VIRGINIA:

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF ORANGE

JANICE WOLK GRENADIER, (JWG)
Pro Se PLAINTIFF, 1 CASE NO. CL 22000241-00.
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
V.

ANDREW GEORGE MCCABE

JAMES Brien2 COMEY

WILLIAM PELHAM BARR

DEFENDANTS

ETHICS COMPLAINT FILED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF

VA CODE § 54.1-3915. RESTRICTIONS
AS TO RULES AND REGULATIONS

The Plaintiff, Janice Wolk Grenadier (JWG), a resident of Virginia files this Ethics Complaint
under the provisions of VA Code§ 54.1-3915. In this civil Ethics Complaint, JWG alleges at the
minimum, the Defendants (Defendants), named above, jointly, and severally, have engaged in a
pattern and practice of intentional, unethical conduct in the Commonwealth of Virginia,

In the conduct of their business as lawyers, United States Attorney General William Barr, Deputy
Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation Andrew McCabe and the 7th director of the Federal
Bureau of Investigation James Comey, JWG alleges the Defendants violated the Virginia Code of
Professional Conduct while violating also their Oaths of Office to protect the public while upholding the
United States Constitution of America Constitution the Supreme Law of the Land.

In conducting their business as lawyers Or when in their appointments with the Federal
Government the Defendants do not have any "Immunity Defenses" to assert in a Complaint alleging
unethical conduct.

Lawyers as leaders conducting business for the Federal Government in the Commonwealth of
Virginia (Virginia or VA) serve the people, Virginia taxpayers, and should have done so equally.
Instead covered up the crimes of the Rich and Powerful Old Boys network of Virginia.

1
Addresses removed of Plaintiff and Defendants from Original
2
Error Allen on Original
1
 Ignored the criminal activity brought to them directly through emails, phone calls to their
agents.

Public, various entities, and people globally. The Virginia taxpayers pay the lawyer
taxes to protect persons who live in Virginia or have any business interests in Virginia.

In support of this Ethics Complaint, JWG states as follows:

1. Any person or entity has the Standing to file an Ethics Complaint with a
Virginia court, including Virginia State Bar personnel and citizen JWG.
2. There is no Virginia statute of limitations for Ethics Complaints filed with the
Virginia State Bar for investigation and reporting. See VA Code §
54.1-3910, et seq.;
https://law.lis.virginia.gov/vacode/title54.1/chapter39/section54.1-3900/
3. There is no Virginia statute of limitations for Ethics Complaints filed with a
Virginia court requesting that the court discipline a lawyer practicing law in
Virginia or requesting that a Virginia court suspend or revoke a lawyer's
license to practice law in the Commonwealth of Virginia. See VA Code§
54.1-3915; See
https://law.lis.virginia.gov/vacode/title54.1/chapter39/section54.1-54.1-
391/

FACTUAL BACKGROUND AND HISTORY OF

LAWYER DISCIPLINE OF LAWYERS / DEFENDANTS

4. JWG restates and incorporates herein all foregoing statements as if restated in

full.

5. All Defendants include the Public, Virginia taxpayers, including JWG, who pay
them specifically to protect the Public, other entities, and people globally.

6. All Defendants, current lawyers, did not protect the Public, and Virginia taxpayers
who pay them to protect the Public, other entities, or the people affected globally
by the unethical conduct of lawyers practicing law in Virginia.

7. JWG who is a member of the Public, Virginia resident, Virginia taxpayer, and
other entities in Virginia who paid the defendants through taxes to protect JWG
and all the Public from unethical lawyers, judges who all Judges in Virginia are

2
 licensed lawyers in Virginia. They did not do it. They ignored it, and protected
their friends by staying silent.

8. The American Public is saying NO MORE. The United States of America was
created for all to be equal. The Rich and Powerful who have used their
Government insider information have to be held accountable.

9. The Justice system can’t be for only the Rich and Powerful. It must be fair and
just for all. Otherwise, we are no different than China and or Russia.

10. The Appearance is we are no different due to the acts and actions of the Federal
and State Governments.

11. JWG and the public globally, Virginia residents, and taxpayers do not pay for the
defendants to protect the Rich and Powerful, themselves, their influential and
big-firm lawyer friends, or the other Powerful Government Workers, Bankers,
Corporate Entities, and Leadership of Corporate Entities, Judges.

12. Complaint information in regard to a lawyer can come from many different
sources, Personal Experience, Radio, TV, Internet, and or another person that
was harmed.

13. Plaintiff, being naive, has been fighting for Justice since 1990, was unaware of the
way she was used by members of the Virginia Judiciary, Lawyers, Old Boys
Network till 2008 and the “TRUTH” of the scheme to harm her was exposed.

14. Plaintiff has two issues with a third that came with the desperate feeling that all
Americans get when targeted by the Government, the Powerful and Rich with the
Power and Government behind them including and not limited to the Full Judiciary
Power.

15. Plaintiff reported criminal activity of the State of Virginia to the FBI and wrote
letters and emails directly to defendants Comey and Barr and their agents.

16. The three issues:

a. The chance of Justice by Donald Kempf. I was desperate for Justice when
I met him and the deal was clear. I go back to his apartment and he helps
me get Justice. Exhibit A

b. Divorced in 2000 without a Property Settlement that includes Real Estate -

the collusion of the Executive Branch under McAuliffe, the Supreme Court

3
 of Virginia and many others, including being illegally jailed and held in
Solitary Confinement till 5 pm on Election day so Senator Mark Warner
could be re-elected. Exhibits B

c. An illegal Foreclosure of 15 W. Spring St., Alexandria, VA 22301 with

Troutman Pepper Hamilton Sanders being the leader of the scheme.
Troutman Pepper Hamilton Sanders aka Mays and VAlentine swindled
$30,000.00 from Plaintiff in 1990 to Cover-up theft of funds from the Trust
Account of Sonia Grenadier, the mother of the late Judge Albert Grenadier.
In May of 2008 Divorce lawyer Ilona Grenadier Heckman admitted to
stealing this money, as she stated my x-husband David Grenadier did not
steal it - only left here in her law firm to collude with Mays & Valentine in
the theft of monies and Real Estate. Exhibits C

STATEMENT OF FACTS ON DONALD KEMPF

14. JWG restates and incorporates herein all foregoing statements as if restated in full.

15. That having lived through “HELL” being illegally jailed and ruined financially and as a person
- I still believed in me and my right to Justice and am still looking in every corner of the World for
it.

16. The Defendants ignore people like plaintiffs.

17. That on the evening of Nov 16, 2017, after a full day at an event JWG stopped by a Bar to
mull over the day.

18. Deputy Assistant Attorney General Donald Kempf was standing behind me to get a drink and
started a conversation.

19. He shared he had just delivered the Remarks to the American Bar Association.

20. After drinks and me telling him my story we made a deal - I would go back to his apartment and he
would help me get Justice.

21. When I reached out to him - he had no intention of helping me - I had again been used.

22. The FBI and the DOJ instead of Justice stated I could come in and talk with them but, I could only
talk about Donald Kempf not the other injustice / hate crimes etc against me.

23. Again the Defendants were going to protect their own.

4
24. The Defendants Comey & McCabe as leaders in the FBI created in 2014 a directive that the FBI was
announced a Campaign to Seek Public Assistance Identifying acts of Public Corruption February 18,
2014,
https://archives.fbi.gov/archives/washingtondc/press-releases/2014/fbi-announces-campaign-to-s
eek-public-assistance-identifying-acts-of-public-corruption

25. When JWG asked about it - I believe James Comey was not honest about knowing about it:

May 11, 2018 FBI James Comey's involvement on FBI October 14th States he knows nothing about the
Public Corruption directive - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KlsSkkxYnTg

26. Attached is an affidavit of Truth filed with the defendant's Exhibit A

STATEMENT OF FACTS ON HATE CRIME / DIVORCE

27. JWG restates and incorporates herein all foregoing statements as if restated in full.

28. Full Outline of Divorce attached in Exhibit

29. JWG and David Mark Grenadier the son of Judge Albert Grenadier were married in
Switzerland.

30. That in 1990 it was learned that monies in the Grenadier Law Firm had been stolen from
Sonia Grenadier and the Trust was then turned over to Mays & Valentine aka Troutman Pepper
Hamilton Sanders.

a. JWG was lied to about the facts and $30,000. Was swindled from her in 1990 when JWG
learned the truth that it was most likely Ilona Grenadier Heckman who stole the money
and not her x-husband she went looking for Justice

31. The Divorce

a. David left JWG in or around 1997, with no Property Settlement, the Divorce in 2000
stated everything split 50 / 50.

b. JWG had sole custody of the girls.

c. The appearance of the accounting would show that when JWG was getting $345.00 a
month in child support Ilona and David would be collecting about $85,000. A month in
rental income on Real Estate I had a 24.5% interest in.

d. In 2008 JWG went after my money and they went after me.

