Big (Bad?

) Brother\
Chirvase George Alexandru , RU II, Grp 4

Personally my opinion is divided. Living in a state where the population is monitored non-stop
has also ups and downs. Monitoring would be good to avoid committing crimes and
misdemeanor behaviors in terms of social relation. The police would be much more efficient and
it is easier to predict where and when such a cause will take place. On the other hand, this
monitoring through any intermediary would violate the right to privacy and the right to liberty,
so it would be contrary to democracy.

This supervision would be beneficial only in a few areas, among those specified above, and not
others. In this case, yes I would love to live in a country where supervising systems are intended
and used for people not against them. In terms of safety, given that the number of the population
is increasing from day to day, using technology to be ubiquitous in social life is a strength.

This surveillance system should be intended to protect people but not against them or to control
their lives. The ratio between the number of law inforcements and the number of civilian
personnel is a disproportionate one and thus a real problem of responding to calls of need is
formed.

Given the tormented and influenced mentality of religion in the country, the implementation of
such a system would cause chaos. On the one way there would be the population that would
agree with such a system and on the one way there would be a population that would count on
the grounds that these things are unconstitutional and intended to restrict people. Such a system
would be beneficial in Romania only as hard to impossible to achieve given that corruption and
crime happen even at the highest level where those people should implement it.

They would feel attacked and in danger and would do anything in their power not to realize the
implementation of such a system