Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Can The Annexation of The Crimean Peninsula Be Justified?
Can The Annexation of The Crimean Peninsula Be Justified?
****** ******
CLN4U1
Ms. *. *****
December 6, 2021
Can the annexation of the Crimean peninsula be justified? 1
To begin with, Crimea, the Crimean peninsula, formerly Taurica, Gazaria - a peninsula
lying between the northern coast of the Black Sea and the Azov Sea. Located in the south of
Ukraine and covers the Autonomous Republic of Crimea, Sevastopol and partly the south of the
Kherson region; most of the peninsula (Crimea and Sevastopol) in February 2014 was captured
and occupied by Russian regular military units, and later temporarily annexed by the Russian
Federation. Occupation of the peninsula is not internationally recognized and is defined as an act
of illegal annexation due to Russia's armed aggression. On the other hand, Russia justifies their
actions by saying that they are taking back their historical territory and saving the citizens that
identify as Russian. The Autonomous Republic of Crimea and Sevastopol have the international
conclusion is simple: the annexation of Crimea cannot be justified legally or morally in any way
possible because of the historical settlers and first colonists and also the lack of respect for
The conflict between Russia and Ukraine began on February 20th, 2014 and it has been
exactly 2,846 days since Russian soldiers with no insignias have been spotted driving Russian
military vehicles and hardware. In an attempt not to be recognized as Russian and occupy
strategic positions in Crimea. These include the Supreme Council of Crimea, Simferopol Airport,
Kerch Ferry and many more. Which is a direct violation of the “Minsk II Agreement”
(https://peacemaker.un.org/sites/peacemaker.un.org/files/UA_150212_MinskAgreement_en.pdf).
The conflict rapidly escalated into an armed confrontation where Russia committed many war
crimes and broke many human rights. "Russian occupation forces engage in extrajudicial
by Russia further prove that during the occupation of Crimea, the Russian government had no
good intentions in mind. Delving deeper into the violations, Russia broke the “Non-intervention
provisions in the United Nations Charter, Helsinki Final Act of 1975, 1990 Paris Charter, 1997
Treaty of Friendship, Cooperation and Partnership between Russia and Ukraine, 1994 Budapest
(https://warsawinstitute.org/crimean-factor-european-union-reacted-russias-annexation-crimea/).
particular, Article 1, “All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights”
entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration without any discrimination”
Article 12, “No one shall be subjected to arbitrary interference with his home”
has the right to freedom of movement and residence within the border of each state”
broken international laws set by the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, those are:
according to article 8², subsection 2⁸, Russia has committed a war crime against Ukraine by
transferring some of its population into the occupied land. And according to article 8 bis 3,
subsection 2. a. Russia also committed the crime of aggression by invading Crimea by armed
forces (https://www.icc-cpi.int/resource-library/documents/rs-eng.pdf).
The self-identification argument Russia is making states that when Crimea voted to join
Russia then it became a legitimate decision, however, not all of Crimea was accounted for during
this election. The elections themselves were held in Crimea, which is now under unlawful
occupation and all the voting results were falsified by Russian military forces, who are now
considered illegal occupants of Crimea. The evidence to the classification of the voting results is
that 2001 statistics taken by the Ukrainian government show that only about 50% of the whole
history of Crimea and who were the first settlers. The first settlers of the Crimean peninsula were
the Cimmerians and Tauri from which the ancient name of the peninsula, Taurica, originates.
Tauri lived on the Crimean peninsula and the current territory of Ukraine. Later studies of
linguists confirmed the presence in the Ukrainian language of words of Iranian origin and the
(http://resource.history.org.ua/cgi-bin/eiu/history.exe?&I21DBN=EIU&P21DBN=EIU&S21STN
=1&S21REF=10&S21FMT=eiu_all&C21COM=S&S21CNR=20&S21P01=0&S21P02=0&S21
main myth and argument used by Russia only one fact needs to be clarified, “tens of thousands
of Crimean Tatars perished during Joseph Stalin’s suppression of the ethnic minorities. In May
1944 the remaining Crimean Tatars (about 200,000 people) were forcibly deported to Siberia and
provides evidence that the population of Crimea has been manipulated to fit the Russian
standards.
Taking everything into account, when justifying something intent needs to be included in
the analysis. Actions taken by Russia before, during and after the occupation of Crimea suggest
no good intentions and sole purpose of simply benefitting the oligarchs and Putin himself. In
addition, there is sufficient evidence of historical manipulation of the Crimean population by the
Russian government making any claims of ownership based on the population invalid. Lastly,
when considering the native colonists of the Crimean peninsula, there is a clear connection
between Taurids and Ukrainians making Crimea historically and originally Ukrainian. So there
are no possible arguments that can be made to justify the annexation of Crimea. Therefore, the
annexation is proven to be unjustifiable in the eyes of the laws and the morals.
Can the annexation of the Crimean peninsula be justified? 5
References
Nato. (2015, September 22). Remarks by NATO secretary general Jens Stoltenberg at the
Joint Press Point with the prime minister of Ukraine, Arseniy Yatsenyuk. NATO. Retrieved
December 5, 2021, from
https://www.nato.int/cps/ru/natohq/opinions_122736.htm?selectedLocale=en.
U.S. Mission OSCE | 28 February, 2019 | T. S. (2019, February 28). Five years of illegal
occupation of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea by Russia. U.S. Mission to the OSCE.
Retrieved December 5, 2021, from
https://osce.usmission.gov/illegal-occupation-of-crimea-by-russia/.
Kruk, K. (2019, December 6). The Crimean Factor: How the European Union reacted to
Russia's annexation of Crimea. Warsaw Institute. Retrieved December 5, 2021, from
https://warsawinstitute.org/crimean-factor-european-union-reacted-russias-annexation-crim
ea/
United Nations. (n.d.). Unai Quiz: Non-intervention. United Nations. Retrieved December
5, 2021, from https://www.un.org/en/academic-impact/unai-quiz-non-intervention.
U.N. (1948, December 10). Universal declaration of human rights. United Nations.
Retrieved December 5, 2021, from
https://www.un.org/en/about-us/universal-declaration-of-human-rights.
Rome Statute International Criminal. Rome Statue of the International Criminal Court.
(1998, July 17). Retrieved December 5, 2021, from
https://www.icc-cpi.int/resource-library/Documents/RS-Eng.pdf.