ar ‘onstruct using the different sections (in parenthesis) of the manuscript (5%) 4. S~ a. Background (Intro) b. Research Question/aim/hypothesis (Intro) ¢. Quick summary of key materials/methods (Methods) d. Key results (Results) - Wighiiaht a Lew ey vesulh €. Conclusion: take-home message (Discussion) —conclusinn 6 tlemumt > 2. Introduction: Convey a strong story (20%) 1 ® a. Background —leh of geod b. ;» _b. Unknown or knowledge gaps/limitations of previous studies - cours tatgu. Ad Weg Ug ht sx" ec. Research Question/hypotheses/specific aims of the stud) A specific Shady oy wot Wy y ee 4 et d. References properly cited and used aoa Lig ig eh The 3. Methods: Provide a clear overview of what was done (15%) 1-=~ Melt Shay. a. Subjects Save datrogvnplerr wumiire (ro ~ Cold Leave” pay babent ae oe cee enna nh woetieal ©. Statistical analyses 7 a rize wl e data reveal i 4, Results: Summarize what the dat. 120K) enn epectfre Ud siuceie rene. a. Figures & tables: Use them to highlight the most important findings i, Figures should be formatted and labeled correctly. = chk devin Mat ee Get weraira fe vegresact cate . 5. Discussion: Summarize the findings, related to other research, and describe why they matter (30%) 2% a. Overview i, Answer the research question/hypothesis fi, Support conclusions with data/results and findings from others . Provide a “big picture”, “take-home” message, “so what” factor iv, References properly cited and used b. Context Give possible mechanisms/reasons why results were they way they were ii, Compare results to results of others (use other journal articles here) . ili, Strengths/limitations of the study, including potential error. — 2e4 iv, Give the big-picture (human) implications of the findings aa 1. Tell readers why they should care v. Strong conclusion 1. Restate main finding 2. Give a final “take-home message” - could Wave weed = ; Coe on dotonee . 6. References: formatted consistently and appropriately and used throughout the™ manuscript (5%) $ 7. Grammar/spelling, sentence structure, overall flow and writing quality (5%) 4.5