5
e. The slippery slope of the “Old Boys Network” that the Defendant’s protected from being
held accountable would begin.

f. The criminal activity of the Judiciary, Executive Branch, the legislature in the Federal &
State of Virginia judiciary would begin.

g. That in 2008 May 2008: Divorce Lawyer Ilona would turn to me to state very clearly in
court:

1. That I could not win as Judge J. Howe Brown was her good friend she gave him free
legal advice all the time
2. That she and her family had nothing to do with me and my girls because I was Catholic
and the girls had gone to Catholic School
3. David did not steal the money from Sonia

This was to intimidate me, and to rub in my face how she had SCAMMED ME !!

h. Then that same day we would go into Judge’s Chambers where I would introduce myself to
Chief Judge Donald Haddock who would go on to confirm everything Ilona had stated You will
never win this “I / We LOVE LOVE LOVE Ilona” he had recused himself but would choose all
retired Judges who would rule by Bias, Friendship et al for the LOVE LOVE LOVE of Judge
Haddock et al. I wonder often how his wife feels about his STRONG LOVE to ignore the law to
rule to do whatever he had to for her?

● Ilona a DIVORCE Lawyer stole in the MILLIONS from Sonia Grenadier the last property
sold recently
● $30,000. Note she demanded to hold onto which was SCAMMED through Mays &
Valentine aka Troutman Sanders
● The Liquidation agreement without my signature done in November of 1997 by lawyer not
Licensed in VA
● The lying in court documents by her and her lawyers
● The lying in court documents and in court by David and his lawyers

i. March of 2011 – City of Alexandria police, Fire and Ambulance comes to the home of Janice
Wolk Grenadier while she is on travel – she is supposedly “DEAD” in the home? There is no
record of this in the City of Alexandria. Two neighbors have confirmed this with Janice and the
one who convinced the police to not hack down her door but to allow him to open it with the key
he had. It was not until June of 2011 when Janice’s neighbor shared this with her she became
aware of it. When researched there is no record yet two other neighbors have confirmed this.

j. There had been other attempts on JWG Life

k. December 2011 / February 2012 – Deliberate tampering with knowledgeable intent of the
Grand Jury by Judge Potter and Commonwealth Attorney Randy Sengel

6
 l. October 2012 – Janice’s documents submitted into the record, when she went to check that they
had been filed – she is told to take them or they would throw them out, Janice refused to take
them and then they are mailed back to her by Judge’s Kemler, Dawkins and Clark. The box about
4” thick has been x-rayed and shows the documents but, never opened still In the box

December / January time frame of 2012 & 2013 Lawyer Ilona in collusion with others as a favor or
hired a gentleman that goes by the name of Mark Stuart who informs
Janice he was to drug Janice and get sexual inappropriate
pictures of Janice, or to rape one of Janice’s daughters, or to
plant drugs on Janice’s daughter or in the home to give Circuit Court
Judge’s Kemler, Dawkins and Clark, information to make JWG
incompetent to file any other documents.

Mr. Stuart said that “Lawyer Ilona will go to any length to harm
Janice or Janice’s daughters”. That Lawyer Ilona will continue to do what she can to distract Janice
from becoming successful and moving on with Janice’s life. That Lawyer Ilona is a “Greedy Jew” that all
Lawyer Ilona’s actions are deliberate to cause harm to Janice. When the Alexandria Police were called
they informed Janice they were instructed by Commonwealth Attorney Randy Sengel to not take any
reports of issue. *****The FIRST Picture

m. November of 2013 the Murder of Ron Kirby – Opening his front door – Shot and Murdered.

n. December of 2013 – Ilona Grenadier Heckman and Presidential Candidate Loretta Lax Miller do
a “HATE OF CATHOLICS, CHRISTIANS et al” Blog – jwgrenadierisalair.blogspot.com taken down
while Janice is in jail.

7
 o. February 18, 2014 - FBI cautions residents of public corruption in Va. -
http://www.wusa9.com/story/news/local/2014/02/18/fbi-cautions-residents-of-public-corruption-in-north
ern-virginia/5585877/ WASHINGTON (WUSA) -- The Federal Bureau of Investigation's (FBI)
Washington Field Office is looking to identify any public corruption occurring in Northern Virginia.
The FBI says public corruption can occur "when a public official, at any level of government – local, state
or federal – does any official act in exchange for money, or other free goods or services, for private gain.
Public corruption could also include public employees who take something of value for their own personal
gain, thereby violating the public's trust." The FBI says many of their investigations into public
corruption start once they receive a tip from someone. If you want to help identify potential criminal
activity, the Washington Field Office has set up a Northern Virginia Public Corruption Hotline at
703-686-6225 and you can also e-mail them at NOVAPC@ic.fbi.gov.

Some of the examples of corruption include:

Government officials such as DMV employees, city inspectors, taxing or zoning assessors or other
regulatory agency employees, or even town councils or mayors;
Contracting officials at all levels, including those who manage government contracts or regulatory
permits; or, school resource officers who manage school accounts;
Local officials colluding with real estate investors to rig the bidding process at foreclosure auctions;
A person representing the judicial branch - a judge, member of the jury or court personnel; or,
A person representing law enforcement, who steals drugs from criminals, embezzles government funds,
falsifies records or smuggles contraband

8
 p. February 2014 the Murder of Ruth Ann Lodato for opening her front door, daughter of Judge
Giammittorio & sister to Judge Bob Giammittorio

*****The FIRST Picture of the person who Murdered Ruth Ann Ladoto resembled Mark
Stuart - I immediately went to the Sheriff’s office not realizing the Sheriff was involved in
the Cover-up. The Sheriff Longhorne would not meet with me, he had me meet with his
brother - who is now retired - I have always wondered if it was because he had a
conscience something his brother “The Sheriff” didn’t have.

******On JUNE 14, 2017 at the shootings of the Congressman the following pictures
show him walking away from me – and then as I hid he came back and I got the following
pictures Secret Service, Capitol Police all are ignoring the threat this man plays:

q. A Blog was then started on Janice Wolk Grenadier to ruin her:

§2071, Records and Reports – Concealment removal or mutilation generally, §2076. Whoever, being a
clerk of a district court of the United States, willfully refuses or neglects to make or forward any report,
corticated, statement or document as required by law, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not
more than one year, or both.”

When Divorce Lawyer and or others hired or as a favor Mark / Michael Stuart to drug Plaintiff and get
inappropriate pictures, or rape one of Plaintiff’s daughters, or plant drugs on one of Plaintiff’s Daughters
or in the home of Plaintiff and her girls in the November / December 2012 time frame. When Defendants
in collusion or ignored the threat:
---------------------------------------------BLOG --------------------------------------------------
Through Ilona Grenadier Heckman and her best friend Loretta Lax Miller aka
Muggy Cat aka Billy Sullivan Presidential Candidate for 2016 – there blog -
jwgrenadierisalair.blogspot.com

We hope that you join us on Friday, January 10th, 2014

outside of Janice Wolk Grenadier's house to protest her
anti-American pro-Satan values. Email us at
muggycatscreams@aol.com for Janice Wolk
Grenadier's address. We are expecting at least 200
people so don't forget to bring Holy Water from your
9
 church to purify and sactify the land of the supporter
of the Anti Christ and the mother of the vessel of
Satan. We will have a prayer session to pray for her
lack of soul but do not look her straight in the eyes or
you will be turned to stone.

JW Grenadier aka Janice Wolk Grenadier

Sunday, January 5, 2014

Janice Wolk Grenadier supports the Anti Christs Obama and Hillary Clinton
Not only is Janice Wolk Grenadier a traitor to the American people by being a card carrying Commie Pinko but
she is also supporting the Anti Christs Obama and Hillary Clinton. Yes we said it here, Anti Christs meaning
plural. Why is Janice doing this? Because they are not only going to let her keep her hairy vag but they are going
to give her the chance to grow a penis as well. Well penises. Yes, Janice Wolk Grenadier will have 6 penises all
over her body including one over her vagina. The other 5 will be as so: one in the palm of each hand, one on the
bootom of each foot and one right where a tramp stamp would be on her back. That way when Janice Wolk
Grenadier dies, she can go to Allah's heaven and have her 72 virgins. These 72 virgins will be a mix of males and
females that she can rape with all of her penises and then the next morning at sun up they become virgins
again. We have figured it out that the fetal body of little Joshua that Janice keeps in the basement of her home
is going to be the vessel for the Dark Lord Satan himself to resurrect in a human body to carry out the
apocolypse. That way, Janie Wolk Grenadier is guaranteed her 6 penises.

Proof she supports the Anti Christ is in her letters she has posted and her other posts of Hillary's and Obama's
support defending both on everything Loretta Lax Miller fought against including the ObamaCare and Islamic
Terrorism which Obama and Hillary support. Janice is for the destruction of the Catholic Church's values of
having Nuns despense birthcontroll pills. Janice supports this by supporting Hillary Rodham Clinton and Barack
Husein Obama. Everything Obama stands for is to destroy American Family Values and Janice has no values and
worships Satan.

10
We at Muggy Cat take the religious stand that Janice is the Anti Christ and does not beleive in God and the
wonders God has done on this Earth. Maybe Janice should move to sin city Las Vegas and sell her soul as well as
her fugly body on the strip since she is whoring for Satan.

