Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1
TABLE OF CONTENTS_ PageNo.
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS _3
INDEX OF AUTHORITES _5
STATEMENT OF JURISDICTION _8
STATEMENT OF FACTS _9
STATEMENT OF ISSUES _12
SUMMARY OF ARGUMENTS _15
PRAYER _19
2
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
& _AND
¶ _PARAGRAPH
AIR _All India Reporter
Anr. _Another
Art. _Article
Co. _Company
Corp. _Corporation
Dr. _DOCTOR
Ed. _Edition
Govt. _Government
Hon’ble _Honourable
i.e _That is
Ltd. _Limited
NFF. _NO FOSSIL FUEL
NGO. _NON GOVERNMENT ORGANISATION
No. _Number
Ors. _others
3
Pvt. _Private
PIL _PUBLIC INTERESRT LITIGATION
SC _Supreme court
SCC _Supreme court cases
SIGN _SIGNATURE
SCR _Supreme court reports
SPL _SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION
U/S _Under section
United Hashiana _ UH
V. _Versus
Vol. _VOLUME
WWW _World Wide Web
4
INDEX OF AUTHORITIES
BOOKS REFFERED_
ENVIRONMENTAL LAW
IPROFESSIONAL AUTHOR, INFORMATION
TECHNOLOGY ACT, 2000
APAR GUPTA, Commentary on
Information Technology Act,2011
Dr. S.K.KAPOOR ,INTERNATIONAL LAW & HUMAN
RIGHTS,CENTRAL LAW AGENCY,12TH EDITION
INFORMATION AND TECHNOLOGY ACT ALONG
WITH RULES AND REGULATIONS,2000 ,BARE ACT
SHANTI KUMAR, INTRODUCTION TO
ENVIRONMENTAL LAW, INDIA , 2008, 2nd EDITION.
FOREST ACT, 2010.
AIR PRVENTION AND CONTROL OF
POLLUTION,1981.
Dr. KAILASH RAI, PUBLIC INTEREST
LAWYERING,LEGAL AID & PARA-LEGAL
SERVICES, CENTRAL LAW PUBLICATIONS,
3RD EDITION, 2005
5
CONSTITUTION_
D.D.BASU COMMENTARY ON THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, 2007, 8th
EDITION.
M.P.JAIN, INDIA CONSTITUTIONAL LAW,
LEXIS NEXIS, INDIA, 2010, 6th EDITION.
THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA,BARE ACT.
WEBSITES_
www.lawnotes.in
www.lexisnexisacademic.com
www.legalserviceindia.com
www.legalcrystal.com
www.vakilno.1.com
www.manupatra.com
www.environmenta-mainstreaming.org
www.thebluebook.com
Envfor.nic.in
6
CASE LAWS CITED/REFFERED_
RAMAN & RAMAN LTD. V. STATE OF
MADRAS & ANR.
M.S.SKY HIGHWAY PVT. LTD. V. THE
STATE TRANSPORT APPELATE
TRIBUNAL.
Nazir Bhai Haji Ghisabhai v.
Phoolchand munnalal jaiswal & ors.
Mahesh Bansal v. Executive Engineer
(fcd. 1)
AVINSH BAJAJ V. STATE
7
STATEMENT OF JURISDICTION
The RESPONDENT submits to the jurisdiction
of the HON’BLE SUPREME COURT against the
filing of PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION under
art. 32.
8
STATEMENT OF FACTS
(1)Alboro is a developing country with thesecond largest
population in the world. It has more than 300 million people
who live without access to electricity.
9
(6)In 2015, Hatimtai emissions scandal had become an
international issue, when a scholar from Alboro identified
misreporting and false claims of low emissions from
Hatimtaimanufactured automobiles. In contradictory ,
HATIMTAI has clamed that there is no error in the emissions
test that took place at hatimtai testing lab.
10
(11). HATIMTAI and the government of alboro emphasized on the
necessity of this policy to serve enery to the citizen of ALBORO. Both
HATIMTAI GROUP and ALBORO are represented by the same counsel
and have challenged the maintainability of this PIL suggesting
alternative legal remedies. They emphasize that this PIL is personal
interest litigation and does not involve the fundamental rights
guaranteed under the constitution.
(12). While the final hearing of this petition was pending before the
supreme court of ALBORO. There was a global cyber attack on the
transactional server, website and data of HATIMTAI GROUP on 30 th
November, 2016 . The hacked website now displays the words
“FOSSIL FUELS WILL DIE” & “SAY NO TO FOSSIL FUELS”. The phrase “
SAY NO TO FOSSIL FUELS” is also the motto of NFF. The central
government of alboro along with the HATIMTAI GROUP Suffered
huge economic losses . Thereafter , the central government formed a
cyber crime investigation team to investigate The cyber offence.
11
STATEMENT OF ISSUES
12
(6) ITS NOT A PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION BUT INSTEAD ITS
A PERSONAL INTEREST LITIGATION AS WE CAN SEE THE
ABOVE ACTED SCENARIOS OF THE NFF.
(7) THE CYBER ATTACK WAS DONE BY THE NFF AS ITS BEEN
CLEARLY INVESTIGATED AND BEEN REPORTED BY THE
INVESTIGATION TEAM IN THEIR REPORTS.THEY SHOULD BE
PUNISHED FOR THIS CRIME.
