People in many countries do not wear their traditional costume. Some argue that they would forget their history and tradition. Do you agree or disagree? The issue of traditional clothes, which was always debatable, has now become even more controversial. Due to the rapid advance in society, it is believed that citizen in many areas would not respect their history and tradition because they do not wear their folk costume. As such, there are both merits and demerits to this trend, but | am of the opinion that the former outdo the latter. There are many arguments in favor of my stance, but the most conspicuous one is that people should wear traditional clothes in special festival. One standout example is originated from the fact that festivals are occasion to have respect for ancestor and look back to history. Wearing traditional is also a good way to encourage people to recall history. Another pivotal aspect of this issue is that modern dress more suitable to wear in daily life than traditional ones. The primary one stems from the fact that wearing national costume cause some difficulties for people when working in a long time. Therefore, modern clothes are more convenient in most situations. Hence, it is apparent why many are against traditional folk. With all the reasons mentioned above, the advantages of national costume are far too great to ignore.The issue of technology, which was always debatable, has now become even more controversial. Due to the rapid advance in technology, it is believed that the more technology field widen, the more distance between the wealth and the poverty. As such, | completely disagree with the statement. There are many arguments in favor of my stance, but the most conspicuous one is that the growth of technology is not the main factor cause the chink between classes in society. This issue also depend on economy, education and society. People who has low salary cannot afford to cost of living. Therefore, the poor have no optional. Whereas, the wealth having high standard living, they have more opportunity to choose where they live, what they eat, good education,... So we should not blame for technology while the government cannot give their civilians a better life, and for all those reason, | believe thet technology is not the main reason about the gap between the rich and the poor. Another pivotal aspect of this issue is that technology for all walks of life. The primary one stems from the fact that many technological companies product variety kind of device from cheap to expensive. Thus, customers have suitable choice when purchasing modern device. Despite the narrow budget, poverty still reach the modern life with technology. With all the reasons mentioned above, | totally believe that the developing in technology is not the reason for increasing the level of wealth inequality.The line graph demonstrates the amount of the citizerilaged 65 and over in Japan, Sweden and USA, both historically and changes projected forthe futur \~ During the last 80 years, the aged ‘of USA and Sweden has risen rapidly and will constantly increase in the next’years, whereas the elderly of Japan showéd/a downward trend in the beginning but suddenly skyrocket onwards. Jn 1940, the number of elderly in USA and Sweden We around 6 millions and 8 millions ., respectivelyBoth-countries grew slightly in the first 20 years and continued.rose sharply iNWext 20 years, However, the Sweden's aged'showed some fluctuation throughout the years. Especially around 1995, the data of Sweden soared, exceeding the USA's rate and reaching a highest point at 25 millions in the end. At the same time, the old people of USA experienced a decline of about 3 millions, Despite the reduce, the trend reversed in nearly 2015{and project drop to about 10 millions by 2040, >” = Wow Japan had rd ei ‘ pan had the lowest figuré, only 5 millions at the beginning, showing a downward in the first decade. From 1960 to 2000 the Japan's elderly levelled off. However, the ariount of elderly in Japan increase quickly from 2010 onwards. Japan's data is forecast to om significantly and more than thesfoue of the other countries, reaching a peak of 27 millions in the end of the period.