We hope that you join us on Friday, January 10th, 2014 outside of

Janice Wolk Grenadier's house to protest her anti-American
pro-Satan values. Email us at muggycatscreams@aol.com for Janice
Wolk Grenadier's address. We are expecting at least 200 people so
don't forget to bring Holy Water from your church to purify and
sactify the land of the supporter of the Anti Christ and the mother of
the vessel of Satan. We will have a prayer session to pray for her
lack of soul but do not look her straight in the eyes or you will be
turned to stone.
----------------End of Copy Paste excerpt from Blog ------------------------------------------------

THESE ARE THE THREATS OF Loretta Lax Miller aka Leah Lax aka Muggy Cat aka Billy Sullivan
That the Defendants allowed – MANY MORE CAN BE READ AND FOUND IN UNITED STATES
DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA - Civil Action No. 14-0162 - That the Judicial
Community is desperate in the cover up of the collusion to protect Ilona Grenadier Heckman is obvious to
a lay man.

r. Who do you go to for HELP? Not the FBI

https://archives.fbi.gov/archives/washingtondc/press-releases/2014/fbi-announces-campaign-to-seek-pu
blic-assistance-identifying-acts-of-public-corruption If you go to the site and then hit the link for the
transcripts you - get -

11
12
t. .October 11, 2014 – Breaking news Senator Mark Warner and aid to Governor Terry McAuliffe guilty
and admit to offering a Federal Judgeship to daughter of Phil Puckett

U. October 14, 2014 – Janice exposes on Blog VaLaw2010.blogspot.com information of corruption by

Senator Warner

V. October 22, 2014 – November 12, 2014 – 22 days Janice illegally jailed and tortured in the City
of Alexandria, Solitary Confinement till 5pm on Election day Tuesday, November 4, 2014. Illegally
Jailed to:
1. Silence her and stop exposure of emails between herself and Mark Warner’s office
on the corruption in the Judiciary. Janice went to Mark Warner for help instead he had her jailed,
at the same time it was exposed his “Pay to Play” with a Federal Judgeship for a favor. Being
ignored by the Senate Ethics Committee.
2. To Bully / scare her into either committing Suicide or to turning the other cheek of the
corruption and not holding Virginia and the Federal Judiciary, the Government and Elected
Officials accountable, as well as the criminal acts and actions of the Old Boys Network in Virginia

That the law is very clear: That Judge Clarks actions have turned back time.

● Giving me less rights than a slave. Taking someone under Title 42 US Code 1994 and Title 18 US
Code 1581(a):

● Whoever holds or returns any person to a condition of PEONAGE, shall be fined under this title
for imprisoned not more than 20 years or both.

● On October 22, 2014, I was placed in jail for failure to pay legal fees in 30 days which is a
violation of my Thirteenth Amendment "Neither Slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a
punishment for a crime whereof the party shall have duly convicted, shall exist within the United
States or any subject to their Jurisdiction".

13
 ● Furthermore the right by placing me "under" a state Peonage / Involuntary Servitude violating the
Fourth Amendment right by malicious prosecution, false imprisonment and unconstitutional
arrest.

● This violation of my Eighth Amendment Right as to Excessive Bail which in this case constitutes
"Restitution Bail" further shows the knowledgeable malicious intent to silence me till the election
was over on November 4th. 2014.

● Bias, Retaliation, and Retribution to further line the Lawyers pockets by Judge Clark.

Further: The system is one where the Lawyers and Judges have set it up to protect each other and line
each other's pockets with Cash.

W. December 2015 – Defendant Janice Wolk Grenadier Stands up and speaks out against the Criminal
Acts of Judge Nolan Dawkins in Regard to his re-appointment - In front of the Courts of Justice in the
Virginia Legislature – Several other Victims also stood up and spoke out about the criminal actions of
other Virginia Judges Courts of Justice A group of Elected Officials / Lawyers who practice in front of
these Judges

VOTED ALL JUDGE’S BACK INTO THEIR POSITIONS KNOWING THE CRIMINAL ACTS & ACTIONS
OF THE JUDGES

The Professional Code of Responsibility of the Lawyers on the Courts of Justice Rule 8.4 Misconduct It is
professional misconduct for a lawyer to:

(a) violate or attempt to violate the Rules of Professional Conduct, knowingly assist or induce
another to do so, or do so through the acts of another;

(b) commit a criminal or deliberately wrongful act that reflects adversely on the lawyer's honesty,
trustworthiness or fitness to practice law;

(c) engage in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation which reflects
adversely on the lawyer’s fitness to practice law;

The Courts of Justice further – GUARANTEES THE JUDGES against complaints being investigated by
HAND SELECTING THE JIRC ( The Judicial Inquiry and Review Committee where complaints are filed
against Judges – and never investigated – Read More at www.proseamerica.blogspot.com the $602,000.
SCAM on the Virginia Citizens Guaranteeing all Judge’s the ability to ignore the law and rule to protect
their own and as Judge Clark stated very clearly to his good friend Attorney Michael Weiser

“I HAVE NO CHOICE BUT TO LET HER OUT OF JAIL, I AM SO SORRY I CANNOT COLLECT YOUR
LEGAL FEES FOR YOU” You will have to come back and get a judgement.

The Appearance and the collusion is that all Judges in the State of Virginia have a Secret “Handshake”
of “You Scratch my Back, I will line you pockets with WINS in the courtroom for your Clients – Call me –
Buy me Lunch or Dinner or whatever – but, we will not turn on our own”

14
So what about those young Men and Women who go off to war to fight for the Rights our Constitution
Gives Americans of Due Process?

X. December 19, 2014 Letter exposed that Michael Gardner ( Democratic fundraiser) was looking for
someone to hire to Murder young girls he had molested and found guilty with DNA – yet let out of jail by
Chief Justice Cynthia Kinser.

December 31, 2014

Chief Justice Cynthia
Kinser with no
explanation to retire
early (January 31,
2022 – expiration of her
appointment) The
Appeals Court of the
State of Virginia had
denied Michael
Gardner’s appeal /
release – Chief Judge
of the Supreme Court
of Virginia Cynthia
Kinser let him out of jail
by all appearance for the Old Boys Network, to hire a hitman to kill the young woman he had molested
prior to his retrial. Cynthia Kinser will receive her pension and perks for cooperating and doing the
bidding of the Old Boys Network for all her years and has been re-hired as the ETHICS COUNCIL FOR
THE SUPREME COURT

Y. January 23, 2015 - The Virginia Republican Party wants the U.S. Senate to investigate whether
Democratic Sen. Mark Warner violated federal law when he discussed possible job opportunities for a
former state senator’s daughter. GOP Party Chairman Pat Mullins sent a letter Friday to the U.S. Senate
Select Committee on Ethics asking it to investigate Warner. He was part of a group of Democrats that
tried unsuccessfully to prevent former state Sen. Phil Puckett from resigning last summer. Puckett’s
resignation gave Republicans control of the state Senate. Warner has acknowledged he “brainstormed”
with Puckett’s son about possible job opportunities for Puckett’s daughter but did not make any explicit
job offers. Federal prosecutors indicated in December their investigation into Puckett’s resignation was
closed, they would ignore the criminal actions. That Janice has followed up with a complaint to the Ethics
Committee by all appearance along with the Judiciary are ignoring these facts, Murder / Suicides et al.

Z. August 31, 2015, Janice Intervenes in the Charles Severance Case

AA. September 2015 Judge Bellows “ORDER” Denies Janice Intervene with no hearing, and Orders
Clerks to take no other filings by Janice

BB. September 2015 Janice Intervenes in the Michael Gardner case – Michael Gardner takes a plea.
The Old Boys Network cannot afford two Murder for Hire case’s going at the same time. The question

15
should be for all – What is the backroom deal the Old Boys Network made with Michael Gardner for the
plea and his silence.

CC. On or around October 3, 2015, we come to full circle Charles Severance will be tried for the
Murders of Nancy Dunning, Ron Kirby and Ruth Ann Lodato with a police officer having told Janice they
had no real evidence that supports him doing it, that the City of Alexandria was in the process of creating
the needed evidence to support a conviction. That Judge Bellows who assisted Pete Scamado’s
Murder / Suicide of Chris Mackney will preside over the Charles Severance trial. That Judge
Bellows understands and will disallow evidence that may find Charles Severance innocent is without
question, he has shown this in his pre-trial Orders.

That Judge Bellows brings a Bias in support of Murder / Suicide into the courtroom cannot be
denied after reading “Bullied to Death”. That Judge Bellows is no different than the Judge’s that
have ruled in Bias, Retribution, Retaliation with the knowledgeable intend to ignore the law and to
protect the criminal acts of David Grenadier and Ilona Ely Grenadier Heckman are obvious in all
documents and Orders filed in the courts. What Chris Mackney, Charles Severance and
Janice Wolk Grenadier, and MANY OTHERS have in common is the Old Boys Network has
made it their mission to kill or ruin their lives to protect one of their own criminal actions.

No doubt the Murderer needs to be stopped, yet the person who paid him to kill the above should
be held accountable – No one will out the Murderer for hire – because for free he will take that
person out. It is the belief of Janice he does not kill if he has met you – and talked to you – He
kills anonymous only, because if he didn’t Janice believes he would have killed her by now, but
that she has met him and he has spared her, as Mark Stuart did.

