 0t series (from 72.772 to 87.461).
Foam L a b ∆E
W_0t 82.8 −2.6 28.0 87.5
C5_0t 85.1 0.5 14.9 86.4
C15_0t 76.6 3.4 15.8 78.3
WU_0t 81.8 −3.6 27.0 86.2
CU10_0t 71.0 2.7 15.9 72.8
W_48h 71.4 8.4 27.9 77.1
C5_48h 70.7 6.8 27.3 76.1
WU_48h 58.7 15.8 35.1 70.2
CU5_48h 62.6 5.9 23.1 67.0
CU15_48h 65.2 5.6 19.1 68.1
W_1t 56.4 18.2 17.3 61.8
C5_1t 57.3 17.4 16.1 60.1
C15_1t 50.8 21.6 29.2 62.4
WU1_t 56.3 16.0 21.3 62.3
CU5_1t 53.4 16.7 21.7 60.0
CU15_1t 57.1 13.7 18.1 61.4
A significant decreasing in compressive strength was observed for aged reference foams (W_1t and
WU_1t) in relation to the compressive strength of non-aged foams (W_0t and WU_0t). Therefore, these
foams had the lowest CV. Only the addition of cinnamon extract increased the value of the CV. This
could be related to the cross-linking formation in the foam structure due to the polyphenols present in
the cinnamon composition. However, more cinnamon-based filler content in the foam (both for the
series with flame retardant C and for the series without flame retardant CU) decreased this coefficient
by about 10%.
Table 6. Compressive strength (CS) and compressive strength ratio (CV): CS_0t—measured before
condition; CS_1t—measured after one-week condition.
CS_0t CS_1t CV
Foam
(kPa) (kPa) (%)
W 251.6 ± 6 140.5 ± 4 74.7 ± 2
WU 361.4 ± 9 256.2 ± 6 70.9 ± 2
C5 212.7 ± 6 200.1 ± 5 94.1 ± 2
C10 160.4 ± 4 143.9 ± 4 89.7 ± 2
C15 147.3 ± 3 126.6 ± 4 86.0 ± 2
CU5 121.4 ± 3 151.1 ± 4 124.4 ± 3
CU10 109.4 ± 2 132.8 ± 4 121.4 ± 3
CU15 91.9 ± 2 109.6 ± 3 119.2 ± 3
The CV ratio exceeded 100% for CU series foams. This meant that the strength of the aged
(CU_1t) foams increased in relation to the strength of non-aged foams (CU_0t). In the course of
photodegradation (apart from the destruction processes), there were also crosslinking and oxidizing.
FTIR studies were shown that the –CH bonds were destroyed (Figure 3). Free radicals could be formed
in the CU series, which were not blocked due to the lack of flame retardant (Antiblaze TMCP) as a
radical inactivator. The structure could probably was crosslinked. It led to a reinforcement of the foam
structure, thus increasing compressive strength [3].
457
458 (b)
459 Figure4.4.FTIR
Figure FTIRof:
of:(a)
(a) C15_0t
C15_0t and
and C15_1t;
C15_1t; and
and(b)
(b)CU15_0t
CU15_0tand
andCU15_1t.
CU15_1t.
FTIR foams without flame retardant (CU_0t series) subjected to degradation (CU_1t) showed that after
degradation the intensity of bands related to bonds: CH (2930 cm−1 ), –N=C=O (2276 cm−1 ), –N=C=N–
(2137 cm−1 ), –C=O (1713 cm−1 ), –NH (1596 cm−1 ), –NH (1512 cm−1 ), isocyanuric (1411 cm−1 ), –C=N in
the trimer (1225 cm−1 ) and –C–OH (1076 cm−1 ) decreases after degradation (green line). Only the band
associated with the –OH (3325 cm−1 ) groups did not change (grey line).
Antioxidant properties of flavonoids were determined by the presence of hydroxyl groups in both
rings, the isomeria of their location, and the presence of a double bond and a carbonyl group in the
heterocyclic ring [42]. Bands whose intensity increased were prone to degradation.
