You are on page 1of 3

524 IEEE MICROWAVE AND WIRELESS COMPONENTS LETTERS, VOL. 27, NO.

5, MAY 2017

Design of SRR-Based Microwave Sensor for


Characterization of Magnetodielectric Substrates
Muhammed Shafi K T, M. Arif Hussain Ansari, Abhishek Kumar Jha, Member, IEEE,
and M. Jaleel Akhtar, Senior Member, IEEE
Abstract— A novel split-ring resonator (SRR)-based microwave properties is the prerequisite. Since most of the wireless com-
sensor for accurately determining the real parts of the complex munication devices operate in very narrowband of frequencies,
permittivity and the complex permeability of magnetodielectric the microwave resonant characterization methods are well
composites is proposed. The proposed sensor is realized using suited for retrieving the accurate material properties [2], [3].
the microstrip technology, where two SRRs coupled magnetically Among various resonant techniques, the microstrip or coplanar
with the microstrip line are printed on two sides of the line. The
sensor is designed using the full-wave electromagnetic solver and
waveguide-based microwave sensors have become quite popu-
its equivalent circuit model is obtained. A numerical model of lar in recent years due to their low cost, lightweight, and ease
the proposed sensor is developed for extracting the magnetic in fabrication. Recently, a number of microwave planar sensors
and the dielectric properties of the sample under test in terms based on the split-ring resonator (SRR) [4], complimentary
of change in resonance frequency after loading the device with SRR (CSRR) [5]–[8], and interdigital capacitor [9] have
the test specimen. The proposed methodology is validated by been reported in literature for determination of the dielectric
fabricating the sensor on RT/duroid 6006 substrate and testing properties of material under test (MUT). The SRR structures
various standard dielectric and magnetodielectric samples viz. are preferred for sensor design due to their smaller dimension
Teflon, Poly vinyl chloride, Plexiglas, Polyethylene, Carbonyl and higher sensitivity compared to the conventional quarter-
iron, Ni0.6 Co0.4 Fe2 O4 , and Cobalt (30%)/Polystyrene composite wavelength transmission line resonators at lower frequency
in S-band. The measured relative permeability and the relative
permittivity of the test specimens are found to be in close
range of microwave frequency band. However, to the best
agreement with their values available in literature with maximum of the author’s knowledge, the microstrip-coupled SRR-based
error of less than 8%. sensors are currently unavailable for characterization of the
magnetodielectric substrates.
Index Terms— Magnetodielectric, material characterization, In this letter, a microstrip-coupled SRR-based resonant
permeability, permittivity, planar sensor, split-ring sensor is proposed for the simultaneous extraction of the real
resonators (SRRs).
parts of the complex permittivity and the complex permeability
I. I NTRODUCTION of MUTs. The novel sensor is designed using the CST
Microwave Studio, and the equivalent circuit model is obtained
T HE demand for compactness in design of microwave
devices such as antennas, filters, resonators, and mixers,
is increasing the challenges in RF engineering. Since the
using the Advanced Design System (ADS). A numerical
model of the proposed sensor is developed for characterization
devices used for wireless communication technologies viz. of the magnetodielectric substrates. The device is fabricated
WiFi, WiMAX, LTE, and GSM are portable in nature, they using the microstrip technology on a 1.27-mm-thick RT/duroid
must be more compact in size for easy accessibility, which 6006 substrate. Various standard reference samples are tested
actually helps in saving the energy consumed by such devices. to validate the proposed sensor in S-band near 2.5-GHz
The magnetodielectric substrates, having both the relative frequency.
permittivity and permeability values higher than one, are II. D ESIGN OF P ROPOSED S ENSOR
recently being used in the microwave industry to design Microwave characterization of magnetodielectric substrates
compact RF devices [1]. The extra compactness is achieved is made possible by interaction of the magnetic and the electric
using the magnetodielectric substrate having higher value fields of the RF sensor with the MUT, which is required
of the relative permeability, which gives one more degree for the retrieval of permeability and permittivity of MUT,
of freedom to miniaturize the dimensions of the microwave respectively. The SRR structures are capable of confining
circuits as compared to the pure dielectric substrates. However, maximum electric field in their dielectric capacitive gap, where
to design a microwave circuit or device using these cus- the MUT can be kept in order to provide better sensitivity
tomized substrates, precise knowledge of their electromagnetic for smaller changes in the dielectric property by capacitive
Manuscript received October 25, 2016; revised January 6, 2017; accepted sensing technique. However, it is interesting to note that the
February 15, 2017. Date of publication April 24, 2017; date of current SRR structures also confine magnetic field on their conductive
version May 8, 2017. This work was supported by BIRAC-SRISTI GYTI loop, giving a space for relative permeability calculation by
awards 2015 through the technological edge category under Grant inductive sensing technique. The proposed magnetodielectric
BIRAC/EE/2016205. (Corresponding author: M. Shafi K T.)
M. S. K T, A. K. Jha, and M. J. Akhtar are with the Department sensor is designed using two SRR structures, which are printed
of Electrical Engineering, IIT Kanpur, Kanpur 208016, India (e-mail: on opposite ends of the microstrip line as shown in Fig. 1
kt.muhammedshafi@gmail.com; akjha.RF@gmail.com; mjakhtar@iitk.ac.in). where various dimensions are also provided. It is to be noted
M. A. H. Ansari and M. J. Akhtar are with the Materials that the location and intensity of the electric and the magnetic
Science Programme, IIT Kanpur, Kanpur 208016, India (e-mail:
aarifhussain07@gmail.com).
fields on SRR are subjected to the coupling type.
Color versions of one or more of the figures in this paper are available Fig. 2 shows variations of the electric and the magnetic
online at http://ieeexplore.ieee.org. fields in two SRRs of the proposed sensor at designated
Digital Object Identifier 10.1109/LMWC.2017.2690873 frequencies. From Fig. 2(b) and (a), it can be observed that
1531-1309 © 2017 IEEE. Personal use is permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission.
See http://www.ieee.org/publications_standards/publications/rights/index.html for more information.