The “Old Boys Network” is an evil Gang of men and a few women with no soul. They consist of
the POWERFUL and WEALTHY of the Judiciary, the Government and Elected Officials in Virginia
and the District of Columbia. They believe they are above the law, and the truth supposedly your
best defense does not exist around them, that they are no more than a bunch of low life bully’s
with money, and no class.

The leaders in this “Gang” are Judge Donald Haddock and Judge Donald Kent at least in the
case of Janice Wolk Grenadier. In the case of Chris Mackney, it was Judge Bellows, who has now
overlapped into Janice’s with the cover-up of the hits and the trial of Charles Severance. That the
following law firms have dirty hands in collusion of these actors: Grenadier Anderson Starace
Duffett and Kieser, Keller Heckman, DiMuroGinsberg, Troutman Sanders aka Mays & Valentine,
BWW Law Group aka Bierman Geesing Ward and Wood, Parker Simon & Kokolis LLC, and
others that are known and unknown

DD. Virginia Rated 47th and 49th in Corruption - Daily Beast rated Virginia second most Corrupt
State -
http://www.loudountimes.com/index.php/news/article/region_survey_finds_virginia_second_most_corrupt
_state987/ - State Integrity Gave them an F - 47th most corrupt States -
http://www.stateintegrity.org/virginia That Janice is not alone the corruption and lack of oversite or Due
Process in the courts in Virginia, the Federal Courts of DC and Virginia is and are a disgrace.

16
EE. Yet to date October 3, 2015, Janice has not been interviewed by the FBI in regard to the
information in this article even with her many phone calls to them – for help to protect herself and her
girls.

FF. Update: Charles Severance was found guilty of the 3 killings with no real evidence.

Update as of October 30, 2016, which does go back and forth –

Divorce Lawyer Ilona Grenadier Heckman in Collusion with Judge James Clark filed a lawsuit to
foreclose on Janice’s home with illegally gotten legal fees by DiMuroGinsberg and Michael
Weiser. Ilona has hired Heba Carter a lawyer who went to the University of Richmond.

We have learned the University of Richmond is where in 1987 Judge Donald Kent best friend to
Judge Donald Haddock was President of the School and still today is on the Board. - Judge
Donald Kent dies in one car accident

James Comey and Senator Tim Kaine were both adjunct Professors at the same time by all
appearances at the University of Richmond.

That the corruption and the illegal acts and actions of Judge Clark can be found at
www.valaw2010.blogspot.com in the case filed against him in the City of Alexandria for injunctive
relief for his financial conflict along with other criminal activities.

GG. But this Email of January 28, 2016 may say it better than anything:

The lawyers did not show up in court. They did not have to file anything – Judge James Clark was on
their side as stated in the below links

JWG Links – Video Update October 28, 2016

HH. June 22, 2016 Janice Circuit Court of the City of Alexandria VA - exposing the corruption - Judge
James Clark states he and Carter Land were Trustee's on all of Burke and Herbert Loans for Friendship

17
as he did on June 8, 2016. That Judge Clark further stated no financial compensation from Burke and
Herbert band directly or indirectly. Which must mean the lawyer representing Burke & Herbert from his
law firm would have had to do it for free - "friendship" still illegal. Janice states this is a "Shame Hearing"
- Judge Clark States - "Not on this side" since when does Judge's take sides?
https://youtu.be/Lo5U4FrvdwI

In May of 2016 learned that Judge Clark had a financial relationship - I contacted the FBI and
here is the conversation with the FBI that has ignored it: https://youtu.be/DbdcVaZkItQ

These two videos show that I spoke with Gov. Terry McAuliffe and Brian Moran and showed him
my Box of evidence that - that I had been illegally jailed and tortured
https://youtu.be/kQ1hRnaxvRc
https://youtu.be/JevLlGOtQBE

II Janice Exposes the Corruption of the City of Alexandria - Nazi Virginia the place Terrorist's can Buy
$$$$ Justice https://youtube.com/watch?v=qhBZLmVynXc

JJ Janice Wolk Grenadier asking/exposing Mark Warner for the 3rd time having the discussion he lied.
DSCF0005 - Jailed so Senator Mark Warner could be Re-elected and https://youtu.be/rRs7cBEYAjQ
DSCF0039 Mark Warner Exposed as he Lies about what he knows - YouTube
https://youtu.be/O10opcNIqNA

STATEMENT OF FACTS ON ILLEGAL FORECLOSURE

32. JWG restates and incorporates herein all foregoing statements as if restated in full.

33. The Illegal Foreclosure

1. The lender owes the borrower a legal duty, and when that duty is breached unjustly by the lender,
that breach results in an injury and DAMAGES to the borrower and the borrower has a right to
property, credit rating, and emotional damages.

2. That Real Estate Property 15 W. Spring St., Alexandria, VA was illegally Foreclosed on March 30
of 2018 and the title is tainted by the collusion and cover-up of defendants / mostly lawyers who
have knowledge of the facts and ignored them for personal and professional self-dealing.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=82tllotwvW0 Link to taped foreclosure with Wells Fargo Bank
buying the property back?

3. The Documents prior to the foreclosure will show that from 2009 - 2013 fraudulent/falsified
documents filed against the home put it on the Balance Sheet of Bank of America aka Lasalle
Bank and Wells Fargo Bank by Lorraine Brown of Dox who went to jail. Exhibit 1 & 2

4. That a letter from BWW Law Group shows it was still on the Bank of America et al and included
in a Federal Settlement - this turned out to be false Exhibit 3

5. That a Corrected Lost Assignment filed, was done by a Robo-Signer who I have interviewed, and
stated in several hours of disclosure the OCWEN corruption. The State of Virginia requires a
18
 review of such documents by a lawyer - the BAR NO. on the document belongs to a Judge in
Florida. No such number exists in Virginia. According to OCWEN/PHH employees, this is a
pattern and practice not to use lawyers and add “FAKE” Bar Numbers. Exhibit 5

6. Conversations with Wells Fargo Bank and OCWEN on home which shows it was known by all the
scheme to foreclose on falsified documents and that Wells Fargo Bank had no knowledge

August 10, 2017, Emily with Wells Fargo 8 10 2017 video 27m50s webcamera io Wells Fargo
https://youtu.be/ol0n-EDveLk

August 10, 2017, Emily with Wells Fargo OCWEN 8 9 2017 video 26m26s webcamera io
https://youtu.be/ZU_JP9w5sDQ

August 11, 2017 OCWEN 8 11 2017 video 10m15s webcamera io https://youtu.be/EUenT0aKsHk

August 11, 2017 OCWEN 2 Video Fri 8011 2017 video 39m22s webcamera io
https://youtu.be/SKZtWosXiUk

August 11, 2017 OCWEN No 3 video 34m10s webcamera io https://youtu.be/iwMIBXHWtj8

Friday, August 11, 2017, OCWEN No 4 Legal Brenda video 12m34s webcamera io
https://youtu.be/qXIy54bvCIo

7. Brook & Scott who foreclosed was told by OCWEN not to. It appears that Troutman Pepper
Hamilton Sanders demanded the foreclosure for personal financial gain.

8. Troutman Pepper Hamitlong Sanders aka Mays & Valentine has a conflict as they with others
swindled $30,000. From Plaintiff September of 1990 - to Cover-Up Trust monies stolen from
Sonia Grenadier. This court Case No. 1:93-cr-00302-CMH - You can Read More:
1https://judicialpedia.com/listing/criminal-trust-theft-by-lawyer-jim-arthur-of-troutman-pep
per-hamilton-sanders-aka-mays-valentine-cover-up-of-trust-theft-by-divorce-lawyer-ilona-el
y-freedman-grenadier-heckman-of-sonia-grenadier/

9. March 29, 2018 - Brock and Scott / OCWEN conversation admits OCWEN had told Brock &
Scott to not Foreclose conv starts at about 6 min and 40 sec
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=00gWnLp11vI&t=1127s

10. The illegal Foreclosure took place on March 30, 2018, with the bank Wells Frago Bank
purchasing the home - Plaintiff is still in the property
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=82tllotwvW0

11. On April 6, 2018, Brock and Scott filed a Deed that Wells Fargo Bank was the Owner of the
Loan. The lawyers have stated in several documents and in court that Wells Fargo Bank is the
lender. Exhibit 11

19
12. On or around April 4 2019 Troutman Pepper Hamilton Sanders Lawyer S. Mohsin Reza exposes
that he and his “Friend” want me to short sell my home to them. That his friend states they can
get Wells Fargo to do whatever they want - There are taped conversations Exhibit 17

13. On March 31, 2019, Plaintiff received 1098 stating the owner was OCWEN - the IRS finds this to
be a fraud and the complaint is being moved to the Tax Court in Washington DC Exhibit 13

14. On August 26, 2019, Plaintiff received a letter from OCWEN / PHH is transferred to new servicer
after the foreclosure NewRez Exhibit 20

15. On October 1, 2019 Exhibit 1 Copy of Computer - print out for NewRez loan

16. On or around February 10, 2020 Exhibits 22 - 24 Servicer for Loan No. 7143312465 Plaintiff
received a letter from New Rez they now had a loan on property 15 W. Spring St. The home was
foreclosed on March of 2018, and in 2020 JWG is getting a letter from a new Servicer?