3.7. Density (d), Water Absorption (WA), Absorbability (A), Softening Point (SP), Brittleness (B), and Content
of Closed Cells (CC)
The apparent density of the foam affects its mechanical properties. The main advantage of PU
materials, which are used in civil engineering, is their low density (and also good durability) [3].
The decrease in foam density is also economically advantageous. The results of research on foams
modified by cinnamon extract (Table 8) showed that the apparent density of C_0t foams decreased
from 39.67 kg/m3 (W_0t) to 33.97 kg/m3 (C15_0t). For a series of foams without commercial flame
retardant –FR (CU_0t), density slightly decreased from 30.94 kg/m3 (CU5_0t) to 29.43 kg/m3 (CU15_0t).
The density of the reference foam WU_0t was 49.6 kg/m3 . The reason for the decrease in foam density
was most probably the incorporation of cinnamon compounds (e.g., flavonoids, chlorogenic acids,
phenol acids and others) into the structure [42–44]. They have contributed to the opening of foam cells
and thus the decrease of density, which resulted in a decrease in brittleness (Table 8) and compressive
strength (Table 6). FR was embedded in the structure of the C foam series and thereby reduced their
brittleness compared to the brittleness of the CU foam series.to the foam causes a decrease in the
softening point of modified foams by 18 ◦ C in the C_0t series and 32 ◦ C in the CU t series. The amount
of cinnamon extract in the C_0t series foams practically did not affect the brittleness of foams, whereas
for the CU_0t foams series, the CU_0t foam brittleness increase was observed in relation to the WU_0t
foam, but its decrease with the increase of cinnamon-based filler content in the foam was observed; see
Table 8. The reason for the CU_0t brittleness increase (in relation to for the CU_0t series) was lack of
flame retardant in foams.
Table 8. Absorbability (A), water absorption (WA), softening point (SP), brittleness (B), apparent
density (d), and content of closed cells (CC).
There are many factors that determine the type of insulation and its thickness. For the insulation
to be fully effective, it should meet at least the basic requirements, which include low absorbability and
low water absorption from the environment [36]. Reduction of this parameters is very beneficial when
these materials are using as thermal insulation. A lack of ability for water to accumulate in foams
prevents a multiplication of mold and other microorganisms in the rooms where they are used [7,8,37].
In the investigated foams, an increase of water absorption (WA), absorbability (A) was observed
with an increasing content of cinnamon extract in foams (Table 8). The increase in WA and W is
due to the hydrophilic nature of the filler (cinnamon), which contains, among others, polyphenols
(chlorogenic acid, flavonoids, and phenol acids); see Table 1. These compounds have hydrophilic –OH
492 and –COOH bonds (about 1077 cm–1 and 2928 cm–1). The unidentified residue was most likely
493 cellulose with –OH groups. The increase in A and WA was also caused by the opening of cells after
494 the addition of cinnamon extract to the foams; see Table 8. Increase in absorbability (A) and water
495 absorption (WA), was also observed for foams modified with ground coffee [45]. Opening of the cells
496 Appl.
wasSci.confirmed
2019, 9, 2663by the SEM method (Figure 5c,f). The increase in brittleness (B) in CU_0t foams (about 16 of 23
497 42%–45%) was caused by the lack of flame retardant. Antiblaze was embedded between the walls of
498 the C_0t series foams and stiffened the structure by gluing it together. Its absence caused a decrease
and –COOH groups. The presence of these groups was confirmed by the FTIR analysis (Figure 3).
499 in the stiffening of the foam structure and thus increased brittleness.
This analysis revealed the presence of a wide –OH band in the wave region of about 3346 cm−1 ) and
500 The addition of cinnamon clearly affects the opening of the foam cells. This causes an increase
–COOH bonds (about 1077 cm−1 and 2928 cm−1 ). The unidentified residue was most likely cellulose
501 in absorptivity (A). Both closed-cell and open-cell foams show suitability in insulation [25,36]. If the
with –OH groups. The increase in A and WA was also caused by the opening of cells after the addition
502 increase in the volume of bubbles (and reducing the thickness of their walls) is not strictly
503 of cinnamon
synchronized extract
withtothetheincrease
foams; see Table
in the 8. Increase
viscosity of theinmixture,
absorbability (A)escapes
the gas and water absorption
to the (WA),
outside. The
504 was also observed
opening for foams
of cells during the modified withprobably
synthesis was ground coffee [45]. by
influenced Opening of the cells
the elongation was
of free confirmed
rise time andby
505 thestring
SEM gel method (Figure 5c,f). The increase in brittleness (B) in CU_0t foams (about
time (Table 3). The CO2 formed in the cells caused the cell to break before it gelled. The 42%–45%) was
506 caused
opening by the lack
of the of flame
foam retardant.