Authorized licensed use limited to: ULAKBIM UASL - ANKARA UNIVERSITESI. Downloaded on March 23,2022 at 13:02:59 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
K T et al.: DESIGN OF SRR-BASED MICROWAVE SENSOR 525

TABLE I
VALUES OF L UMPED E LEMENTS OF M ODIFIED E QUIVALENT C IRCUIT

Fig. 1. Structure of proposed sensor with the dimensions, d = 80 mm,


W = 40 mm, d1 = 4.95 mm, d2 = 10 mm, d3 = 5.9 mm, d4 = 10 mm,
g1 = 0.6 mm, g2 = 0.2 mm, k = 13.2 mm, wd = 0.3 mm, and g = 0.3 mm.
Fig. 4. Comparison of transmission characteristics from circuit theory,
EM simulation, and measurement.

Fig. 2. Field variation at frequency f r0m = 2.34 GHz. (a) Electric field
(b) Magnetic field, field variation at frequency f r0e = 2.74 GHz. (c) Electric
field. (d) Magnetic field.

Fig. 5. Variation of resonant frequency for different permittivity and


permeability values. The variation of relative permeability is between 1 and 2
as shown in the inset.

Fig. 3. (a) Equivalent circuit model for proposed sensor. (b) Modified
equivalent circuit model.

the SRR coupled to the microstrip line has maximum magnetic


field variation and almost zero electric field at the center of the
farthest edge from the microstrip line. So this SRR unit can be
used for testing of the magnetic properties of MUT. Similarly,
Fig. 6. (a) Measurement setup. (b) Fabricated prototype.
from Fig. 2(c) and (d), it can be seen that the electric field
variation is maximum in the SRR gap, which can conveniently
be used for testing of the dielectric properties of MUT. simulation, the CST electromagnetic (EM) simulation, and the
measurement carried out using a network analyzer.
A. Theoretical Model
As shown in Figs. 1 and 2, the SRR structures in the B. Numerical Model
proposed sensor are magnetically coupled to the microstrip The proposed sensor is numerically simulated using the full-
line. Fig. 3(a) shows the equivalent circuit model of the wave EM solver, the CST Microwave Studio with various
proposed sensor without considering the losses in the sensor MUTs having wide range of their relative permeability μr
design. In the proposed equivalent circuit model, each SRR and relative permittivity εr . The change in resonant frequency
unit is represented by the combination of inductor (L i ) and corresponding to each SRR unit with respect to the variation
capacitor (Ci ), where i = a, b, 1, 2. These LC-tank circuits in the μr and εr of MUTs are extracted from the recorded
are coupled to the microstrip line with mutual coupling values transmission coefficient (S21 ) data and then plotted in Fig. 5.
M1 and M2. The microstrip line in the proposed sensor design Using the curve fitting tool of the Origin9.1, the empirical
is modeled with an inductor (L) and capacitor (C). Since it is relations are formulated for calculation of μr at 2.34 GHz
difficult to extract the value of mutual coupling in microstrip and εr at 2.74 GHz as given in the following:
circuits, the equivalent circuit in Fig. 3(a) is transformed into  
−1 f re − 1.61387
the circuit shown in Fig. 3(b) [10]. The values of the lumped εr = ln (1)
elements in the modified equivalent circuit diagram, Fig. 3(b), 0.05583 1.1992
 
are extracted using the ADS, and are tabulated in Table I. −1 f rm − 2.16467
μr = ln . (2)
Fig. 4 shows the comparison of S21 plot using the ADS circuit 0.73927 0.39469

Authorized licensed use limited to: ULAKBIM UASL - ANKARA UNIVERSITESI. Downloaded on March 23,2022 at 13:02:59 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
526 IEEE MICROWAVE AND WIRELESS COMPONENTS LETTERS, VOL. 27, NO. 5, MAY 2017