17. That the documents from signing into accounts will show now after the foreclosure Plaintiff still
had a loan with Two Servicers. Exhibit 21

18. Bank of America has always taken a stand they had no ownership and or an interest in a loan on
15 W. Spring St., but, never took the corrective steps to ensure Plaintiff was not harmed by
lawyers et al.

19. On April 4, 2020 Troutman Pepper Hamilton Sanders Reza Moushin asked Plaintiff to agree to
sell the property - knowing the Title of the property was tainted. He would then go on to harass me
and my daughters by giving out our phone numbers by all appearances to his friend Micheal
Martinez who several taped conversations will show the intent and the insider relationship.

20. On or around Nov 18, 2018 Wells Fargo Bank answered discovery and stated they had no
loan on 15 W. Spring St. and filed it directly in the City of Alexandria court. They also had
no knowledge that Troutman Pepper Hamilton Sanders was representing them.

21. Wells Fargo Bank answered discovery on August 6, 2019 and August 7, 2019 with a Notarized
Letter that they had no loan or ownership of 15 W. Spring St., Alexandria, VA 22301. Again
Wells Fargo Bank had no knowledge of lawyers Troutman Pepper Hamilton Sanders Exhibits 18
& 19

22. That in or around 2021 the home without notification to Plaintiff was put on the market for Sale by
Altisource, Houbzu, REALHOME SERVICES AND SOLUTIONS, INC. aka Altisource, and
MLS BRIGHT the problem is nowhere on the listing did they disclose the tainted title.
Misleading the public of a home that was illegally foreclosed on.

23. That the majority of those involved are Lawyers, Realtors and have an obligation under the
professional code of ethics and the law to report such corruption and collusion.

24. They have a responsibility to the public to protect it from such fraud and the very least to disclose
it in any listing to the public that they will pay over $1 million for a property that the bank has
20
 tainted the title with the filing of their document in the court that they have no interest in such
property.

STATEMENT OF ADDITIONAL FACTS

32. JWG restates and incorporates herein all foregoing statements as if restated in

32. The United States, and the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Virginia."

See Constitution of the Commonwealth of Virginia, Article II. Franchise and Officers:

Section 7. Oath or affirmation

All officers elected or appointed under or pursuant to this Constitution shall,

before they enter on the performance of their public duties, severally take and
subscribe the following oath or affirmation: "I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I
will support the Constitution of the United States, and the Constitution of the
Commonwealth of Virginia, and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge all
the duties incumbent upon me as ...................., according to the best of my ability
(so help me God)."

34. The Defendants allegedly violated their oaths as set out hereinabove.

35. The Defendants, lawyers retired from their jobs, allegedly did not uphold their oaths when
they ignored the criminal activity in Virginia by appearance for .

36, For decades since 1976, the lawyer-legislators have directly harmed their clients,
client-constituents, Virginia taxpayers, entities,

and the Public globally through their inaction to correct the preferential treatment of some lawyers
and to correct the failure of the VSB to perform its mandatory responsibilities under VA Code §
54.1-3910, et seq.

37. For more than 27 years, the Virginia State Bar Disciplinary panels, VSB District Committee
panels, and Three-Judge Circuit Court panels have imposed Public Discipline only on minorities,
women, solo practitioners, or small firms (5 members or less). Leaving no where in Virginia for
the public to go for fairness in the courts and justice.

21
38. On February 2, 2022, the current President of the Virginia State Bar (VSB), Jay Barry
Myerson, Esquire, (Myerson), testified that in 2021, the VSB Disciplinary System dismissed
"eighty-one percent (81%) of all Complaints" during 2021.

39. On February 2, 2022, VSB President Myerson continued to state to the Senate Judiciary
Committee that 81% of Complaints received annually by the VSB were "dismissed 'without
reaching the investigative stage' and often 'without the accused lawyers' knowledge.'"

40. VSB President Myerson's statements are "admissions against interest" to the Senate
Judiciary Committee that

(1) the VSB Disciplinary system attorneys and other personnel are disobeying Virginia's
statutory mandates; and

(2) on an annual basis, the VSB is not investigating 81% of the Complaints received from
the Public. See VA Code § 54.1-3910. "Organization and government of Virginia State
Bar" mandating the VSB to investigate and report [to the Virginia courts] the results of all
Complaints the VSB receives annually.

41. Instead, the VSB President Myerson admits publicly that the VSB covers up approximately
81% of the Public's or entities' Complaints of alleged unethical conduct of lawyers practicing law
in Virginia.

See VA Code § 54.1-3910. "Organization and government of Virginia

State Bar" mandating the VSB to investigate and report [to the
Virginia courts] the results of all Complaints the VSB receives
annually.

See VA Code § 54.1-3910 is not a "permissive" statute. VA Code §

54.1-3910 is a directive using the word "shall" and explicitly mandate
the VSB to investigate and report all Complaints the VSB receives
annually.

See VA Code § 54.1-3915. "Restrictions as to rules and regulations" is

not a permissive statute based on the word "shall," which makes VA
Code 54.1-3915 another mandatory Virginia statute prohibiting the
SCV from establishing private "quasi-judicial" bodies of any type
("private Virginia courts") and from appointing "private judges" to
man those illegal private, "quasi-judicial" VSB bodies, the VSB DB
and DC.

See Virginia Supreme Court case, Ross v. Craw, 231 Va. 206, 343 S.E.2d 312
(Va. 1986).

VA Code § 54.1-3915. Restrictions as to rules and regulations.

22
 Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this article, the Supreme Court
"shall not". . . "promulgate any rule or regulation or method of procedure
which eliminates the jurisdiction of the courts to deal with the discipline of
lawyers. . ."

42. VSB President Myerson's admissions and other statements to the Senate Judiciary
Committee illustrate that the VSB Disciplinary System is acting secretly with no transparency to
protect lawyers, not the Public.

43, VSB President Myerson's statements regarding a "Uniform Letter, from various private bar
associations, appears to have been false.

https://www.dropbox.com/s/5w8y35ou4lngnmb/2-2-22%20SEN%20JU
DIC%20COMM%20MTG_SB%20561-IN%20FAVOR%20%26%20OPPOS
ED.mp4?dl=0

44. Despite multiple written requests, to the date of this filing, some 22 days, no member of the
Virginia Senate Judicial Committee has been able to locate any "Uniform Letter" in opposition to
SC 561.

https://www.dropbox.com/s/5w8y35ou4lngnmb/2-2-22%20SEN%20JU
DIC%20COMM%20MTG_SB%20561-IN%20FAVOR%20%26%20OPPOS
ED.mp4?dl=0

45. The Virginia General Assembly did not intend the VSB to protect lawyers or act in secret
when the VGA enacted VA Code § 54.1-3910. Organization and government of Virginia State
Bar.

See VA Code § 54.1-3910. "Organization and government of Virginia

State Bar" which states:

The Virginia State Bar "shall act as an administrative agency of the Court for
the 'purpose of investigating and reporting violations of rules and
regulations'" adopted by the Court under this article. . . [which do not
conflict with other Virginia statutes] [to the Virginia courts.] [Emphasis
added.] See VA Code § 54.1-3910 and SCV Rule 13-2 –

https://www.vsb.org/pro-guidelines/index.php/bar-govt/procedure-for-discipli
ning-suspending-and-disbarring-attorneys/13-2

23
46. By dismissing 81% of the Complaints received each year without any investigation, the VSB
Disciplinary System is not performing its duties mandated by Title 54.1. Professions and
Occupations, Subtitle IV. Professions Regulated by the Supreme Court, Chapter 39. Attorneys,
Article 2. Bar Organization and Government VA Code § 54.1-3910. Organization and government
of Virginia State Bar or VA Code § 54.1-3915. Restrictions as to rules and regulations.

47. The lawyer-Defendants-government employees have a specific obligation to know Virginia

law as "lawyers" licensed to practice in Virginia, and these lawyer-legislators must know and
understand that the following mandatory Virginia statutes state as follows:

VA Code § 54.1-3910. Organization and government of Virginia State Bar.

. . .The Virginia State Bar "'shall' act as an administrative agency of the Court for
the purpose of 'investigating and reporting violations of rules and regulations
adopted by the Court under this article'"[to the Virginia courts.]; and

48. VA Code § 54.1-3910. Organization and government of Virginia State Bar

and VA Code § 54.1-3915. Restrictions as to rules and regulations contain mandatory

statutory language by including the word "shall."

See Virginia Supreme Court case, Ross v. Craw, 231 Va. 206, 343
S.E.2d 312 (Va. 1986).

49. On February 2, 2022, in fact, during the same meeting of the Senate Judiciary Committee,
these same lawyer-legislator recognized the necessity to use "shall" in another Bill they voted to
"move forward."

50. Virginia lawyers must know the law and cannot rely on "ignorance of the law."

51. Significantly, all lawyer- cannot rely on "ignorance of the law" in Virginia legislative
proceedings when considering and voting on new Virginia laws or amendments to Virginia laws.