cells was Antiblaze
influenced was embedded
by an increase between
in the heat thecoefficient
transfer walls of the C_0t series
λ, which for
507 foams and stiffened
all foams ranged from the structure by gluing
0.0353 W/(m∙K) it together.
to 0.0356 W/(m∙K). Its For
absence caused
standard a decrease
foams W_0t and in WU_0t
the stiffening
was
508 of the
0.026foam structure
W/(m∙K). Open and
cellthus
foamincreased
has lowerbrittleness.
strength than closed cell [36]; see Table 6.
509
(a) (b)
(e) (f)
510 Figure
Figure 5. 5.
SEMSEM micrographsofoffoams:
micrographs foams: (a)
(a) W_0t,
W_0t, (b)
(b) W_1t;
W_1t;(c)
(c)C15_0t;
C15_0t;(d)
(d)C15_1t;
C15_1t;(e)(e)
CU15_0t; and
CU15_0t; (f) (f)
and
511 CU15_1t.
CU15_1t.
512 Table 8. Absorbability (A), water absorption (WA), softening point (SP), brittleness (B), apparent
513 density (d), and content of closed cells (CC).
The addition of cinnamon clearly affects the opening of the foam cells. This causes an increase
in absorptivity (A). Both closed-cell and open-cell foams show suitability in insulation [25,36]. If the
increase in the volume of bubbles (and reducing the thickness of their walls) is not strictly synchronized
with the increase in the viscosity of the mixture, the gas escapes to the outside. The opening of cells
during the synthesis was probably influenced by the elongation of free rise time and string gel time
(Table 3). The CO2 formed in the cells caused the cell to break before it gelled. The opening of the foam
cells was influenced by an increase in the heat transfer coefficient λ, which for all foams ranged from
0.0353 W/(m·K) to 0.0356 W/(m·K). For standard foams W_0t and WU_0t was 0.026 W/(m·K). Open cell
foam has lower strength than closed cell [36]; see Table 6.
Table 9. Flame properties of foams: combustion residue (CR); limited oxygen index (LOI); and
horizontal test (HT).
with the evaporation of water from foams. Its increase was caused by the increasing content of the
biofiller in the foams. H1 for the foam without cinnamon extract (W_0t) was 25.75 J/g. The maximum
temperature (Tmax in P1) also increased from 71.8 J/g (W_0t) to 85.6 J/g (C15_0t). There was a reduction
in the intensity (size) of the first exothermic peak (P2) associated with the decomposition of urethane
bonds and ether bonds from polyol at Tmax2 around 295 ◦ C (for W_0t foam) and its goes towards a
lower temperature, i.e., 270 ◦ C for C15_0t foam). The Tmax3 of the second exothermic peak (P3) was
practically unchanged. The curves of CU_1t foams series (Figure 4b) degraded one week were similar
Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, x 18 of 23
to C_0t series. However, the H2 and H3 enthalpy values or P2 and P3 peaks were smaller.
(a) (b)
(c) (d)
Figure
Figure 6.
6. DSC
DSCcurves
curves of
of foams
foams modified
modified by
by cinnamon
cinnamon extract:
extract: (a)
(a) C_0t
C_0t series;
series; (b)
(b) series
series C_1t;
C_1t; (c)
(c) series
series
CU_0t;
CU_0t; and (d) series CU_1t.
From the graphs (Figure 6), it can be observed that the increasing amount of cinnamon extract
Table 10. Values of thermal transformations of foams series C (with flame retardant) using the DSC.
