Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Abraham & Yalew
Abraham & Yalew
GONDER UNIVERSITY
INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL AND INDUSTRIAL
ENGNEERING
Instructor: Mr PUNEET.U
Submitted by: ABRAHAM ABEBE ID.NO 0040/07
YALEW ANDALE ID.NO 1198/07
[DOCUMENT TITLE]
Abstract
This technical paper presents design, and analysis of pressure vessel. High pressure rise is
developed in the pressure vessel and pressure vessel has to withstand severe forces. In the design
of pressure vessel safety is the primary consideration, due the potential impact of possible
accident. There have a few main factors to design the safe pressure vessel. This writing is
focusing on analysing the safety parameter for allowable working pressure. Allowable working
pressures are calculated by using Pressure Vessel Design Manual by Dennis Moss, third edition.
The corruption of the vessel are probability occur at maximum pressure which is the element
that only can sustain that pressure. Efforts are made in this paper to design the pressure vessel
using ASME codes & standards to legalize the design.
Acknowledgment
[DOCUMENT TITLE]
First we would like to thanks for GOD to do this project and then we would like to
acknowledge for our instructor Mr PUNEET.U for given all information, procedure and to give
reference book and sample. Finally we would like thanks our classmate to support us by shearing
acknowledge and give same advice.
[DOCUMENT TITLE]
1.7, Objective………………………………………………………..7
1.9, Methodology…………………….………………………………8
List of table
Table 1.lay out of pressure vessel…………………………………..12
Table 2.design temperature…………………..…………………….13
Table 3.parameter of saddle support……………………………….24
Table 4.value of constant (k)………………………………………27
Table 5.standader flange…………………………………………..32
Table 6.result and conclusion……………………………………..35
[DOCUMENT TITLE]
Vessels, tanks and pipelines that carry, store or receive fluids are called pressure vessel.
A pressure vessel is defined as a container with a pressure differential between inside and
outside. The inside pressure is usually higher than the outside, except for some isolated
situations. Pressure vessel is often a combination of high pressure together with high
temperature and in some cases flammable fluids or high radioactive materials. In addition
these vessels have to be designed carefully to cope with the operating temperature and
pressure. The pressure vessel is designed with great care because rapture of a pressure vessel
means an explosion which may cause loss of life.
Pressure vessels may theoretically be almost any shapes made of section spheres and
cones are usually employed. A common design is a cylindrical with hemispherical ends caps
or heads.
When the vessels walls is thin, the stresses distribution throughout its thickness will
not vary significantly and so we will assume that it’s uniform or constant.
The design rule in the codes and limited to vessels of cylindrical or spherical and
ellipsoidal shapes under internal or external pressure and to head and nozzles attachment for
such vessels rules for more complicated types of construction and for loading other than that
due to pressure are beyond the scope of the codes to include such rule would turn the code in
to design hand book and it would restrict the designer in working out his design in
accordance with acceptable engineering principles. The code receives that the shell provided
details of construction that will be as safe as those provided by the rules of the code. Some
problem of designers of ellipsoidal pressure vessels that have their axis vertical and subjected
to applied forces in addition to internal and external pressure the vertical forces considered
are the weight of any attachments to vessels.
Finally, pressure vessel are refers to those reservoirs and apparatus which work under
internal and external pressure and operate under the pressure.
[DOCUMENT TITLE]
The main goal in pressure vessel design is to assure safe and satisfactory performance of a
vessel or piping, stress classification provides vehicle for reaching the goal.
An unfired pressure vessel is any type of pressure vessel that is not fired. This means that they
are not exposed to combustion or burner fire. Since it is an unfired vessel, there is a lesser risk of
overheating.
Unfired pressure vessels are very helpful in preventing corrosion by being an instrument of heat
exchange. With these vessels, the occurrence of corrosion due to extremely high temperatures
and other related factors can be prevented.
A pressure vessel is created to house fluids that are subjected to pressure and is connected to
other machinery. It can be a single chamber or composed of more.
There are two forms of pressure vessels: fired and unfired. A fired pressure vessel is partially or
totally open to burners and combustion gases and is prone to overheating. Examples of fired
vessels include thermal oil heaters related to organic liquid piping systems as well as boilers that
are used to generate hot water or steam.