1. could not assert that they were "ignorant of the law" or unaware of the mandates
of VA Code § 54.1-3910. Organization and government of Virginia State Bar
or VA Code § 54.1-3915. Restrictions as to rules and regulations.
2. could not assert that they were unaware of the "mandates" of any other Virginia
statutes conferring jurisdiction of Virginia Circuit Courts to discipline lawyers
practicing law in Virginia.
3. could not assert that they were unaware of the Supreme Court of Virginia's Rule
13-2, which states as follows:

24
 Rule 13-2 Authority of the Courts:

Nothing in this Paragraph shall be interpreted so as to eliminate, restrict or

impair the jurisdiction of the courts of this Commonwealth to deal with the
disciplining of Lawyers as provided by law. Every Judge shall have authority
to take such action as may be necessary or appropriate to protect the interests of
clients of any Attorney whose license is subject to a Suspension or Revocation.
Every Circuit Court shall have power to enforce any order, summons or
subpoena issued by the Board, a District Committee or Bar Counsel and to
adjudge disobedience thereof as contempt. Updated: November 25, 2019.
[Emphasis added.]
https://www.vsb.org/pro-guidelines/index.php/bar-govt/procedure-for-discip
lining-suspending-and-disbarring-lawyers/13-2

52. VA Code § 54.1-3910. Organization and government of Virginia State Bar; VA Code §
54.1-3915. Restrictions as to rules and regulations; and Rule 13-2 Authority of the Courts are
straightforward and understandable as written.

53. The Defendants, and all other lawyers in Virginia, are bound as lawyers to understand the
plain Virginia Black Letter law contained in Virginia statutes and Supreme Court of Virginia Rules
of Procedure for disciplining lawyers and suspending or revoking the licenses of lawyers
practicing law in Virginia.

See VA Code § 54.1-3910. Organization and government of Virginia State Bar; VA Code §
54.1-3915. Restrictions as to rules and regulations, and Virginia Supreme Court Rules for
the VSB Disciplinary System, Paragraph 13.
https://www.vsb.org/pro-guidelines/index.php/bar-govt/procedure-for-disciplining-suspen
ding-and-disbarring-attorneys.

57. The lawyer-legislator Defendants know only the Virginia General Assembly can establish
Virginia courts and appoint Virginia judges.

See Article VI. Judiciary, Section 1. Judicial power; jurisdiction.

The judicial power of the Commonwealth shall be vested in a Supreme

Court (SCV) and in such other courts of original or appellate jurisdiction
subordinate to the Supreme Court as the General Assembly may from time
to time establish. Trial courts of general jurisdiction, appellate courts, and
such other courts as shall be so designated by the General Assembly shall
be known as courts of record. [Emphasis added.]
25
58. For decades, the lawyer-legislators have known that the SCV had no authority to establish
any Virginia courts, of record or not of record.

59. Since 1976, the lawyer-legislators have known that the SCV had no authority to establish any
private confidential or semi-confidential courts of record or not of record, known as the VSB DB
panels and DC panels.

60. Since 1976, the lawyer-legislators have known that the SCV had no authority to appoint
private judges to sit on any VSB DB or DC panels, which consist primarily of lawyers competing
for business with all VSB Respondent-lawyers.

61. These VSB Disciplinary System DB and DC panels have no Virginia constitutional or
statutory authority to impose "discipline" on Virginia attorneys in violation of Virginia statutes.

62. Since 1976, the Virginia lawyer-legislators have known that the VSB-elected governing body,
"VSB Council," which consists primarily of lawyers competing with VSB Respondents, had no
authority to appoint private judges to impose discipline on attorneys practicing law in Virginia in
clear violation of Virginia law.

63. The VSB publishes the following mission statement:

a. The mission of the Virginia State Bar is (1) to protect the Public, (2) to regulate the
legal profession of Virginia, (3) to advance access to legal services, and (4) to
assist in improving the legal profession and the judicial system. [Emphasis
added.] https://www.vsb.org/site/about

64.. Virginia lawyer-legislators know the VSB is not fulfilling its "mission" mandated by the
Virginia Code to protect the Public, and the Defendants when in a position to do something did
nothing, but now with the knowledge under the Professional Code of Ethics requires them to
report to the correct authorities and to use there POWER to have it reviewed.

65. On February 2, 2022, the VSB President, Jay Barry Myerson, Esquire, touted that the VSB
Disciplinary System "fails to perform its mandatory statutory duties annually" by admitting to the
Senate Judiciary Committee that the VSB System

dismisses 81% of the Complaints received with "no investigation."

See VSB President Jay Barry Myerson, Esquire's February 2, 2002, statements to
the Virginia Senate Judiciary Committee; and VA Code § 54.1-3910.

66. On February 2, 2022, VSB President Jay Barry Myerson, Esquire, stated

26
 a. unequivocally to the lawyer-legislators and other members of the Senate Judiciary
Committee that, in 2021, 81% of the Complaints received by the VSB Disciplinary System
were "dismissed without reaching the investigative stage and often without the accused
lawyers' knowledge."

b. above-referenced statements and other statements made by VSB President Myerson

were descriptive of the failure of the VSB to carry out its statutory mandates in the years
before 2021.

c. had an immediate duty after VSB President Myerson spoke to them to request an
independent investigation by the Joint Legislative Audit and Review Commission.

d. had an immediate duty after VSB President Myerson spoke to them to file civil Ethics
Complaints in Virginia courts requesting investigation and the issuance of Rules to Show
Cause for all (a) VSB employee-lawyers and VSB lawyer-agents, (b) lawyer-volunteers,
(c) VSB Council lawyer-members, (d) VSB DB and DC panels lawyer-members, and (e)
VSB Committee on Lawyer Discipline lawyer-members to appear and show cause why
Virginia courts should not discipline them for their alleged unethical conduct in violation of
the (i) SCV Code of Professional Conduct, (ii) Virginia Constitution, and (iii) Virginia Code

67. In 1987, Senator Babalas voted to "kill" a Senate Bill intended to protect the Public from
unethical, predatory second mortgage lenders, including Babalas' private client, Landbank Equity
Corporation.

68. On February 2, 2022, the Virginia Senate lawyer-legislators, ignored the mandates of the
Virginia Code and "willfully violated" the Virginia Code of Professional Conduct (VCPC) and
Virginia conflict of interest laws. That the VSB is a self dealing agency alson with the JIRC the
Judicial Inquiry and Review Commission.

69. The Virginia Constitution, Virginia Code, and VSB Code of Professional Conduct (VCPC)
mandate that all Virginia lawyers protect the public globally, including Virginia taxpayers and
entities doing business in Virginia.

70. The Virginia Constitution, Virginia Code, and United States Constitution contain constitutional
and statutory directives which mandate that lawyers cannot provide preferential treatment to the
public, employees of the VSB Disciplinary System, lawyer-legislators' clients, constituents,
Virginia's influential and large-law firm lawyers.

71, The 1995 JLARC Audit and Review Report of the VSB contained findings that revealed
severe issues concerning the VSB Disciplinary System's secret actions

27
 1. against lawyers, procedural due process flaws, failures to protect the Public as
mandated by the Virginia General Assembly, various financial irregularities involving the
SCV and VSB, and acceptance of expensive gifts from wealthy, influential lawyers and
their families or organizations.

2. The 1995 JLARC Audit and Review Report of the VSB revealed that the name "VSB
Presidents' Collection" referred to expensive gifts from wealthy, influential lawyers and
their families or organizations received by the VSB.
a. See 1995 JLARC Audit and Review Report of the VSB found at
http://jlarc.virginia.gov/pdfs/reports/Rpt182.pdf

3. In 2022, the "VSB Presidents' Collection" continues to refer to an overwhelming number

of expensive gifts from wealthy, influential lawyers and their families or organizations.
4. Many of these unusually costly gifts received by the VSB, a Virginia government agency,
are on public or private display in the luxurious VSB lobbies, offices, and conference
rooms, in its expensive office building not owned by the Virginia government, or in storage
away from the Public's eye.
5. To the best of JWG's knowledge and belief, JLARC has never conducted an audit and
review of the SCV, even though the 1995 JLARC Report of the Audit and Review of the
VSB contains information about financial improprieties of the SCV and VSB and issues
with the confidential parts of the VSB Disciplinary System.
6. On February 2, 2022, the Senate Judicial Committee should have requested immediately
that the Virginia General Assembly have JLARC audit the VSB and SCV.

72. The allegations contained in this Complaint against the Defendants when complaints were
filed with them ignored the complaints leaving Plaintiff in more harm Ignoring the “HATE crime
and the illegal jailing et al but, the Plaintiff in physical harms way.

ALLEGED VIOLATIONS BY DEFENDANTS OF

THE SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT

JWG restates and incorporates herein all foregoing statements as if restated in full.

JWG alleges that the Defendants named in this Ethics Complaint, who are Virginia lawyers
/ FBI and DOJ leaders, violated the following SCV Rules of Professional Conduct:

VCPC 1.1 Competence- DR 6-101 (A)(2).

28
 A lawyer shall provide competent representation to a client. Competent
representation requires the legal knowledge, skill, thoroughness and preparation
reasonably necessary for the representation.

VCPC 1.7 (a) Conflict of interest.

(a) Except as provided in paragraph (b), a lawyer shall not represent a client if
the representation involves a concurrent conflict of interest. A concurrent conflict
of interest exists if:

(1) the representation of one client will be directly adverse to another

client; or

(2) there is significant risk that the representation of one or more clients
will be materially limited by the lawyer's responsibilities to another client, a
former client or a third person or by a personal interest of the lawyer.
[Emphasis added.]

