Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ASSIGNMENT
Submitted by
-
Ankita Tripathi 8029
Tushita Sonkar 8060
Ishaan Tandon 8107
BALLB Sem-8
Section-B
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The success and final outcome of this project required a lot of guidance and
assistance from many people and I am extremely privileged to have got this all
along the completion of my project. All that I have done is only due to such
supervision and assistance and I would not forget to thank them.
I am also extremely grateful to the library staff of Faculty of Law, Jamia Millia
Islamia for helping me identifying the relevant material for my project and
guiding me through the library sections on the tax law.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION…………………………………………………………………...P. 3
I. SECTION 60………………………………………………………………...P.4
1. Section 64(1)
(ii).........................................................................................P.6
2. Section 64(1)
(iv)........................................................................................P.9
3. Section 64 (1)
(vi).......................................................................................P.11
4. Section 64(1)
(vii).......................................................................................P.12
5. Section 64(1)
(viii)....................................................................................P.13
6. Section
64(1A)..........................................................................................P.
14
7. Section
64(2).............................................................................................P.
15
BIBLIOGRAPHY……………………………
V.
………………………………...P.18
INTRODUCTION TO ‘CLUBBING OF
INCOME’ UNDER INCOME TAX ACT, 1961
Generally, a person is taxed in respect of income earned by him only. However,
in certain special cases income of other person is included (i.e. clubbed) in the
taxable income of the taxpayer and in such a case he will be liable to pay tax in
respect of his income (if any) as well as income of other person too. The
situation in which income of other person is included in the income of the
taxpayer is called as clubbing of income. E.g., Income of minor child is clubbed
with the income of his/her parent.
If the above conditions are satisfied, the income from the asset would be
taxable in the hands of the transferor.
❖ Illustration:
X owns 4,000 14 per cent debentures of A Ltd. of Rs. 100 (annual interest being Rs. 56,000). On April 1,
2018 he transfers interest income to Y, his friend, without transferring the ownership of these
debentures. Although, during 2018-19, he transfers interest income to Y, his friend, without transferring
the ownership of these debentures. Although, during 2018-19, interest of Rs, 56,000 is received by Y, it
is taxable in the hands of X, as he has transferred income without transferring the ownership of the
asset.
3 Section 63(b).
D. If the transfer contains any provision for the re-transfer of the asset (or
income therefrom) to the transferor, directly or indirectly, wholly or partly4.
Illustration- X transfers an asset. Under the terms of transfer, on or
after April 1, 1998, he has a right to utilise the income of the asset for his
benefit. However, he has not exercised his right as yet. On or after April
1, 1998, income of the asset would be taxable in the hands of X, even if
he has not exercised the aforesaid right.
E. If the transferor has any right to re-assume power over the asset (or income
therefrom) directly or indirectly, wholly or partly5. If there is provision to
reassume power, the transfer will be revocable and the actual exercise of
power is not necessary6.
Illustration: X transfers an asset. Under the terms of transfer, he has a
right to use the asset for the personal benefits of his family members
whosoever he wants. Till date, he has not exercised this right. It is a
revocable transfer. The entire income from the asset would be taxable in
the hands of X.
4 S.63(a)(i).
5 Section 63(a)(ii).
6 CIT v. S.Raghbir Singh [1965] 57 ITR 408(SC).
7 [1968] 67 ITR 102 (SC).
8 [1972] 84 ITR 466 (SC).
Section 64-Income of other persons included
only in the individual’s total income
Income of the individuals to include income of -
(A) Spouse and Son’s wife
(B) Minor child
(C) HUF
In computing the total income of an individual, there shall be included all such
sums as arises directly or indirectly to the spouse of such individual by way of
Salary, commission, fees or any other form of remuneration whether in cash or
in kind from a concern in which the individual has substantial interest.
Provided that nothing in this clause shall apply in relation to any income
arising to the spouse where the spouse possesses technical or professional
qualifications and the income is solely attributable to the application of his or
her technical or professional knowledge and experience
❏ For the purposes of clubbing the income under this S.64 (1)(ii), salary has to
be computed in accordance with the provisions of sections 15 to 17 of the IT
Act, 1961.
The income from the asset transferred must be calculated in the same way as it
would be if the asset has not been transferred. Exemption, deduction or tax
incentives in respect of such income can be claimed by the transferor.