On the other hand, unfired pressure vessels can act like heat exchangers, used to cool and heat
fluid when combined with another fluid. These usually consist of several adjacent chambers and
tube bundles. Another example of an unfired pressure vessel is a steam generator that is related
to the piping systems for producing steam. Steam generators are used more often than boilers in
generating steam, since these are safer alternatives and capable of reducing the extent of damage
associated with corrosion.
Unfired pressure vessels are commonly seen in industrial settings that deal with:
During the 18th and 19th centuries, steam become the chief source of power and spurred the
industrial revolution
Pressure vessels are used in a variety of applications in both industry and the private sector.
They appear in these sectors as industrial compressed air receivers and domestic hot water
storage tanks. Other examples of pressure vessels are diving cylinders, recompression chambers,
distillation towers, autoclaves, and many other vessels in mining operations, oil refineries and
petrochemical plants, nuclear reactor vessels, submarine and space ship habitats, pneumatic
reservoirs, hydraulic reservoirs under pressure, rail vehicle airbrake reservoirs, road vehicle
airbrake reservoirs, and storage vessels for liquefied gases such as ammonia, chlorine, propane,
butane and LPG. The pressure vessels are used fluid to store such as liquid vapours and gases
under pressure. Major uses of pressure vessels are as follows.
a) Thin shell: - if the ratio of t/d is less than 1/10 is called thin shells.
b) Thick shell: - if the ratio of t/D is equal or greater than 1/10 is called thick shell used in high
pressure cylinder, guns, barrels and other equipment where as thin shells are used in boiler,
tanks, and pipelines.
b) Conical and;
A. Head
B. Shell
C. Nozzle and
D. Support
A. HEAD
All pressure vessel shells must be closed at the ends by heads (or another shell
section). Heads are typically curved rather than flat heads. Curved configurations are stronger
and allow the heads to be thinner, lighter, and less expensive than flat heads. Heads can also be
used inside a vessel. Heads are usually categorized by their shapes. Ellipsoidal, hemispherical,
conical, and flat are the common types of heads.
B. SHELL
The shell is the primary component that contains the pressure. Pressure vessel shells
are welded together to form a structure that has a common rotational axis. Most pressure vessel
shells are cylindrical or conical in shape. Horizontal drums have cylindrical shells and fabricated
in a wide range of diameters and lengths.
C. NOZZLE
[DOCUMENT TITLE]
Provide for direct attachment of other equipment items, (e.g. a heat exchanger or mixer)
D. SUPPORT
The type of support that is used depends primarily on the size and orientation of the
pressure vessel. In all cases the pressure vessel support must be adequate for the applied weights,
wind, and earthquake loads. Calculated base loads are used to design of anchorage and
foundation for the pressure vessels. Typical kinds of supports are as follows:-
I. Skirt support
1.7 Objective
1.7.1 General Objective
The general objective this is to know the general and basic process and procedure of
The specific objective of this design project to design horizontal pressure vessel position with
saddle support by estimate the inner service pressure at 6.3 Mpa and service temperature at
300°C for purpose of con`ain alcohol by taking suitable head and proper material.
1. The reasoning that established the most likely mode of damage or failure;
2. The method of stress analysis employed and significance of result;
3. The selection of materials and its environment behavior.
The increasing use of vessel has given special emphasis to analytical and
experimental method for determining their operating stress. Of equal
importance is the appraising the significance of these stresses. This appraisal
entails the means of determining the values and extent of the stress and
strains, establishing the behaviour of the material involved, and evaluating the
compatibility of these two factors in the media or environment to which they
are subjected. Knowledge of material behaviour is required not only to avoid
failure, but also equally to permit maximum economy of material choice and
amount used.
1.9 Methodology
Methodology the part of the process that describes overall the process of
design pressure vessel in this part method, tasks, phase, techniques and tools
of design project describes.
CHAPTER TWO
LITERATURE REVIEW
Modi A J, Jadav C.S concluded that the radial stresses in case of hemispherical head pressure
vessel is low compared to other types of head, in this paper author study the comparative
structural behaviour of different types of geometry of pressure vessel, the head is under internal
uniform pressure, the analytical and finite element method used for finding stresses in pressure
vessel, the aim is finding best head for specific parameter with finite element analysis of thin
cylindrical pressure vessel, here three types of geometry consider like hemisphere, flat and
ellipsoidal and computation result compared with finite element analysis.