13
UNDER THE JURISDICTION WHERE CYBER HACKING IS A
CRIME.SO HIS SPL SHOULD BE REJECTED.
14
SUMMARY OF ARGUMENTS
As its been stated that HATIMTAI GROUP corporation is
group of multinational companies that manufactures
automobiles , heavy vehicles and realed parts ,explores coal
and produces thermal energy.
HATIMTAI has also claimed in a scandle which was against
them for the high emissions of pollution emited from
HATIMTAI MANUFACTURED AUTOMOBILES.that there is no
error in the report and the emission tests that too placed at
HATIMTAI TESTING LAB.
HATIMTAI has also started a project to build the worlds
largest thermal power plant in MUNDRU, ALBORO which is in
a good deed .
As stated above we know that due to rapid industrialization
there was an increase in demand for energy in ALBORO. And
due to the highest energy consumption in ALBORO there was
a breakdown of nortern electricity grid of ALBORO on 15 th
june 2016. Due to which ALBORO sufferd blackout for two
days.with this turn of events , the central government also
felt an inevitable need to start the operation of MUNDRU
THERMAL POWER PLANT. As soon as possible. As a matter of
policy, the central govt. Of alboro ordered the construction
of rail road of 800 km from the largest coal mine in ALBORO
to the mundru power plant on 15th july 2016.
15
On 31st July 2016 a public consultation process was held in the
sensitive areas under Forest Rights Act, 2006 that were
covered by the railroad. After this consultation, conditional
Forest Clearance and Environmental Clearance were granted by
the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change of
Alboro, on 30th September 2016 and 14th October 2016
respectively, for laying down the railroads over 800kms. The
project is scheduled to be completed by 31st March, 2017 so
that the government of Alboro can guarantee energy security
and energy justice to its people.
16
DUE TO THEIR ILLICT AND CRIMINAL BEHAVIOUR,OUR
ORGANISATION HAS SUFFERED A LARGE AMOUNT OF
ECONIMIC LOSS FOR WE WHICH SHOULD BE COMPENSATED
AND THEY SHOULD BE HEAVILY PENALISED.
DUE TO THE INCOMPETENT AND CRIMINAL ACT DONE BY
THE NFF’s ,WE STRICTLY DEMANDS TO ARREST THE FOUNDER
PRESIDENT OF NFF MR. RUI KAI THAT WAS SUPPOSED AND
WAS IN ALBORO AT THAT TIME WHEN THE CYBER ATTACK
TOOK PLACE.
IN FURTHERNESS AS MR. RUI KAI IS CLAMING A SPL (SPECIAL
LEAVE PETITION BEFORE THE SC. OF ALBORO STATING THAT
HE IS NOT A CITIZEN OF UH BUT OF PAKIANA, WHERE CYBER
CRIMES ARE NOT AN OFFENCE AND ALSO ANOTHER A
DEFENCE OF EXTRA TERRITORIAL JURISDICTION OF IT ACT
2000. BUT THIS APPEAL IS NOT MAINTAINABLE AS THE CRIME
WAS INSTIGATED BY THE ACCUSED IN THE TERRITORY AND
UNDER THE JURISDICTION WHERE CYBER HACKING IS A
CRIME.SO HIS SPL SHOULD BE REJECTED AND HE SHOULD BE
PUNISHED UNDER THIS TERRITORIAL JURISDUCTION FOR
THIS ACT OF CRIME.
17
PROBLEM OF ELECTRICITY EHICH IS A MAIN ESSENTIAL FOR A
NATION TO BE CALLED A DEVELOPED ONE.
18
PRAYER
In light of the legal & principles cited, & in light of the
provisions of the constitution applied and the arguments
advanced, & in the light if the studies relating to the issues
referred to, the respondent most humbly prays that the
SUPREME COURT:
1. HOLD THAT THE PETITION FILED BY THE NRR IS NOT
MAINTAINABLE.
2. HOLD THAT THERE IS NO VIOLATION OF FUNDEMANTAL
RIGHTS OF THE PEOPLE.
3. FIND THAT THERE IS NO VOILATION OF
ENVIRONMETNAL RIGHTS & ALSO NO VOILATION OF
PROVISION OF THE FOREST ACT AS THERE IS A VERY
LITTLE DEGRADATION BUT INSTEAD OF THAT THERE
WILL BE ALOT BETTERMENT TOO. THUS PIL IS NOT
MAINTAINABLE.
4. AS HATIMTAI GROUP AND GOVT. BOTH challenges the
maintainability of this PIL suggesting alternative legal
remedies. They emphasize that this PIL is personal
interest litigation and does not involve the fundamental
rights guaranteed under the constitution
5. The founder of NFF’s i.e Mr. RUI KAI should be heavily
penalised and should be punished for bthe act done by
him in order oF defamation and cyber attack and losses
suffered by the respondent.
19
6. THEIR APPEAL IS NOT MAINTAINABLE AND INSTEAD OF
THAT THEY SHOULD ARRESTED AND HEVILY PENALISED
UNDER THE SECTIONS 65,66,71,43 OF IT ACT,2000
WHICH IS MONETARY COMPENTATION OR PENALTY
UPTO 2 LAKHS AND IMPRISIONMENT UPTO 3 YEARS.
SIGN:
(COUNSEL FOR THE RESPONDENT)
20