(from 5% by weight to 15% by weight) increases the enthalpy H1 in the first endothermic peak (Figure
0t—foams before degradation, 1t—foams after 1-week degradation.
6a) from 26.47 J/g (C5_0t) to 36.53 J/g (C15_0t); see Table 10. Enthalpy H1 was associated with the
evaporation of water from
Peak P1foams. Its increase was caused Peak P2 by the increasing content of the
Peak P3 biofiller in
the foams.
Foam H 1 for
Tonset , Tmax1 the foam
Tk1 without
H1 cinnamon
Tonset2 Tmax2 extract
Tk2 (W_0t)
H2 was 25.75 J/g.
Tonset3 Tmax3 The Tk3maximum
H3
temperature(◦ C)(Tmax(in
◦ C) (◦ C)increased
P1) also (◦ C)71.8 J/g
(J/g) from (◦ C)(W_0t)
(◦ C)
to 85.6 (◦ C) There
J/g (C15_0t).
(J/g) (◦ C) was (◦ C)
a reduction
(J/g)
inW_0t
the intensity
21.7 (size)
71.8 of the first exothermic
146.6 25.8 peak294.8
278.6 (P2) associated
325.3 with the
44.9 decomposition
326.3 330.4 of urethane
347.3 5.1
bonds
C5_0t and44.6
ether bonds
82.3 from 131.4 polyol
26.5 at T266.0
max2 around
285.9 295316.6
°C (for28.0
W_0t foam)
330.2 and its goes
335.9 351.6towards
4.6 a
C10_0t
lower 46.7
temperature, 86.4 139.4
i.e., 270 °C for33.4
C15_0t261.9
foam).274.5
The T319.1 35.6 324.0 329.8 352.7
max3 of the second exothermic peak (P3) was
6.1
C15_0t 46.7 85.6 140.8 36.5 262.6 271.0 314.4 30.8 327.1 333.2 357.7 8.9
practically unchanged. The curves of CU_1t foams series (Figure 4b) degraded one week were similar
W_1t 54.7 91.3 179.8 41.8 271.5 289.0 314.4 19.0 318.2 323.6 342.2 4.7
toC5_1t
C_0t series.
39.7 However,
93.9 the H2 and
133.9 47.5H3 enthalpy
259.7 values 313.0
285.3 or P2 and P3 peaks
13.8 331.2were smaller.
337.5 358.8 5.2
Subjecting
C10_1t 40.1 the foams140.0
94.0 (CU_1t50.0series)249.7
to a 1-week
271.2 degradation
310.4 was shown
15.5 329.6 of334.1
the Tmax peaks going
342.5 7.1
C15_1t higher
towards 47.4 temperatures,
94.4 142.2 e.g.,
53.0
for P1244.8 267.3 81.2
peak from 305.8 17.8
°C (CU15_0t) 323.0
to 91.0333.4 363.2 for
°C (CU15_1t), 11.1P2
peak with 282.3 °C (CU15_0t) up to 325.2 °C (CU15_1t) in Table 11.
Degradation of the reference foam WU_0t (without cinnamon extract, without flame retardant)
resulted in the disappearance of the endothermic peak of the WU_1t foam (Figure 6c,d). In the CU_1t
foam series (Figure 5d), pronounced endothermic peaks were observed at temperatures above 300 °C
for CU5_1t, CU10_1t, CU15_1t foams. Any endothermic peak was not observed for WU_1t, at
Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 2663 19 of 23
Subjecting the foams (CU_1t series) to a 1-week degradation was shown of the Tmax peaks going
towards higher temperatures, e.g., for P1 peak from 81.2 ◦ C (CU15_0t) to 91.0 ◦ C (CU15_1t), for P2
peak with 282.3 ◦ C (CU15_0t) up to 325.2 ◦ C (CU15_1t) in Table 11.
Table 11. Values of thermal transformations of foams series CU (without flame retardant) by using the
DSC. 0t—foams before degradation, 1t—foams after one week degradation.