Nishant M. Tandel, Jignesh M parmar presented work on A review on pressure vessel design
and analysis, this paper deal with vessel are subjected to various applied forces acting in
combination with internal or external pressure and some design principle, design of pressure
vessel is governed by ASME pressure vessel code, design of different pressure vessel concerned
with element such as shell, dish end, operating man hole, support leg, based on standard and
code and evaluation of shell and dish end analysed by means of analysis, and this paper they
concluded that finite element analysis is an extremely powerful tool foe pressure vessel and also
[DOCUMENT TITLE]
concluded the design method to be used in pressure vessel are depend upon stresses and internal
or external pressure
Yogesh Borse Avadesh Sharma presented work on Modelling of Pressure Vessels with
different End Connections using Pro Mechanical, author used here only three types head
hemispherical, elliptical and tori spherical In this paper authors, describes its basic structure and
the engineering finite element modelling for analysing, testing and validation of pressure vessels
under high stress zones, Analysis results do not suggests the use of Toro spherical end
connection with the same thickness due to more displacement occurs in this type of head.
Dražan Kozak Ivan Samardžić worked on stress analysis of cylindrical vessel with changeable
head geometry, The main objective of this paper is numerical analyses of cylindrical pressure
vessel with changeable head geometry (semi-elliptical and hemispherical heads) and comparison
of results in means of precision and time needed for getting the solution, comparison of
analytical and numerical results for pressure vessel with hemispherical heads is shown, In this
paper a numerical analysis of pressure vessel with hemispherical and semi-elliptical heads is
performed, with three types of elements: SOLID 95, PLANE 183 and SHELL 181. It is
concluded that in both cases of pressure vessel heads, using of PLANE 183 element presents the
best approach, because of minimal number of elements for meshing, shortest calculation time,
this type of axisymmetric element could be recommended in such cases, when the total
symmetry of model is considered.
V. N. Skopinsky had worked on stresses in ellipsoidal pressure vessel heads with non-central
nozzle, the objective of this paper is more investigation of shell intersection problem, the shell
theory and finite element method are used for stress analysis of nozzle connections in ellipsoidal
heads of the pressure vessel, here nozzle is considerably displaced on ellipsoidal head from head
axis is considered in this paper, the feature of numerical procedure, structural modelling of
nozzle-head shell intersections and SAIS special-purpose computer program are discussed. The
result of stress analysis and parametric study of ellipsoidal vessel head with a non-central nozzle
under internal pressure loading are presented, in many practical design, the nozzle is placed at a
relatively large distance from the head axis. Special consideration of these case is given in this
analysis, this stress analysis result better understanding of this poorly investigated problem and
give the possibility of achieving a more reliable design of nozzle connections on the pressure
vessel heads, also the SAIS program can be used for design optimization purpose e.g. nozzle
location finding.
James j Xu, benedict C. Sun, Bernard Koplik work on local pressure stress on lateral pipe-
nozzle with various angle of interaction, this paper report variation of local pressure stress factor
at the junction of pipe-nozzle when its angle varies from 90 to 30 degree, the circumferential and
longitudinal stress at four symmetric points around the pipe nozzle junction are plotted as
function of an angle, the ALGOR finite element software was employed to model for the true
pipe-nozzle geometry, the numerical stress result come from parameters beta and gamma which
are the nozzle mean radius and pipe thickness, at angle 90 degree at this angle result had low
value local stress, these stress increase as angle of interaction is decrease from 90 degree and
stress value more decrease when angle is decrease from 45 degree, the inside crotch point B has
worst circumferential stress value, and concluded that angle 90 degree local pressure stress are
same at point A and B as same as point C and D due to symmetry. And it had low stress value
than other angle
Pravin Naral and P S Kachare presented work on structural analysis of nozzle attachment on
pressure vessel design, they said if the nozzle is kept on peak of the dished end it do not disturb
the symmetry of the vessel, but if it is placed on the placed on the periphery of the vessel, it may
be disturb the symmetry of the vessel. Size, diameter, angle, etc. of nozzle connection may
significantly vary even in one pressure vessel, these nozzle cause geometric discontinuity of
vessel wall, so a stress concentration created around an opening, the junction may fail due to
high stress ,so detailed analysis is must be required, in this paper conduct a study analysis, what
will be the effect of the nozzle angle and increase number of nozzle on the periphery of pressure
vessel until the symmetry is achieved, and find out optimum angle such that the stress are
maintained within limits. in this paper first one nozzle placed on top on shell and calculated
[DOCUMENT TITLE]
stresses with finite element analysis, then two nozzle placed with angle 60 degree from each
other, then again two nozzle placed at angle 90 degree from each other, then also again two
nozzle placed at angle 180 degree from each other ,then three nozzle placed at angle 60 degree
from each other, then again three nozzle placed at angle 90 degree from each other, then four
nozzle placed at angle 60 degree and again four nozzle placed at 90 degree from each other and
calculated stress from ANSYS software ,from this study they found the result that peak stresses
for symmetrical nozzle attachment is lowest than the others and stress increment factor for
symmetric nozzle attachment is lower than other, here the stress value is minimum at two nozzle
which is placed at angle 180 degree and four nozzle placed at angle 90 degree from each other,
this state that the symmetry nozzle attachment had always lower stress than others.
