Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Lecture 6
Lecture 6
Ethical Issues in
Health Care
Lydia‘s parents often become A. Yes, if she cheats and does well, her
angry when she gets bad grades. parents will think she is a good daughter
and will be proud.
She has not been doing very
well at school recently and is B. No, because if she gets caught she will
considering cheating on an be punished.
upcoming test.
C. No, because cheating is against school
Should she cheat? rules.
• Journalist 22
• Politician 13
http://www.who.int/genomics/public/patientrights/en/
WHO: Patient rights can vary
in different countries
http://www.who.int/genomics/public/patientrights/en/
Code of Professional Conduct
Example (Hong Kong Medical Council)
http://www.mchk.org.hk/code.htm
Paternalistic model:
Strengths and Weaknesses
• Paternalistic model: The doctor is the
professional. He/she gives the order, the
patient obeys.
• Strengths: Emphasizes the expertise and
knowledge of the doctor
• Weaknesses:
• Ignores the autonomy of the patient
• Ignores non-health related but morally
legitimate values of the patient
Contractual model:
Strengths and Weaknesses
• Contractual model: The doctor and patient "contract"
for each other's mutual benefit; the patient determines or
agrees to the doctor‘s decisions.
• Strengths:
• Highlights the autonomy of both patient and
physician
• Acknowledges cooperative/shared aspects of medical
decision-making
• Weaknesses:
• No "contracts" developed or signed in real doctor/
patient relationships
• Model doesn‘t allow for at trusting relationship
Fiduciary model:
Strengths and Questions
• Fiduciary model: The patient confidently entrusts his/her health care to
the doctor, who takes on the obligation of working for the benefit of the patient
(Fiduciary: relates to a holding of something in trust for another)
• Strengths:
• Preserves the freedom and autonomy of both patient and physician
• The legitimate role of physician knowledge
• The important role of trust in the doctor/patient relationship
Non-Maleficence
Beneficence
Justice
Respect for Patient Autonomy
Autonomy literally means ‗self-rule‘ or ‗self-
governance‘.
An individual‘s capacity to make decisions about
their health care needs and to consent to or refuse
treatment depends on their ability to think, decide
and act, freely, on the basis of such thought and
decision.
Non-Maleficence
Beneficence
Justice
Non-Maleficence
We should avoid doing harming to others.
‘Primum non nocere’ – [trans. first (or above all) do no
harm] – this would make medicine a very difficult
pursuit!
It is an extremely important principle to avoid harming
others, but cannot take priority and be expressed as an
absolute principle. Must be considered in the context
of the obligation in medicine of the principle to do
good for our patients (beneficence), e.g cancer
surgery.
Also balance required with the principles of autonomy
and justice, e.g. involuntary isolation.
‘The Four Principles’ in Medical Ethics
Beauchamp & Childress (2001)
Non-Maleficence
Beneficence
Justice
Beneficence
The obligation to do good / promote what is best
for the patient.
Sometimes conflict may arise between doctor's
judgement of what is in the patient‘s best interests
and his desire to respect the patient‘s different but
autonomous decision.
Must be balanced with the principles of respect for
autonomy, non-maleficence and justice (e.g..
rights and needs of others).
‘The Four Principles’ in Medical Ethics
Beauchamp & Childress (2001)
Non-Maleficence
Beneficence
Justice
The Ethical Principle of
Justice
Social justice: the principle that all persons are
entitled to have their basic needs met regardless
of economic status, class, gender, race, ethnicity,
religion, citizenship, age, sexual orientation,
disability or health. (PHN Scope and Standards, 2007)
Distributive justice- resources should be given
first to those who need it the most
Egalitarian justice- equal distribution to everyone
regardless of need (Socialism)
Restorative justice – payback those previously
harmed by injustice-i.e. Native Americans
Which chemotherapy?
• Mr Jones has non small cell lung cancer
Chance of Chance of Cost £
benefit % death %
Chemo A 10 2 1 000
Chemo B 50 33 1 500
• Autonomy
• Non-maleficence
• Beneficence
• Justice
Solution
Chance of Chance of Cost £
benefit % death %
Chemo A 10 2 1 000
Chemo B 50 33 1 500
Chemo C 60 10 100 000
• Autonomy Chemo A or B or C
• Non-maleficence Chemo A
• Beneficence Chemo C
• Justice Chemo B or A
The Big Four Principles
These principles are widely used as a
starting point for practical decision making
in clinical professions dealing with
individual cases (biomedical):
Autonomy- free choice
Beneficence-doing good
Nonmaleficence- do no harm
Justice- fairness