Degradation of the reference foam WU_0t (without cinnamon extract, without flame retardant)
resulted in the disappearance of the endothermic peak of the WU_1t foam (Figure 6c,d). In the
CU_1t foam series (Figure 5d), pronounced endothermic peaks were observed at temperatures above
300 ◦ C for CU5_1t, CU10_1t, CU15_1t foams. Any endothermic peak was not observed for WU_1t, at
approximately 300 ◦ C. The disappearance of the first exothermic P2 peak was also observed in the
temperature range from 265 ◦ C to 300 ◦ C (occurring in the C_0t and C_1t series containing the flame
retardants; Figure 6a,b) relative to the series without flame retardant (CU_0t and CU_1t, Figure 6c,d).
The second exothermic peak P3, was preserved.
The changes in the peaks observed in Figure 6c,d could indicate the breakdown of urethane bonds
(with dissociation temperature of 200 ◦ C) and ether (with dissociation temperature of 260 ◦ C) [47–50].
The presence of the P3 peak on the DSC curve suggested the lack of climatic influence on the PUR/PIR
foam degradation (with dissociation temperature of 350 ◦ C) in CU_1 series, what could be observed on
FTIR of CU_1t series of foams; see Figure 4b.
height cells
Anisotropy coe f f icient = (13)
width cells
The anisotropy factor > 1 means the elongation of cells in the vertical direction. The highest strength
parameters are characterized by foams with anisotropy coefficient equal to 1 (not elongated neither
vertically nor horizontally) [27]. The anisotropy of analyzed foams was about 1.
The cell walls were destroyed during conditioning (Figure 5b,d,f) (under given conditions) and
additional holes were formed. In the SEM study, these additional holes were interpreted and measured
by the program as cells (and not as holes created as a result of wall destruction). On a given surface (in
Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 2663 20 of 23
this case 1 mm2 ) additional holes were interpreted as a smaller cells (not as a real cells). In fact, the
results in Table 12 relate to measurements of holes created after destruction and not measurements
of real cells. Measurements proved that foams conditioning (series 1t) were destroyed (the thinnest
fragments of the walls were broken); see Figure 5b,d,f).
Based on results in Table 12, it was read that cinnamon extract increased the destruction of foams.
It was evidenced by the increased number of holes per 1 mm2 of surface. The number of holes (“cells”)
of conditioned foams of C series (containing flame retardant) increased according to increasing content
of cinnamon extract in foams (Table 12) from 3.8 (W_1t) to 19.69 cell/mm2 (W15_1t).
Considering foams without flame retardant (CU series), content of cells per mm2 decreased twice
after condition. It means that not only walls of foam were destructed, but even ribs were cracked
and, thus, cells were opened. Number of holes (cells) per 1 mm2 decreased from about 3.5 cell/mm2
(CU5_1t and CU15_1t) to about 1.5 cell/mm2 (WU5_1t and WU15_1t).
4. Conclusions
Two series of foams with cinnamon extract were obtained: one with flame retardant (C_0t) and
the other without flame retardant (CU_0t). The results of this research showed an improvement of
some properties of foams with biofiller. The measurement of the color indicates an increase in the
red color of foams subjected to conditioning (accelerated degradation conditions) and an increase in
the color of blue in thermostated foams (for 48 hours in an exhaust dryer). In cinnamon-modified
RPU/PIR foams with and without flame retardants was observed decrease in compressive strength
from 251.63 kPa (W_0t foam) to 147.29 kPa (C15_0t foam) and from 361.39 kPa (WU_0t) to 91.93 kPa
(CU15_0t). The observed decrease of brittleness was from 13% to 11% (in C series) and an increase from
16% to 45% in CU series of foams. In addition, increasing amount of cinnamon extract in the C series
(from 5% to 15%) increased the H1 enthalpy at a temperature of about 80 ◦ C–95 ◦ C (from 25.75 J/g,
W0t to 36.53 J/g, C15_0t, and to 54.94 J/g, CU15_0t). The oxygen index was between 18.5% and 20.2%
(C series) and between 23.7% and 24.7% (CU series). The combustion residue (CR) after the burning of
foams containing cinnamon extract and flame retardant (series C_0t) increased by about 10% in relation
to the foam without biofiller (W_0t). For a series without flame retardant (CU_0t), the CR increased by
about 30% in relation to the CR of the reference foam WU_0t. The difference in CR between reference
foams W_0t and WU_0t was about 40%. W_0t foam, containing Antiblaze TMCP, had a CR of 83.44
and WU_0t was 37.72%. The addition of cinnamon extract contributed to increasing the foams’ CR
to 91.68% for C15_0t and to 63.33% for CU15_0t. Cinnamon-based filler showed synergism with
Antiblaze TMCP in reducing flammability. Foams containing flame retardant and cinnamon extract
(C_0t series) were characterized by the highest combustion residue. Conditioning caused decrease
in compressive strength for C_1t series of foam by about 20 kPa (in comparison to the C_0t series).