V.N. Skopinsky, A.B. SMETANKIN presented work on modelling and stress analysis of
nozzle connection in Ellipsoidal head of pressure vessel under external loading, in this paper he
used Timoshenko shell theory and the finite element method, the effect of stress concentration in
external loading has more effect than in the internal pressure, there is an appreciable increase of
the maximum stress for shell in the interaction region even at the small level of nominal stress,
non-radial and offset connection have non-uniform distribution of stress on the interaction curve
between the nozzle and the head, the influence of angular parameter α for non-radial nozzle
connection is shown in this paper, a decrease of maximum effective stress as an angle α increase
is more significant for non-central connection, and in case of torsional moment loading, the angle
affects the stress in opposite manner, the stress in the shell increase as alpha angle increase.
CHAPTER THREE
DESIGN ANALYSIS
Table 3.1
diameter
1 lateral nominal diameter 125 Mm
Medium Alcohol
Position Horizontal
Supporting element Saddle frame
Pi=internal pressure
The strength of metals decreases with increasing temperature so the maximum allowable design
stress will depend on the material temperature. The design temperature at which the design stress
is evaluated should be taken as the maximum working temperature of the material, with due
allowance for any uncertainty involved in predicting vessel wall temperatures. In our case the
design temperature is given as:-
PdDi
t¿ where:- t=thickness
2 SE−Pi
S=design stress
E=joint efficiency
Di=internal diameter
¿ 2 m( 235× −0.6 )
1
F2
6.93
F2 ¿ 66.62 mm ≅ 2.62inc
[DOCUMENT TITLE]
πD 3 πD 2 L
V= +
12 4
πD 3 πD 2 (3.8 D )
1.6 m3= +
12 4
D=
√
3 1.6
3.246
=0.7899 ≅ 0.79 m
πDi 2 2
V= × LS Ls=L− Where Hi=inner head of the ellipsoid
4 3 Hi
0.6241 2
V =π × × 2.87 Ls=3− × 0.79=2.87 m
4 3
V =1.407 m3
Step 5;-Design stress analysis of the shell
Pd × Di
σl=
4 Tt
6.93 ×790
σl=
4 × 13.86
σl=98.75 Mpa <235 Mpa So the shell along the longitudinal stress is safe.
Pd × Di
σh=
2Tt
σh =2σl
σh =197.575 Mpa<235 Mpa So the shell along the hoop stress is safe.
3
πD
Vh=
12
0.79³
Vh=π ×
12
Vh=0.13 3 m3
• Provide for direct attachment of other equipment items, (e.g., a heat exchanger or
mixer).
C=790-√(790²−125²)
C=9.95mm
t s=¿ 13.86mm
L=9.95+13.86+100.18
A1=(t−t r )d n
A1= (11.86−0.9 ×11.86 )
[DOCUMENT TITLE]
2
A1=148.225 mm
A2= Area of excessthickness∈the nozzle
A2= ( t n −t rn ) 5 t
A2= (1.876−0.9 ×1.876 ) × 5× 11.86
2
A2=11.2mm
A3 =Area of inside extension
A3 =t n ×2 h But h=2.5 t n
A3 =1.876×(2.5 ×1.876) ×2
A3 =17.596 mm2
A 4= Area of weld
0.375 inc ≅ 9.52 mm
A 4=¿
∑ A=¿ A1 + A2 + A3 + A 4 + A5=358.2mm2 ¿
But this available area for single longitudinal data pipe since we have 2 longitudinal and 1 lateral
pipe in equal diameter.