VCPC RULE 3.1 Meritorious Claims And Contentions

A lawyer shall not bring or defend a proceeding, or assert or controvert an issue

therein, unless there is a basis for doing so that is not frivolous, which includes a
good faith argument for an extension, modification or reversal of existing law. . .

VCPC RULE 1.11 Special Conflicts Of Interest For Former And Current
Government Officers And Employees

(a) A lawyer who holds public office shall not:

(2) use the public position to influence, or attempt to influence, a tribunal to

act in favor of the lawyer or of a client; or

(f) As used in this Rule, the term "matter" includes:

(1) any judicial or other proceeding, application, request for a ruling or

other determination, contract, claim, controversy, investigation, charge,
accusation, arrest or other particular matter involving a specific party or
parties; and

29
 (2) any other matter covered by the conflict of interest rules of the
appropriate government agency.

See: General Assembly Conflicts of Interests Act

§ 30-100. Declaration of legislative policy; construction

The General Assembly, recognizing that our system of representative government

is dependent in part upon (i) citizen legislative members representing fully the
Public in the legislative process and (ii) its citizens maintaining the highest trust in
their public officers, finds and declares that the citizens are entitled to be assured
that the judgment of the members of the General Assembly will not be
compromised or affected by inappropriate conflicts.

The provisions of this chapter do not preclude prosecution for any violation of any
criminal law of the Commonwealth, including Articles 2 (Bribery and Related
Offenses, § 18.2-438 et seq.) and 3 (Bribery of Public Servants and Party Officials,
§ 18.2-446 et seq.) of Chapter 10 of Title 18.2, and do not constitute a defense to
any prosecution for such a violation.

This chapter shall apply to the members of the General Assembly.

This chapter shall be liberally construed to accomplish its purpose.

1987, Sp. Sess., c.1, § 2.1-639.30; 2001, c. 844; 2014, cc. 792, 804.

https://law.lis.virginia.gov/vacodepopularnames/general-asse
mbly-conflicts-of-interests-act/

VCPC 1.10 Imputed Disqualification

Imputed Disqualification: General Rule

(a) While lawyers are associated in a firm, none of them shall represent
a client when the lawyer knows or reasonably should know that any
one of them practicing alone would be prohibited from doing so by
Rules 1.6, 1.7, 1.9, or 2.10(e).

VCPC 8.4 (a), (b), & (c) Misconduct

It is professional misconduct for a lawyer to:

30
 (a) violate or attempt to violate the Rules of Professional Conduct,
knowingly assist or induce another to do so, or do so through the
acts of another;

(b) commit a criminal or deliberately wrongful act that reflects

adversely on the lawyer's honesty, trustworthiness or fitness to
practice law;

(c) engage in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or

misrepresentation which reflects adversely on the lawyer's fitness

to practice law.

VCPC RULE 8.3 Reporting Misconduct

(a) A lawyer having reliable information that another lawyer has

committed a violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct
that raises a substantial question as to that lawyer's honesty,
trustworthiness or fitness to practice law shall inform the
appropriate professional authority.

(b) A lawyer having reliable information that a judge has

committed a violation of applicable rules of judicial conduct
that raises a substantial question as to the judge's fitness for
office shall inform the appropriate authority.

(c If a lawyer serving as a third party neutral receives reliable

information during the dispute resolution process that another
lawyer has engaged in misconduct which the lawyer would
otherwise be required to report but for its confidential nature, the
lawyer shall attempt to obtain the parties' written agreement to waive
confidentiality and permit disclosure of such information to the
appropriate professional authority

INAPPLICABLE DEFENSES
ASSERTED IN CIVIL ETHICS COMPLAINTS

JWG restates and incorporates herein all foregoing statements as if restated in full.

JWG avers that the following defenses do not apply in this Civil Ethics Complaint filed with this
Honorable Court:

PRIVATE CAUSES OF ACTION vs. PUBLIC CAUSES OF ACTION

31
JWG restates and incorporates herein all foregoing statements as if restated in full.

A Civil Ethics Complaint is a "public cause of action" filed to protect the Public.

Civil Ethics Complaints are not private, personal causes of action.

A Civil Ethics Complaint is a public cause of action which requests that a Virginia court
discipline a lawyer, lawyer-legislator, or lawyer/judge/Justice and does not request any
other relief;

Under VA Code § 54.1-3915, et seq., any person or entity can file an Ethics Complaint
with a Virginia court, including the Virginia State Bar personnel.

See https://law.lis.virginia.gov/vacode/title54.1/chapter39/section54.1- 3910/

https://law.lis.virginia.gov/vacode/title54.1/chapter39/section54.1-3915

https: //law.Iis.virginia.gov/v<tcode/title54.l/chapter.39/section54.l-3935

https: //law.Iis.virginia.gov/v<tcode/title54.l/chapter.39/section54.l-3937

VA Code§ 54.1-3910, § 54.1-3915 and§ 54.1-3935 do not require a Plaintiff to be a victim or any
other person involved directly in any underlying matter. But, in this matter Plaintiff is the victim of
Defendants not doing their job.

As with Complaints filed with the Virginia State Bar for investigation and reporting, a Plaintiff may
have mere knowledge from any source of the alleged unethical conduct; and

Any person or entity can file an Ethics Complaint with a Virginia court, including the Virginia State
Bar personnel.

STANDING

JWG restates and incorporates herein all foregoing statements as if restated in full.

Any person or entity globally can file a civil Ethics Complaint in Virginia courts against lawyers
practicing law in Virginia.

See VA Code § 54.1-3915. Restrictions as to rules and regulations.;

VA Code § 54.1-3935. Procedure for disciplining attorneys by
three-judge circuit court; and VA Code § 54.1-3937. Procedure for

32
 revocation of certificate of registration of professional law
corporations or professional limited liability companies.

JWG has "Standing" to bring this Complaint based on her witnessing the alleged public unethical
conduct of the Defendants for years.

The Virginia Constitution and Virginia Code do not mandate that a person or entity file Ethics
Complaints with the Virginia State Bar against lawyers practicing law in Virginia.

The Virginia Constitution and Virginia Code do not authorize the Virginia State Bar District
Committee members to act as Virginia judges, judicial officials, or quasi-judicial officials with
authority to impose any discipline or issue any judicial Certifications to the Virginia State Bar
Disciplinary Board.

The Virginia Constitution and Virginia Code authorize the Virginia State Bar District
Committee and Disciplinary Board members only to investigate and report the results of
their respective investigations [to the Complainants, the Respondents, subject attorneys,
and the Virginia Courts].

See

https://law.lis.virginia.gov/vacode/title54.1/chapter39/section54.1-3910
https://law.lis.virginia.gov/vacode/title54.1/chapter39/section54.1-3915
https://law.lis.virginia.gov/vacode/title54.1/chapter39/section54. l-3935

https://law.lis.virginia.gov/vacode/title54.1/chapter39/section54. l-3937

In support of these assertions, JWG relies on the Virginia Constitution and Virginia Code
which authorize the following public causes of action:

a. The Virginia State Bar lawyer employees can file civil Ethics Complaints with the Virginia
Circuit Courts under the provisions of VA Code§ 54.1-3915, et seq.;
b. Virginia State Bar Disciplinary Board members are authorized to file civil Ethics
Complaints under the provisions of VA Code§ 54.1-3915, et seq.; and
c. The Virginia State Bar District Committees are authorized to file civil Ethics Complaints
with the Virginia Circuit Courts under VA Code § 54.1-3915, et seq.
d. Every person or entity globally is authorized to file civil Ethics Complaints with the Virginia
Circuit Court under VA Code § 54.1-3915, et seq.

33
 See:

https://law.lis.virginia.gov/vacode/title54.1/chapter39/section54.1-3910
https://law.lis.virginia.gov/vacode/title54.1/chapter39/section54.1-3915
https://law.lis.virginia.gov/vacode/title54.1/chapter39/section54. l-3935

https://law.lis.virginia.gov/vacode/title54.1/chapter39/section54. l-3937

JURISDICTION

JWG restates and incorporates herein all foregoing statements as if restated in full.

VA Code § 54.1-3915 specifies "Virginia courts."

VA Code § 54.1-3915 prohibits the SCV from promulgating "any rule or regulation or
method of procedure which eliminates the jurisdiction of the courts to deal with the
discipline of attorneys. . ."

The SCV reiterated this restrictive prohibition found in VA Code § 54.1-3915 in Supreme Court of
Virginia's procedural Rule 13-2 for Virginia State Bar disciplinary procedure, which states as
follows:

Rule 13-2 Authority of the Courts

Nothing in this Paragraph shall be interpreted so as to eliminate, restrict or

impair the jurisdiction of the courts of this Commonwealth to deal with the
disciplining of Lawyers as provided by law.

Every Judge shall have authority to take such action as may be necessary
or appropriate to protect the interests of clients of any Attorney whose
license is subject to a Suspension or Revocation.