Destruction of characteristic bonds (e.g., cracking urethane bond) occurred was a result of a combined
effect of temperature, humidity, and UV radiation in the conditioner.
Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 2663 21 of 23
Author Contributions: Conceptualization: J.L; methodology: J.L., M.I., and K.M.; software: J.L.; validation: J.L.;
formal analysis: J.L. and M.B.; investigation, J.L.; data curation: J.L.; writing—original draft preparation: J.L.;
visualization: J.L.; supervision: J.P.-S. and B.C.
Funding: An article fined in fifty percent of the grant National Science Center (NCN) no. 2015/17/DST8/02618
(K. Moraczewski).
Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
1. Czupryński, B. Issues in Chemistry and Technology of Polyurethanes; WN AB: Bydgoszcz, Poland, 2004.
2. Żabski, L. PIR foams—A new type of insulation: Rigid polyurethane foam. Mater. Bud. 2005, 1, 46–47.
3. Żuchowska, D. Construction Polymers; WNT: Warsaw, Poland, 2000.
4. Randall, D.; Lee, S. (Eds.) The Polyurethanes Book; Wiley LTD.: New York, NY, USA, 2002.
5. Prociak, A.; Pielichowski, J. Characteristics of rigid polyurethane boilings in the aspect of new porophors
application. Czas. Tech. 1998, R95, 26–52.
6. Polyurethane Foam Composition. Available online: https://patents.google.com/patent/US6894083B2/en
(accessed on 26 June 2019).
7. Paciorek-Sadowska, J.; Borowicz, M.; Czupryński, B.; Tomaszewska, E.; Liszkowska, J. Oenothera biennis
seed oil as an alternative raw material for production of bio-polyol for rigid polyurethane-polyisocyanurate
foams. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2018, 126, 208–217. [CrossRef]
8. Paciorek-Sadowska, J.; Borowicz, M.; Czupryński, B.; Isbrandt, M. Effect of Evening Primrose Oil-Based
Polyol on the Properties of Rigid Polyurethane–Polyisocyanurate Foams for Thermal Insulation. Polymers
2018, 10, 1334. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
9. Liszkowska, J.; Czupryński, B.; Paciorek-Sadowska, J.; Moraczewski, K. The effect of UV radiation on the
properties of PUR-PIR foam. Adv. Polym. Technol. 2015, 36, 21631–21639. [CrossRef]
10. Agrawal, A.; Kaura, R.; Walia, R.S. PU foam derived from renewable sources: Perspective on properties
enhancement: An overview. Eur. Polym. J. 2017, 95, 255–274. [CrossRef]
11. Soares, B.; Gama, N.; Freire, C.S.R.; Timmons, A.B.; Brandão, I.S.; Neto, C.P.; Ferreira, A. Spent coffee grounds
as a renewable source for ecopolyols production. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2015, 90, 1480–1488. [CrossRef]
12. Levchik, S.V.; Weil, E.D. Thermal decomposition, combustion and fire-retardancy of polyurethanes-a review
of the recent literature. Polym. Int. 2004, 53, 1585–1610. [CrossRef]
13. G˛ebura, A.; Kowalska, D.; Tokarski, T. Research on Accelerated Aging of Electric Wires. Available online: http:
//www.academia.edu/17704721/Badania_przyśpieszonego_starzenia_przewodów_elektrycznych (accessed
on 1 December 2018).