∑ Atotal=3 × A=1074.6 mm2
FOR DISCHARGE PIPE
L=C+t s+A (L=total length of nozzle)
C=790-√(790²−65²)
C=2.67mm
t s=¿ 13.86mm
L=2.67+13.86+100.47
D n=65 mm
A1=(t−t r )d n
(
A1= 11.86−0.9 × 65=76.56 mm
×11.86
2
)
PdRn
t n=
SE−0.6 × Pd
6.93× 32.5
t n=
235× 1−0.6 × 6.93
t n=0.975 mm
A2= ( t n −t rn ) 5 t
A2= ( 0.975−0,9 × 0,975 ) × 5× 11.86
2
A2=5.88mm
A3 =t n ×2 h But h=2.5 t n
A3 =0.975× 2× 2.5 ×0.975
2
A3 =4.753 mm
A 4= A5 =90.25 mm2
∑ A=¿ A1 + A2 + A3 + A 4 + A5=267.69mm 2 ¿
Then the total areal of the nozzle
∑ Atotal=3 ×1074.6 mm2 +267.69 mm2=1342.29mm 2
2 2
1342.29 mm >1334.25 mm
Therefore;-our available area of reinforcement is greater than the required area reinforcement. So
there is no need of additional reinforcement pad is required.
3.7 Support
The type of support that is used depends primarily on the size and orientation of the pressure
vessel. In all cases, the pressure vessel support must be adequate for the applied weight, wind,
and earthquake loads.
• Saddle
• Leg
[DOCUMENT TITLE]
• Skirt
• Lug
The saddles must be designed to withstand the load imposed by the weight of the vessel and
contents. They are constructed of brick or concrete, or are fabricated from steel plate. The
contact angle should not be less than120 °, and will not normally be greater than150 °. Wear
plates are often welded to the shell to the shell wall to reinforce the wall over the area of contact
with the saddle.
Thin welded vessel with average diameter is best supported near the head so as to utilize the
stiffing effect of the head. Long thick welded vessel are best supported where the maximal
[DOCUMENT TITLE]
longitudinal bending stress as the mid span. This point varies with the contact angle of saddles.
The distance between the head tangent line and the saddle shell is no case be more than 0.2time
the length of the vessel( L )
Contact angle(θ)
Contact angle suggested by the ASME (Association Society of Mechanical Engineering) is 120 °,
for very small vessel.
Table 3
No Parameters Value
1 Maximum weight
2 V 0.575
3 Y 0.15
4 E 0.6925
5 E 0.2875
6 J 0.22325
7 G 0.095
8 t2 7.9
9 t1 5
10 Bolt diameter 20
11 Bolt hole 25
Where:
W i =volume∗density∗gravity−−−−−−−−−−−(eqn)
Double this to allow for fittings and there for Wi=1.8 KN ×2=3.6 KN .
Weight of working fluid (Wf )
We use the formula below to find out the value of the working fluid of the design which is
alcohol.
Wf =ρgV ………………eqn (1)
But:- V =Vshell+Vhead
2
π di l s
Vshell=
4
(
2 hi
)
2
0.79 d
Vshell=π × × l− But: - hi = and l=3
4 3 4
0.79 2 0.79
Vshell=π × (3−2/3( ))
4 4
3
Vshell=1.405 m … … … … … … … … … … .. ans .
And
[DOCUMENT TITLE]
3
π di
Vhead=2 ×
12
0.792
Vhead=2 × π ×
12
Vhead=0.258 m3 … … … … … … … … … … . ans .
Vtotal=Vshell+Vhead
Vtotal=0.258+1.405
3
Vtotal=1.663 ≈ 1.66 m … … … … … … . ans .
780 Kg
Wf =780× 9.81 ×1.66 Note that ; ρ of alcohol is .
m3
Wf =12.7 KN … … … … … … … … … … ….. ans .
Weight of head(Wh)
In order to calculate weight of head we use the following formula.
Wh=ρgV … … … … … … … … … … … … .. eqn ( 1 )
In this case the density of low carbon steel is required in order to calculate and therefore from
property of low carbon steel its density equal with ρ=7600 Kg/ m3.