❏ Natural love and affection may be a good consideration but that would not be
adequate consideration for the purpose of this section 64 (1).12
❏ The relationship of husband and wife should subsist both at the time of transfer
of asset and at the time when income is accrued in order to attract clubbing
12 Tulsidas Kilachand v. CIT [1961]42 ITR 1 (SC).
provision. It means that transfer of asset before marriage is outside the scope
of this section. Similarly , if transferor– spouse dies, the income , though
continued to be enjoyed by the transferee, cannot be included in the income of
deceased transferor, heir, administrator or executor , as widow or widower is
not a spouse .13
❏ The word “spouse “ does not include illegal wife.14 Wife , in these provisions ,
means a lawfully wedded wife and child, a legitimate child. Income of a
prospective wife or an illegitimate child is not affected by these provisions.15
❏ Where the assessee made payments of premium on policy taken in the name of
his wife, the maturity proceeds were invested and income earned thereon in
the name of his wife. The assessing officer clubbed such income in the hands
of the assessee. The Gujarat high court upheld such action. The court held that
proximity between asset and income had to be considered irrespective of time
lag between transfer of asset and actual income derived.17
If the above conditions are satisfied, then income from the asset is included in
the income in the income of the taxpayer who has transferred the asset.
(A) Pre – marital transfers: The relationship of Husband and wife / Father in
law, mother in law and daughter in law for the purpose of Sec 64 should
subsist both at the time of transfer and at the time of accrual of income.19
19 Philip John Plasket Thomas v. CIT {1963}49 ITR 97(SC).
As per Section 56(2)(vi), any sum of money , the aggregate value of which
exceeds Rs.50000, received without consideration by an individual or HUF in
any previous year from any person or persons on or after 01-04-2006, subject
to certain exceptions is taxable under the head Income from other sources. In
this case transferee spouse is taxable.
As per Section 56(2)(vii), Any sum of money, the aggregate value of which
exceeds Rs.50000 is received without consideration or property (whether
movable or immovable) is received without consideration or movable property
is received for an inadequate consideration by an individual or HUF on or after
01-102009, if the amount of such gift or inadequate consideration exceeds
Rs.50000 subject to certain exceptions is taxable under the head Income from
other sources. In this case transferee spouse is taxable.
3. If the minor child is suffering from any disability of the nature specified in
Sec 80 U , the income of such child shall not be included in the hands of the
parent but shall be assessed in the hands of the child.
6. Income of the minor married daughter is clubbed in the hands of the parent.
However , where Sec 27 applies, clubbing of income from property gifted by
the parent does not arise.
7. Even though income derived by the minor from the manual work or from
activity involving skill and talent can not be clubbed, there is no provision to
avoid clubbing of income earned on investment made out of such income.
8.Where any such income is once included in the total income of either parent,
any such income arising in any succeeding year shall not be included in the
total income of the other parent , unless the assessing officer is satisfied, after
giving that parent an opportunity of being heard, that it is necessary to do so.
9. Exemption u/s 10(32) : If the income is included in the hands of the parent
under Section 64(1A), then the assessee is entitled to claim exemption under
Sec 10(32) to the extent of Rs.1500 per child.
(c) where the converted property has been the subject-matter of a partition
(whether partial or total) amongst the members of the family, the income
derived from such converted property as is received by the spouse on partition
shall be deemed to arise to the spouse from assets transferred indirectly by the
individual to the spouse and the provisions of sub-section (1) shall, so far as
may be, apply accordingly :
Provided that the income referred to in clause (b) or clause (c) shall, on being
included in the total income of the individual, be excluded from the total
income of the family or, as the case may be, the spouse of the individual.
Explanation 1.—For the purposes of sub-section (2),—
"property" includes any interest in property, movable or immovable, the
proceeds of sale thereof and any money or investment for the time being
representing the proceeds of sale thereof and where the property is converted
into any other property by any method, such other property.
Explanation 2.—For the purposes of this section, "income" includes loss.
The following transactions are covered by Section 64(2)
A Hindu father, being the Karta of HUF, is vested with the power of making,
within reasonable limits, gifts of ancestral movable property, without the
consent of his sons, for the purposes prescribed by texts of law, as gifts through
affection, support of family, relief from distress and so forth. He also has power
to make a gift, within reasonable limit, of ancestral immovable property, for
‘pious purposes’. The alienation should, however, be an act inter vivos and not
by will.
In CGT v. Tej Nath20, the Karta made gifts in favour of his sons and other
members of the family. The Court held the gifts to be invalid. In S.V.
Sunderasan v. Asstt. CED21, held that settlement of land in favour of a
coparcener was held to be invalid by the Madras High Court.
Where any such asset is held jointly by more than one person, they shall be
jointly and severally liable to pay the tax on the income from such assets.