14. Kolbiński, K.; Słowikowski, J. Materials Electricial; WNT: Warszawa, Poland, 1988.
15. Broniewski, T.; Kapko, J.; Płaczek, W.; Thomalla, J. Test Methods and Evaluation of Plastic Properties; WNT:
Warsaw, Poland, 2000.
16. Szumniak, J.; Smoczyński, Z.; Szcześniak, K. Armament and Military Equipment Polymer Composite Ageing;
Zeszyty Naukowe WSOWL: Wrocław, Poland, 2011; Volume 1, pp. 270–285.
17. Prociak, A.; Rokicki, G.; Ryszkowska, J. Polyurethane Materials; WN PWN: Warsaw, Poland, 2014.
18. Bajda, M.; Pogoda, M. Study of the effect of conveyor belt accelerated heat aging on its strength. Transport
2016, 1, 16–22.
19. Liszkowska, J. Citric acid used in the production of polyols for rigid PUR-PIR foams. Polym. Bull. 2017, 74,
283–305. [CrossRef]
20. Rytlewski, P.; Malinowski, R.; Moraczewski, K.; Żenkiewicz, M. Influence of some crosslinking agents on
thermal and mechanical properties of electron beam irradiated polylactide. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2010, 79,
1052–1057. [CrossRef]
21. Gramza, A.; Korczak, J.; Amarowicz, R. Tea polyphenols—Their antioxidant properties and biological activity.
Pol. J. Food Nutr. Sci. A Rev. 2005, 55, 219–235.
22. Lee, L.W.; Cheong, M.W.; Curran, F.; Bin, Y.; Shao, Q.L. Coffee fermentation and flavor—An intricate and
delicate relationship. Food Chem. 2015, 185, 182–191. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
23. Kudła, S. Technological aspects of phenolic antioxidants interactions with dicumyl peroxide in the processes
of polyolefins’ crosslinking. Polimery 2005, 50, 43–47. [CrossRef]
Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 2663 22 of 23
24. Półka, M. Analysis of the toxicity of thermal decomposition and combustion products obtained from selected
epoxy materials. Res. Dev. 2010, 19, 73–78.
25. Richard, C.; Thompson, R.C.; Moore, C.J.; Frederick, S.; vom Saal, F.S.; Swan, S.H. Plastics, the environment
and human health: current consensus and future trends. Philos. Trans. R Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 2009, 364,
2153–2166.
26. Liszkowska, J.; Czupryński, B.; Paciorek-Sadowska, J.; Michałowski, S. Thermal and flammable properties of
rigid PUR–PIR foams obtained by using new compounds based on 2-hydroxypropane-1.2.3-tricarboxylic
acid. J. Cell. Plast. 2016, 52, 321–341. [CrossRef]
27. Liszkowska, J. Properties of Rigid PUR-PIR Foams Obtained with the Condensation of Citric Acid with Diols and
Selected Glycolysates; WU UKW: Bydgoszcz, Poland, 2016.
28. Technical Card of Cinnamon; Agrema Sp. z o.o: Wrocław, Poland.
29. Wirpsza, Z. Poliuretanes. Chemistry, Technology, Application; WNT: Warsaw, Poland, 1991.
30. Liszkowska, J.; Czupryński, B.; Paciorek-Sadowska, J. Thermal properties of polyurethane-polyisocyanurate
(PUR-PIR) foams modified with tris(5-hydroxypentyl)-2-hydroxypropane-1,2,3-tricarboxylate. J. Adv. Chem.
Eng. 2016, 6, 148–154. [CrossRef]
31. Czupryński, B.; Liszkowska, J.; Paciorek-Sadowska, J. Modification of rigid polyurethane-polyisocyanurate
foam selected powder fillers. Polimery 2008, 3, 48–52.