3
π di
And V =
12
π 0.793
V=
12
3
V =0.13 m
Wh=7600 ×9.81 ×0.13
Wh=9.62 KN … … … … … … … … … . ans
After calculating those weights, we can find the total weight of the design and total mass the
design.
∴ W total =Wh+Wf +Wi+W v
W total =9.62+12.7+3.6+10.98
W total =36.9 KN =36900 N … … … … . ans
From W =mg m=W /g
So the total mass of the design is calculated by dividing the total weight to acceleration due to
gravity.
[DOCUMENT TITLE]
m=W total /g
36900
m= kg
9.81
m=3761.4 kg … … … … … … … .. ans
[DOCUMENT TITLE]
[DOCUMENT TITLE]
Longitudinal stress
At the saddle
Tension at the top and compression at the bottom
2 2
A R −H
+ 1−
L 2 AL
±QA (1− )
4H Where, A=0.2× l
1+
3L
S 1= 2
K R ts
2
A=0.2× 3=0.6 m
S1=
± 17.94 ×103 ×0.6 1− ( ( )(0.6
3
+ 0.9352 −0.79/4 ¿2 ¿ ¿ 2× 0.6 ×3 ) )
2 2
0.335 ×0.395 ×13.86
S1=12.69 Pa=0.01269 Mpa .
' Pdr
S1=S + where; E s=shell joint efficency
2 ES t s
6.96 × 0.385
S1=0.0127+
2 ×1 ×13.86
S1=0.11 Mpa
( )( 2 ( R −H )
)
2 2
QL
1+
4 L2
At mid span 4H
1+
3L 4A
S1=± −
π R2 t s L
( )
2 ( 0.395 −0.1975 )
2 2
17.94 × 3 4
1+
4 9
1+ ( 4 ×0.1975 ) 4 ×0.6
S1= −
9 3
S1=0.07 Mpa .
' Pdr
S1=S +
2 ES t s
6.96 × 0.385
S1=0.07+
2 ×1 ×13.86
[DOCUMENT TITLE]
S1=0.168 Mpa .
But to check it is safe or not S1plus the stress due to internal pressure ( PR
2t )
s
shell not
exceed the allowable stress value of shell material times the efficiency (85%=0.85) of
girth seems. Our support material is carbon steel with allowable stress of 85Mpa.
greater stress 0.168 −3 '
∴ 0.168>0.11 so stress ratio= = =2.32 ×10 < 1. so it s safe
allowable stress 85 ×0.85 Mpa
R
A>
2
Tangential stress
K2Q
( L−2 A )
R ts
S2=
4
L+
3(H)
S2= (
1.71 ×17.94 3−2× 0.6
0.395 ×13.86 3+ 0.263 )
=3.09 Mpa .
3.09 Mpa
stressratio= =0.010< 1. so its safe.
0.8 ×235 Mpa
L>8 R
Circumstantial at the form of saddle
[DOCUMENT TITLE]
[DOCUMENT TITLE]
S4 =0.423 Mpa
S4 0.423 Mpa '
stressratio= = =0.0012<1. so it s safe.
allowable stress 1.5 ×235
Circumstantial at bottom of saddle
S5=−K I Q/¿
S5=5.6 Mpa
S5 5.6 '
stressratio= = =0.048<1. so i t s safe .
allowable stress 0.5× 235
Flanges are used to sealed the nozzle. In our design we select standard flanges. Standard from
gas are available in range of types, size and materials and are also used extensively for pipes,
nozzles and other attachments on the pressure vessel.
To select standard from the role is based on their nominal size that fit with the nozzle diameter or
in other cases it is selected by their classes but in our case we select standard flanges based on
the size of the nozzle. The nozzles in our design are 4 type with internal diameter these are; 2
longitudinal 1 lateral are with a diameter of 125mm and the other one has a value of 65mm. so
by using nominal values we can find the values of D, b, h, d2, f, bolting size and no,, k, d3,
r……….etc.
Standard flanges will be specified for most applications. Special designs would be used only if
no suitable standard flange were available; or for large flanges, such as the body flanges of
vessels, where it may be cheaper to size a flange specifically for the duty required rather than to
accept the nearest standard flange, which of necessity would be over-sized. Standard flanges are
[DOCUMENT TITLE]
available in a range of types, sizes and materials; and are used extensively for pipes, nozzles and
other attachments to pressure vessels.