TABLE II
M EASURED D ATA FOR D IFFERENT M AGNETODIELECTRIC AND D IELECTRIC M ATERIALS

of the fabricated sensor possess a good match with theo-


retically developed equivalent circuit model and the numer-
ical model. The empirical formulae have been developed
for extracting the magnetic and dielectric properties of test
samples. The proposed technique has been validated by mea-
suring various dielectric and magnetodielectric samples. The
maximum error in the measured permittivity and permeability
values of all these samples with their reference data is found
to be typically less than 8%.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The authors would like to thank Azizurrahman Ansari for
providing the magnetic samples.
Fig. 7. (a) Measured S21 plot for different dielectric samples at 2.74 GHz.
(b) Measured S21 plot for different magnetic samples at 2.34 GHz. R EFERENCES
[1] B. Y. Park, M. H. Jeong, and S. O. Park, “A magneto-dielectric handset
The curve fitting function is chosen according to the avail- antenna for LTE/WWAN/GPS applications,” IEEE Antennas Wireless
able set of data to be fit, and the final expressions are obtained Propag. Lett., vol. 13, pp. 1482–1485, 2014.
[2] A. K. Jha and M. J. Akhtar, “Improved resonator method for microwave
based on the criterion of least error between the available data testing of magnetic composite sheets,” IEEE Trans. Magn., vol. 51, no. 9,
and the selected curve fitting function [5]. Sep. 2015, Art. no. 4003709.
[3] C.-S. Lee and C.-L. Yang, “Complementary split-ring resonators for
III. M EASUREMENT AND R ESULT measuring dielectric constants and loss tangents,” IEEE Microw. Wireless
The proposed sensor is fabricated on 1.27-mm-thick Compon. Lett., vol. 24, no. 8, pp. 563–565, Aug. 2014.
RT/duroid 6006 substrate, and two female type SubMinia- [4] A. A. Abduljabar, D. J. Rowe, A. Porch, and D. A. Barrow, “Novel
microwave microfluidic sensor using a microstrip split-ring resonator,”
ture version A connectors are soldered to match the 50- IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Techn., vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 679–688,
microstrip line and feed the RF signal from the vector network Mar. 2014.
analyzer (VNA). The fabricated prototype sensor is shown [5] M. A. H. Ansari, A. K. Jha, and M. J. Akhtar, “Design and application
in Fig. 6(b), while Fig. 6(a) shows the measurement setup used of the CSRR-based planar sensor for noninvasive measurement of
complex permittivity,” IEEE Sensors J., vol. 15, no. 12, pp. 7181–7189,
for material characterization. The resonant frequency value for Dec. 2015.
each sample is obtained from the transmission curve measured [6] A. Ebrahimi, W. Withayachumnankul, S. Al-Sarawi, and D. Abbott,
using the VNA shown in Fig. 6(b) that was calibrated with “High-sensitivity metamaterial-inspired sensor for microfluidic dielectric
the Short, Open, Load and Through calibration standard. characterization,” IEEE Sensors J., vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 1345–1351,
Fig. 7(a) and (b) shows the variation in measured S21 (dB) May 2014.
[7] M. S. Boybay and O. M. Ramahi, “Material characterization using com-
data for various MUTs at 2.74 and 2.34 GHz, respectively. The plementary split-ring resonators,” IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., vol. 61,
measured resonant frequency is used to calculate the μr and εr no. 11, pp. 3039–3046, Nov. 2012.
of MUT using the developed empirical formulae (1) and (2). [8] M. S. Boybay and O. M. Ramahi, “Non-destructive thickness measure-
Each measurement is repeated at least five times to check the ment using quasi-static resonators,” IEEE Microw. Wireless Compon.
Lett., vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 217–219, Apr. 2013.
variance of the measured data points, which is found to be [9] T. Chretiennot, D. Dubuc, and K. Grenier, “A microwave and microflu-
in the admissible range; however, the mean value is taken. idic planar resonator for efficient and accurate complex permittivity
The measured relative permittivity and relative permeability characterization of aqueous solutions,” IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory
data of each sample are tabulated in Table II, which are then Techn., vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 972–978, Feb. 2013.
compared with the reference values available in literature, and [10] F. Aznar et al., “Characterization of miniaturized metamaterial res-
onators coupled to planar transmission lines through parameter extrac-
their percentage error are given in columns 4 and 7 of Table II, tion,” J. Appl. Phys., vol. 104, no. 11, p. 114501, Dec. 2008.
respectively. [11] A. M. Gama and M. C. Rezende, “Complex permeability and per-
mittivity variation of carbonyl iron rubber in the frequency range of
IV. C ONCLUSION 2 to 18 GHz,” J. Aerosp. Technol. Manage., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 59–62,
An attractive microwave planar resonant sensor based on Jul. 2011.
[12] A. Azizurrahaman and M. J. Akhtar, “Investigation on electromagnetic
SRR structure has been designed, fabricated, and tested for characteristics, microwave absorption, thermal and mechanical prop-
the characterization of magnetodielectric substrates commonly erties of ferromagnetic cobalt–polystyrene composites in the X-band
being used for miniaturization of circuits. The characteristics (8.4–12.4 GHz),” RSC Adv., vol. 6, no. 17, pp. 13846–13857, 2016.

Authorized licensed use limited to: ULAKBIM UASL - ANKARA UNIVERSITESI. Downloaded on March 23,2022 at 13:02:59 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.

You might also like