32. Mańczak, K. Experiment Planning Technique; WNT: Warszawa, Poland, 1976.
33. ASTM Standard D7487–13e1. Standard Practice for Polyurethane Raw Materials: Polyurethane Foam Cup Test;
ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2016. [CrossRef]
34. Operating Instructions for the Climate Chamber Model CCK-40/300 NG, Es-tor.
35. Szczepaniak, W. Instrumental Methods in Chemical Analysis; PWN: Warsaw, Poland, 2011.
36. Prociak, A. High-Tech Insulation Polyurethane Materials; WU PK: Cracow, Poland, 2008.
37. Paciorek-Sadowska, J.; Borowicz, M.; Czupryński, B.; Liszkowska, J.; Tomaszewska, E. Application of
halloysite as filler in the production of rigid PUR-PIR foams. Polimery 2018, 63, 185–190. [CrossRef]
38. Gama, N.V.; Silva, R.; Mohseni, F.; Davarpanah, A.; Amaral, V.S.; Ferreira, A.; Barros-Timmons, A.
Enhancement of physical and reaction to fire properties of crude glicerol polyurethane foams filled with
expanded graphite. Polym. Test. 2018, 69, 199–207. [CrossRef]
39. Paciorek-Sadowska, J.; Borowicz, M.; Czupryński, B.; Liszkowska, J. Composites of rigid
polyurethane-polyisocyanurate foams with oak bark. Polimery 2017, 62, 666–672. [CrossRef]
40. Rojek, M. Methodology of Diagnostic Tests of Layered Composite Materials with a Polymer Matrix (in Polish).
Open Access Libr. 2011, 2, 11–31.
41. Paczkowski,
˛ J. Photochemistry of Polymers. Theory and Applications; WU UMK: Toruń, Poland, 2003.
42. Czaplińska, M.; Czepas, J.; Gwoździński, K. Structure, antioxidant and anti-cancer properties flavonoid bike.
Adv. Biochem. 2012, 58, 235–244.
43. Yi-Fang, C. (Ed.) Coffee: Emerging Health Effects and Disease Prevention; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: New York,
NY, USA; Blackwell Publishing Ltd.: Oxford, UK, 2012.
44. Gawlik-Dziki, U. Phenolacids as bioactive food ingredients. Food Sci. Technol. Qual. 2004, 4, 29–40.
45. Liszkowska, J. The effect of ground coffee on the mechanical and application properties of rigid
polyurethane-polyisocyanurate foams. Polimery 2018, 63, 305–310. [CrossRef]
46. Liszkowska, J.; Paciorek-Sadowska, J.; Czupryński, B. Temperature stability and thermal properties of
polyurethane-polyisocyanurate foams obtained using products of citric acid condensation. Polimery 2018, 63,
503–514. [CrossRef]
47. Czupryński, B.; Paciorek-Sadowska, J.; Liszkowska, J. Heat and thermal reistance of rigid
polyurethane-polyisocyanurate foams with addition of polyethylene, polypropylene and foamed polystyrene
recyclates. Inżynieria I Apar. Chem. 2008, 4, 15–16.
48. Paciorek-Sadowska, J. Research on the Influence of Boric Acid and N, N–(dihydroxymethyl) urea Derivatives on the
Properties of Rigid Polyurethane-Polyisocyanurate Foams; WU UKW: Bydgoszcz, Poland, 2011. (In Polish)
49. Dick, C.; Dominges-Rosado, E.; Eling, B.; Liggat, J.J.; Lindsay, C.I.; Martin, S.C.; Mohammed, M.H.; Seeley, G.;
Snape, C.E. The flammability the flammability of urethane-modified polyisocyanurates and its relationship
to thermal degradation chemistry. Polymer 2001, 42, 913–923. [CrossRef]
50. Janik, H. Progress in the studies of the supermolecular structure of segmented polyurethanes. Polimery 2010,
55, 421–430. [CrossRef]
Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 2663 23 of 23
51. Thirumal, M.; Khastgir, D.; Singha, N.K.; Manjunath, B.S.; Naik, Y.P. Water blown rigid polyurethane foam. J.
Appl. Polym. Sci. 2008, 8, 1810–1817. [CrossRef]
52. Piszczyk, Ł.; Hejna, A.; Formela, K.; Danowska, M.; Strankowski, M. Morphology, mechanical and thermal
properties of flexible polyurethane foams modified. Polimery 2014, 59, 783–791. [CrossRef]
© 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access
article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution
(CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).