3.6 Gaskets
Gaskets are used to make a leak-tight joint between two surfaces. It is impractical to machine
flanges to the degree of surface finish that would be required to make a satisfactory seal under
pressure without a gasket. Gaskets are made from “semi-plastic” materials; which will deform
and flow under load to fill the surface irregularities between the flange faces, yet retain sufficient
elasticity to take up the changes in the flange alignment that occur under load.
A great variety of proprietary gasket materials is used, and reference should be made to the
manufacturers' catalogues and technical manuals when selecting gaskets for a particular
application. Design data for some of the more commonly used gasket materials are given in
Appendix, which is taken from Dr. Sadhu Singh, Design of Machine Elements (Machine design),
fifth edition.
The following factors must be considered when selecting a gasket material:
The process conditions: pressure, temperature, corrosive nature of the process fluid.
Whether repeated assembly and disassembly of the joint is required.
The type of flange and flange face
The gasket factor m is the ratio of the gasket stress (pressure) under the operating conditions to
the internal pressure in the vessel or pipe.
The internal pressure will force the flanges' faces apart, so the pressure on the gasket under
operating conditions will be lower than the initial tightening-up pressure. The gasket factor gives
the minimum pressure that must be maintained on the gasket to ensure a satisfactory seal.
For this particular pressure vessel we select ring joint type gasket material which is made from
iron or soft steel. The selection is based on the above requirement.
Welled joint is a permanent joint which is obtained by the fusion of the edge of two parts to be
joined together, with the application of pressure and a filler material. Weld joint we should be
able to fix the following parameters.
Type of weld
Thickness of weld
Width and length of weld
Area of weld
Material type electrode used
The design of a welled joint should satisfy the following basic requirements.
22.99
F ¿= =5.79 KN .
4
Step 3. Calculate stress on M12.
F 5.74/ π
δ= = (12)2 m²²
A 4
δ=50.75 Mpa .
Tensile stress of M12 is 1220Mpa
50.75 Mpa<¿ 1220Mpa. so the it’s safe.
Step 4. Calculate length of thread and unthreaded part.
LT =2 d+ 6 mm
LT =2× 12+ 12mm
LT =30 mm .
∴ length of threaded part Ld=L−Lt
Ld=38−30 mm
Ld=8 mm .
For lateral pipe with diameter equal to 125mm
From the standard table
M16 Bolt
L=48 length of bolt
N=8 No of bolt
6.93 × 125
t n= =1.87 mm
2× 235−6.93
By adding corrosion allowance t n=1.87 mm+2=2.87 mm .
Step 2. Calculate stress on M16
F 10.63
δ= =
A π 162
'
δ=52.86 Mpa< 1220 Mpa therefore i t s safe .
CHAPTER FOUR
Result and Discussion
component Diameter(mm²) Length(m) Volume(m³) Thickness(mm)
1,shell 790 2.87 1,407 13.86
2,head 790 0.03 0.103 13.68
3,nozzle 65 (Bottom 0.117 5.87×10−4 0.975
discharge)
Area of Ar=1334.25 m
2
reinforcement
required
[DOCUMENT TITLE]
(2longitudinal 2
A3 =17.596 mm
and1lateral ) A 4=¿
reinforcement A2=5.88mm 2
(Bottom
2
discharge) A3 =4.753 mm
2
A 4= A5 =90.25 mm
The basic manufacturing processes adopted for the fabrication of the vessel is forming.
Forming is the process by which the size of shape of the part is changed by application of force
that produce stress in the part which are greater than yield strength and less than fracture
Hot working
To fabricate a wall designed pressure vessel by good cost and by method we use
the different kinds of method such as fusion, welding, casting, forging, machining,
brazing and soldering and sheet metal forming.
Each method has certain advantages for particular type of equipment however
fusion welding is the most important method .the size, shape service and material
properties of equipment ally may influence the selection of fabrication method. Let
us see different method of fabrication.
4.2 Maintenance
[DOCUMENT TITLE]
Maintenance needed when the pressure is affected by some external factors. It’s mainly done by
welding. The people who maintain the pressure vessel use ladder which is movable because our
design doesn’t have a ladder in internal port.
Ensure that we are carrying the correct spheres to insure minimal down time when breaking
down occurs as well as insure capital is not un necessary easily break down association .