Every Circuit Court shall have power to enforce any order, summons or
subpoena issued by the Board, a District Committee or Bar Counsel and to
adjudge disobedience thereof as contempt. Updated: November 25, 2019.
[Emphasis added.]
https://www.vsb.org/pro-guidelines/index.php/bar-govt/procedure-for-discipl
ining-suspending-and-disbarring-lawyers/13-2

The Virginia State Bar does not have jurisdiction to impose discipline on

Attorneys who are practicing law in Virginia.

See

34
 VA Code VA Code § 54.1-3910 :

VA Code§ 54.1-3910 Organization and government of Virginia State Bar

states explicitly that the VSB "shall act as an administrative agency of the Court
limited to "' investigating and reporting violations of rules and regulations adopted
by the Court under this article.'" [Emphasis added.]; and

VA Code§ 54.1-3915 Restrictions as to rules and regulations, states strictly that:

Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this article, the Supreme Court shall
not promulgate rules or regulations prescribing a code of ethics governing the
professional conduct of attorneys which are inconsistent with any statute; "nor
shall it promulgate any rule or regulation or method of procedure which eliminates
the jurisdiction of the courts to deal with the discipline of attorneys". . . [Emphasis
added.]

VA Code § 54.1-3915 authorizes Virginia State Bar lawyers, employees, or volunteers to

file civil Ethics Complaints in the Virginia Courts; and

VA Code § 54.1-3915 provides that a Virginia court, after a trial, shall discipline attorneys
practicing law in Virginia.

VENUE

JWG restates and incorporates herein all foregoing statements as if restated in full.

The Virginia Code does not specify a particular venue for civil Ethics Complaints except in
VA Code § 54.1-3915. Orange Virginia has taken Venue of several Ethics Complaints.

See
https://law.lis.virginia.gov/vacode/title54.1/chapter39/section54.1-3915

The provisions of VA Code § 54.1-3915 specify "Virginia courts" in general as the proper venue.

Venue lies in all Virginia courts to process civil ethics Complaints filed by any person or entity,
including Complaints filed by the Virginia State Bar.

STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS

JWG restates and incorporates herein all foregoing statements as if restated in full.

There is no Statute of Limitations for filing Virginia Ethics Complaints with Virginia courts based
on the following Virginia Statutes.

35
There is no Virginia statute of limitations for Ethics Complaints filed with the Virginia State Bar for
investigation and reporting.

See VA Code§ 54.1-3910

https://law.lis.virginia.gov/vacode/title54.1/chapter39/section54.1-3910
/

There is no Virginia statute of limitations for Ethics Complaints filed with a Virginia court
requesting that the court discipline a lawyer practicing law in Virginia or suspend or
revoke a lawyer's license to practice law in Virginia.

See VA Code § 54.1-3910 and VA Code § 54.1-3915

https://law.lis.virginia.gov/vacode/title54. l /chapter39/section54.1-3915; and

https://law.lis.virginia.gov/vacode/title54.1/chapter39/section54.1-3935.

In JWG's experience of over thirty (30) years, of being scammed by lawyers, the Old Boys
Network - the FBI and DOJ the ethics complaint against the defendants for not doing there job -
instead setting up a system where they can control what is investigated makes this complaint
appropriate.

RES JUDICATA

JWG restates and incorporates herein all foregoing statements as if restated in full.

Res Judicata does not apply to this civil Ethics Complaint because no Virginia court or
other judicial entity has disciplined the Defendants in this case.

COLLATERAL ESTOPPEL

JWG restates and incorporates herein all foregoing statements as if restated in full.

Collateral Estoppel does not apply to this matter because no parallel Virginia state entity, Virginia
court, or other judicial entity has disciplined the Defendants in this case or issued an opinion
ruling that collateral estoppel applies in this Ethics Complaint.

DEMURRER DEFENSES

JWG restates and incorporates herein all foregoing statements as if restated in full.

36
This civil Ethics Complaint, filed in the Orange Circuit Court, contains more than sufficient facts in
the body of the civil Ethics Complaint and the attached Exhibits A, B & C to survive a Demurrer
based on the following points:

Based on the facts and law contained in this civil Ethics Complaint, the court can or should be
able ot see that Plaintiff contacted and met with the FBI who stated to her they could not
investigate it had to go to DC - McCabe and Comey.

That the FBI would hang up on Plaintiff and the DOJ never did anything. That you should not
have to have sex to get Justice in the DOJ, you should not have to spend 14 days in solitary
when you are illegally jailed and have NO ONE CARE and NO were to go for redress as the
Judges are all protecting each other.

Based on the facts and law contained in this civil Ethics Complaint, the court can grant the relief and
discipline the Defendants based on the facts alleged in this Complaint and included in Plaintiff's Exhibits
A, B & C, hereto, and incorporated herein by reference, and based on the Virginia law cited in this
Complaint.

JWG claims focus on the alleged unethical actions by the individual Defendants observed in
Henrico County, Virginia, by Daniel.

The alleged facts as specified in this civil Ethics Complaint apply to all individually named
Defendants.

The Defendants' acts and omissions, jointly and severally, caused injury to the Public, which
relies on the integrity and strict adherence of lawyers' legislative and judicial bodies to Virginia
state law and federal law.

As stated by Chief Justice John G, Roberts, Jr. (Justice Roberts), United States Supreme Court
in the Chief Justice's 2021 Year-End Report on the Federal Judiciary:

We are duty-bound to strive for 100% compliance because public

trust is essential, not incidental to our function.

See
www.supremecourt.gov/publicinfo/year-end/2021year-endreport.pdf;

Just as Justice Roberts stated about the Federal Judiciary, the Defendants are duty-bound as
officers of the court and to abide by the United States Constitution [and the Virginia Constitution,

37
Virginia Code, and SCV Rules of Court.] See Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr. 2021-Year-End
Report to the Federal Judiciary, dated December 31,

2021: https://www.supremecourt.gov/publicinfo/year-end/2021year-endreport.pdf, and

incorporated herein as if restated

The Defendants must respect their authority granted by the Virginia General Assembly to
establish and oversee the Supreme Court of Virginia, other Virginia courts, and Virginia State
Bar.

Based on the separation of powers between the Virginia Legislative and Judicial Branches of
government, the Defendants must respect that the Virginia Legislature has the sole authority to
establish all Virginia courts and appoint all Virginia judges, Justices, or officials acting in judicial
capacities.

The Virginia Legislative and Judicial Branches cannot trespass on the exclusive authority granted
to these two Branches or on the Virginia Executive Branch's authority.

See Constitution of Virginia https://law.lis.virginia.gov/constitution

The Judicial Branch has no authority to create any Virginia courts or judicial bodies or to appoint
judges or persons to act as judges governed by the Virginia Supreme Court Judicial Canons.

Only the Virginia General Assembly can establish Virginia courts and appoint judges or officials
who serve in judicial-type capacities.

IMMUNITY DEFENSES ARE INAPPLICABLE

JWG restates and incorporates herein all foregoing statements as if restated in full.

"Immunities" defenses do not apply in alleged lawyer misconduct cases, alleged lawyer unethical
conduct cases filed with Virginia courts, or to any Justices/judges/lawyers misconduct Complaints
filed with the Judicial Inquiry and Review Commission or in any Virginia courts.

No Virginia governmental immunity applies to the Defendants in this Civil Ethics Complaint case.

Virginia does not allow immunities as a defense to any Complaints alleging lawyers' unethical
conduct, even if the Defendants are legislators, holders of other public offices, judges or Justices,
employed in federal, state, or local or occupy elected positions in Virginia government.

38
Under the provisions of VA Code § 54.1-3915 and § 54.1-3935, et seq., only Virginia courts are
authorized to try lawyers practicing law and serving in other capacities in Virginia for ALLEGED
unethical conduct or violations of the Virginia Code of Professional Conduct.

INAPPLICABLE IMMUNITY DEFENSES

JWG restates and incorporates herein all foregoing statements as if restated in full.

All following are inapplicable immunity defenses:

Sovereign; Commonwealth; Employees and Agents; Judicial; Absolute; Qualified;

Prosecutorial; Legislative; City and Town immunity; County immunity;

Ministerial/Discretionary Acts; Intra-family; Spousal; Charitable; Hybrids; Fugitive from
justice; and All other currents possible or unknown immunity defenses.

We cannot forget or intentionally overlook that we are "a government of laws and not of men."

See John Adams; Massachusetts Constitution; Constitution of Virginia, Article I.

Bill of Rights, Sections 5 and 7; and the January 26, 2022-Official Advisory Opinion
issued by Attorney General Jason Miyares, in accordance with § 2.2-505 of the
Code of Virginia.

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff Janice Wolk Grenadier prays that, based on the facts and
law

contained herein and on admissible facts and law presented at trial in support of the alleged
unethical conduct of Defendants, this Honorable Court discipline the Defendants to protect the
Public by

A. Imposing discipline on them, jointly or severally; or

B. In the alternative, suspending or revoking their licenses to practice law in the
Commonwealth of Virginia.

PLAINTIFF DEMANDS A JURY TRIAL.

March 18, 2022,

Respectfully Submitted,
Janice Wolk Grenadier

39
 Pro Se
15 W. Spring St.
Alexandria, VA 22301
202-368-7178
jwgrenadier@gmail.com

40