Each component of asset has to analyzed to determine the input of the asset should it fail, any
component that can cause failure to the asset should be readily available. It should be required
this components can be set as stock or non-stock parts depending on cost and availability.
Work management system insure that our planning and maintenance scheduling system set up
correctly and opening efficiency be applying work management audit system. This system
measures your performance on going bases.
The approach to equipment critically relies on identifying equipment failure has on production.
The failure mode that causes breaking down are identified and the necessary planned
maintenance to address the failure are specified.
4.3 Guidance
Inspection of pressure vessel should be periodically inspected for evidence of linkage, corrosion
comparing or other types of damage and evidence of usage conditions that may cause the value
malfunction. There should be unrestricted vent path on the outlet of pressure vessel. The pressure
installation inspected process should include
Checking the test data of the pressure vessel.
Visual extend inspections looking for science of linkage, corrosion allowance or value
tempering.
Operating the pressure vessel manually provided this would not hazard to personal or
degrade the value or system performance.
Verifying that a proper pressure vessel has been selected for the system specified
application. Verification can include material compatibility and checking the flow
calculation for accumulated pressure conclusion found in the safety data package.
[DOCUMENT TITLE]
Mass of saddle
Ms=V × ρ=0.63 m ³ ×7850 Kg/ m³
[DOCUMENT TITLE]
Ms=4945.5 birr . which means thetotal cost of the saddle will be equal ¿ 4945.5 × 6.61=32689.25 birr
∴ therefore the total cost of the pressure cessel=32689.25 birr+ 401.1 birr+ 8762.2birr +2935.8 birr=44788.5 bir
Conclusion
To conclude, we passed through series of steps to design the pressure vessel from the very
beginning which was material selection and to the cost analysis. For instance we choose different
material for different parts of the pressure vessel according to the working conditions. In addition
to this, we work on the analysis part of the design and we calculate different parameters such as;
[DOCUMENT TITLE]
volume, masses, thickness, stress …..etc. Then, we try to analysis the cost since it’s very
important to determine expense and profit. We also try to check weather our design is so or not
in each steps by checking the calculated value with the given value. Generally, the pressure
vessel design is a very careful design in which the designer should be always alert and active
while designing it and the manufacturer while manufacturing it since it’s a complex process and
need a series of steps and a lot of costs to maintenance after fault is made during designing and
manufacturing and also it can be a disastrous if the vessel is used to keep some acids like sulfuric
acid and benzene also alcohol in addition it’s impossible to control such hazard that can be a
cause of death of many people, animals and cause of a serious of environmental pollution such
as; air pollution, water pollution and soil pollution. So once this problem solved and the designer
propose a maximum efficiency of the pressure vessel,
Maximum profit can be made
Long last of performance of pressure vessel
Failure decrease
Maintenance cost decrease
Cause of disastrous decrease
Availability of the pressure vessel increase
Market control
Recommendation
We would like to suggest that, in pressure vessel design that we made we pass thorough
different steps, calculation and we choose a lot of material for the production of pressure
vessel so our suggestion is that Firstly, while designing the pressure vessel there should be
[DOCUMENT TITLE]
lot of care on the manufacturing process of the pressure vessel since its must to assemble
the parts. Secondly we like to suggest that material selection for the design should keep in
mind while designing which means since we use different material for the manufacturing
process of different parts of the pressure vessel we should select different materials for the
parts to be manufactured with in the given parameters. For instance, the material that used
for the bolt, the vessel, the head are different since they functioned and experience
different application. Thirdly, while designing the other thing should be considered is that
is the cost of the pressure vessel. In this case the designer should remember the expense
and the profit in order to minimize the expense and maximize the profit the following
points are very vital. The first is that, using suitable materials for suitable condition. The
second is that using a material with good property to decrease the maintenance cost. The
third point is that choosing best material that can takes long time of functioning and at last,
if the materials with outstanding property are fat difficult to get using the materials that the
designer has and making some changes like, heat treating the material so as to strengthened
it. Finally, the designer should keep those points which are mentioned above to increase
the profit, to have high performance of the pressure vessel. So generally since our aim
should be in the performance while designing the pressure vessel, the correct procedures
and the appropriate analysis also manufacturing processes.
References
Coulson &Richardson’s chemical engineering, vol 6.
[DOCUMENT TITLE]